Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant
x
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto
_
Check the appropriate box:
_oPreliminary Proxy Statement
xDefinitive Proxy Statement
_Definitive Additional Materials
_Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
_oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
oDefinitive Additional Materials
oSoliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

United Natural Foods, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
xNo fee required.
_Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:
_oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.
_oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.0-11



Table of Contents
unficoa03.jpg
stahl002.jpgLetter from Our Independent Chair of the Board
Dear Fellow Stockholders,
I have been honored to serve as the Independent Chair of our Board over the last year as we have begun to execute against our Fuel the Future strategy and have built on our strong foundation to position our Company for future growth. We continue to elevate and execute our programs and policies related to good corporate governance practices, including our robust board refreshment efforts, our environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives, human capital management matters, and our commitment to diversity and inclusion. For the fifth consecutive year, we have engaged with our investors to hear their feedback and respond in a manner that allows us to deliver for our associates and stockholders.
Board Evaluation and Refreshment. We are committed to maintaining a diverse Board with relevant skills and experience to oversee our strategy. After thoughtful evaluation of our Board composition and with the help of a third-party recruiter, we appointed Shamim Mohammad to our Board in February 2022. We believe that Mr. Mohammad’s experience in strategic leadership and development of forward-thinking technology solutions make him a valuable addition to our Board. Part of our Board’s commitment to strong oversight is a robust Board and Committee evaluation process. In fiscal 2022, we engaged a third party to facilitate that process, something we do every two to three years to ensure we get a fresh perspective and objective feedback.
Better For All. Our 2021 Better for All Report, issued in March of 2022, expanded on our six impact focus areas to provide a more in-depth look at our direct and indirect impacts across our value chain. This approach better reflects how our long-term, ambitious ESG goals align with our operations and strategy.We are also extremely proud that in April 2022 our emissions reduction targets were validated by the Science Based Targets initiative, and we are excited to have launched our Climate Action Hub to foster engagement with our suppliers on these important issues.
Stockholder Engagement and Commitment to Good Governance. We continue to be committed to engaging with, and responding to feedback from, you, our stockholders. This summer we conducted our fifth annual stockholder engagement program. We are happy to report that once again we spoke with holders of over 50% of our outstanding common shares across a broad spectrum of matters. These sessions provide us the opportunity to discuss a wide variety of topics with our stockholders, and we have made several enhancements to our executive compensation and governance programs over the years as a result of these conversations. For example, in fiscal 2022, we separated the role of CEO and Chair of the Board, revised our Corporate Governance Principles to include a diverse slate requirement for all director appointments and rotational guidelines for leadership positions, and made several design changes to our executive incentive compensation programs. As a matter of good governance, we also recently updated our stock ownership guidelines to exclude unexercised in-the-money options and unearned performance awards in ownership calculations and, in October 2022, updated our Code of Conduct to align statements and provisions with our Company values and mission and our commitment to diversity and inclusion, safety and ESG matters.
On behalf of the entire Board of Directors, I would like to thank you for your continued investment and trust as we deliver long-term value for our customers and for you, our stockholders.
 (1)Sincerely,
Amount Previously Paid:
jacksig.jpg
Jack Stahl
Independent Chair


Table of Contents
sandy1.jpgLetter from Our CEO
Dear Stockholders,
This past year as CEO of UNFI has been both productive and rewarding. During a year of significant industry and economic uncertainty, we produced strong results through our commitment to delivering value for our customers, suppliers and associates, while supporting our communities and our planet. We added seasoned executives to our leadership team who I'm confident will help us enhance our capabilities and improve our end-to-end execution. I am honored to lead this strong, diverse and focused team.
Fuel the Future. We completed our first year of our Fuel the Future strategy, and are laser focused on creating value for our customers, suppliers and associates, while contributing to our communities. We want to be a value-additive partner to our customers, leverage our insights to create value for our suppliers and attract, retain and develop talent, while simultaneously contributing to our communities and achieving our ESG goals. I believe we have made important progress on these areas in fiscal 2022, and I am excited and energized for what’s next.
A Focus on our People. We recognize that our associates are critical to supporting our values and achieving our strategic vision. To that end, we are focused on associate engagement, empowerment and safety to foster innovation and bring best-in-class solutions to our customers and suppliers in an ever-changing retail landscape. We have implemented policies and procedures that focus on associate wellbeing, and we remain committed to creating a diverse and inclusive environment to drive accountability and results. We're extremely focused on enhancing engagement with our associates across the Company, and we achieved progress on this front in fiscal 2022 as our associate engagement scores improved during the year. We launched innovative new programs to provide, among other things, flexibility with scheduling and pay frequency, improved career development and education assistance programs, and wellness offerings. We also added two new diversity and inclusion goals to further our commitment to providing a dynamic and rewarding work environment for all of our associates.
I am extremely proud of the hard work and resiliency demonstrated by our teams in a challenging operating environment, and I believe we are well positioned to continue to improve our execution and drive high value for our customers, suppliers, associates and our stockholders. On behalf of our Board of Directors, and everyone at UNFI, thank you for your continued support of this great Company.
 (2)Sincerely,
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
sandysignature.jpg
 (3)Filing Party:Sandy Douglas
 (4)Chief Executive Officer
Date Filed:
Please vote. Stockholders may vote through the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please refer to your proxy card or the notice of proxy availability distributed to you on or about November 22, 2022 for information on how to vote through the Internet, by telephone or by mail.




unfilogoa11.jpg
Table of Contents
UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on December 13, 2017Meeting Information
Dear Stockholder:Tuesday, January 10, 2023, 4:00 p.m. EST, with log-in at 3:45 p.m. EST.
You are cordially invited tomay attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of United Natural Foods, Inc., which will be held on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. eastern standard time at the Providence Marriott Downtown, 1 Orms Street, Providence, RI 02904, and any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting. For your convenience, we are also offering you the option to attend theour annual meeting onof stockholders in January 2023 (Annual Meeting) through the Internet through aby virtual web conference at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2017.unfi2023. The meeting will be a virtual-only meeting, consistent with prior years. We believe the virtual meeting allows greater access for stockholders to participate in the meeting, hear from Management and ask questions than an in-person meeting in one geographic location.
We are holdingItems to be Voted on
1.The election of eleven nominees as directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders.
2.The ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the following purposes:fiscal year ending July 29, 2023.
1.To elect eight nominees as directors to serve until the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.
2.To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 28, 2018.
3.To approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation.
4.To approve the amendment and restatement of the United Natural Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.
5.To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of advisory approval of our executive compensation.
6.To consider a stockholder proposal regarding stockholder approval of certain future severance agreements, if properly presented at the annual meeting.
7.To consider a stockholder proposal regarding a decrease to the ownership threshold for stockholders to call a special stockholder meeting, if properly presented at the annual meeting.
These3.The approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation.
4.The approval of the Second Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan.
5.Consideration of such other matters are more fully described inas may properly come before the accompanying proxy statement, which is made a part of this notice. We are not aware ofmeeting or any other business to be transacted at the annual meeting.adjournments or postponements thereof.
Record Date
Only stockholders of record on our books at the close of business on Monday, October 16, 2017November 14, 2022, will be entitled to vote at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting. For 10 days prior toAnnual Meeting.
Proxy Voting
Your vote is important. If you do not attend the annual meeting, a list of stockholders entitledAnnual Meeting, we encourage you to vote will be available for inspection at our principal executive offices located at 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, RI 02908.your shares through the Internet, by telephone or by completing, dating, signing and promptly returning your proxy card to us in the envelope provided. The proxy materials provide you with details on how to vote by these three methods. If you would likedecide to viewattend the stockholder list, please call our Investor Relations Department at (401) 528-8634 or send a request via email to InvestorRelations@unfi.com to schedule an appointment. The stockholder list will also be available at the annual meeting and onAnnual Meeting through the Internet, throughyou may revoke your proxy and cast your vote during the virtual web conference at the beginning of the annual meeting.
Proxy Materials
In accordance with rules approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, this year we are again furnishingfurnish proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. On or about November 3, 201722, 2022, we mailed to all stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 16, 2017November 14, 2022, a notice containing instructions on how to access our Annual Report to Stockholders, which




contains our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017,30, 2022; our proxy statement,statement; proxy cardcard; and other items of interest to stockholders on the Internet website indicated in our notice, at www.proxyvote.com, as well as instructions on how to vote your shares of common stock in connection with the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. That notice also provided instructions on how you can request a paper copy of our proxy materials and Annual Report to Stockholders if you desire.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Mahrukh Hussain, Esq.
mshsignature002.gif
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
November 22, 2022
If you do not attend the annual meeting, you may vote your shares via the Internet, by telephone or by completing, dating, signing and promptly returning your proxy card to us in the envelope provided, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail. The proxy materials provide you with details on how to vote by these three methods. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we encourage you to vote in the method that suits you best so that your shares will be voted at the annual meeting. If you decide to attend the annual meeting in person or virtually through the Internet, you may revoke your proxy and cast your vote during the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
sssign.jpg
Steven L. Spinner
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


November 3, 2017
PLEASE VOTE. STOCKHOLDERS MAY VOTE IN PERSON OR BY THE INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR MAIL. PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PROXY CARD OR THE NOTICE OF PROXY AVAILABILITY DISTRIBUTED TO YOU ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 3, 2017 FOR INFORMATION ON HOW TO VOTE BY THE INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR MAIL.






TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents







A-1


Forward Looking Statements

UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.
313 Iron Horse Way
Providence, Rhode Island 02908
PROXY STATEMENT
For the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held On December 13, 2017
This proxy statement is being furnishedcontains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our actual results may differ from our expectations, estimates and projections, and consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Words such as “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “budget,” “forecast,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “believes,” “predicts,” “potential,” “might,” “continues,” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, our expectations with respect to our future performance and the drivers of that performance. These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results. Most of these factors are outside our control and are difficult to predict. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to: (1) our dependence on principal customers; (2) the relatively low margins of our business, which are sensitive to inflationary and deflationary pressures; (3) the impact and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic; (4) our ability to operate, and rely on third parties to operate, reliable and secure technology systems; (5) labor and other workforce shortages and challenges; (6) our ability to realize anticipated benefits of our strategic initiatives, including any acquisitions; (7) the addition or loss of significant customers or material changes to our relationships with these customers; (8) our sensitivity to general economic conditions including inflation, changes in connectiondisposable income levels and consumer spending trends; and (9) other risks and uncertainties identified in our filings with the solicitationSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC). More information about other potential factors that could affect our business and financial results is included under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of proxies by the BoardFinancial Condition and Results of Directors of United Natural Foods, Inc., for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. (eastern standard time) at the Providence Marriott Downtown, 1 Orms Street, Providence, RI 02904, and any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting, and on the Internet through a virtual web conference at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2017. The Board of Directors (which we sometimes refer to as the BoardOperations” in this proxy statement) is soliciting proxies for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We will bear the cost of soliciting the proxies.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on December 13, 2017:
As outlined on the notice we mailed to you on or about November 3, 2017 (the “Notice of Proxy Availability”), the proxy statement, proxy card and Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017 are available on the Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING
Record Date and Share Ownership
Only stockholders of record on our books at the close of business on Monday, October 16, 2017 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting. As of the close of business on October 16, 2017, we had 50,816,288 shares of common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock entitles the record holder to one vote on each matter to be voted upon at the annual meeting. Copies of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this proxy statement, the proxy card and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017, were first made available to stockholders of record as of the Record Date on or about November 3, 2017. The Board is making these materials available to you on the Internet or, upon your request, is delivering printed versions of these materials to you without charge by mail. On or about November 3, 2017, we mailed to all stockholders of record as of the Record Date the Notice of Proxy Availability, which contains instructions on how to access these materials and vote.
We will, upon written request of any stockholder, furnish without charge a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017, as30, 2022 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC.

SEC

”), without exhibits. Please address all such requests to the attentionTable of Investor Relations, United Natural Foods, Inc., 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island 02908 or via email to InvestorRelations@unfi.com. Exhibits will be provided upon written request and payment of an appropriate processing fee.Contents
Submitting and Revoking Your Proxyunficoa03.jpg
If you complete and submit a proxy, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by your proxy in accordance with your instructions. If you submit a proxy but do not complete the voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by your proxy as follows:
FOR the election of Eric F. Artz, Ann Torre Bates, Denise M. Clark, Daphne J. Dufresne, Michael S. Funk, James P. Heffernan, Peter A. Roy, and Steven L. Spinner as directors to serve until the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders (Proposal 1);
FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 28, 2018 (Proposal 2);
FOR the advisory approval of our executive compensation (Proposal 3);
FOR the approval of the amendment and restatement of the United Natural Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (Proposal 4);


For ONE YEAR as the frequency of advisory approval of our executive compensation (Proposal 5);
AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding stockholder approval of certain future severance agreements (Proposal 6); and
AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding a decrease to the ownership threshold for stockholders to call a special stockholder meeting (Proposal 7).
If other matters come before the annual meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. We have not received notice of other matters that may properly be presented at the annual meeting.
You may revoke or revise your proxy at any time before it is exercised by (1) delivering to us a signed proxy card with a date later than your previously delivered proxy, (2) voting via the Internet while attending the virtual annual meeting, (3) granting a subsequent proxy through the Internet or telephone, (4) voting in person at the annual meeting; or (5) sending a written revocation to our corporate secretary at 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island 02908. Attendance at the annual meeting in person or virtually through the Internet will not itself be deemed to revoke your proxy unless you vote in person or via the Internet while attending the virtual annual meeting. Your latest dated proxy card or telephone or Internet proxy at the time of the meeting is the one that is counted.
If you hold shares of common stock in a stock brokerage account or through a bank or other nominee, you are considered to be the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee. You may not vote directly any shares you beneficially own that are held in street name; however, as the beneficial owner of the shares, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote your shares. If you do not provide your broker, bank or nominee instructions on how to vote your shares on non-discretionary items, a “broker non-vote” will occur. Proposals 1 and 3 through 7 are non-discretionary items for which your broker, bank or nominee will not be able to vote your shares without your instructions. Proposal 2 (ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP) is a discretionary item, and your broker, bank or nominee may vote your shares in their discretion even without voting instructions from you. Accordingly, it is possible for there to be broker non-votes for Proposals 1 and 3 through 7, but not for Proposal 2. In the case of a broker non-vote, your shares would be included in the number of shares considered present at the meeting for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum, but will not otherwise have any effect on the outcome of the vote on Proposals 1 and 3 through 7.
If you participate in the United Natural Foods, Inc. Stock Fund (the “Stock Fund”) through the United Natural Foods, Inc. Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), you will receive a separate voting instructions card that will serve as a voting instruction for Fidelity Management Trust Company (“Fidelity”), the trustee of the plan. If Fidelity does not receive voting instructions for your shares, it will not vote your shares.
In addition to solicitations by mail and the Internet, our directors, officers and employees may, without additional remuneration, solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile and personal interviews. In addition, we have retained Okapi Partners LLC, to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of approximately $9,000 plus associated costs and expenses. We will request brokerage houses, banks, and nominees to forward copies of the proxy materials to those persons for whom they hold shares and request instructions for voting the proxies. We will reimburse such brokerage houses, banks and other nominees for their reasonable expenses in connection with this distribution.
How to VoteProxy Statement Summary
For Proposal 1, you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” each of the nominees to the Board. You may also abstain from voting “FOR” or “AGAINST” any nominee. For each of Proposals 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7, you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or abstain from voting. For Proposal 5, you may vote for ONE YEAR, TWO YEARS, THREE YEARS or abstain from voting.
Stockholders of Record: If you are a stockholder of record, there are four ways to vote:
by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card by mail, if you request a paper copy of the proxy materials;
by written ballot at the annual meeting;
by making a toll-free telephone call within the United States or Canada using a touch-tone telephone to the toll-free number provided on your Notice of Proxy Availability; or
by voting on the Internet. To vote on the Internet, go to the website address indicated on your Notice of Proxy Availability to complete an electronic proxy card prior to the annual meeting. You will be asked to provide the control number from the Notice of Proxy Availability. You may also vote on the Internet while attending the meeting virtually through the Internet.


If you plan to vote by telephone or Internet in advance of the meeting, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., eastern standard time, on December 12, 2017 to be counted. Internet voting during the annual meeting is also permissible through the virtual web meeting hosted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2017.
Street Name Holders: If you hold your shares in street name, the Notice of Proxy Availability was forwarded to you by your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee and you should follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee. You may complete and return a voting instruction card to your broker, bank or nominee. Please check your Notice of Proxy Availability for more information. If you hold your shares in street name and wish to vote at the annual meeting in person, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker and bring that proxy to the meeting. If you wish to vote at the annual meeting while attending through the virtual annual meeting, you must have your 16-digit control number from your Notice of Proxy Availability.
Holders Through the 401(k) Plan: If you hold your shares through the 401(k) Plan’s Stock Fund, you will receive a separate voting instructions card which will serve as a voting instruction for Fidelity, the trustee of the 401(k) Plan. You must submit your voting instructions to Fidelity by 5:00 p.m. eastern standard time on December 8, 2017 to allow time to receive your voting instructions. If Fidelity does not receive voting instructions for your shares, it will not vote your shares.
We provide Internet proxy voting to allow you to vote your shares online both before and during the meeting, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your Internet access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies.
Quorum
Presence in person, by attendance through the virtual annual meeting, or by proxy of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding at the close of business on the Record Date and entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be required for a quorum at the meeting. Shares of common stock present in person or by attendance through the virtual annual meeting or represented by proxy (including shares that abstain or do not vote with respect to one or more of the matters presented for stockholder approval) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the annual meeting.
Votes Required
Proposal 1 (election of a total of eight nominees as directors) is an uncontested director election. In uncontested elections, our Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (the "Bylaws") require that each nominee be elected by a majority of votes cast with respect to such nominee. Therefore, a director will be elected if the number of shares voted “FOR” the director exceeds the number of shares voted “AGAINST” the director. Since each nominee is already a director, our Bylaws require any nominee who does not receive the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes cast to offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board will make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on such recommendation within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on this item because they are not considered votes cast.
For each of Proposal 2 (ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP), Proposal 3 (advisory approval of our executive compensation), Proposal 4 (the amendment and restatement of the United Natural Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan), Proposal 6 (the stockholder proposal regarding stockholder approval of certain future severance agreements), and Proposal 7 (the stockholder proposal regarding a decrease to the ownership threshold for stockholders to call a special stockholder meeting) the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast on the proposal is necessary for approval. Abstentions (in the case of Proposals 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7) and broker non-votes (in the case of Proposals 3, 4, 6 and 7) will have no effect on the results because they are not considered votes cast.
For Proposal 3 (advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes to approve our executive compensation), The Company will consider stockholders to have expressed a non-binding preference for the option that receives the most votes. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results because they are not considered votes cast.
Attending the Annual Meeting
We will be hosting the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, at the Providence Marriott Downtown, 1 Orms Street, Providence, RI 02904, as well as live via the Internet. A summary of the information you need to attend the annual meeting online is provided below:
    Any stockholder as of the Record Date can attend the annual meeting in person or virtually through the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2017.
Meeting starts at 4:00 p.m. eastern standard time.


If attending the annual meeting virtually through the Internet, please have your 16-digit control number provided on your Notice of Proxy Availability to enter the annual meeting.
If you hold your shares in street name and wish to vote at the annual meeting in person, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or nominee and bring that proxy to the meeting.
Stockholders may vote and, subject to any rules of the meeting, submit questions while attending the annual meeting in person or through the Internet.
Instructions on how to attend and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2017.
Webcast replay of the annual meeting will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2017 until December 13, 2018.
HouseholdingJanuary 10, 2023
We have adopted a procedure for stockholders whose shares are held in street name called “householding,” pursuant to which stockholders of record who have the same address and the same last name will receive only one Notice of Proxy Availability each and, as applicable, one set of any additional proxy materials that are delivered, unless one or more of these stockholders notifies us that they wish to continue receiving multiple copies. This procedure provides extra convenience for stockholders and a cost savings for us. Currently, we are not providing householding to stockholders of record.
If at any time you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate Notice of Proxy Availability and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are delivered, or if your shares are held in street name and you are receiving multiple copies of our Notice of Proxy Availability and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are delivered and wish to receive only one, please notify your bank, broker, nominee, trust or other holder of record. We will promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of the proxy statement to any stockholder residing at an address to which only one copy was mailed. Requests for additional copies for the current year or future years should be directed to our Investor Relations Department at (401) 528-8634 or 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island 02908.Voting Matters
Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate control numbers for use in voting their shares, and, if requested, separate proxy cards.


STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
This table includes information regarding the amount of our common stock beneficially owned as of October 16, 2017 by (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our executive officers named in the EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES—Summary Compensation Table—Fiscal Years 2015-2017, (iii) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group, and (iv) each person or entity known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)  
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned(2)(3)
 
Percentage
Ownership
Directors and Named Executive Officers:     
Steven L. Spinner  285,032
 **
Eric F. Artz  10,430
 **
Ann Torre Bates  9,430
 **
Denise M. Clark  17,382
 **
Daphne J. Dufresne  7,100
 **
Michael S. Funk  64,739
 **
James P. Heffernan  54,820
 **
Peter A. Roy  51,608
 **
Sean F. Griffin  49,121
 **
Michael P. Zechmeister  21,855
 **
Eric A. Dorne  19,631
 **
Paul Green  9,884
 **
All directors and executive officers, as a group (17 persons)  714,457
 1.4%
Other Stockholders:     
FMR LLC (4)  5,648,165
 11.1%
BlackRock, Inc. (5)  5,099,833
 10.0%
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (6)  4,053,916
 8.0%
** Less than 1%
(1)ProposalThe address for each listed directorBoard RecommendationPage
Proposal 1Election of Directors
FOR
Proposal 2Ratification of Independent Auditor
FOR
Proposal 3Say on Pay Resolution
FOR
Proposal 4Approval of the Second Amended and executive officer is c/o United Natural Foods, Inc., 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island 02908. The address for FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210. The address for BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055. The address for The Vanguard Group, Inc. is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan
FOR

Director Nominees
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors (the Board). The Board currently consists of eleven (11) Directors, ten (10) of whom are independent.
Information about our Directors and the Committees on which they serve is set forth below. Each Director serves a one-year term and has been nominated for re-election.
(2)NameThe number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each stockholder is determined under SEC rules, Director
Since
AuditCompensationNominating
and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which a person has the right to acquire within 60 days after October 16, 2017 through the vesting and/or exercise of any equity award or other right. The inclusion herein of such shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of such shares. Unless otherwise indicated, each person named in the table has sole voting power and investment power (or shares such power with his or her spouse) with respect to all shares of common stock listed as owned by such person.
Governance
Eric F. Artz
     Independent
Oct 2015üü
Ann Torre Bates
     Independent
Oct 2013CHAIR
Gloria R. Boyland
     Independent
Jan 2021üü
Denise M. Clark
     Independent
Feb 2013CHAIR
J. Alexander (Sandy) Miller Douglas
     Chief Executive Officer
Aug 2021
Daphne J. Dufresne
     Independent
Oct 2016CHAIR
Michael S. Funk
     Independent
Feb 1996
Shamim Mohammad
     Independent
Feb 2022ü
James L. Muehlbauer
     Independent
Apr 2019üü
Peter A. Roy
     Independent
Jun 2007üü
Jack Stahl
     Independent Chair
Jun 2019ü

1

Year in Review
Fuel the Future in Action
UNFI is a leading distributor of grocery and non-food products, and support services provider to retailers in the United States and Canada. We believe we are uniquely positioned to provide the broadest array of products and services to customers throughout North America. Through our Fuel the Future strategy, we are building a food ecosystem that is better for all by delivering great food, more choices and fresh thinking for our customers and suppliers. Our Fuel the Future strategy consists of six pillars: Fulfill Power in Scale, Unlock the Customer Experience, Taste the Future, UNFI Pride, Retail Optimized and Earn Results.
We are executing our strategy through four focus areas:
Customers: Utilizing our scale, insights and innovative offerings to develop a differentiated value proposition that helps our customers grow and gain share.
Suppliers: Strengthening our capabilities, especially those driven by technology, to deliver value creating programs to our suppliers.
Associates: Building a culture that inspires pride and enables associates to do their best work.
Communities: Supporting our communities and the planet through our wide-ranging and ambitious ESG initiatives.
ftf4audiencelockup.jpg



2

ESG - Better For All
better_forxallx2021xrgbx90.jpg
(3)
Advanced on our Better for All ESG agenda, which includes long-term goals meant to make the world, our communities and our people better
Science-based emissions reduction targets addressing scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions validated by the Science Based Targets initiative
Launched Climate Action Hub to foster collaboration across our supply chain on ESG issues
Enhanced ESG disclosure and made information increasingly accessible through the release of our 2021 Better for All Report
Added two new goals to further our diversity and inclusion initiatives
Achieved LEED Gold certification for a California distribution center
ESG matters overseen by Nominating and Governance Committee; supported by ESG Executive Committee
Board Refreshment and Expansion of Executive Leadership Team
The shares
Appointed Sandy Douglas as CEO and member of commonthe Board
Separated our Chair and CEO roles and appointed Jack Stahl as Independent Chair
Appointed Shamim Mohammad to the Board in February 2022 and to the Audit Committee in June 2022
Created two new executive leadership roles to add capabilities to achieve our strategic initiatives:
Chief Strategy and Transformation Officer
Chief Corporate Affairs Officer
Hired a new General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Governance Updates
Updated our Corporate Governance Principles to add a diverse slate requirement and rotational guidelines for Board and Committee leadership positions, and to reflect our shift to an Independent Chair leadership structure
Revised our stock shownownership guidelines in the table include the following numbers of shares that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options and that are exercisable within 60 days following October 16, 2017: Mr. Spinner—102,089; Mr. Funk—12,625; Mr. Heffernan—11,970; Mr. Roy—11,970; Mr. Griffin—24,825; Mr. Zechmeister—16,515; Mr. Dorne—16,815; Mr. Green—2,843; all directorsMarch 2022 for Directors and executive officers asto exclude unexercised in-the-money options and unearned performance awards in ownership calculations
Hired a group—257,037.third-party facilitator to conduct our fiscal 2022 Board evaluations
Effective in October 2022, amended our Code of Conduct to reflect recent updates to certain policies, including our Company values and mission, diversity and inclusion, safety and social and environmental matters
Updated our Social Media Policy to align with our diversity and inclusion commitments
The shares
3

The shares of common stock shown in the table include the following numbers of shares that are issuable pursuant to phantom stock in our Deferred Compensation and Deferred Stock Plans (the "Deferral Plans"): Mr. Spinner—8,125; Ms. Clark—8,650; Mr. Heffernan—18,756; Mr. Griffin—10,313; all directors and executive officers as a group—59,329.Board Refreshment
The shares of common stock shown in the table include the following numbers of shares that are allocated to the individual's account under our 401(k) Plan's Stock Fund: Mr. Spinner—651; Mr. Funk—4,228; Mr. Griffin—1,632; Mr. Dorne—814; Mr. Green—168; all directors and executive officers as a group—9,001.


The shares of common stock shown in the table include 23,345 vested performance units held by Mr. Spinner that are not payable until the termination of Mr. Spinner's employment with the Company, or if earlier, immediately prior to consummation of a change in control of the Company.
(4)AssessBeneficial ownership information based solely onèIdentifyèEvaluate and Recommend
Review desired skills against our current strategy and Board composition
Consider our Director eligibility guidelines, including independence and diversity considerations
Create a Schedule 13G/A fileddirector candidate profile
Third-party recruiter identifies potential candidates
Any director slate must include diverse candidates
Stockholders have ability to present candidates to our Board for consideration
Nominating and Governance Committee reviews skills, qualifications, diversity, independence and potential conflicts
Candidates meet with the SEC on February 14, 2017 by FMR LLC. FMR LLC reported sole voting power with respectfull Board
Nominating and Governance Committee recommends selected candidates to 902,932 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,648,165 shares. Includes shares beneficially owned by FIAM LLC, Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Trust Company, FMR Co., Inc., and Strategic Advisers, Inc. FMR Co., Inc. beneficially owns 5% or greater of the outstanding shares reported on the Schedule 13G/A. Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR LLC. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (“Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management & Research Company carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees.full Board
(5)Beneficial ownership information based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with
Results
ê
5 new directors (4 Independent) appointed over the SEC on February 8, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc. BlackRock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 4,984,321 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,099,833 shares.last 5 years (including 2 in fiscal 2022)
(6)Beneficial ownership information based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2017 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. The Vanguard Group, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 59,469 shares, shared voting power with respect to 5,199 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,991,831 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 62,085 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company ("VFTC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., reported beneficial ownership of 56,886 shares as a result of VFTC's serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. ("VIA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., reported beneficial ownership of 7,782 shares as a result of VIA's serving as investment manager of Australia investment offerings.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Summary
We are committed to maintainingactively refreshing our Board and each Committee to maintain a mix of short-, medium- and long-tenured directors, which we believe promotes strong Board governance. We also proactively manage potential vacancies due to retirement. The Board engages a top tier third-party recruiter to identify and recommend diverse candidates that will complement the existing skill set and qualifications of our current Board, our strategic vision and our corporate values.
In February 2022, upon the recommendation of our third-party recruiter, the Board appointed Shamim Mohammad to serve as a Director. Mr. Mohammad is currently a member of the Audit Committee. His appointment adds significant experience in strategic leadership and development of forward-thinking technology solutions to our Board. The addition of Mr. Mohammad furthers our commitment to ongoing Board refreshment, resulting in the addition of five Directors (four independent) over the last five years.
2022 Stockholder Outreach
 Met with holders of over 50% of our stockFifth consecutive year
of robust engagement
Formal Engagement Policy
We engaged with holders of over 50% of our outstanding stock again this year. In these meetings, we discussed significant Company updates, such as our refined strategy under an expanded leadership team; our corporate governance, practicesincluding Board refreshment and Board oversight; our commitments to human capital management and diversity and inclusion; our ESG programs and initiatives, including our third-party validated climate targets and progress on ESG goals; our supply chain engagement; and our executive compensation. Investors were complimentary of the changes made to our executive compensation program in fiscal 2022 in response to stockholder feedback and our demonstrated responsiveness to stockholder feedback overall. We also generally seek investor feedback about how we can further enhance our good governance principles. The Board actively monitors developments relatingOverall, the feedback we received was positive and Management provided a summary of comments received to the Board for discussion.

Responsive Actions to Feedback
Revised several components of Executive Compensation ProgramEnhanced disclosureStrengthened governance policies

See “Corporate Governance—Stockholder Engagement” and “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Say on Pay Vote, Investor Engagement and Responsive Action” for more discussion of actions we have taken in response to our conversations with stockholders.


4

Governance Highlights
üTen of eleven directors are independent; Mixed tenure with three Directors added since January 2021üBoard oversight of ESG; Launched Climate Action Hub and Science-based targets validated
üActive stockholder engagement five consecutive years - strong responsiveness to executive compensation feedbacküStrong risk oversight at Board and committee level, including regular review of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
üRecently enhanced stock ownership guidelines for directors, executive officers and additional senior officersüRobust Board refreshment process - five new Directors in last five years
ü
Strong Executive Compensation Policies:
Fully independent Compensation Committee
Long-term incentive compensation capped and aligned with predetermined financial metrics
Strong responsiveness to stockholder feedback reflected by high Say On Pay support
No gross ups or excessive perquisites
Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines and Recoupment Policy
How to Vote:
PhoneInternet before meetingMailDuring the meeting
1-800-690-6903www.proxyvote.comVote Processing
c/o Broadridge
51 Mercedes Way
Edgewood, NY 11717
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2023
How to attend and ask questions at the meeting:
Attend the Annual Meeting online, including to vote and/or submit questions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2023
The Annual Meeting will begin at approximately 4:00 p.m. EST (log-in at 3:45 p.m.) on Tuesday, January 10, 2023
You may submit questions for the meeting in advance at www.proxyvote.com
You may submit live questions during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2023
For more information about voting and attending the meeting, see “Information About the Meeting,” beginning on page 75.
5

Corporate Governance
Governance Highlights
We are committed to best practices in corporate governance. Some of our key corporate governance programs are summarized below, with further information provided throughout this proxy statement.
Independent Oversight
Independent Board Chair and annual review of public corporations,optimal leadership structure with guidelines for Board leadership rotation
Ten out of eleven director nominees are independent
Regular executive sessions of independent directors at Board and Committee meetings
100% independent Board Committees, with strong Committee mandates and rotating leadership terms
Comprehensive Board oversight of strategy development and execution
Active Board oversight of the Company’s compliance and risk management, including regular review of enterprise risk management (ERM)
Board has consulted with our legal counsel to evaluate our current corporate governance and other practices in lightCommittees may hire outside advisors independent of these developments. OurManagement
Board oversight of ESG and political contributions policies and practices reflect our reviews of corporate governance best practices and are compliant with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, SEC rules and regulations and the NASDAQ Stock Market ("NASDAQ") listing standards. For example:
The Board has adopted clear corporate governance principles, which are reviewed annually and were most recently revised in March 2016, that outline the roles and responsibilities of the Board and its committees and establish policies regarding governance matters such as Board meetings and communications, performance evaluations of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer, stock ownership guidelines, and director orientation and continuing education;
Each member of our Board is elected annually to a one-year term;
A majority of the members of the Board are independent within the NASDAQ listing standards' definition, and the Board makes an affirmative determination regarding the independence of each director annually;
All members of the Board's standing committees—the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and thecommitments through Nominating and Governance Committee—are independent within the NASDAQ listing standards' definitionCommittee
Board oversight of human capital management through Compensation Committee
Board Skills and applicable SEC rulesQualifications
Regular Board refreshment and regulations;mixed tenure
The independent membersDiverse backgrounds, ages, experiences and qualifications, with a view to making changes as needed to continue to add value and meet our evolving strategic needs
Diverse gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and veteran status, with further commitment to Board diversity demonstrated through formal adoption of thediverse slate requirement
Deep industry expertise
Annual Board meet regularly without the presenceand Committee self-evaluations, conducted by a third-party in fiscal 2022
Mandatory director retirement age of management;75
We have designated an independentOrientation program for new directors and ongoing director to serve as our "Lead Independent Director" to coordinate the activities of theeducation programs for all directors
Limitations on other independent members of the Board;
We have a clear code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our principal executive officers and all members of our finance department, including our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer;
The charters of the Board's committees clearly establish their respective roles and responsibilities;
The Compensation Committee has considered whether any of the Compensation Committee's consultants have any relationships with us or our directors or executive officers that would call into question the consultant's independence or constitute a conflict of interest; and
The Audit Committee has procedures in place for the anonymous submission of employee complaints on accounting, internal controls or auditing matters.
In addition, our corporate governance principles limit our independent directors to serving on no more than a total of four public company boards and limit our executive officers to serving on no more than a total of two public company boards, in each case, including our Board.board positions; Directors and executive officers must notify the chairChair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the CEO of potential appointments in advance for review by the Committee
Good Governance Practices
Annual comprehensive review of accepting an invitationgovernance policies leading to serve on another corporate board. Directors are also requiredthe following updates in 2022:
In October 2022, amended our Code of Conduct to notify thereflect recent updates to certain policies, including our Company values and mission, diversity and inclusion, safety and social and environmental matters
Corporate Governance Principles amended to require a diverse initial pool of director candidates, reflect separation of Chair and CEO roles, and provide for rotational guidelines for Board and Committee leadership positions
Director and executive stock ownership policies requiring meaningful levels of ownership, revised in fiscal 2022 to exclude vested options and unvested performance-based restricted stock units
Social Media Policy updated to align with our diversity and inclusion commitments
Hired a third-party facilitator to conduct our fiscal 2022 Board evaluations
ESG matters overseen by Nominating and Governance Committee, when their principal occupationsupported by our ESG Executive Committee
Launched Climate Action Hub to facilitate engagement across our supply chain on climate matters
Implemented a policy to present a diverse candidate slate for all employee roles that are director-level and above
Human capital management
6

Compensation Committee oversight of human capital management matters with a focus on associate wellbeing across a variety of measures
Offer associates several benefit programs, including:
Comprehensive health and welfare benefit programs
No-cost wellness program
Paid time off, including parental paid leave
Employee assistance program
401(k) plan
Back-up childcare program
Recently strengthened employee education assistance program
Include human capital management and diversity and inclusion as key elements of our people first strategy
Added two new ESG goals in fiscal 2022 to enhance our diversity and inclusion initiatives
Continued focus on associate engagement, empowerment and safety to allow for innovation and best-in-class solutions for our customers and suppliers
Elevated our safety lead to SVP role to further enhance our focus on the safety of our associates
Prohibition on hedging or business association changes, at which point the committee will evaluate the proprietypledging of continued service on ourCompany stock by directors and executive officers included in stock ownership guidelines and insider trading policy
Strong policies restricting trading by insiders, including discussion-based preclearance process
Ongoing Board by the director.oversight of robust data and cyber security programs
Stockholder Rights
As discussed under PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS—Annual election of all directors
Majority Vote Standardvote and director resignation policy for Election of Directorsdirectors in uncontested elections
, our Bylaws provide proxy access right for a majority voting standardstockholders (3% ownership threshold continuously held for uncontested elections3 years/2 director nominees or 20% of directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee's charter sets forth the procedures for the Nominating and Governance Committee's deliberations regarding whether to accept an offer by a nominee for director to resign from the Board if that nominee does not receive more votes cast “FOR” his or her election than votes cast “AGAINST” his or her election in an uncontested election.Board/20 stockholder aggregation limit)
All directors electedStockholder right to call special meeting by stockholders owning at least 25% of the annual meeting will be elected for one-year terms.outstanding shares
One class of shares, with each share entitled to one vote
No poison pill
We maintain a corporate governance pagesection on our corporate UNFI website that includes key information about our corporate governance initiatives and our codeCode of business conduct.Conduct. The corporate governance pageinformation can be found at www.unfi.com, by clicking on "Investor Overview" and then on "Corporate Governance" or "Code“Governance” listed under “Investors” at the bottom of Conduct" as applicable.our website. Copies of our corporate governance principles,Corporate Governance Principles, our codeCode of business conductConduct, our Social and ethics,Environmental Policy and the charters for each of the Board's committees and the charter of the Lead Independent DirectorBoard’s Committees can be found on the investor overview pagesour website. During fiscal 2022, we revised and updated our Corporate Governance Principles and in October 2022, we amended our Code of Conduct, each in connection with our ongoing comprehensive review of our website.governance practices. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this proxy statement or considered to be part of this document.


Director Independence
Our corporate governance principlesCorporate Governance Principles require a majority of the members of the Board to be independent directors as such term is defined in the NASDAQNew York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards. The Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, has determined that sixten of its eighteleven current members are independent. Our sixten independent directors are Eric F. Artz, Ann Torre Bates, Gloria R. Boyland, Denise M. Clark, Daphne J. Dufresne, James P. Heffernan, and Peter A. Roy. Michael S. Funk, Shamim Mohammad, James L. Muehlbauer, Peter A. Roy and Steven L. Spinner areJack Stahl. Sandy Douglas is our employeesCEO. Mr. Funk previously was not an independent director because he was an employee of the Company until shortly after the Company’s acquisition of SUPERVALU INC. (Supervalu) in 2018. The Board’s 2022 determination of Mr. Funk’s independence in accordance with NYSE standards was made in light of it being more than three years since he has been an employee of the Company. In addition, the Board recognized that since Mr. Funk’s service as CEO of the Company from October 2005 to September 2008, the Company’s strategic initiatives and therefore areleadership team have changed significantly. The current leadership team is not the same team that operated the Company under Mr. Funk’s leadership. Taking all of these factors into account, the Board determined that Mr. Funk is an independent directors.director.
7

Our corporate governance principlesCorporate Governance Principles and the charter for each of the Board'sBoard’s standing committees—Committees—the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee—require all members of such committeesCommittees to be independent within the meaning of NASDAQthe NYSE listing standards and the SEC'sSEC’s rules. The charter of the Audit Committee also requires each of its members to meet the definition of independence under Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")Exchange Act), and the SEC'sSEC’s rules thereunder. The charter of the Compensation Committee requires each of its members to be a non-employee director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and an outside director within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the "Code").Act.
Lead Independent DirectorChair
The Lead Independent DirectorChair is elected annually by the independent directorsDirectors of the Board. In September 2022, the independent Directors appointed Mr. Heffernan currently servesStahl to serve as the LeadBoard’s Independent Director.Chair for a second term. In accordance with our corporate governance principlesCorporate Governance Principles, the Board must elect an Independent Chair annually and the charterwill consider rotation of the Lead Independent Director,Chair every three to five years based on the Leadbest interests of the Company at that time. The Independent Director must be independent. The Lead Independent DirectorChair is responsible for coordinating the activities of the other independent directorsDirectors and for performing such other duties and responsibilities as the Board may determine from time to time, which are set forth in our Corporate Governance Principles, including:
Providing leadership of the Board;
Serving as aprincipal liaison between the Chair ofDirectors and senior Management, and particularly the Board, independent directors, and the President and Chief Executive Officer;CEO;
RecommendingProviding input to the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee on the membership of various committees;
Advising and assisting the Board's committees,chairs of the Board’s Committees in fulfilling such individual’s roles and recommendingresponsibilities;
Suggesting an appropriate schedule of and agenda for the Board’s meetings and including the Board’s and CEO’s input into the agenda for the Board’s meetings;
Leading the independent Directors in their role in the annual evaluation of the performance of the CEO, providing any feedback to the Chair of the BoardNominating and Governance Committee and overseeing actions to address the outcomes of such evaluations;
Overseeing the process for CEO succession in coordination with the Nominating and Governance Committee;
Determining the retention of advisersadvisors and consultants who report directly to the Board;
Advising and assisting the chairs of the Board’s committees in fulfilling such individuals’ roles and responsibilities;
Advising the Chair of the Board as to an appropriate schedule of and agenda for the Board's meetings and ensuring the Board's input into the agenda for the Board's meetings; and
Serving as the Chair for executive sessions of the Board's independent directors and acting as Chair of the Board'sChairing regular and special Board meetings when the Chair is unable to preside.and shareholder meetings; and
Presiding at meetings in executive session.
A complete description of the duties of the Lead Independent DirectorChair is included in the amended and restated charter of the Lead Independent Director,Corporate Governance Principles, a copy of which can be found in the corporate governance“Governance” section of our website at www.unfi.com.
Board Leadership Structure
As of August 2021, our Board is led by an Independent Chair, Mr. Stahl. Upon the appointment of Mr. Douglas as CEO, the Board determined that the positions of CEO and Chair should be separated and that the two roles, with separate and delineated accountabilities, were most appropriate for the Company at that time. In making this decision, the Board also considered the input of certain stockholders reflecting a desire for the separation of the Chair and CEO roles. The Board is currently led byreevaluated this structure in September 2022, and determined that a separate CEO and Chair best serves the Chair of the Board, Mr. Spinner,Company and by the Lead Independent Director, Mr. Heffernan.its stockholders at this time.
Our corporate governance principlesCorporate Governance Principles do not require the Chair of the Board to be independent and do not specify whether the positions of Chair of the Board and the Chief Executive OfficerCEO must be separated. The Board will regularly considersconsider the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at any given time and has concludeddetermined that the Company and its stockholders are best served by the Board retaining discretion to determine whether the same individual should serve as both Chief Executive OfficerCEO and Chairman of the Board,Chair, or whether the roles should be separated. The Board believes that it is important to retain the flexibility to make this determination at any given point in time based on what it believes will provide the best leadership structure for the Company, based onin light of the prevailing facts and circumstances at thesuch time.
The Board currently believes that having Mr. Spinner serve as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, coupled with strong independent director leadership, is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time. The Board believes a number
8

Table of factors support this decision. The Board believes the combined Chairman and Chief Executive Officer structure promotes decisive leadership, ensures clear accountability and enhances our ability to communicate with a single and consistent voice to stockholders, employees and other stakeholders. Further, given he has the benefit of over 28 years of operational and leadership experience with distributors of food and non-food products, including during the last six (6) years as our industry has undergone significant changes, Mr. Spinner (together with our Lead Independent Director and in consultation with the chairs of our various standing committees) is well-positioned to set the Board’s agenda and provide leadership. Mr. Spinner’s career experience also gives him exceptional industry knowledge, which the Board believes is critical for the chairman of the board of a company that operates in an evolving industry. The Board also noted Mr. Spinner’s strong performance as a leader. At present, the Board believes that this structure, along with having a Lead Independent Director vested with key duties and responsibilities (as discussed above) and the Board’s standing committees comprised of and chaired by independent directors (as discussed below) provides a formal structure for strong independent oversight of our management team. We plan to continue to examine our corporate governance policies and leadership structures on an ongoing basis to ensure that they continue to meet our needs.Contents


Risk Oversight
Full Board
The Board has overall responsibility for risk oversight. The Board exercises its oversight responsibilities with respect to strategic, operational and competitive risks, as well as risks related to the succession planning of our CEO and other members of senior Management. The Board has delegated responsibility for the oversight of certain risks to its Committees. All Committees report to the full Board as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise-level risk. Certain risks are overseen by the full Board directly, such as strategic, cyber, other operational and macro-environment risks.
Audit CommitteeCompensation CommitteeNominating & Governance Committee
The Audit Committee and full Board receive Management’s quarterly ERM report and the Audit Committee discusses significant financial risk exposures and the steps Management has taken to monitor, control and report such exposures with Management, the Company’s internal audit department and our independent auditor.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for developing and maintaining compensation policies and programs that are aligned with pay for performance, stockholder interests and the other elements of the executive compensation philosophy developed and maintained by the Committee. Embedded in this philosophy and foundational to these programs is that they mitigate any unnecessary and excessive risks in our compensation plans and programs that could threaten our long-term value. For more discussion of risk considerations in our compensation programs, see “Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and AnalysisCompensation Risk Assessment.”
The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees our compliance programs, including those under our Chief Compliance Officer, who reports to our General Counsel, and our ESG programs. This Committee also participates extensively in our ERM and compliance programs generally, actively considering assessment and mitigation for risks that do not fall within the purview of the Audit Committee or the Compensation Committee, as well as overseeing other risks that fall within the matters covered by its charter.
Committees may address other risks on an ad hoc basis, as well as risks related to the planning for succession of our Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management. The Board has delegated responsibility for the oversight of specific risks to the Board's committees as follows: the Audit Committee receives management’s quarterly Enterprise Risk Management and Risk Committee reports and discusses with management, the Company’s internal audit department and our independent auditor significant financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, control, and report such exposures; and the Compensation Committee is responsible for ensuring that compensation policies and programs do not encourage our executives to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten our long-term value. All committees report to the full Board as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise level risk.appropriate. We believe the division of risk management responsibilities described above is an effective approach for addressing the risks facing our Company.Company, allowing the consideration of key risks to be allocated across Committees so that sufficient time, attention and expertise are directed to the respective risks the Company faces.
Compensation RiskAnti-Hedging and Insider Trading Policies
We performedOur stock ownership guidelines and our Policy Regarding Trading in Company Securities (Insider Trading Policy) include prohibitions against speculative trading activities in relation to Company securities. Senior employees, including executive officers and non-employee directors, are strictly prohibited from entering into any transaction that would operate as a comprehensive assessment forhedge against their stock ownership position or that would hedge against the Compensationfinancial effect of their building up stock ownership to reach the requirements set forth in our stock ownership guidelines. Under our Insider Trading Policy, directors, certain employees (including executive officers) and Audit Committeesother individuals with access to determine whethermaterial non-public information about the risks arisingCompany are prohibited from engaging in transactions in Company securities during blackout periods (other than in accordance with a pre-approved Rule 10b5-1 trading plan), and such persons are required to preclear (through discussion) any transactions in Company securities with a member of our compensation policies or practiceslegal department who is trained in these conversations. Certain insiders who have been identified as regularly having access to material nonpublic information are reasonably likelyrestricted to have a material adverse effect on us. Our assessment covered each material element of executivetrading during quarterly open window periods, and non-executive employee compensationthen may trade only after preclearance.Under our policy governing 10b5-1 trading plans, we permit all directors and any risk mitigating factors as discussed below. We believe that our policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, the structure of our compensation program for executive officers does not incentivize unnecessary or excessive risk taking. The base salary component of compensation does not encourage risk-taking because it is a fixed amount. In addition, performance-based cash incentive awards and long-term equity-based incentive awards made in fiscal 2017 as part of our core executive compensation program have the following risk-limiting characteristics:
Our overall compensation levels are competitive with the market.
Our core compensation mix for fiscal 2017 was balanced among (i) fixed components like salary and benefits, (ii) annual incentives that reward total Company financial performance and individual performance, and (iii) a portfolio approach for stock awards with a mix of performance share units and time-based vesting restricted stock units.
Time-based vesting equity awards for the Named Executive Officers under our core program were granted with a grant date fair value equal to the sum of approximately one-half of the total grant date fair value of the core long-term equity based compensation awarded in fiscal 2017, to our Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Spinner, excluding one-time, special retention awards given to Messers. Zechmeister, Dorne, and Green (each of whom received special time-based vesting restricted stock unit awards during fiscal 2017) and Messers. Spinner and Griffin (each of whom received special performance-based vesting restricted stock unit awards during fiscal 2017). Within our core program, Mr. Spinner’s time-based vesting equity awards made up approximately 25% of the grant date fair value of his equity-based awards for fiscal 2017.
Equity awards issued as part of our core executive compensation program were generally delivered equally in the form of time-based vesting restricted stock units and performance-based vesting restricted stock units (or, in the case of Mr. Spinner, with performance awards making up almost 75% of his core awards) which align the interests of ouremployees, including executive officers, to long-term stockholder interests.
A significant portionenter into 10b5-1 plans during an open window period when they are not in possession of our executive compensation is tied to how our stock performs over multiple years. Time-based vesting equity awards to employees generallymaterial nonpublic information. All plans must have graded vesting with 25% of the grant vesting on each anniversary of the grant date. This minimizes the benefit of a temporary increase in stock price.
With the exception of awards made to our Directors, with the exception of Mr. Spinner, all equity awards issued as part of our core executive compensation program contain30-day “cooling-off” period between entering into a vesting requirement of at least one year.
Our equity based incentive programs are based on a sliding scale with amounts interpolated between threshold, target and stretch performance metrics rather than "all or none" awards. These awards can typically vest at a value of up to 200% of the grant date value if the stretch performance targets are achieved.
The Compensation Committee has discretion to reduce performance-based awards when it determines that such adjustments would be appropriate based on the Company's interestsplan and the interestsstart of our stockholders.
Payouts for awardstrading under our Annual Cash Incentive Plan are tiered based on threshold, target,that plan, and stretch goals and the payout of these annual cash incentives and vesting of performance units are based on results included in,no plan may be shorter than six months or derived from, the audited consolidated financial statements.
Executive officers are subject to our executive stock ownership guidelines as described in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Programs, Policies and Considerations and all non-employee directors


are subject to stock ownership requirements as described in DIRECTOR COMPENSATION—Stock Ownership Requirement.longer than 18 months.
Equity awards and cash-based incentive plan awards are subject to our Recoupment Policy as described in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Programs, Policies and Considerations.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board currently has three standing committees: the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Upon recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the full Board appoints members of each committee. Each committee is responsible for appointing its chair.

9

Compensation Committee. Committee
The Compensation Committee establishes or approves all policies and procedures related to our human resources function with respect to our executive officers, including employee compensation, incentive programs, and the 401(k) Plan, and administers our stock incentive plans, including the United Natural Foods, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2002 Equity Plan"), the United Natural Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2004 Equity Plan") and the United Natural Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Original Amended and Restated Plan").plans. Additionally, this committeeCommittee evaluates and establishes the respective compensation of our executive officers whose compensation is described below in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES—Summary Compensation Table—Fiscal Years 2015-2017,on an individual basis, including our Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer (CFO), and Chief Financial Officer.recommends compensation of our CEO for approval by the Board. The Compensation Committee also reviews the compensation of thecertain other members of our senior management team and recommends to the Board the compensation for our non-employee directors. For a description of the role of the Compensation Committee, its consultants and managementManagement in setting executive compensation, please see EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis—AnalysisHow We Make Decisions Regarding Executive Pay. The Compensation Committee also approves our annual compensation discussion and analysis included in our annual proxy statements. The Compensation Committee oversees our leadership development and management succession planning (although the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the CEO succession planning process), as well as our diversity initiatives. Additionally, the Compensation Committee oversees human capital management matters, including reviewing and overseeing key diversity and inclusion initiatives and Human Resources policies and practices.
The agenda for meetings of the Compensation Committee is determined by its Chair with the assistance of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,CEO, CFO, Chief Human Resources Officer and Secretary(CHRO) and General Counsel.Counsel and Secretary. Compensation Committee meetings are regularly attended by the Chair ofCEO, the BoardCFO, the CHRO and Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the General Counsel and the Chief Human Resources Officer.Secretary. At certain meetings during fiscal 2017,2022, including each of its regular meetings, the Compensation Committee met in executive session. The Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s Chair reports the committee'sCommittee’s recommendations on CEO executive compensation to the Board, which sets the CEO’s compensation, and reports its determinations on other executive compensation to the Board. Independent advisors and our finance, human resources, benefits and legal departments support the Compensation Committee in its duties and may be delegated authority to fulfill certain administrative duties regarding the compensation programs. The Compensation Committee has authority under its charter to retain, approve fees for and terminate(and, as may be necessary or advisable, change or terminate) a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor as it deems necessary to assist in the fulfillment of its responsibilities. Moreover, theThe Compensation Committee annually evaluates the independence of its consultants.consultants, assesses their performance and establishes annual scope of work and fees for the consultants pursuant to a pre-approval policy. The Compensation Committee engages Frederic W. Cook & Co. (FW Cook) as its compensation consultant.
The Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s charter is available on our website, www.unfi.com. The charter was most recently amended in March 2021. The Compensation Committee held ninefour meetings during fiscal 2017.2022. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. HeffernanMs. Dufresne (chair) and Messrs. Artz, Muehlbauer and Ms. Bates,Roy, each of whom is an independent director.director under the SEC rules and NYSE listing standards applicable to compensation committee members.
Audit Committee. The Board has an Audit Committee that is a separately designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the integrity of our financial reporting process and systems of disclosure controls and internal controls regarding finance, accounting, and legal compliance;over financial reporting; monitoring the independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm; and monitoring the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm andoverseeing our internal audit department. Among the Audit Committee'sCommittee’s duties are to review the results and scope of the audit and other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is also responsible for overseeing the finance and accounting matters regarding related party transactions under our Related Party Transaction Policy and certain compliance matters under our Code of Conduct.
The Audit Committee'sCommittee’s charter is available on our website, www.unfi.com. The charter was most recently amended in March 2021. The Audit Committee held sixfour meetings during fiscal 2017.2022. The current members of the Audit Committee are Ms.Mses. Bates (chair), Mmes. Clark and DufresneBoyland and Messrs. ArtzMohammad, Muehlbauer and Heffernan,Stahl, each of whom is an independent director.director under SEC rules and the NYSE listing standards applicable to audit committee members. The Board has determined that Mmes.all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate, and Ms. Bates and Dufresne and Messrs. Artz and Heffernan areis an audit committee financial experts,expert, as defined by the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Nominating and Governance Committee. Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for developing, reviewing and recommending to the Board for adoption our corporate governance principles;Corporate Governance Principles; identifying and nominating candidates for election to the Board; assessing and making recommendations to the Board regarding the size and composition of the Board; making recommendations to the Board andregarding the size, composition, scope of authority, responsibilities and reporting obligations of each of the Board's committees; andBoard’s Committees; assisting the Board in conductingfacilitating performance reviews of the Board and its committeesCommittees and members. members; oversight of our ESG programs; oversight of our CEO succession planning process; and other duties and responsibilities. The Nominating and Governance Committee is also responsible for reviewing related party transactions under our Related Party Transaction Policy and oversees certain compliance matters under our Code of Conduct that are not related to finance or accounting (which are overseen by the Audit Committee), and provides oversight of general risk and compliance areas not falling under the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee. Additionally, the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees our political
10

contributions, policies and commitments. Our Political Activities and Government Relations Policy, together with our Code of Conduct, provide for oversight of political contributions, including that any corporate contributions must be reviewed and approved in writing by our General Counsel, be in compliance with applicable law and be properly disclosed.
For additional information regarding the director nomination process undertaken by the Nominating and Governance Committee, please refer to PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS—“Proposal 1Election of DirectorsNomination of Directors.
The Nominating and Governance Committee'sCommittee’s charter is available on our website, www.unfi.com. The charter was most recently amended in March 2021. The Nominating and Governance Committee held sixfour meetings during fiscal 2017.2022. The current members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Mr. RoyMses. Clark (chair) and Mmes. ClarkBoyland and Dufresne,Messrs. Artz and Roy, each of whom is an independent director. Gail A. Graham (who was also andirector under SEC rules and NYSE listing standards.


independent director) served on the Nominating and Governance Committee prior to the expiration of her term as a director at the 2016 annual meeting.
Board Meetings
During fiscal 2017,2022, the Board met nineseven times and following mosteach of the Board'sBoard’s regularly scheduled quarterly meetings, the independentnon-employee directors met in executive session without the presence of management (in each case, including by telephone conference).Management. All directors attended at least 94%75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served. We encourage each member of the Board to attend our annual meetingsmeeting of stockholders. All ten of our current directors standing for re-election who were directors at that time attended theour last annual meeting. Mr. Mohammad was appointed after our annual meeting heldof stockholders.
Stockholder Engagement
Stockholder engagement is an important and regular part of the Company’s strategy so that the Board and Management are aware of and respond to stockholder input on a broad spectrum of business and governance matters. Members of Management, including our General Counsel and Secretary, CHRO, head of Investor Relations, and head of our Sustainability and Social Impact team, as primary participants, have engaged in December 2016 eitherdiscussions with stockholders as part of our efforts to gain an understanding of stockholder views. Directors are generally available to participate in personour engagement meetings upon request from stockholders, and this year Mr. Stahl, our Independent Chair, joined an investor call. For the fifth consecutive year, the Company reached out to a significant percentage of its stockholders, and we met with holders representing more than 50% of our outstanding shares. The Company has found its outreach efforts over the past five years to be very helpful in understanding our investors’ perspectives on various business and governance matters and intends to maintain ongoing discussions with a large number of investors each year. Additionally, members of our ESG team engaged in ESG-focused meetings with certain investors, upon request.
Topics of discussion included business performance; our refined strategy under an expanded leadership team; our corporate governance, including Board refreshment and Board oversight; our commitments to human capital management and diversity and inclusion; our ESG programs and initiatives, including our third-party validated climate targets and progress on ESG goals; our supply chain engagement; and our executive compensation. Investors were complimentary of the changes made to our executive compensation program in fiscal 2022 in response to stockholder feedback and our demonstrated responsiveness to stockholder feedback overall.
After our engagement discussions, Management provides the feedback received from our stockholders to the Board. Since the beginning of 2021, we have taken the following governance actions directly responsive to our stockholder conversations:
11

WHAT WE HEARDWHAT WE DID
Include reputational harm as a clawback triggerEnhanced our recoupment policy to include misconduct and reputational harm and provide for forfeiture of incentive compensation in certain cases of misconduct resulting in financial harm and to require disclosure in certain circumstances
Disclose metrics of Board composition and individual diversityIncluded Board composition metrics in our proxy statement disclosure and, beginning this year, individual diversity metrics in our Director skills matrix
Separate role of CEO and ChairUpon appointing a new CEO, we separated the role of CEO and Chair of the Board and appointed an Independent Chair
Enhance HCM disclosureAdded disclosure in our proxy statement about programs offered to employees for recruiting, engagement and career development
Expand ESG disclosureExpanded ESG disclosure in our proxy statement, ESG Report and through the launch of our Better for All campaign
Continue Board evaluation and refreshmentContinuously evaluate our Board and refreshment efforts (added four new independent directors in last five years, including one in 2022)
Disclose EEO-1 ReportIn addition to the diversity disclosures in our Better for All Report, we intend to disclose our EEO-1 report beginning with our 2023 filing
See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Say on Pay Vote, Investor Engagement and Responsive Action” for a discussion of actions we took in response to conversations regarding executive compensation.
Board Evaluation and Refreshment
Our Board regularly evaluates its performance and composition, assessing individual director’s skills, qualifications and experience to align the overall Board composition to best meet the needs of the Company’s evolving long-term business strategy. Each year, the Board undertakes a thorough Board and Committee evaluation process, including peer feedback on individual directors, using a comprehensive set of questionnaires requesting quantitative and qualitative input from directors. The Board uses a skills matrix to assess the contributions, background and experience of each director with those sought-after skills. In 2022, the Board engaged a third-party to conduct the Board and Committee assessment, working with the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee also considers any additional skills, qualifications and experience that may be needed to meet the evolving strategic needs of the Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee is committed to considering a facilitated, third-party assessment every two to three years.
The Committee considers prospective candidates and identifies appropriate individuals for the Board’s further consideration. The Nominating and Governance Committee also assesses the proper mix of skills and expertise for directors serving on the Board’s committees. The Board is highly skilled and qualified, and committed to the Company’s success, as indicated by the high attendance rate and robust discussion and debate that occurs during each Board and committee meeting.
In early fiscal 2022, upon the appointment of Mr. Douglas as our new CEO and board member, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, appointed Mr. Stahl as Independent Chair of the Board and Mr. Roy stepped down as Lead Independent Director. Additionally, Ms. Dufresne was appointed as Chair of the Compensation Committee. Further, in fiscal 2022, our Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, revised the composition of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. The current composition of each committee is disclosed above.
In fiscal 2022, the Board and Nominating and Governance Committee considered additional skills and experience that would be desirable in light of our strategy and focused on adding a director with strategic leadership and information technology experience. At the recommendation of our third-party search firm, the Board appointed Shamim Mohammad to the Board in February 2022. Mr. Mohammad is also a member of the Audit Committee.

12

Board Tenure
We aim to maintain a mix of short-, medium- and long-tenured directors, which we believe promotes strong Board governance.
Average Director Tenure is 7.7 years
5 Directors4 Directors2 Directors
0 - 4 years5 - 9 years10+ years
Board Diversity
Our Board is diverse in gender and ethnic background, as well as having a broad range of experience. The Nominating and Governance Committee charter provides for the consideration of diversity, including gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and veteran status, when considering Board candidates. As provided below, our Director skills matrix now includes individual diversity metrics as requested by our stockholders. In fiscal 2022, the Board amended our Corporate Governance Principles to formally require the initial pool of director candidates for any director search to include qualified diverse candidates to further support our commitment to a diverse and qualified Board.
431
are femaleidentify as a Racially or Ethnically Diverseidentifies as LGBTQ+
    


13

Summary of Board Skills, Experiences and Qualifications
Skills, Experiences and QualificationsDirector
ArtzBatesBoylandClarkDouglasDufresneFunkMohammadMuehlbauerRoyStahl
Significant experience in business, education, the professions or public serviceüüüüüüüüüüü
Commitment to areas aligned with the Company’s public interest commitmentsüüüüüüüüüüü
Service as an executive officer for another public companyüüüüüüü
Experience in the Company’s industryüüüü
Experience with risk oversightüüüüüüüüüü
Experience with stockholder engagementüüüüüüü
Information technology experienceüüüü
Experience in leadership developmentüüüüüüüüü
Experience with mergers and acquisitionsüüüüüüüüüü
eCommerce experienceüüü
Supply chain management experienceüüüüüüü
Consumer products/retail experienceüüüüüü
Senior operations management/CEOüüüüüü
Strategic thinking, planning and executionüüüüüüüüüüü
Operating financial expertise (CFO)üüüü
Senior operations experience in industry or adjacent industryüüüü
Large-scale transformation/innovation experienceüüüüüüü
DiversityFemaleFemale

Racially Diverse
Female

LGBTQ+

Veteran
Female

Racially Diverse
Ethnically Diverse
Environmental, Social and Governance Practices
At UNFI, we are committed to being good stewards of our planet, our communities and our people through tangible action. We seek to lead by example on social and environmental issues of critical important to society and strive to be a force for positive change in the virtualfood system. This commitment is described in our Social and Environmental Policy, which was most recently updated in September 2020 and is available on our website, www.unfi.com. Our Nominating and Governance Committee has direct oversight of our policies and strategies addressing ESG matters, including sustainability, corporate social responsibility and political contributions, and is responsible for reporting to the Board on such matters at least annually. The ESG Executive Committee, an executive steering committee formed in 2020 to oversee implementation of our ESG initiatives, provides executive sponsorship for our ESG strategy and goals. We also developed emissions reduction targets, which were validated by the Science Based Targets initiative in April 2022.
In March 2022, we issued our 11th annual meeting.

report on our social and environmental impacts, and the first update to our Better for All plan, which seeks to build a food system that is better for our people, our communities and our world. The Better for All Report, available on our website, www.betterforall.unfi.com, expands upon the six impact focus areas announced last

14

PROPOSALyear to provide a more in-depth look at our direct and indirect impacts at multiple points along our value chain. Our key focus areas now include Diversity and Inclusion, Responsible Procurement, Community Development, Governance, Associate Safety and WellBeing, Climate Action, Waste Reduction, Customer Health and Safety and Energy Efficiency. Our Better for All Report highlights our progress toward achieving our ESG goals and references Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards and Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). The GRI and SASB tables are available on our website. The Better for All Report and its disclosures are not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
Our “Better for All” Report takes a more holistic view of the Company’s value chain and demonstrates accountability for the critical role we play, given our position and scale, to drive change across the food industry. Our plan includes expanding and enhancing our policies and practices related to climate change, waste reduction, food access, safety and wellbeing and diversity and inclusion.
We’re on a mission to make the world a better place, not just for one, but for all. Our key highlights and achievements toward attaining our ambitious long-term goals include the following:
Governance
Board receives regular ESG updates.
Added two new goals in furtherance of our diversity and inclusion strategic plan.
Launched ‘Missions’ platform to promote awareness of our goals and actively promote associate engagement of our ESG programs.
Upstream
Climate targets covering scopes 1, 2 and 3 validated by the Science Based Targets initiative in April 2022.
Launched the UNFI Climate Action Hub, providing tools and resources to our suppliers to help innovate and scale climate solutions across the food system.
Revamped supplier diversity program and hired a new Manager of Supplier Diversity in April 2022.
Operations
Elevated lead safety to SVP role to further enhance our focus on the safety of our associates.
Achieved LEED® Gold certification for Riverside, CA distribution center.
Received a score of 100 on the Human Rights Campaign Foundation’s 2022 Corporate Equality Index and a score of 100 against the Disability Index.
Established Diversity Council and launched six associate-led Belonging and Innovation Groups
Downstream
Launched UNFI Food Equity Project, a program of the UNFI Foundation, which aims to invest in community-led solutions that create more equitable access to fresh, healthy food.
Expansion of relationship with Too Good to Go, an innovative food waste reduction app and the largest business-to-consumer marketplace for surplus food.
Human Capital Management
A major part of our ESG initiatives and key element of our UNFI Pride strategic pillar is creating a diverse and inclusive workplace. Our employees are critical to supporting our values and achieving our strategic vision. We are focused on associate engagement, empowerment and safety to foster innovation and bring best-in-class solutions to our customers and suppliers in an ever-changing retail landscape, including new ways of work scheduling and productivity investments. Our Compensation Committee oversees human capital management matters with a focus on associate wellbeing across a variety of measures.
We discuss our dedication to human capital management, including disclosure of certain diversity metrics, in our 2021 Better for All Report, which can be found on our ESG website, www.betterforall.unfi.com. More information regarding human capital management may be found in our recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K.


15

Diversity and Inclusion
We pledge to promote equity, celebrate diversity, dismantle systemic racism and support justice and inclusion for all. Our Board is diverse in gender and ethnic background, as well as having a broad range of experience. Four out of eleven directors are female, with two members identifying as African American, one member identifying as Asian American, one member identifying as LGBTQ+ and one member identifying as a veteran. We recognize that innovation thrives when there is unity and respect for diverse backgrounds and perspectives. Additionally, we aim to foster a culture of belonging, equity and empathy through open dialogues, educational opportunities and by honoring the experiences and special events that speak to our associates’ many identities. Over the last three years, we are actively working on the following initiatives to promote our pledge of creating an equitable, diverse and inclusive environment for all:
Ongoing member of CEO Action for diversity and inclusion.
Launched six Belonging and Innovation Groups for associates.
Adopted a diverse slate requirement for director candidates in September 2021 to further support diversity among our Board.
Built a diversity and inclusion team and created a diversity and inclusion strategy, including:
Hiring a Vice President of Diversity and Inclusion;
Establishing a diversity council which has taken an active role in advocating for and celebrating diversity;
Providing helpful diversity and inclusion information on our associate platforms, including diversity and inclusion training; and
Implementing a policy to present a diverse candidate slate for all director and above roles.
Matched associate donations to organizations fighting for racial justice and reform, including the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Foundation.
Included discussion of gender, ethnicity, tenure and generation statistics into our year-end performance review discussions for leaders to mitigate against unconscious bias.
Developing Talent
Attracting and retaining talent is one of our top priorities. Our goal is to differentiate ourselves in the market by offering unprecedented flexibility to associates. To reduce turnover, we have an emphasized focus on and commitment to our associates, their experiences and their engagement. As a result, in fiscal 2022 our associate engagement scores improved over the prior year. We are committed to the continued support and development of our associates and provide access to robust leadership development programming, role-based training and other career development opportunities at every stage of an associate’s tenure. Designed to enhance the leadership capabilities of our people, the Emerge program for front-line leaders and the Evolve program for our mid-level managers invite participants from all departments to come together to learn and practice their management skills and identify opportunities to lead more effectively. The Elevate program for director-level and above associates, as well as the Operations Leadership Academy for leaders in our distribution centers, work to solidify our talent pipeline and promote the success of the organization’s future leaders. In addition, we partner with key groups within the organization, such as Sales and Risk & Safety, to develop role-based training to drive greater productivity and safety. We also offer associates additional learning and career development opportunities that extend from skills-based training deployed electronically through our BetterU learning system, to mentorship programs and career development discussions and beyond. We also provide flex-shift and quarterly performance check-ins.
Compensation and Benefits
Our compensation and benefits programs are designed to promote a culture of wellbeing and recognize our associates for their outstanding achievements and dedication to serving our customers and keeping them safe during even the most challenging of times. We are committed to offering market competitive pay programs which reward high levels of performance, and behaviors that challenge convention and drive company success. Our short-term incentive programs model the Company’s financial goals and are intended to align our eligible associates’ rewards with our financial success. Long-term incentives, including restricted stock units and performance awards, are designed to attract and retain innovative leaders and align their financial interests with those of our stockholders and other stakeholders. As part of our commitment to recognize our associates’ “whole self” – health, finances and overall wellbeing – we offer the following benefits to eligible associates:
16

Comprehensive health and welfare benefit program providing a variety of medical, dental and vision options
Revamped employee education assistance program to provide for prepayment rather than reimbursement benefit and to no longer require that the program be related to the associate’s position at UNFI
Voluntary benefits like long-term disability and optional life insurance
No-cost wellness program
Paid time off programs, including parental paid leave
Employee assistance program
401(k) plan
Back-up childcare program
Creating a Safe Environment
Safety is at the forefront of everything we do. We continue to focus on the safety of our associates, customers and communities with enhanced sanitation and increased safety measures. We also have invested in several initiatives, including the development and implementation of a new safety brand and pledge, Every Moment Matters, that is designed to foster a caring culture. We have implemented interactive and proven training programs, which were rolled out across our network, and include ergonomic experts and interactive training. In fiscal 2022, we created a new role and hired a new Senior Vice President, overseeing occupational and food safety. We also cultivate a culture of openness to foster an emotionally safe environment and continue to strive for zero workplace injuries.


17

Proposal 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORSElection of Directors
Directors and Nominees for Director
The Board is currently comprisedconsists of eight directors. Alleleven directors, elected at the annual meeting will be elected for one-year terms.
The termeach of each directorwhose terms will expire at the 2018 annual meeting, unless elected to a new term by our stockholders. Mmes.Annual Meeting.
Mses. Bates, Boyland, Clark and Dufresne and Messrs. Artz, Douglas, Funk, Heffernan,Mohammad, Muehlbauer, Roy and SpinnerStahl have been nominated to stand for election as a directordirectors at the 2017 annual meetingAnnual Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2018 and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each nominee has indicated his or her willingness to continue to serve if elected by our stockholders. If any nominee should be unable to serve, the person acting under the proxy may vote the proxy for a substitute nominee. We have no reason to believe any of the nominees will be unable to serve if elected.
We have describedincluded below information concerning the business experience and qualificationqualifications, and the age as of November 14, 2022, of each of our director nominees.
The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” each of the director nominees. Proxies received by the Board will be voted “FOR” each of the nominees unless a contrary choice is specified in the proxy.

Nominees for Election as Directors for a Term Expiring at the director nominees. Proxies received by the Board will be voted “FOR” each of the nominees unless a contrary choice is specified in the proxy.Next Annual Meeting
artz1114571002.jpg
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS FOR A TERM EXPIRING IN 2018Eric F. Artz
Age: 55
Board Member since October 2015
Compensation Committee Member
Nominating & Governance Committee Member
Eric F.Mr. Artz, age 49, previously served on the Compensation Committee from December 2015 to September 2020. Mr. Artz has served as a memberPresident and Chief Executive Officer, as well as on the board of the Boarddirectors, of Recreational Equipment, Inc. (REI), an American retail and outdoor recreation services corporation, since October 2015. Mr. Artz is a member of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. Mr. Artz hasMay 2019. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Recreational Equipment, Inc. ("REI") sinceREI from August 2014.2014 to May 2019. In addition to this role, Mr. Artz also served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of REI from May 2012 to December 2015. Prior to REI, Mr. Artz served as Chief Financial Officer for Urban Outfitters, Inc. from February 2010 to April 2012. From August 1992 until January 2010, Mr. Artz served in various positions of increasing responsibility at VF Corporation.
Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Artz'sArtz’s professional experience brings valuable knowledge and insight to our Board. The Board values his experience as a Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, which provides him with valuable knowledge and insight regarding operations of retailers as well as the background and experience in overseeing the audits of financial statements, communicating with independent auditors and assisting with the general oversight of accounting and financial reporting processes.
Ann Torre Bates, age 59, has served as a member of the Board since October 2013. Ms. Bates serves as the chair of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Compensation Committee. ann-torrexbatesa.jpg
Ann Torre Bates
Age: 64
Board Member since October 2013
Chair of the Audit Committee
Ms. Bates has served as a member of the board of directors of Ares Capital Corporation since 2010 and currently chairs its Audit Committee. Since September 2022, Ms. Bates has served as a director and member of the audit committee of Ares
18

Strategic Income Fund. She held a directorship at Allied Capital Corporation until it was acquired by Ares Capital Corporation in 2010. Ms. Bates also serves as director or trustee of 17 investment companies in the Franklin Templeton Group of mutual funds.funds, and sits on those audit committees. Ms. Bates was a strategic and financial consultant from 1997 to 2012. From 1995 to 1997, Ms. Bates served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NHP, Inc., a national real estate services firm. Ms. Bates previously served as a member of the board of directors of Navient Corporation from April 2014 to August 2016, and she served on the board of directors of Navient'sNavient’s predecessor, SLM CorporationCorporations, from 1997 to 2014.
Skills and Qualifications: Ms. Bates'Bates’ professional experience and service on other boards brings valuable knowledge and insight to our Board. The Board values her experience serving on audit committees, which providethe Board believes her service on other audit committees provides her with the background and experience in overseeing the audits of financial statements, communicating with independent auditors and assisting with the general oversight of accounting and financial reporting processes.
Denise M. Clark, age 59, hasgloria-robertsxboylandx1x1a.jpg
Gloria R. Boyland
Age: 62
Board Member since January 2021
Audit Committee Member
Nominating & Governance Committee Member
Ms. Boyland is a retired senior executive of the FedEx Corporation, where she served as Corporate Vice President, Operations and Service Support (beginning in 2015). Ms. Boyland led advanced operations technology initiatives, electro mobility, network and fleet automation, service quality and customer experience improvements, and new service offerings for the company. Prior to her tenure at FedEx, Ms. Boyland held leadership positions in various functions at GE Capital Corporation, including Six Sigma Quality, mergers and acquisitions and acquisition integration. She also practiced for eight years as a commercial transactions and investment attorney at GE. Ms. Boyland currently serves on the boards of directors of Vontier Corporation and Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, and previously served as a member of the Board since February 2013.boards of Chesapeake Energy Corporation and UMRF Ventures, Inc. In 2016, Ms. Clark isBoyland was appointed to the U.S. DOT Advisory Committee on Automation in Transportation. Ms. Boyland also served as a memberstrategic advisor of the Audit CommitteeAurora Technologies, LLC.
Skills and NominatingQualifications:Ms. Boyland’s extensive experience leading operational transformation at global companies and Governance Committee. customer service, coupled with her leading-edge, future-focused logistics and supply chain knowledge, make her a valuable addition to our Board.
clark002.jpg
Denise M. Clark
Age: 64
Board Member since February 2013
Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee
Ms. Clark served as Senior Vice President and Global Chief Information Officer for The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. from November 2012 until her retirement in March 2017. Prior to that role, Ms. Clark served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Hasbro Inc. from October 2007 to November 2012. Ms. Clark also served at Mattel, Inc., where she was Global Chief Technology Officer and later Chief Information Officer for the Fisher Price brand between January 2000 and February 2007. Ms. Clark'sClark’s previous experience includes two other consumer goods companies, Warner Music Group, formerly a division of Time Warner Inc., and Apple Inc. Ms. Clark has over 20 years of experience in the delivery of enterprise resource planning, digital platforms and innovative business transformation initiatives. Ms. Clark previously served as a director of Six Flags Entertainment Corporation from August 2021 to August 2022 and as a member of the board of directors of Caesars Entertainment Corporation and as chair of its compensation committee from October 2018 to July 2020.
19

Skills and Qualifications: Ms. Clark'sClark’s extensive background, particularly her expertise involving information technology and transformation initiatives, allows her to provide the Board valuable guidance on our strategic path,initiatives, especially as it relates to information technology solutions.
Daphne J. Dufresnesandy.jpg
J. Alexander Miller Douglas
Age: 61
Board Member since August 2021
UNFI Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Douglas, was appointed as our CEO in August 2021 and most recently served as the Chief Executive Officer of Staples, Inc., age 45,an office retail company, from April 2018 to June 2021, which included leading that company’s business-to-business distribution platform. Prior to Staples, Mr. Douglas served as President of Coca-Cola North America until February 2018, where he led the $10 billion revenue business, encompassing all aspects of its consumer and business-to-business operations. During Mr. Douglas’ 30-year tenure at Coca-Cola, he also served as Global Chief Customer Officer, and held a variety of positions across sales and marketing. Mr. Douglas began his career at The Procter & Gamble Company in sales and sales management positions. Since May 2020, Mr. Douglas has served as a member of the board of directors of Wawa Inc., a leading convenience retailer in the Eastern United States.
Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Douglas’s experience at large public companies, including his extensive experiences leading consumer and business-to-business-to-consumer distribution operations, brings valuable insight to the Board since October 2016. beyond the knowledge and insight he brings from being our Chief Executive Officer.
dufresne002.jpg
Daphne J. Dufresne
Age: 50
Board Member since October 2016
Chair of the Compensation Committee
Ms. Dufresne is a member ofserved on the Audit Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee.Committee until September 2021. Ms. Dufresne has been a Managing Partner of GenNx360 Capital Partners, a venture capital firm that specializes in acquisition, buyouts, and turnaround of underperforming businesses, since January 2017. Ms. Dufresne was previously a Managing Director of RLJ Equity Partners, a private equity


fund, from December 2005 to June 2016. Ms. Dufresne participated in building the RLJ investment team, raising capital to fund its operations and constructing a partnership with The Carlyle Group, a global private equity firm. Prior to that role, Ms. Dufresne was a Venture Partner during 2005 with Parish Capital Advisors, an investment fund for emerging and experienced institutional investors and a Principal from 1999 to 2005 at Weston Presidio Capital, a private equity organization. She also served as Associate Director in 1997 in the Bank of Scotland’sScotland's Structured Finance Group. Ms. Dufresne has been a director of Condor Hospitality Trust, Inc. since June 2015.2015, and was appointed chair in May 2019.
Skills and Qualifications:Ms. Dufresne'sDufresne’s professional experience, including her role as an equity investor for over 23 years, brings valuable knowledge and insight to our Board. Ms. Dufresne is very familiar with conducting due diligence, negotiating purchase and sale agreements and leading the board during these processes. She possesses experience in owning and managing enterprises like our Company and is familiar with corporate finance, strategic business planning activity and general issues involving various types of stockholders.



20


michael-sxfunk002.jpg
Michael S. Funk
Age: 68
Board Member since February 1996
Mr. Funk, age 63, has been a member of the Board since February 1996 and served as Chair of the Board from January 2003 to December 2003, and again from September 2008 to December 2016. Mr. Funk served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from October 2005 to September 2008. Mr. Funk also served as Vice Chair of the Board from February 1996 until December 2002, as our Chief Executive Officer from December 1999 until December 2002 and as our President from October 1996 until December 1999. Until January 1, 2019, Mr. Funk served as an executive advisor to us. From its inception in July 1976 until April 2001, Mr. Funk served as President of Mountain People'sPeople’s Warehouse, Inc., now known as United Natural Foods West, Inc., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Skills and Qualifications:Mr. Funk'sFunk’s extensive knowledge of our industry and our historical operations as well asthrough his past service as our Chief Executive Officer brings to the Board valuable insight into the day-to-day operations of our Company and a deepstrong understanding of the natural and organic products distribution business. His deep institutional knowledge of all operational aspects of our business resulting from his long-time involvement with our Companyand industry is also valuable to the Board.
shamimmohammad.jpg
Shamim Mohammad
Age: 53
Board Member since February 2022
Audit Committee Member
Mr. Mohammad currently serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Information and Technology Officer of CarMax Inc., the largest used car retailer in the United States, third largest wholesaler of used cars in the United States and a leading auto finance company, a position he has held since April 2021. He has held various senior technology roles of increasing responsibility since 2012. Prior to joining CarMax, Mr. Mohammad held information technology leadership roles at BJ’s Wholesale Club Inc., Blockbuster, Inc. and TravelClick, Inc. In 2020, MIT Sloan selected Mr. Mohammad as the recipient of the CIO Leadership Award, which recognizes CIOs who lead their organizations to deliver exemplary levels of business value through the innovative use of technology. Mr. Mohammad is a registered CPA.
James P. HeffernanSkills and Qualifications:, age 71, Mr. Mohammad has strong financial oversight experience and brings with him a wealth of financial expertise. Mr. Mohammad’s proven track record in strategic leadership, development of forward-thinking technology solutions and business transformation make him a valuable addition to our Board.
muehlbauer002.jpg
James L. Muehlbauer
Age: 61
Board Member since April 2019
Audit Committee Member
Compensation Committee Member
Mr. Muehlbauer previously served as a member of the Board since March 2000.Nominating and Governance Committee from May 2019 to September 2020. Mr. Heffernan servesMuehlbauer served as the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer for The Valspar
21

Corporation from 2013 to 2017. Prior to that role, Mr. Muehlbauer served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Best Buy Co., Inc. from 2007 to 2013.
Skills and Qualifications:Mr. Muehlbauer’s extensive finance, commercial and leadership experience with complex, multinational organizations provide him with background and experience in strategic planning, financial oversight, and large-scale business transformations. Mr. Muehlbauer’s knowledge and experience in broad strategic transitions and large-scale integration efforts are a valuable addition to our Board.
peter-axroy004.jpg
Peter A. Roy
Age: 66
Board Member since June 2007
Compensation Committee Member
Nominating & Governance Committee Member
Mr. Roy served as the Lead Independent Director Chair of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Heffernan has served as a Director of Command Security Corp. since October 2010 and as a Director of Jason Industries, Inc. since August 2013. Mr. Heffernan previously served as Vice Chairman and Trustee of the New York Racing Association from November 1998 until 2012, a member of the Board of Directors of Solutia, Inc. from February 2008September 2019 until July 2012, and a member of the Board of Directors of Columbia Gas System, Inc. from January 1993 until November 2000.
The totality of Mr. Heffernan's professional experience, together with his other board service has provided him with the background and experience of board processes, function, compensation practices and oversight of management which is valuable to the Board.
Peter A. Roy, age 61, has served as a member of the Board since June 2007. Mr. Roy serves as Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee.August 2021. Mr. Roy is an entrepreneur and since 1999, Mr. Roy has been a strategic advisor to North Castle Partners. In connection with his roleserved as a strategic advisor to North Castle Partners, a private equity firm focused on healthy living and aging investments. Mr. Roy served on the boards of Avalon Natural Products, Inc.has worked with many iconic brands such as Stonyfield Farms and Naked Juice Company.Applegate. From 1993 to 1998, Mr. Roy served as President of Whole Foods Market, Inc. and, for five years prior to that, served as President of that company's West Coast Region. Since April 2021, Mr. Roy serves on the board of Thrive Acquisition Corp.
Skills and Qualifications:Mr. Roy'sRoy’s experience as the President of Whole Foods Market, Inc. allows him to provide the Board essential insight and guidance into the day-to-day operations of natural and organic products retailers, including a key customer of ours.our largest customer. In addition, his experience in the healthy lifestyle industry provides valuable insights and helps the Board maintain its focus on our core values, including our sustainability goals.
Steven L. Spinner, age 57, hasstahl002.jpg
Jack Stahl
Age: 69
Board Member since June 2019
Independent Chair
Audit Committee Member
Mr. Stahl previously served as a member of the Compensation Committee and as Chair of the Board since December 2016 and as our President and Chief Executive Officer andCompensation Committee from September 2020 to August 2021. Mr. Stahl has served as a member of the Board and the Lead Director of Catalent, Inc., a contract manufacturing and development company for drugs, biologics and consumer health products since September 2008.August 2014. Mr. Spinner alsoStahl served as our Interim President of the Eastern Region from September 2010 to December 2010. Prior to joining the Company in September 2008, Mr. Spinner served as a director and as Chief Executive Officer of Performance Food Group Company ("PFG")Revlon Inc., a multinational cosmetics, skin care, fragrance and personal care company, from October 20062002 until his retirement in 2006. Prior to May 2008, when PFG was acquired by affiliates of The Blackstone Group and Wellspring Capital Management.joining Revlon, Mr. Spinner previously hadStahl served as PFG's President and Chief Operating Officer beginningof The Coca-Cola Company from 2000 to 2001, after previously serving in May 2005.various management positions of increasing responsibility, including Chief Financial Officer, during a tenure with Coca-Cola which began in 1979. Today, Mr. SpinnerStahl also serves on the U.S. board of advisors of CVC Capital, a private equity firm. Additionally, he formerly served as PFG's Senior Vice Presidenton the boards of Advantage Solutions LLC, Schering Plough Corporation, Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Saks, Inc., Coty Inc. and Chief Executive Officer—Broadline Division from February 2002 to May 2005Ahold Delhaize, and as PFG's Broadline Division President from August 2001 to February 2002. was chairman of the board of managers of New Avon LLC.
Skills and Qualifications:Mr. SpinnerStahl has served asextensive leadership and significant Board experience. Mr. Stahl has a Directorlong-term record of ArcBest Corporation since July 2011profit and as its Lead Independent Director since April 2016.
Mr. Spinner's extensivevalue driving performance in both stable and turnaround operating environments; and significant experience with complex, large, and dynamic organizations. At The Coca-Cola Company and Revlon, he gained significant skills and general management experience in the wholesale food distribution business, including having served as the presidentbuilding brands, maximizing customer relationships, and chief executive officerreducing costs.
22



Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors
We adoptedOur Bylaws provide for a majority voting standard for the election of directors asin an amendment to our Bylaws in 2007.uncontested election. If the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected in an election (a contested election), directors will be elected by a plurality standard. However, whenWhen the number of nominees does not exceed the number of directors to be elected (an uncontested election), however, as is the case atfor this year's annual meeting,Annual Meeting, our Bylaws require each of the directors to be elected by a majority of the votes cast (that is, the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of shares voted “against” that director). If a nominee who is serving as a director is not elected at the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, under Delaware law the director would continue to serve on the Board as a "holdover“holdover director." However, under our Bylaws, any director who fails to be elected must offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee would then make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Nominating and Governance Committee'sCommittee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date the election results are certified. The director who offers to tender his or her resignation will not participate in the Board'sBoard’s decision or the Nominating and Governance Committee'sCommittee’s deliberations (if the director is a member of that committee). If a nominee who was not already serving as a director is not elected at the annual meeting, under Delaware law that nominee would not become a director and would not serve on the Board as a "holdover director." All nominees for election as directors at the 2017 annual meetingAnnual Meeting are currently serving on the Board.
Nomination of Directors
The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the qualifications of every person recommended as a nominee to the Board, including potential nominees recommended by our third-party recruiting firm, to determine whether the recommended nominees are qualified to serve on the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee has adopted qualitative standards by which it identifies nominees and determines if nominees are qualified to serve on the Board. Additionally, in September 2021, the Board revised the Corporate Governance Principles to expressly state that any initial list of candidates for a new director appointment shall include qualified diverse candidates. The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates recommended nominees in accordance with the following criteria:
Personal characteristicsCharacteristics.. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers the personal characteristics of each nominee, including the nominee'snominee’s integrity, accountability, ability to make informed judgments, financial literacy, professionalism and willingness to meaningfully contribute to the Board (including by possessing the ability to communicate persuasively and address difficult issues). In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates whether the nominee'snominee’s previous experience reflects a willingness to establish and meet high standards of performance, both for him or herself and for others.
Core CompetenciesCompetencies.. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers whether the nominee'snominee’s knowledge and experience would contribute to the Board's achievement ofBoard possessing certain core competencies. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the Board, as a whole, should possess competencies in accounting and finance, business judgment, management best practices, senior leadership, crisis response, industry knowledge, leadership, strategy and vision.vision, and broad-scale transition and transformation, and it periodically reassesses the specific skill sets that are needed by the Board.
Board IndependenceIndependence.. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers whether the nominee would qualify as "independent"“independent” under SEC rules and NASDAQthe NYSE listing standards.
Director CommitmentCommitment.. The Nominating and Governance Committee expects that each of our directors will prepare for and actively participate in meetings of the Board and its committees, provide advice and counsel to our management,Management, develop a broad knowledge of our business and industry and, with respect to an incumbent director, substantially maintain the expertise that led the Nominating and Governance Committee to initially select the director as a nominee. The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates each nominee on his or her ability to provide this level of commitment if elected to the Board.
Additional ConsiderationsConsiderations.. Each nominee also is evaluated based on the overall needs of the Board and the diversity of experience he or she can bring to the Board, whether in terms of specialized knowledge, skills or expertise. Although we do not have a formal policy with regard toOur Nominating and Governance Committee charter provides for the consideration of gender, race and ethnic diversity in identifying director nominees,when considering Board candidates, and the Committee is committed to maintaining a diverse Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee strives to nominate directors with a variety of complementary skills so that, as a group, the Board will possess the appropriate talent, skills and expertise to oversee our businesses.businesses and add value to strategic plans and initiatives.
Following this evaluation, the Nominating and Governance Committee will ultimately make recommendations for membership on the Board and review such recommendations with the Board, which will decide whether to inviteappoint the candidate to be a nominee for election to the Board.

23



Stockholder Director Nominees Recommended by StockholdersRecommendations and Proxy Access
Stockholder Director Recommendations
The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates nominees recommended by stockholders on the same basis as nominees recommended by any other sources, including making a determinationdetermining whether the candidate is qualified to serve on the Board based on the qualitative standards described above. To behave a nominee considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee, a stockholder who wishesmust follow the procedures in our Bylaws related to recommend a director nomineenominations described under “Other MattersStockholder Proposals for the Next Annual Meeting of Stockholders.” Written notice must deliverbe delivered or sendsent by first class U.S. mail a written notice addressed to Joseph J. Traficanti, Corporate Secretary, United Natural Foods, Inc., 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, RI 02908. Generally, to be timely, the written notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary within the following time periods:
in the case of an annual meeting, no earlier than 120 days and no later than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that if (A) the annual meeting is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date, or (B) no annual meeting was held during the preceding year, to be timely the stockholder notice must be received no later than the tenth day after the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of such meeting is first made, whichever occurs first; and
in the case of a nomination of a person or persons for election to the Board of Directors at a special meeting of the stockholders called for the purpose of electing directors, no earlier than 120 days before such special meeting and no later than 90 days before such special meeting or, if later, the tenth day after the day on which public disclosure of the date of such meeting is first made.Proxy Access
We have also adopted a proxy access rightprovision in our Bylaws that permits a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning, continuously for at least three years, shares of our stock representing an aggregate of at least 3% of the voting power entitled to vote in the election of directors, to nominate and include in our proxy materials director nominees, provided that the stockholder(s), the nominee(s), and the nominee(s)notice satisfy the requirements in our Bylaws. The number of potential proxy access nominees nominated by all eligible stockholders shall not exceed the greater of (A) two or (B) 20% of the directors then in office. Under our Bylaws, to be considered timely, compliant notice of proxy access director nominations must be submitted to thereceived by our Corporate Secretary at the address specified above no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date the Company mailed its proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that if (A) the annual meeting is not within 30 days before or after the anniversary date of the preceding year'syear’s annual meeting, or (B) no annual meeting was held during the preceding year, to be timely the stockholder notice must be received no later than 90120 days prior to such annual meeting or, if later, the tenth day after the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of suchthe annual meeting is first made, whichever occurs first.

The foregoing is a summary of the requirements for stockholders to nominate persons for election to our Board of Directors, which requirements are set out fully in our Bylaws and the foregoing description is qualified by reference to the full text of our Bylaws. You should consult our Bylaws for more detailed information regarding the processes by which stockholders may nominate directors, including the specific requirements regarding the content of the written notices and other related requirements.
Communication with the Board of Directors
Our stockholdersAnyone who would like to communicate with, or otherwise make his or her concerns known directly to, the Board may communicate directly with the Board.do so. All communications should be in written form and directed to Joseph J. Traficanti,our Corporate Secretary, United Natural Foods, Inc., 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, RI 02908. Communications should02908, who will forward such communications to the appropriate party. All correspondence will be enclosed in a sealed envelope that prominently indicates that it is intended forcompiled and summarized by the Board. Each communication intended forCorporate Secretary and periodically submitted to the Board, individual directors or Management, as appropriate. The Corporate Secretary may also forward certain correspondence elsewhere within the Company for review by a subject matter expert and received by the corporate secretary that is related to our operation and is relevant tofor a specific director's service on the Board will be forwarded to the specified party following its clearance through normal review and appropriate security procedures.

response, as appropriate.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
24


Director Compensation
The Board and the Compensation Committee review and determine compensation for our non-employee directors, based in part based on a review of the annual Director Compensation Survey prepared by the National Association of Corporate Directors and other reputable sources, as well as with the input from the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s independent consultant, Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC ("Semler Brossy").based on benchmarking of comparable peer company director compensation. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that we should fairly compensate non-employee directors for work required in a company of our size and scope and that our compensation program for non-employee directors should align the non-employee directors' interests with thebe designed to drive long-term interest ofvalue creation for our stockholders. Our non-employee director stock ownership guidelines, which are discussed in greater detail below, are also designedrequire directors to alignhold a substantial amount of our stock during their tenure as directors, thereby directly aligning the interests of our non-employee directors with those of our stockholders. Mr. Spinner, our Presidentformer CEO, did not, and Chief Executive Officer,Mr. Douglas, our current CEO, does not, receive separate compensation for his service on the Board including in his capacity as Chair of theour Board. Mr. Funk does not receive cash compensation for his service as a director. Mr. Funk receives equity-based compensation for his service to the Company. Mr. Funk receives cash compensation for his service as an executive advisor.
Non-Employee Director Compensation
The components of our non-employee director compensation are annual cash feesretainers and awards of time-based restricted stock units.units (RSUs), which will vest one-year from the date of grant of the award. Each non-employee director is also reimbursed for direct expenses (e.g. travel, hotel, and meals) incurred in connection with his or her attendance at meetings of the Board and its committees.
Each    In September 2021, the Compensation Committee amended the Director compensation to reflect the shift to an Independent Chair-based leadership structure. After reviewing the Independent Chair compensation for our peer companies and certain other benchmark data, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, an additional annual cash retainer for the Independent Chair. Further, in December 2021, the Compensation Committee, after reviewing certain benchmarking information and in consideration of when the Board last approved an increase, recommended, and the Board approved, an increase in the annual cash retainer for non-employee directors of $10,000. Accordingly, non-employee director who served during fiscal 2017 received the following compensation (as applicable):is as follows:
Annual cash retainer of:
$52,000 for serving as the Lead Independent Director (without duplication for serving as director);
$30,000100,000 for serving as a director;
$15,000100,000 for serving as Independent Chair;
$30,000 for serving as the chair of the Audit Committee;
$8,00020,000 for serving as chair of the Compensation Committee; and
$8,00020,000 for serving as chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee.
Quarterly cash retainer of:
$6,500 per quarter for serving as a director in lieu of separate meeting fees;
Annual equity grants of restricted stock unitsRSUs having a value, based on the stock price on the date of grant, of (without duplication):
$162,000$162,000 for serving as a director;director.
$190,000 for serving as chairAdditionally, in September 2021, the Compensation Committee and Board approved payments to certain of the Audit Committee;Company’s Directors for chair and
$236,000 for serving as Lead Independent Director
With respect member service on the CEO Succession Planning Committee to equity awards to non-employee directors in fiscal 2017, one halfreflect the special nature of the annual grant vest immediatelyCommittee and the remaining half veststime and effort involved, as follows: $25,000 for service as a chair, $10,000 for service as a member on the six month anniversaryCommittee and $20,000 for continuing members. In addition, the Compensation Committee and Board determined that additional payments of $10,000 for one Board member, and $15,000 for another Board member, should be made given the date of grant.
Compensation of Mr. Funk
Mr. Funk, our former Chair of theextended service, time and effort expended by these two individuals in their capacities as Board and former President and Chief Executive Officer, serves as an executive advisor to us and makes himself generally available to our executive officers. We pay him a base salary and provide him with the health and welfare benefits and other employee benefits generally available to our executives. Mr. Funk's base salary during fiscal 2017 was $134,100. Mr. Funk does not receive any cash compensation for serving as a director. During fiscal 2017, Mr. Funk received an equity grant of restricted stock units having a value of $365,000, or 9,230 restricted stock units, of which one half vested immediately and the remaining half vestedmembers on the six month anniversary of the date of grant.nearly year-long CEO succession and search process.
We are currently a party to a severance agreement with Mr. Funk. The severance agreement includes confidentiality, non-competition and intellectual property assignment provisions. For a period of one year following either his termination for a reason other than Cause, death or disability, or his resignation for Good Reason, the agreement requires us to pay to Mr. Funk his base salary in effect as of the termination date of his employment and provide certain medical benefits. In the event of either Mr. Funk's termination for a reason other than Cause, death or disability or his resignation for Good Reason within one year of a Change in Control, he will be entitled to the severance payments and medical benefits provided in the previous sentence, and acceleration and full vesting of all unvested stock options and restricted stock units. For purposes of Mr. Funk's severance arrangement, the terms "Cause", "Good Reason" and "Change in Control" have the meanings set forth below.
"Cause" means (1) conviction of the executive under applicable law of any felony or any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, (2) unauthorized acts intended to result in the executive's personal enrichment at the material expense of the Company


or its reputation, or (3) any violation of the executive's duties or responsibilities to the Company which constitutes willful misconduct or dereliction of duty, or material breach of the confidentiality and non-competition restrictions contained in the severance agreement.
"Good Reason" means, without the executive's express written consent, the occurrence of any one or more of the following: (1) the assignment of the executive to duties materially adversely inconsistent with his current duties, and failure to rescind such assignment within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice from the executive; (2) a relocation more than 50 miles from the Company's offices in Providence, Rhode Island; (3) a reduction by the Company in the executive's base salary, or the failure of the Company to pay or cause to be paid any compensation or benefits under the severance agreement when due or under the terms of any plan established by the Company, and failure to restore such base salary or make such payments within five days of receipt of notice from the executive; (4) failure to include the executive in any new employee benefit plans proposed by the Company or a material reduction in the executive's level of participation in any existing plans of any type; provided that a Company-wide reduction or elimination of such plans shall not give rise to a "Good Reason" termination; or (5) the failure of the Company to obtain a satisfactory agreement from any successor to the Company with respect to the ownership of substantially all the stock or assets of the Company to assume and agree to perform the severance agreement.
"Change in Control" means the happening of any of the following:
any "person", including a "group" (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, but excluding the Company, any of its affiliates, or any employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its affiliates) is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13(d)(3) under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing the greater of 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities;
approval by the stockholders of the Company of a definitive agreement (1) for the merger or other business combination of the Company with or into another corporation if (A) a majority of the directors of the surviving corporation were not directors of the Company immediately prior to the effective date of such merger or (B) the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to the effective date of such merger own less than 60% of the combined voting power in the then outstanding securities in such surviving corporation or (2) for the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or
the purchase of 30% or more of the Company's stock pursuant to any tender or exchange offer made by any "person", including a "group" (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), other than the Company, any of its affiliates, or any employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its affiliates.
Deferred Compensation
Our non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the United Natural Foods, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Deferred Compensation Plan") and, prior to being frozen with respect to new deferrals in January 2007, the United Natural Foods, Inc. Deferred Stock Plan (the "Deferred Stock Plan", collectively, the "Deferral Plans"). For a description of the Deferral Plans, please see EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation—Fiscal 2017.
Director Compensation Table—Fiscal 20172022
The following table summarizes compensation provided to our former Chair of the Board (Mr. Funk) and each individual who served as a non-employee director during fiscal 2017.


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION2022.
25

Name 
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)(1)
 
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 
Option
Awards
($)(3)
 
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)(4)
 
All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
 Total ($)
Eric F. Artz 56,000
 162,000
 
 
 
 218,000
Ann Torre Bates 71,000
 190,000
 
 
 

261,000
Denise M. Clark 56,000
 162,000
 
 19,555
 
 237,555
Daphne J. Dufresne 57,000
 203,000
 
 
 
 260,000
Michael S. Funk 
 365,000
 
 
 134,100
 499,100
Gail A. Graham (6) 28,000
 
 
 
 
 28,000
James P. Heffernan 86,000
 236,000
 
 
 
 322,000
Peter A. Roy 64,000
 162,000
 
 
 
 226,000
(1)This column shows the amount of cash compensation earned in fiscal 2017 for service on the Board and its committees.
(2)The amounts contained in this column represent the grant date fair value for the restricted stock units (including those which are not yet vested) granted in fiscal 2017 calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718, Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). The grant date fair value for restricted stock units is calculated using the intrinsic value method based on the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant. At July 29, 2017, no director other than Mr. Spinner had any unvested restricted stock units outstanding.
(3)At July 29, 2017, the directors had options to purchase the following number of shares of common stock: Mr. Artz—none; Ms. Bates—none; Ms. Clark—none; Ms. Dufresne—none; Mr. Funk—12,625 shares; Ms. Graham—none; Mr. Heffernan—14,630 shares; and Mr. Roy—14,630 shares.
(4)As of July 29, 2017, two of our non-employee directors, Ms. Clark and Mr. Heffernan have elected to defer restricted stock units under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferred shares are valued at the current market price of our common stock, and therefore have no above market or preferential earnings. As of July 29, 2017, Ms. Clark is the only director to defer a portion of director fees paid in cash under the Deferred Compensation Plan. For fiscal 2017, Ms. Clark deferred $56,000 of her fees payable in cash.
(5)The amount in this column represents the amount of cash compensation that Mr. Funk earned in fiscal 2017 in his capacity as our executive advisor. Mr. Funk does not receive any cash compensation for serving as a director.
(6)Gail A. Graham was not nominated to stand for re-election at our 2016 annual meeting.
Director Compensation
Name
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)(1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
Option
Awards
($)(3)
Total ($)
Eric F. Artz98,322 162,000 — 260,322 
Ann Torre Bates128,322 162,000 — 290,322 
Gloria R. Boyland(4)
108,322 282,279 — 390,601 
Denise M. Clark(5)
158,322 162,000 — 320,322 
Daphne J. Dufresne121,202 162,000 — 283,202 
Michael S. Funk(5)
118,322 162,000 — 280,322 
Shamim Mohammad(6)
65,833 — — 65,833 
James L. Muehlbauer(5)
108,322 162,000 — 270,322 
Peter A. Roy(5)
108,322 162,000 — 270,322 
Jack Stahl(5)
219,844 162,000 — 381,844 
(1)This column shows the amount of cash compensation earned in fiscal 2022 for service on the Board and its committees.
(2)The amounts contained in this column represent the grant date fair value for the RSUs granted in fiscal 2022 calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718, Stock Compensation (ASC 718). The grant date fair value for RSUs is calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.
(3)As of July 30, 2022, no directors held options to purchase shares of common stock. As of July 30, 2022, each director held 3,500 unvested RSUs, other than Ms. Boyland, who held 6,099 unvested RSUs and Mr. Mohammad, who was not a member of our Board at the time of the fiscal 2022 annual grant, and therefore did not receive a grant in fiscal 2022.
(4)Ms. Boyland was appointed to the Board in January 2021. Accordingly, this grant amount is reflective of proration of the annual equity award for Ms. Boyland’s service as a director for the service period prior to the grant date. Additionally, Ms. Boyland received a payment of $10,000 for her service as a member on the ad hoc CEO Succession Planning Committee, which was approved and paid during the first quarter of fiscal 2022.
(5)Includes the following additional compensation for services on the ad hoc CEO Succession Planning Committee, which was approved and paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2022: Ms. Clark received a payment of $40,000 for her service as a member and chair of the Committee, Mr. Funk received a payment of $20,000 for his service as a member of the Committee, and Messrs. Muehlbauer, Roy and Stahl received payments of $10,000 of their service as members of the Committee.
(6)Mr. Mohammad joined the Board in February 2022 and did not receive a grant of equity for fiscal 2022.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
All non-employee directors and Mr. Funk, are required to hold shares of our stock in an amount that is determined in accordance with the requirements of our stock ownership guidelines. The guidelines provide that each of our non-employee directors must acquire and hold shares of our common stock valued at threefive times the annual and quarterly cash retainer, not including supplemental retainers for committee leadership. Our stock ownership guidelines require that each new non-employee director is expected to comply with the policy by the end of the later of the fifth year after (i) the guidelines were adopted or (ii) he or she becomes a member of the Board. Once attained, each non-employee directorCompliance with the guidelines is required to maintain this level of stock ownershiptested once per year for as long as the director serves on the Board. When calculating whether a director owns a sufficient number of shares under these guidelines, shares owned in a deferred compensation plan are included in the number of shares owned, as are shares of vestedVested and unvested restricted stock and restrictedRSUs are also included in ownership. In March 2022, we updated our stock units subject onlyownership guidelines to time-based vesting restrictions. Unvestedexclude vested stock options doand stock appreciation rights in calculating compliance. Pursuant to our stock ownership guidelines and insider trading policy, Directors are not count. Allallowed to hedge their interests in the stock held. Given the sustained decline in our stock price at the level specified in our stock ownership guidelines for 18 months, the five-year accumulation period was reset for our directors as of August 1, 2020, in accordance with the terms of the guidelines, and they will be required to accumulate shares to reach the required ownership level by the end of that accumulation period. As of July 30, 2022, each of our directors arewas in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines.compliance.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The current members of the Compensation Committee are Ms. Bates and Messrs. Artz and Heffernan. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing standards and no member is an employee or former employee of the Company. During fiscal 2017, no member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship requiring disclosure under "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below. During fiscal 2017, none of our executive officers served


as a director or a member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director on the Board or as a member of the Compensation Committee.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Review and Approval of Related PersonParty Transactions
We reviewPursuant to our Related Party Transaction Policy, our Nominating and Governance Committee reviews all relationships and transactions in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a participant if a “related party” will have a direct or indirect material interest and the amount involved or expected to be involved in any fiscal year exceeds $120,000. The transaction will not be approved unless, after a consideration of all relevant circumstances, the Committee determines that the transaction is in the best interests of the Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee reports any transaction that has been approved to the Audit Committee and the full Board. For purposes of this policy, “related parties” include our directors, nominees for director,
26

executive officers, greater than 5% beneficial owners, or any of their immediate family members are participants (or(as defined in the policy, which includes additional family members beyond the SEC’s related person disclosure rules) or any entity in which they have an interesta material interest. Among the factors that must be considered in making the determination of whether the transaction is a participant), to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect materialappropriate are: the nature of the related party’s interest in the relationships or transactions. Our legal department, in conjunction withtransaction; the corporate finance departmentmaterial terms of the transaction, including whether the terms of the transaction are fair to the Company and outside legal counsel, is primarily responsible for the development and implementation of processes and controls to obtain information from these "related persons" regarding such transactions and relationships and for determining, based on the facts and circumstances and SEC regulations, whether we orsame basis as would apply if the transaction did not involve a related person hasparty; the significance of the transaction to the related party and the Company; whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a directdirector or indirect material interestexecutive officer to act in the transaction. Thebest interests of the Company; compliance with applicable law; and any other factors deemed appropriate by our Nominating and Governance Committee also reviews this information. Our policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of transactions that are required by SEC rules to be reported under Transactions with Related Persons are not in writing, rather, they fall under the general responsibilities of our corporate finance department and Nominating and Governance Committee. We require any related party transactions to be on terms no less favorable to the Company than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties. As required under SEC regulations, transactions between us and any related personinvolving amounts in excess of $120,000 in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000we are a participant and as to which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest are disclosed in this proxy statement.
Each of our executive officers, directors and nominees for director is required to complete and deliver to us an annual questionnaire that includes, among other things, a request for information relating to any transactions in which both the(i) any executive officer, director, nominee, beneficial owner or any of their respective immediate family members or affiliates, on the one hand, and (ii) the Company or any of its subsidiaries, on the other hand, participates, and in which the executive officer, director, nominee, beneficial owner or immediate family member, has a material interest.participates. We review the responses to these questionnaires as part of our process for determining whether disclosure is required to be made under the SEC'sSEC’s related person disclosure rules.
Transactions with Related Persons Based on such responses, there are no related person transactions to report.
One
27


Mr. Spinner has a minority interest in a private equity fund that is managed by his brother that owns a minority interest in two of the Company's suppliers. Consolidated annual purchases from the suppliers for fiscal 2017 were approximately $0.6 million. We do not believe that Mr. Spinner has a material direct or indirect financial interest in these relationships. Supplier terms are the same as other suppliers with whom we have similar purchase volumes.


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTAudit Committee Report
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is comprisedconsists solely of independent directors, as defined by NASDAQthe NYSE listing standards and Section 10A of the Exchange Act and SEC rules thereunder, and it operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.Board. The composition of the Audit Committee, the attributes of its members and its responsibilities, as reflected in its charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter on an annual basis. A copy of the Audit Committee'sCommittee’s current charter can be found in the Investors section of our website, www.unfi.com. The Board has made a determinationdetermined that the Audit Committee has fourall members Ms. Bates, the Chair of the Audit Committee are financially literate and Ms. Dufresne and Messrs. Artz and Heffernan, that qualifyBates qualifies as an "audit“audit committee financial expert"expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations, and that have accounting and related financial management expertise in accordance with NASDAQ listing standards. All committee members are financially literate.regulations.
The Audit Committee has prepared the following report on its activities with respect to the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 29, 201730, 2022 (for purposes of this report, the "audited“audited financial statements"statements” or “consolidated financial statements”). The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this report by reference in the specified filing.
As part of its specificdelineated duties, the Audit Committee reviews the Company'sCompany’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors;Board; reviews the financial information issued to stockholders and others, including a discussion of the quality, and not only the acceptability, of our accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of discussions in the financial statements; and monitors our systems of internal control over financial reporting and the audit process. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, and disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensuredrive compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Management also is responsible for objectively reviewing and evaluating the adequacy, effectiveness and quality of our own systems of internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, is responsible for performing an independent integrated audit of the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and expressing an opinion as to whether the consolidated financial statements conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America(GAAP) and as to whether the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee has met and held discussions with managementManagement and our independent registered public accounting firm.KPMG LLP. In our discussions, managementManagement has represented to the Audit Committee that the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.GAAP. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with managementManagement and KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm.LLP. The Audit Committee meets with our internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm,KPMG LLP, with and without managementManagement present, to discuss the results of their examinations, the evaluations of the Company'sCompany’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company'sCompany’s financial reporting.
The Audit Committee held sixfour formal meetings in fiscal 2017. These meetings included quarterly pre-earnings release telephone conference calls.2022. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firmKPMG LLP all matters required to be discussed in accordance with auditing standards, including the statement on Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees.
The Company's independent registered public accounting firmKPMG LLP has also provided to the Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant'saccountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has considered and discussed with KPMG LLP the firm'sfirm’s independence and the compatibility of any non-audit services provided by the firm with its independence.
Based on the Audit Committee'sCommittee’s review of the audited financial statements and the review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited financial statements in the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 29, 2017,30, 2022, for filing with the SEC. The Board has approved this recommendation.
Ann Torre Bates, Chair
Eric F. ArtzGloria R. Boyland
Denise M. ClarkShamim Mohammad
Daphne J. DufresneJames L. Muehlbauer
James P. HeffernanJack Stahl
    
28


Executive Officers of the Company
Our executive officers are elected on an annual basis and serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors.Board. Our executive officers and their ages as of November 3, 201714, 2022 are listed below:
NameAgePosition
J. Alexander (Sandy) Miller Douglas61Chief Executive Officer
John W. Howard53Chief Financial Officer
Danielle Benedict50Chief Human Resources Officer
Eric A. Dorne62Chief Operating Officer (retired effective October 29, 2022)
Matthew Echols50Chief Corporate Affairs Officer
Mahrukh Hussain50General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Louis Martin52Chief Strategy and Transformation Officer
Michael C. Stigers64Chief Executive Officer, Cub
NameAgePosition
Steven L. Spinner57President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Michael P. Zechmeister50Chief Financial Officer
Sean F. Griffin58Chief Operating Officer
Danielle Benedict45Chief Human Resource Officer
Eric A. Dorne57Chief Administrative and Information Officer
Paul S. Green54President, Pacific Region
John M. Hummel46President, Central Region
Craig H. Smith59Senior Vice President, Fresh Sales
Christopher P. Testa4752President Atlantic Region
Joseph J. Traficanti66Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary
We have included below information concerning the business experience and qualifications of each of our executive officers, except Mr. Douglas whose business experience and qualifications are described above in the section “Proposal 1—Election of Directors.”
Steven L. SpinnerJohn W. Howard has served as Chair of the Board since December 2016 and as our President andwas appointed Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer and as a member of the Board since September 2008.in February 2020. Mr. Spinner alsoHoward previously served as our Interim President of the Eastern Region from September 2010 to December 2010. Prior to joining the Company in September 2008, Mr. Spinner served as a director and as Chief Executive Officer of Performance Food Group Company ("PFG") from October 2006 to May 2008, when PFG was acquired by affiliates of The Blackstone Group and Wellspring Capital Management. Mr. Spinner previously had served as PFG's President and Chief Operating Officer beginning in May 2005. Mr. Spinner served as PFG's Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer-Broadline Division from February 2002 to May 2005 and as PFG's Broadline Division President from August 2001 to February 2002. Mr. Spinner has served as a Director of ArcBest Corporation since July 2011 and as its Lead Independent Director since April 2016.
Michael P. Zechmeister has served as our Chief Financial Officer since October 2015.from August 2019 to February 2020. Mr. Zechmeister, previously servedHoward joined us in July 2019 as Senior Vice President, from September 2015 to October 2015.Finance. Prior to joining us,that, Mr. ZechmeisterHoward served in a variety of senior finance roles over a span of 25 years with General Mills, Inc., including most recently as Vice President, Finance at Yoplait USAInterim Chief Financial Officer for Prime Therapeutics from 2012July 2018 to September 2015. In addition,May 2019. From August 2014 to July 2017, Mr. ZechmeisterHoward was Vice President, Corporate Finance for Valspar Corporation leading the global accounting, tax, treasury, regional CFOs and Treasurer from 2010 to 2012, Vice President, Finance US Retail Sales from 2007 to 2010corporate financial planning and Vice President, Finance, Pillsbury Division from 2005 to 2007.
Sean F. Griffin has served as our Chief Operating Officer since September 2014. Mr. Griffin previously served as our Senior Vice President, Group President from June 2012 to September 2014 and as our Senior Vice President, National Distribution from January 2010 to June 2012.analysis. Prior to joining us,that, Mr. Griffin was East Region Broadline PresidentHoward held a number of PFG. Previously he served as President of PFG in Springfield, MA from 2003 until 2008. Hefinance and tax roles at Celanese Corporation and Reichhold, Inc. Mr. Howard began his career as a tax consultant with Sysco Corporation in 1986Arthur Anderson and has held various leadership positions in the foodservice distribution industry with U.S. Foodservice, Alliant FoodservicePricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Howard holds a Bachelor of Science and Sysco Corporation.Master of Accounting, Tax, both from University of Virginia.
Danielle Benedictwas appointed as our Chief Human Resource Officer in September 2017. Ms. Benedict previously served as our Senior Vice President, Human Resources from May 2016 to September 2017 and as our National Vice President, Human Resources from August 2014 to May 2016 and Director, Compensation & Benefits from April 2013 to August 2014. Prior to joining us, Ms. Benedict was Vice President, Human Resources & Leadership Development at Clean Harbors Environmental Services from 2007 to 2013. She began her career with Dunkin Brands, Inc. in 1999. Since September 2022, Ms. Benedict serves on the board of The Food Project, a non-profit organization.
Eric A. Dorne hasserved as our Chief Operating Officer from March 2020 until his retirement on October 29, 2022. He also served as our Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Information Officer sincefrom September 2016.2016 to March 2020. Mr. Dorne previously served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer from September 2011 to September 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Dorne was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., the parent company of the A&P, Pathmark, SuperFresh, Food Emporium and Waldbaum'sWaldbaum’s supermarket chains located in the Eastern United States from January 2011 to August 2011, and Vice President and Chief Information Officer from August 2005 to January 2011. In his more than 30 years at The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Mr. Dorne held various executive positions including Vice President of Enterprise IT Application Management and Development, Vice President of Store Operations Systems and Director of Retail Support Services.
Paul S. GreenMatthew Echols has served as our Chief Corporate Affairs Officer since March 2022. Prior to joining us, Mr. Echols served as Global Vice President for Public Affairs, Communications and Sustainability at The Coca-Cola Company. Mr. Echols held several positions during his 24 years at Coca-Cola including Senior Vice President of Public Affairs, Communications and Sustainability for North America from 2015 to 2019, and from 2019-2021 a similar role in Asia Pacific based in Singapore. Before joining Coca-Cola, Mr. Echols worked on Capitol Hill for several members of the U.S. Congress. He holds a master’s degree in marketing communications from Johns Hopkins University’s Carey Business School, where he currently serves on the Dean’s Advisory Board, and a bachelor’s degree from the University of West Georgia.
Mahrukh Hussain has served as our President, Pacific RegionGeneral Counsel and Corporate Secretary since August 2016. Mr. Green previously served as our Senior Vice President, Operations from June 2014 to August 2016 and Vice President, Operations from May 2010 to June 2014. Prior to


joining us, Mr. Green was Vice President of Sales for PFG-Springfield, MA from 2008 until 2010 and Vice President of Operations for PFG-Springfield, MA from 2005 until 2008. Mr. Green held various other leadership positions in his ten years at PFG. He began his career with Fleming Foods and held several positions over 16 years. 
John M. Hummel has served as our President, Central Region, since August 2016. Mr. Hummel previously served as our Vice President of Distribution, Central Region, from May 2013 until July 2016.2022. Prior to joining us, he was CorporateMs. Hussain served as Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial and Privacy Officer for McDonald’s Corporation since January 2022. During her tenure with McDonald’s, Ms. Hussain held a range of Operations for Reinhart FoodService, LLC, a division of Reyes Holdings, LLC,legal positions with increasing responsibility. She served as the Interim Global General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from 2005October 2020 until 2013. In his 24 years at Reinhart, he held other key divisional leadership roles, including Director of Physical Distribution for their largest location in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He began his career with Walter's Food Service, Inc., in 1987 and has held various leadership positions in other large scale foodservice distribution organizations such as PepsiCo Food Systems/AmeriServe and Institution Food House.April 2021. From July
29

Craig H. SmithTable of Contents
2013 through October 2020, Ms. Hussain served as McDonald’s U.S. General Counsel; from May 2011 through May 2013 she served as the Europe General Counsel; from February 2009 through May 2011 she served as the Central Division General Counsel; and from December 2000 through February 2009 she served as Managing Counsel/Senior Counsel/Counsel U.S. Real Estate Practice Groups. Prior to working with McDonald’s, she was an Associate at the law firm of Schwartz, Cooper, Greenberger, and Krauss and served one year as a judicial clerk for Justice Rita Garman. Ms. Hussain holds a bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the University of Chicago and a J.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Louis Martin has served as our Senior Vice President, Fresh SalesChief Strategy and Transformation Officer since August 2016. Mr. Smith previously served as our Senior Vice President, National Sales and Service from September 2013 to July 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Smith served as our President of the Eastern Region from December 2010 to August 2013.March 2022. Prior to joining us, Mr. Smith was Atlantic RegionMartin served as President of U.S. Foodservice, a leading broadline foodservice distributor of national, private label, and signature brand items in the United States from May 2008 to December 2010. InGlobal Walmart Customer Team at The Coca-Cola Company since April 2016. Mr. Martin held several positions during his 1715 years at U.S. Foodservice, Mr. Smith held various executive positionsCoca-Cola including Senior Vice President Street Sales,of System Evolution for Coca-Cola North Region Zone President, Detroit Market President and Boston Market President.America (May 2014-April 2016). Prior to U.S. Foodservice,working with Coca-Cola, Mr. Smith heldMartin was with McKinsey & Company and previously with E.D. & F. Man, a British Sugar Trade House. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in English from Princeton University as well as an MBA in Finance and Management from the Stern School of Business at New York University.
Michael C. Stigers has served as the Chief Executive Officer, Cub and Executive Vice President of UNFI since 2019. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President of UNFI Fresh and CEO of Cub Foods, Minnesota’s largest retail grocery chain, since November 2018. Prior to its acquisition by UNFI, Mr. Stigers served as Supervalu’s Executive Vice President of Wholesale Supply Chain Services and Logistics since 2016. Mr. Stigers prior experience included serving as President of Shaw’s / Star Markets; Regional Vice President of Sterilox Fresh, a food safety company; and Chief Operating Officer of PW Supermarkets. Mr. Stigers began his grocery career as a part-time courtesy clerk at Safeway and has been active in several positions at foodservice industry manufacturertrade associations, including the California Grocers Association, past president of Western Association of Food Chains, and distributor Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. from 1982 until 1993.immediate past Chair of National Grocers Association.
Christopher P. Testa has served as our President, Atlantic RegionUnited Natural Foods, Inc. since August 2016.1, 2018. In March 2020, Mr. Testa assumed additional oversight of supplier services, professional services, our Brands+ business, and our Canadian business. From August 2016 to August 2018, he served as our President, Atlantic Region. Mr. Testa previously served as President, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, from September 2012 to August 2016 and President, Blue Marble Brands, from August 2009 until August 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Testa served as Vice President of Marketing for Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages from August 2002 to May 2005 and as CEO of Wild Waters, Inc. from May 2005 to August 2009.
Joseph J. Traficanti
30

has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary since April 2009. Prior to joining us, Mr. Traficanti served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate SecretaryTable of PFG from November 2004 until April 2009.Contents
Executive Compensation



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview
In this section, we describe the principles, policies and practices that formedform the basis for our executive compensation program in fiscal 2017 and explain how they were applied to the Named Executive Officers. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis presents historical and current information and analysis related to the compensation programs for theour Named Executive Officers and is not necessarily indicative of the compensation that the Named Executive Officers will receive from us(NEOs) in the future.fiscal 2022, as well as changes we have made for fiscal 2023. For purposes of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the following individuals were our Named Executive OfficersNEOs for fiscal 2017:2022:
Chief Executive Officer (J. Alexander (Sandy) Miller Douglas);
Chief Financial Officer (John W. Howard);
Chief Operating Officer (Eric A. Dorne);
Chief Executive Officer, Cub (Michael C. Stigers);
President (Christopher P. Testa);
Former Chief Executive Officer and Board Chairman (Steven L. Spinner); and
Former Chief FinancialLegal Officer, (Michael P. Zechmeister);General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (Jill E. Sutton).
Chief Operating Officer (Sean F. Griffin);Our compensation policies and programs are designed to support the achievement of our strategic business plans by motivating, retaining and attracting exceptional talent to develop and execute our key objectives. Our ability to compete effectively in the marketplace depends on the knowledge, capabilities and integrity of our leaders. Our compensation programs help create a high-performance, outcome-driven and principled culture by holding leaders accountable for delivering results, developing our employees and exemplifying our core values. In addition, we believe our compensation policies and programs for leaders and employees are appropriately balanced and incentivize the achievement of short- and long-term results, and therefore drive behavior that is aligned with our overall objectives of delivering long-term growth and stockholder value for UNFI.
Chief AdministrativeIn fiscal 2022, we adopted further changes in our executive compensation policies to reflect best practices and Information Officer (Eric A. Dorne);in response to stockholder input. We proactively sought the views of our stockholders through our annual stockholder engagement program and adopted changes that responded to stockholder feedback. As further described below, we continue to value and respond to the preferred practices and guidelines of our stockholders on executive compensation, including the feedback received in our engagement conversations.
President, Pacific Region (Paul S. Green).
Business and Performance Highlights
UNFI is a leading distributor of grocery and non-food products, and support services provider to retailers in the United States and Canada. We believe we are uniquely positioned to provide the broadest array of products and services to customers throughout North America. We are a coast-to-coast distributor with customers in all 50 states as well as all ten provinces in Canada, making us a desirable partner for retailers and consumer product manufacturers. We believe our total product assortment and service offerings are unmatched by our wholesale competitors. We plan to continue to pursue new business opportunities with independent retailers that operate diverse formats, regional and national chains, as well as international customers with wide-ranging needs.
Fiscal 2022 was another strong year for UNFI as we continued to leverage our scale and extensive customer offering to deliver full-year results that were at, or above, our initial expectations. We appointed a new CEO, Sandy Douglas, early in the year, and during the year, added several new executive roles focused on driving our Fuel the Future strategy and the six underlying pillars that we believe will drive growth in the years to come. We continued to put the safety and welfare of our associates at the forefront of everything we do. We also issued our 2021 ESG Report that includes an update on our progress against our ambitious goals meant to make the world, our communities, and our people better.
31

Key Business Highlights from Fiscal 2022
Net sales of approximately $29 billion; 7.3% growth from the prior year.
Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (adjusted EBITDA) of $829 million; 7.7% growth from the prior year. (See Annex B for reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to the most comparable GAAP metric).
Net debt reduction of $174 million in fiscal 2022.
Mr. Douglas added several new strategic executive roles to support execution of our strategy, which is designed to make our customers stronger, our supply chain better, and our food solutions more inspired.
Opened and commenced operations at our new Allentown, PA distribution center.
Disclosed the addition of two new goals aimed at enhancing our diversity and inclusion initiatives in our 2021 Better for All Report and reported progress of our other human capital management initiatives around wellness, financial wellbeing and flexibility.
Science-based emissions reduction targets validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.
Elevated our safety lead to SVP role in our effort of continued focus on the safety of our associates.
performancechartsimageproxa.jpg
Note: During fiscal 2022, the Company revised its definition of Adjusted EBITDA to exclude the impact of non-cash LIFO charges or benefits. Prior periods have been revised to conform to the current year presentation.
Say on Pay Vote, Investor Engagement and Responsive Action
Our annual say-on-pay vote is one of our opportunities to understand stockholder perspectives regarding our executive compensation program. At our annual meeting of stockholders in January 2022, we submitted a proposal to our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation for our NEOs, and 92.6% of our stockholders voted for that proposal, as compared to 60.2% in January 2021, which we believe reflects our responsiveness to the feedback we heard through engagement in connection with and following our January 2021 annual meeting. In response to that feedback, we made several changes to our compensation program for fiscal 2022, as described below.
In fiscal 2022, we conducted our fifth annual stockholder outreach program, and we met with stockholders representing more than 50% of our outstanding common stock over the summer of 2022. In addition to discussing our Say on Pay results and our executive compensation program generally, we shared relevant information and solicited feedback from our stockholders on our corporate governance practices, including recent changes, our business priorities, our Fuel the Future strategy and our robust ESG program, including our Better for All campaign. See “Corporate Governance—Stockholder Engagement” for discussions of governance actions we took in response to these conversations.
In recent years, we have made several changes to our executive compensation programs in response to our investor engagement activities. Overall, the investors we met with viewed the changes we have made to our compensation program and governance program and practices positively, which is reflected in our 92.6% favorable vote at our 2022 annual meeting. Based on the feedback we heard with respect to our Say on Pay vote results at our last annual meeting, we believe the results were driven by our demonstrated responsiveness to stockholder feedback on our program and practices following our 2021 annual meeting, which include the following changes:
32

WHAT WE HEARDWHAT WE DID
Viewed special severance arrangements with departing executive officers entered into in fiscal 2020 as problematic
We have entered into severance agreements with limited terms (three years) and other policies and programs that specify the benefits payable to executive officers upon a separation of employment, which have been fully disclosed to our stockholders
Did not enter into an employment agreement with our new CEO, whose terms and conditions of employment generally align with those in place for our other executive officers and plan participants, except as specifically disclosed with respect to retirement years of service and multiples for severance and change in control payments
No employment agreements, and no intention of entering into any special employment agreements, with any of our NEOs
Preference for performance-based, at-risk compensation
Beginning in fiscal 2022, equity grants are more heavily weighted to performance at 60% performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs) and 40% RSUs (compared to 50%/50% in prior years)
Add second metric to short-term incentive (STI) plan aligned to strategic priorities
Added Net Sales metric to STI plan, which, balanced with the existing adjusted EBITDA metric, aligns with our strategy to grow sales profitably
Continue to align long-term incentive plan metrics with strategic priorities
Removed leverage metric given significant progress on this metric in recent years and long-term nature of the target, reweighted adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC metrics
Consider the addition of ESG-related metrics in compensation programs
Evaluating and tracking various ESG-related metrics to better understand our data and identify appropriate metrics
Consideration of the dilutive impact of equity awards
We are mindful of the effect of our comparatively low number of outstanding shares on the dilutive impact of our equity awards
As our stock price has increased, we have maintained disciplined grant practices reflective of market practices, resulting in decreasing dilution year-over-year. See “Executive Compensation Tables - Securities Authorized for Issuance under our Equity Compensation Plans” for more information.
In September 2022, our Board approved a share buyback program that will provide an opportunity to help offset dilution.
Other Actions Responsive to Stockholder Feedback in Recent Years
We regularly review our compensation program to align with best practices and to confirm that our program supports our pay for performance philosophy. We have a history of listening and responding to feedback from our stockholders, and we intend to continue our stockholder outreach activities to understand investor perspectives and incorporate that direct input into our program. Below are some of the other compensation actions we have implemented in recent years in response to perspectives shared with us by our stockholders:
Strengthened our recoupment policy to permit the Board to require forfeiture of incentive compensation in the event of certain misconduct causing reputational harm, and to provide for reporting of any required recoupment or forfeiture thereunder in certain circumstances;
Tied all payouts under the short-term incentive plan to pre-established financial goals that are aligned with strategic initiatives - for fiscal 2022, this was adjusted EBITDA and Net Sales to support a balanced approach of growing both top and bottom line results;
Revised payout levels at threshold and maximum of 50% and 150%, respectively, (previously 200% maximum) for annual cash incentive plan to limit potential maximum payments;
Aligned long-term incentive awards to market by extending to a 3-year cliff-vesting for performance share units, or PSUs, and reducing to a 3-year ratable annual vesting for time-based restricted share units, or RSUs;
33

Implemented a new stock plan in 2020 that includes the addition of robust restrictive covenants, payment of dividends only upon vesting, one-year minimum vesting period and better defined death, disability and retirement treatment to create a uniform approach for equity participants;
Aligned pay programs competitively, both internally and externally with the market;
Use of tally sheets (showing all forms of compensation for each officer) and measurements of internal pay equity;
Aligned metrics in the long-term incentive program to key strategic priorities; for grants in fiscal 2022, that included adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC, which we believe were the most important drivers of the Company’s long-term success;
Removed duplicative performance metric from STI and LTI plans;
Enhanced disclosures of compensation program and pay-for-performance, including the “why” for each component;
Reduced payment multiples in change in control and severance agreements, limited the number of executives covered, and limited agreements to established terms, which we intend to maintain going forward; and
Amended equity award agreements for all participants, including executives, to provide for the continuous vesting of awards in retirement, to keep executives focused on long-term performance through their retirement date and limit the need for discretion.
Executive Compensation Program Philosophy
Our executive compensation program is designed to:
üAttract and retain individuals with the skills to develop and execute the strategy and advance the culture necessary for us to achieve long-term growth;
üMaintain a strong pay for performance work environment;
üMotivate our executives and align their interests with those of our stockholders by delivering more at-risk pay for senior executives;
üReward our executives fairly over time for performance that enhances stockholder value;
üEmphasize consistent and sustainable top- and bottom-line growth; and
üAvoid incentives encouraging excessive risk taking.
Our executive compensation program is also designed to reinforce a sense of ownership in the Company and overall entrepreneurial spirit. The program links rewards, including both short- and long-term awards, as well as cash and non-cash awards, to measurable corporate performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee designed to incentivize actions to execute and achieve the objectives of our long-term strategy.
The program measures achievement of corporate financial goals. These goals support our short- and long-term business strategies and are aligned with the interests of our stockholders. By aligning all executives to corporate financial goals, we encourage a shared focus and collaborative work toward strong, long-term operating performance. In addition, our executive compensation program is designed to balance our growth strategies with a managed approach to risk tolerance. Our compensation programs provide assurances of stability and a focus on the long term, upon a solid foundation that requires personal accountability, integrity and compliance.
Executive Compensation Program Highlights
Our core executive compensation program is designed to align our executive compensation with long-term stockholder interests and incorporates the following best practices:
For fiscal 2017, approximately 68%
WHAT WE DO
üOur NEO pay is aligned with financial performance, with variable, performance-based pay constituting 71% - 84% of NEO compensation at target in fiscal 2022
üWe grant incentive compensation based on rigorous performance conditions and peer group comparisons
üPerformance-based incentive awards are tied 100% to pre-established financial goals; any adjustments to performance targets and conditions impacting payouts are considered by the Compensation Committee in accordance with pre-established guidelines
üOur Compensation Committee utilizes the services of an independent compensation consultant; engaged a new consultant in fiscal 2021 after comprehensive search process
üOur change in control severance benefits are double-trigger and provide for market multiples of 2 to 2.5 (CEO only) and cover only executive officers and small groups of officers under pre-existing agreements
üSeverance agreements for executives other than CEO are limited to 1x multiple of base and bonus and to three-year terms (compared to prior unlimited terms) and cover only executive officers and a small group of officers under pre-existing agreements in exchange for non-compete and no solicitation covenants
34

The compensation of our executives differs based on individual experience, role and responsibility and performance.
üWe have a policy for recoupment of performance-based compensation applicable to our NEOs and other senior officers, which we most recently enhanced in fiscal 2021 to permit the Board to require forfeiture of incentive compensation in the event of misconduct causing reputational harm
üWe have robust stock ownership guidelines (that we strengthened in fiscal 2022) for NEOs and certain other officers
üEquity awards continue to vest through qualifying retirement, with proration of awards granted in year of retirement to match service period
üWe require employment and post-employment covenants (including non-compete, non-solicitation and assignment of intellectual property) for executive officers and all equity and bonus participants
Portions of Named Executive Officers' incentive compensation are earned over different and overlapping time periods, ensuring that performance is not maximized during one period at the expense of other periods.
WHAT WE DON’T DO
ûNo employment agreements with any executive officers (including CEO)
ûNo uncapped incentive opportunities
ûNo change in control agreements are expected to be extended beyond key executive officers and the existing group
ûNo severance agreements are expected to be extended beyond existing group and are time-bound
ûNo tax gross-ups of severance or change in control payments
ûNo hedging or short sales of our stock; no pledging
ûNo excessive perquisites
ûNo supplemental retirement benefits
ûNo guaranteed bonuses
ûNo incentives that motivate excessive risk-taking
ûNo acceleration of equity awards expected for executive officers
A significant portion of each Named Executive Officer's compensation is at risk of forfeiture in the event of conduct detrimental to us, termination of employment prior to vesting or a material negative restatement of our financial condition or operating results.
We have a recoupment (clawback) policy applicable to our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, which provides that if we file an amendment to our SEC reports to restate all or a portion of our financial statements within two years of filing the financial statements, all or a portion of any bonus or incentive compensation paid or granted after May 28, 2009 may be recouped by us at the sole discretion of the Board.
We have stock ownership guidelines (that we amended in September 2016) for Named Executive Officers and our other executive officers.
We have a formal policy under which we may not enter into new or amended agreements which provide for "gross ups" for excise tax obligations payable by our executives upon termination of employment following a change in control and we previously amended earlier agreements to remove these types of "gross ups" where they existed before our adoption of this policy.
Any benefits to be paid upon a change in control under the change in control agreements with our Named Executive Officers or the employment agreement with Mr. Spinner are "double trigger," which requires both a Change in Control and a termination of a Named Executive Officer by us for a reason other than Cause, death or disability or a resignation by the executive for Good Reason within one year of the date of the Change in Control.
Our Named Executive Officers participate in the same retirement, health, welfare and other benefits programs as all of our other executive officers.
From time to time we review and assess, with the assistance of management, potential compensation-related risks in our programs. Based on these assessments, we have concluded that our executive compensation program as it is currently designed does not encourage behaviors that would create risks reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.
We have not repriced equity awards.         
The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors.


The Compensation Committee was advised by Semler Brossy, an independent compensation consultant, in fiscal 2017. The consultant was retained directly by the Compensation Committee and performed no other consulting or other services for us.
For fiscal 2017, outside of our core program, we awarded our Named Executive Officers special retention equity-based awards including performance units for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer and four-year cliff vesting restricted stock units for our other Named Executive Officers. We also paid our Chief Executive Officer a special cash bonus of $1,250,000 in fiscal 2017 in connection with his entering into an employment agreement and assuming the role of Chairman of the Board. These special awards and payments are described in more detail below.

New Employment Agreement with President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman in Fiscal 2017
On October 28, 2016, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Steven L. Spinner (the "Employment Agreement") pursuant to which Mr. Spinner will continue to serve as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Concurrently with the execution of the Employment Agreement, the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") appointed Mr. Spinner to serve as its Chairman effective immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders which was held on December 15, 2016.
The Employment Agreement has a three year term, ending October 28, 2019, subject to automatic one year renewals unless either party gives 180 days’ notice of intent not to renew.
The Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Spinner will receive an initial base salary at the annual rate of $922,500 as well as an annual cash incentive opportunity of not less than 100% of his annual base salary for each fiscal year within the term of the Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement also provides Mr. Spinner with certain benefits, such as reimbursement of expenses, paid leave and participation in the Company’s employee benefit plans and programs.

In connection with the execution of the Employment Agreement, the Company paid Mr. Spinner a cash payment in the amount of $1,250,000. This payment was made to Mr. Spinner in recognition of the successful execution of the Company’s acquisition and “building out the store” strategies in fiscal 2016, Mr. Spinner’s commitment to remain with the Company through the term of the Employment Agreement and expanded non-competition covenants and time periods contained in the Employment Agreement, and the additional responsibilities undertaken with his expanded role as the Chairman.

Further details on the Employment Agreement including severance provisions are described in Employment Agreements below.

Fiscal 2016 Stockholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
At our annual meeting of stockholders in December 2016, we submitted a proposal to our stockholders to approve on an advisory basis our executive compensation for our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2016. Our stockholders approved our fiscal 2016 compensation to our Named Executive Officers with more than 93% of the votes cast being cast in favor of the proposal.
When discussing our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee considered the positive outcomes of the advisory vote on executive compensation at last year's annual meeting and other earlier positive votes and viewed the stockholders' prior votes in favor of our executive compensation as a signal that our stockholders are generally supportive of our compensation approach reflected in our core compensation program. As a result of these discussions, the Compensation Committee reaffirmed for the most part our existing executive compensation program philosophy described below. We value the opinions of our stockholders and will continue to consider the outcome of future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers when making compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.
Executive Compensation Program Philosophy
Our core executive compensation program is designed to:
Attract individuals with the skills and culture necessary for us to achieve our business plan;
Motivate our executive talent;
Reward our executives fairly over time for performance that enhances stockholder value;
Retain those individuals who continue to ensure our success and culture; and
Instill a pay for performance work environment.


Our executive compensation program is also designed to reinforce a sense of ownership in the Company, urgency with respect to meeting deadlines and overall entrepreneurial spirit. The program links rewards, including both short- and long-term awards, as well as cash and non-cash awards, to measurable corporate and individual performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee.
The program measures achievement of corporate and business unit financial goals and individual goals tied to the executive’s specific areas of concentration. These goals support our short- and long-term business strategies and are aligned with the interests of our stockholders. In addition, our executive compensation program is designed to balance our growth strategies with a managed approach to risk tolerance.
In applying these principles, we seek to integrate compensation with our short- and long-term strategic plans and to align the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders through equity-based opportunities.
How We Make Decisions Regarding Executive Pay
The Compensation Committee, managementManagement and the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s independent compensation consultant, (which was Semler Brossy for purposes of fiscal 2017 compensation)Frederic W. Cook and Co. (FW Cook), each play a role in designing our executive compensation program and determining performance levels and associated payouts. The roles of the Compensation Committee, managementWe also look at market data and the independenttake into consideration stockholder views about executive compensation consultant are carefully determined to reflect many of what the Compensation Committee believes to be best corporate governance practices and to comply with rules and regulations applicable to the setting ofexpressed in our Named Executive Officers' compensation.stockholder engagement process, as described above.
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing, implementing and monitoring our executive compensation program and its adherence to our compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee approves the minimum performance thresholds and our executive officers’ individualthe financial and strategic performance metrics applicable to executive officers under our annual cash incentive plan as described in Components of our CoreOur Executive Compensation Program—Program for Fiscal 2022Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentive Compensation Compensation”and sets performance metrics applicable to the performance-based component of our long-term equity incentive plan as described in Components of our CoreOur Executive Compensation Program—Long TermProgram for Fiscal 2022Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive ProgramProgram”. The Compensation Committee is responsible for approving our employment policies and agreements impacting executive officers. The Compensation Committee also evaluates actual corporate and individual performance against the established goals and determines appropriate levels of compensation for our executives. The Compensation Committee makes all decisions with respect to, the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and approves, compensation for our other executive officers.officers, including base salary, annual cash incentive, long-term equity incentive, and benefits, except that the compensation of our CEO is further reviewed and approved by the independent members of our Board.
As part of the compensation approval process for our executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee considers the views and recommendations of management,Management, particularly our Chief Executive Officer,CEO. For our CEO, we have established an annual performance evaluation process, which includes a self-assessment by the CEO and a formal performance assessment by the full Board consisting of both quantitative and qualitative assessments, which is considered in setting the CEO’s annual compensation. In setting the nature, type and level of compensation for all of our executive officers, the Compensation Committee consideredconsiders the recommendation of its independent compensation consultant as described in greater detail below.
Role of Management
Our President, Chief Executive OfficerCEO and Chairman, Chief Human Resource Officer and Chief Financial OfficerCHRO provide the Compensation Committee with an assessment of our corporate performance, market pay practices, and the performance of our executive officers and make recommendations for the compensation of our other executive officers based on this assessment.assessment, including recommendations for pay mix and the nature of performance metrics that best support our business objectives. Additionally, our President, Chief Executive OfficerCEO, CHRO and Chairman, Chief Human Resource Officer, and Chief Financial OfficerCFO discuss with the Compensation Committee management'sManagement’s internal projections with respect to a variety of performance metrics and operationsoperational goals for future fiscal years on which performance-based compensation will be based. Other membersThe General Counsel and Corporate Secretary advises on the
35

foregoing matters and provides guidance on governance principles and practices, investor perspectives and regulatory trends and analyses in the Compensation Committee on an as needed basis.context of executive compensation determinations.
No executive officer makes any decision on any element of his or her own compensation, and our President, Chief Executive Officer and ChairmanCEO does not participate in deliberations regarding his compensation.compensation, which is recommended by the Compensation Committee to the full Board and considered and determined by the full Board in conjunction with the CEO’s performance evaluation in executive session.
Role of Independent Compensation Consultant
Late in fiscal 2021, following a thorough review process, the Compensation Committee selected FW Cook as its independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee selected and directly retained Semler Brossy as its compensation consultant during fiscal 2017FW Cook to provide independent, third-party advice and expertise on all aspects of executive compensation and related corporate governance matters, including designing and establishing our executive compensation program for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018. Semler Brossy2022. FW Cook provided input and guidance related to our fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 incentive plan design, reviewed our Compensation Discussion and Analysis and associated disclosures, and summarized and provided perspectiveperspectives on market developments related to executive compensation, including regulatory requirements and related disclosures. Semler BrossyFW Cook only provides services to the Compensation Committee. It does not provide any other services to us.Management. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Semler BrossyFW Cook pursuant to SEC and NasdaqNYSE rules, as described below, and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Semler BrossyFW Cook from serving as an independent consultant to the Compensation Committee.
As mentioned above, the Compensation Committee analyzed whether the work of FW Cook as its compensation consultant raises any conflict of interest, taking into consideration the following factors: (i) FW Cook does not provide any other services to the Company; (ii) the amount of fees the Company paid to FW Cook represents less than 1% of FW Cook’s total revenues; (iii) FW Cook maintains policies and procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) FW Cook does not have any business or personal relationship with any executive officer of the Company; (v) neither FW Cook nor any member of its consulting team directly owns any stock of the Company; and (vi) FW Cook’s consulting team for UNFI does not have any known business or personal relationship with any member of the Committee. The Committee determined, based on its analysis of the above factors, that the work of FW Cook and the individual compensation advisors employed by FW Cook as compensation consultant to the Committee does not create any conflict of interest. The Committee will continue to monitor the independence of its compensation consultant on an annual basis. The Compensation Committee also annually evaluates the independence, performance, scope of work and fees, and other key elements of this relationship under a pre-approval policy pursuant to which fees are ultimately approved. In the future, the Compensation Committee may retain other similar consultants.
Compensation Risk Assessment
Our Compensation Committee charter requires the Compensation Committee to assess, on an annual basis, whether the Company’s compensation policies and practices encourage the Company’s executive officers or other key employees to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of the Company. The Compensation Committee believes that our compensation policies do not encourage the taking of unnecessary and excessive risks. Our compensation and governance practices are designed to align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of stockholders and the achievement of the Company’s strategic objectives. For example:
A substantial portion of our executive officers’ compensation is “at risk,” including compensation paid in the form of common stock;
Total executive officer compensation is substantially weighted to long-term equity, 60% of which is performance-based and tied to long-term, strategic performance targets;
The short-term bonus program has established performance metrics (adjusted EBITDA and Net Sales for fiscal 2022) that reduces risk and supports the Fuel the Future strategy with a focus on bottom- and top-line growth;
We set a maximum level of compensation; there is no uncapped compensation for our executive officers in any element of executive compensation;
Our executive officers are required to maintain certain levels of stock ownership, which are tested each year based on the then-current price of our common stock;
Our executive officers are prohibited from hedging and pledging shares of Company common stock;
The Compensation Committee periodically reviews and oversees key diversity and inclusion initiatives and Human Resources policies and practices, including those related to overall business performance and the relationship of such performance to executive officer compensation, including as relating to recruiting, learning and talent development programs; and
All performance-based compensation is subject to our robust recoupment policy. In the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements or a material inaccuracy in the performance metrics used to measure
36

performance-based compensation, such performance-based compensation is subject to recoupment. Additionally, performance-based compensation may be forfeited in the case of misconduct in violation of law or Company policy, including through failure of an executive’s oversight responsibilities, that results in material financial or reputational harm to the Company.
Competitive Marketplace Assessment


In making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee hasperiodically, generally once annually in the past periodically reviewed theAugust or September, reviews all elements of total compensation packages for our executive officers compared to those in likesimilar positions with substantially similar responsibilities at “peer” organizations, i.e. those organizations with similar characteristics to ours.our Company generally (Comparator Group). Due to the nature of our business, there are ongoing challenges in developing an appropriate mix of companies to include in our Comparator Group, including that few of our direct peers are publicly traded, the complex nature of our business, and the structure of our Management team and their responsibilities. In addition todeveloping our Comparator Group, we include companies in the same or similar industries, companies with comparable revenues, firms with similar business models, and companies from which we would consider recruiting talent.
In setting compensation levels,for NEOs for fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee also has historically reviewed program designs, including an assessmentconsidered Willis Towers Watson Retail/Wholesale survey data for companies in the retail/wholesale distribution sector with revenues comparable to ours, in addition to the companies in the table below, the Comparator Group. There were no changes to this group from prior year, other than the two mergers highlighted in the table. The Committee believes this group of pay vehicles and performance metrics. In fiscal 2015,companies, together with consideration of the Compensation Committee determined that it would review base salaries every two years, or more frequently as the need arises, and in connection with that decision decided not to conduct a competitive market assessment annually. Accordingly, a formal competitive assessment was not undertaken in connection with setting fiscal 2017 compensation. Further, and as described below, when setting the Named Executive Officers' compensation for fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee reviewed a Mercer general industry survey data referenced above, provides a meaningful perspective of current pay practices and other information provided by Semler Brossy. In selecting appropriate data, the Compensation Committee considered companies with revenue between $5 and $10 billion and the market midpoint was definedlevels, as the average of the 25th and 50th percentiles to account for the low-margin nature of our business relative to general industry companies.well as overall compensation trends.
Food- and Distribution-Related Companies of Comparable Size
CompanyGICS Sub-IndustryRevenue
($ in millions)
Market Value
($ in millions)
Arrow ElectronicsTechnology Distributors36,0638,464
AvnetTechnology Distributors24,3114,676
C.H. Robinson WorldwideAir Freight and Logistics26,38013,714
CDW CorporationTechnology Distributors22,93224,528
Core-Mark Holding CompanyDistributors N/A - Acquired by Performance Food Group September 1, 2021
Genuine Parts CompanyDistributors20,51921,621
Henry Schein, Inc.Health Care Distributors12,71810,883
Performance Food Group CompanyFood Distributors47,1947,705
Pilgrim's Pride CorporationPackaged Foods and Meats16,7387,499
SpartanNash CompanyFood Distributors9,2041,167
Sysco CorporationFood Distributors68,63643,254
TD SYNNEX Corporation (1)
Technology Distributors51,5589,625
US Foods Holding Corp.Food Distributors32,1547,053
Summary Statistics (n=13)
75th Percentile38,84615,691
Median25,3469,045
25th Percentile19,5747,388
United Natural Foods, Inc.Food Distributors28,9282,478
Percentile Rank59P3P
Source: S&P CapIQ. Peer Total Revenue = trailing 12 months; Market Value as of July 31, 2022.
(1) SYNNEX completed a merger with Tech Data on September 1, 2021, creating an entity named TD SYNNEX.
Market data is only one factor that the Compensation Committee considers when making determinations regarding executive compensation. Other factors considered include individual performance, internal pay equity, scope of responsibilities, tenure, criticality of the position and executive retention concerns, and the need to recruit new officers. Consequently, theThe Compensation Committee does not target a specific positioning versus the market for each role and takes into account all the above factors in determining the competitiveness of our compensation.
37

Components of our CoreOur Executive Compensation Program for Fiscal 2022
Our executive compensation philosophy is reflected in the principal elements of our core executive compensation program. The four key components of our core executive compensation program in fiscal 2017 were:
Base salary;
Performance-based annual cash incentives;
Long-term equity-based incentive awards2022 and how each component supports our compensation philosophy are set forth in the form of time-based vesting restricted stock units and performance-based vesting restricted stock units; andtable below.
Other compensation and benefits including minimal perquisites and participation in the Deferral Plans (as described in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation—Fiscal 2017 below) as well as participation in benefit plans generally available to all of our employees, such as participation in the 401(k) Plan.
ComponentHow It Supports Our Compensation Philosophy
Base SalaryProvides competitive level of compensation to attract and retain top talent
Performance-based annual cash incentiveAt-risk, variable pay to motivate our executives to achieve short-term (annual) business objectives within appropriate risk parameters
Long-term equity awards in the form of time-based vesting restricted stock units, or RSUs, and performance-based vesting restricted stock units, or PSUsAt-risk, variable pay that motivates our executives to focus on multi-year operational performance and increasing stockholder value; also a long-term retention tool
Other compensation and benefits, including minimal perquisites and participation in benefit plans generally available to all our employees, such as the 401(k) PlanAssist in attracting and retaining top talent by providing competitive benefits, with minimal perquisites
Pay Mix
When setting or recommending target total compensation for our core compensation program for fiscal 20172022 for the Named Executive Officers other than our Chief Executive Officer,NEOs, the Compensation Committee determined that target cash compensation and equity-based compensation would each be approximately 50% of such Named Executive Officer's total target compensation should be weighted toward variable, at-risk pay, and that base salary would contribute approximately 57% in the casea significant percentage should consist of Messrs. Griffinequity-based compensation. We believe this approach appropriately aligns executive compensation with financial results and Zechmeisterprovides a balance between managing risk and 66% in the case of Messrs. Dorneincentivizing our Management team to create short- and Green,long-term stockholder value by achieving pre-established financial performance objectives directly tied to targeted total cash compensation while performance-based cash incentives would contribute approximately 43% of Messrs. Griffin's and Zechmeister’s targeted total cash compensation, and 33% of Messrs. Dorne’s and Green's targeted total cash compensation. The Compensation Committee determined that within our core compensation program target cash compensation and equity-based compensation would be approximately 35% and 65%, respectively,achievement of our Chief Executive Officer's total compensation for fiscal 2017. Total target cash compensation of our Chief Executive Officer within our core compensation program was comprised of approximately 50% base salary and 50% performance-based cash incentives.strategic priorities. The Compensation Committee determined that a separate pay structure for our Chief Executive OfficerCEO is necessary to ensuredeliver competitive pay while even more heavily weighting at-risk incentives within the design. The charts below illustrate the mix of pay elements for 2022 at target for our CEO (84% at-risk pay) and the weighting ofaverage for our other NEOs, excluding the design more towards incentive compensation was most appropriate.two former NEOs, (76% at-risk pay).
paymixa.jpg
Base Salary
As described above, for fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee considered data from the Willis Towers Watson Retail/Wholesale survey as well as proxy statement data from the Comparator Group for the second-highest paid executive and CFO roles. Base salaries provide a fixed ratewere generally targeted at the median of pay designed to compensate executives for day-to-day responsibilities and are established based on the scope of their respective responsibilities, competitive market conditions, individual performance and tenure.
Base salaries are generally reviewed every two yearsthese data sources taking into account other factors mentioned above. Mr. Douglas’ salary was set early in the first quarter of the fiscal year upon his hire and was aligned with market midpoint for the Comparator Group. Given Mr. Spinner’s anticipated retirement, he did not receive any increase to his pay. There was no increase to Mr. Stigers base salary in whichfiscal 2022 as it is well aligned with survey data. For Messrs. Howard, Dorne, Testa and Ms. Sutton, the review occurs,competitive market assessment determined that their base salaries were below market for an executive
38

performing comparable duties, and are typically effective as oftheir salary increases reflect our attempt to close this gap with modest merit increases while also recognizing their outstanding performance during the first day ofyear.
Set forth below are the fiscal year, but may be adjusted from time to time to realign2021 and fiscal 2022 base salaries with market levels, taking into account each Named Executive Officers' responsibilities, performance, increased responsibilities, geographic location, experiencefor the NEOs and proven capability. Merit increases for our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, if giventhe percentage change between periods.
Named Executive Officer
Fiscal 2021
Base Salary(1)
Fiscal 2022
Base Salary (2)
Percentage
Change
Sandy Douglas$— $1,050,000 n/a
John W. Howard$625,000 $675,000 %
Eric A. Dorne$750,000 $787,500 %
Michael C. Stigers$575,000 $575,000 — %
Christopher P. Testa$750,000 $810,000 %
Steven L. Spinner$1,200,000 $1,200,000 — %
Jill E. Sutton$580,000 $614,800 %
(1)Reflects annual rate at all, are expected to be modest unless the executive takes on additional responsibility or is promoted or an increase is determinedend of fiscal 2021.
(2)Reflects changes made by the Compensation Committee to be necessary as a result of a compensation analysis.
For fiscal 2017, the base salary for each Named Executive Officer was increased over fiscal 2016 levels by the percentage noted below. With the exception of Mr. Griffin, Mr. Dorne and Mr. Green, the percentage increases are consistent with the merit pool for the Company as a whole. In the case of Mr. Griffin, the competitive market place assessment performed in setting fiscal


2016 compensation determined his base salary was below market for an employee performing comparable duties. The Committee determined it would be appropriate to bring Mr. Griffin’s salary more in line with the competitive market over multiple years, and the increase shown below for fiscal 2017 is indicative of our attempt to continue to close the gap to the competitive market. Effectiveduring its annual review, effective October 1, 2016, Mr. Dorne was appointed to a new role and the change in his base salary reflects the additional responsibilities he has assumed. For Mr. Green the change in salary reflects a cost of living adjustment as a result of his relocation from Texas to California as part of his new role as President, Pacific Region.31, 2021.
The table below reflects the fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017 base salaries for the Named Executive Officers, and the percentage change in base salaries between those two periods:
Named Executive Officer 
Fiscal 2016
Base Salary (1)
 
Fiscal 2017
Base Salary (1)
 
Percentage
Change
Steven L. Spinner $900,000
 $922,500
 2.5%
Michael P. Zechmeister $450,000
 $461,250
 2.5%
Sean F. Griffin $500,000
 $550,000
 10.0%
Eric A. Dorne $355,000
 $383,400
 8.0%
Paul S. Green $310,000
 $335,000
 8.1%
(1)For each Named Executive Officer, fiscal 2016 base salaries were effective as of December 20, 2015 and fiscal 2017 base salaries were effective as of September 25, 2016.
Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentive Compensation Metrics
The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting the minimum, thresholds oftarget and maximum or “stretch” performance levels (objectives that must be achieved) and related payout levels from $0 to maximum payout for our performance-based annual cash incentive compensation discussed below. Receipt of this compensation is contingent upon satisfaction of these Company-widecorporate-wide metrics established by the Compensation Committee togetherat the beginning of the performance period.
The Compensation Committee retains the ability to adjust targets in certain circumstances, including in the event that unbudgeted or unforeseen events would impact a metric, such that it is not reflective of actual underlying operating performance that it was designed to assess. In making any such adjustment, consistent with specific Company-wide, division-level or individual financial or operational performance goals. In the case of our President, Chief Executive and Chairman these goals are determined byestablished guidelines that allow for consistency in consideration from year to year, the Compensation Committee after consultationreviews, among other things, the original target and the budget upon which the target was based, whether the events giving rise to a potential adjustment had occurred or were contemplated at the time the performance targets were established, whether these factors were related to our core operating performance and the impact of any change in accounting or financial policy or methodology. After consideration of these factors, the Compensation Committee may determine to make adjustments to metrics or payouts where, absent such adjustment, the payout would not, in the Compensation Committee’s determination, be reflective of the level of operating performance driven by the executive officers.
In fiscal 2022, we revised our definition of adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS to exclude the impact of the non-cash charge or benefit resulting from the last-in, first out (LIFO) accounting methodology on most of our inventory. This change was made to better reflect the operating performance of the business, since the LIFO charge has created significant non-cash volatility due to high inflation, which is out of Executives’ control. This change is also consistent with how most of our peers treat LIFO charges or benefits in their reported results. When targets were set for outstanding short- and long-term incentive program, modest LIFO charges were assumed. In fiscal 2022, concurrently with the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer. For all other Named Executive Officers these goals are recommended by our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Chief Human Resources Officer and Chief Financial Officer and approved byreporting change, the Compensation Committee. The factors considered in setting this target compensation vary depending onCommittee aligned the individual executive, but generally relatedefinitions of adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EPS, ROIC and Leverage for outstanding awards under our short- and long-term incentive plans and increased the targets to strategic projects or financial factors such as net sales, gross margin, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), return on invested capital ("ROIC"), earnings per diluted share, and other measuresreflect the expectations for business growth at the time the targets were set absent the impact of the budgeted non-cash LIFO charge. These changes better align with how we communicate results externally to our stockholders, since the impact of LIFO is not indicative of our profitability.underlying business performance.
Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentive Compensation
Minimum Performance Hurdle. Metrics.For For fiscal 2017, as a condition for paying out2022 annual cash incentive compensation, the Compensation Committee selected adjusted EBITDA, a key metric tied to anyour long-term business performance as well as the addition of Net Sales to drive top-line growth in support of the Named Executive OfficersFuel the Future strategy. We believe using adjusted EBITDA and Net Sales as performance metrics focuses our executive officers on growth in core operational performance and rewards all officers for achievement of this important driver of overall financial performance while also growing market share through scale and customer experience. For information on how we required that we:calculate adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income, see Annex B.
maintain a ratio of total debt to EBITDA not to exceed 3.0x;
maintain compliance withPerformance-Based Annual Cash Incentive Targets (Potential Payouts).For our debt covenants under our credit facilities;
achieve a minimum level of GAAP earnings per diluted share of $1.00; and
fully fund a profit sharing program we instituted in fiscal 2016 to replace our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”).
The $1.00 per share of GAAP earnings per diluted share is the Section 162(m) performance metric underNEOs, the annual cash incentive plan. If these thresholds were not met, our Named Executive Officers would not be eligible to receive annual performance-based cash incentiveaward targets, or potential payouts, regardless of their individual respective achievements. For fiscal 2017, each of these minimum funding hurdles was achieved. Our ratio of total debt to EBITDA was 1.2x, we were in compliance with our debt covenants, our GAAP diluted earnings per share ("EPS") was $2.56, and we fully funded the profit sharing plan.


Performance Based Annual Incentive Targets. As discussed in more detail below, for the Named Executive Officers, the annual cash awards for fiscal 20172022 at variousthreshold, target and stretch Company-wide performance levels were set as percentages of base salary earned, and prorated if applicable to changes in base salary over the fiscal year, as follows:
39

  Applicable Targets as % of Fiscal 2017 Salary
Named Executive Officer ThresholdTargetStretch
Steven L. Spinner 16%100%200%
Michael P. Zechmeister 12%75%150%
Sean F. Griffin 12%75%150%
Eric A. Dorne 8%50%100%
Paul S. Green 8%50%100%
Applicable Targets as % of Fiscal 2022 Salary
Named Executive OfficerThreshold (50%)Target
 (100%)
Stretch
(150%)
Sandy Douglas75.0 %150.0 %225.0 %
John W. Howard50.0 %100.0 %150.0 %
Eric A. Dorne50.0 %100.0 %150.0 %
Michael C. Stigers37.5 %75.0 %112.5 %
Christopher P. Testa50.0 %100.0 %150.0 %
Steven L. Spinner (1)
n/a
Jill E. Sutton42.5 %85.0 %127.5 %
Corporate(1)Mr. Spinner was not eligible for a bonus in fiscal 2022 per his agreement and retirement on August 8, 2021.
For example, if the Company achieved its targets at the threshold level, Mr. Douglas’ cash incentive would be an amount equal to 75% of his base salary; at target level, he would receive a cash incentive in an amount equal to 150% of his base salary; and at the stretch level he would receive an award equal to 225% of his base salary. The actual payout depends, however, on whether the Company met the threshold performance level. If performance were below the threshold level, there would be no payout.
Performance MetricsTarget.. In initially setting the performance targets for fiscal 2017,2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed historical levels of performance, expected initiatives in connection with ongoing transformation and productivity initiatives, a desire to support our growth and long-term operating results, the competitive environment and company-specific initiatives contemplated for fiscal 2017.the heightened uncertainty given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and labor market challenges. In establishing the intended degree of difficulty of the payout levelslevel for each performance metric,adjusted EBITDA, the Compensation Committee set the performance targets at levels that required successful implementation of corporate operating objectives for meaningful payouts to occur. The Compensation Committee believed that the initial targets related to "threshold"“threshold” performance were achievable in light of budgeted expectations, but the payouts for "target"“target” performance and "stretch"“stretch” performance each required significant improvement over the prior year'syear’s comparable performance, after taking into account the impact of important company-specific initiatives designed to support our growth and enhance our long-term operating results. We believe that one of the best indicators of how difficult a particular performance metric was to achieve is reflected in what level of payout the executive actually received with respect to the metric. Generally, company-level financial goals, including consolidated adjusted EBITDA, consolidated adjusted EBITDA as a% of net sales, consolidated adjusted earnings per diluted share, consolidated net sales, adjusted return on invested capital ("adjusted ROIC") or regional or division-level adjusted EBITDA and regional or divisional net sales made up 80% of the Named Executive Officer's targeted performance-based annual incentive compensation. One or more strategic goals tailored for each Named Executive Officer based on his responsibilities made up the remaining 20% of the Named Executive Officer’s targeted performance-based annual incentive compensation. This was true in fiscal 2017 for all Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee believes that linking a majority of the Named Executive Officers' annual cash incentive compensation to company-level financial metrics is appropriate. The mix of company-level metrics provides a balanced performance-measurement framework that captures earnings, profitability, and capital efficiency. Weightings on company-wide measures for each Named Executive Officer are determined based on each executive’s role and the factors that the executive can influence.  The Compensation Committee also believes that in most cases it is appropriate to link a portion of a Named Executive Officer's annual cash incentive compensation to individual objectives related to the executive’s area of responsibility.noted above.
The following is a breakdown of which company-level financial goals applied to each of the Named Executive Officers in addition to the gateway diluted EPS metric applicable to all of our Named Executive Officers:
Performance Measures
Named Executive OfficerConsolidated adjusted EBITDAConsolidated Net SalesConsolidated adjusted earnings per diluted shareAdjusted Return on invested capitalConsolidated adjusted EBITDA as % of net sales
Steven L. SpinnerXX
Michael P. ZechmeisterXX
Sean F. GriffinXXXX
Eric A. DorneXX
Paul S. GreenXX



Initial Establishment of Performance Metrics. The performance targets tied to company-level financial goals selected by the Compensation Committee for the Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2017, were initially set in October 2016 at the following amounts:
  Applicable Targets
Performance Measures (1)ThresholdTargetStretch
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA in $000's (2)
$287,216$326,382$365,548
Consolidated net sales in $000's
$9,212,424$9,596,275$9,980,126
Consolidated adjusted earnings per diluted share$2.29$2.60$2.91
Adjusted return on invested capital (3)5.76%6.55%7.34%
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA as % of net sales3.25%3.40%3.50%
(1)Details regarding the performance measures and the associated levels of performance payout percentage for each of our Named Executive Officers are included below.
(2)Consolidated adjusted EBITDA for purposes of the performance-based annual cash incentive compensation represents net operating profit before non-operating expenses (interest expense, interest income, other expenses), depreciation, amortization, and the provision for taxes, plus or minus certain adjustments described in more detail below.
(3)Adjusted return on invested capital for purposes of the performance-based annual cash incentive compensation represents net operating profit after income taxes, divided by the sum of total debt and stockholders' equity, plus or minus certain adjustments described in more detail below.
Determination of Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentive Plan Payouts.If Annual cash incentive plan goals for NEOs for fiscal 2022 were set by the minimum funding hurdles of ourCompensation Committee at the following amounts for Messrs. Douglas, Howard, Dorne and Testa and Ms. Sutton:
Performance MeasureWeightThresholdTargetStretchThreshold PayoutTarget PayoutStretch Payout
Adjusted EBITDA in $000’s
75 %$688,390 $809,871 $931,351 50 %100 %150 %
Net Sales in $000’s
25 %$26,931,515 $28,053,661 $29,175,808 50 %100 %150 %
For Mr. Stigers, his annual cash incentive plan are achieved, the Compensation Committee reviews theincluded total Company Adjusted EBITDA plus Retail Net Sales and Retail Adjusted EBITDA to drive performance of each Named Executive Officer during the performance period and determines the level of performance-based compensation, if any, to be paid to each Named Executive Officer. This amount may not exceed the amount of payouts for "stretch" performance. However, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, award an amount less than the amount attributable to a certain level of performance that was attained.his specific business unit metrics:
The Compensation Committee determined in
Performance MeasureWeightThresholdTargetStretchThreshold PayoutTarget PayoutStretch Payout
Adjusted EBITDA in $000’s
15 %$688,390 $809,871 $931,351 50 %100 %150 %
Retail Net Sales in $000’s
25 %$2,357,596 $2,455,830 $2,554,063 50 %100 %150 %
Retail Adjusted EBITDA in $000’s
60 %$78,633 $92,509 $106,386 50 %100 %150 %
In September 2017 that the minimum performance hurdle related to GAAP diluted earnings per share of $1.00 had been achieved as had the funding thresholds related to the level of our debt, expressed as a percentage of EBTIDA, compliance with our debt covenants and funding of the profit sharing plan. Thereafter,2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed with managementManagement our anticipated financial results for fiscal 20172022. The Compensation Committee determined the level of achievement against each of the metrics as set forth below.
For Messrs. Douglas, Howard, Dorne and Testa and Ms. Sutton, final payouts were based on the actualfollowing metrics:
Performance Metric (in millions)
WeightTargetActualPerformance as a Percentage of TargetWeighted Payout
Adjusted EBITDA75 %$810 $829 (1)102 %80.8 %
Net Sales25 %$28,054 $28,928 103 %34.7 %
(1)See Annex B for a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP metric
40

For Mr. Stigers, his final payout is based on the following metrics:
Performance Metric (in millions)
WeightTargetActualPerformance as a Percentage of TargetWeighted Payout
Adjusted EBITDA15 %$810 $829 (1)102 %16.2 %
Retail Net Sales25 %$2,456 $2,468 100 %26.4 %
Retail Adjusted EBITDA60 %$93 $98 105 %70.8 %
(1)See Annex B for a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP metric.
The Company exceeded its adjusted EBITDA, Retail Adjusted EBITDA, Net Sales and Retail Net Sales targets for fiscal 2022. The payout amounts earned by the Named Executive Officersbelow were determinedlinearly interpolated for results between target and paidmaximum or “stretch” performance, which resulted in a single lump sum in the first quarter115.54% payout as a percent of fiscal 2018 following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, contingent on our results reflected in our Annual Report on Form 10-K not being different than the results anticipated at the time the Compensation Committee reviewed our results, unless the executive had previously elected to defer such compensation into the Deferred Compensation Plan.
When measuring our performance against the consolidated adjusted EBITDA, consolidated adjusted EBITDAtarget for Messrs. Douglas, Howard, Dorne and Testa and Ms. Sutton and a 113.40% payout as a percentage of net sales, and adjusted ROIC targets,target for Mr. Stigers. The payout amounts reflect performance in fiscal 2022 that exceeded the Compensation Committee made certain adjustments to our actual fiscal 2017 results. The adjusted results included approximately $9.6 million of upward adjustments to EBITDA inestablished performance objective, demonstrating the aggregate related to (i) unbudgeted, pre-tax restructuring expense related to fiscal 2017 cost saving measures, (ii) unbudgeted pre-tax legal expense for litigation, legal and governance matters, and (iii) additional pre-tax performance based share based compensation expense as a resulteffectiveness of our sale of our investment in Kicking Horse Coffee in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The Compensation Committee believed itpay for performance incentive plans.
Performance-Based Annual Incentive
Named Executive OfficerTargetActual
Sandy Douglas$1,544,712 $1,784,744 
John W. Howard$662,500 $765,446 
Eric A. Dorne$778,125 $899,038 
Michael C. Stigers$431,250 $489,046 
Christopher P. Testa$795,000 $918,535 
Steven L. Spinner (1)
$— $— 
Jill E. Sutton (2)
$183,548 $212,069 
(1)Mr. Spinner was appropriate to adjustnot eligible for the impact of these items in light of the fact that the events giving rise to these items had not been entered into or had not been contemplated at the time the performance targets were established or were unusual or unrelated to our core performance. As a result, our GAAP based EBITDA of $312.1 million was adjusted upward to $321.6 million and our GAAP based EBITDA as a percentage of net sales of 3.36% was adjusted upward to 3.47%.  In addition to the income statement adjustments noted above, our GAAP ROIC was adjusted to exclude approximately $2.0 million of long-term debt we incurred to make an investmentbonus in fiscal 2017. As a result, our ROIC of 6.48% calculated2022 per his agreement and retirement on a GAAP basis for fiscal 2017August 8, 2021.
(2)Ms. Sutton’s target was adjusted upward to 6.76%.       
When measuring our performance against the diluted earnings per share target other than the threshold level required for payout of any incentive under the plan, the Compensation Committee approved certain adjustments to our actual fiscal 2017 adjusted diluted earnings per share for the same reasons it approved adjustments to our GAAP based EBITDA and ROIC. The adjustments to our GAAP diluted earnings per share resulted in an upward adjustment of approximately $0.04 to earnings per diluted share in the aggregate related to (i) the net loss per share related to the restructuring and impairment costs and legal expense related to litigation, legal and governance matters and (ii) the diluted earnings per share contribution of the Company's gain on the sale of our investment in Kicking Horse Coffee in the fourth quarter of 2017. As result, our consolidated diluted earnings per share of $2.56 calculated on a GAAP basis for fiscal 2017 was adjusted upward to $2.60 per diluted share.  


The following table sets forth for each Named Executive Officer the total amount of performance-based annual incentive awards targeted for the Named Executive Officer (which represents the "target" level) and the actual amount of performance-based annual incentive awards earned by the Named Executive Officer expressed in dollars, as a percentage of the Named Executive Officer's base salary, and as a percentage of the such targeted amount:
  
Performance-Based Annual
Incentive
 
Actual Performance-Based Annual
Incentive Payment
Named Executive Officer Target Actual 
As a Percentage of
Actual Base Salary
 
As a Percentage of
Target
Steven L. Spinner $919,039
 $998,060
 108.6% 108.6%
Michael P. Zechmeister $344,639
 $374,272
 81.4% 108.5%
Sean F. Griffin $406,731
 $422,753
 78.0% 104.0%
Eric A. Dorne $189,516
 $193,202
 51.0% 102.0%
Paul S. Green $165,577
 $219,523
 66.3% 132.6%
Details regarding the performance targets and the associated levels of performance payout percentage that have been paid for fiscal 2017 for each of our Named Executive Officers are included below. Set forth below is the amount of annual incentive compensation, expressed as a percentage of base salary, that each Named Executive Officer earned and could have earnedprorated based on "threshold", "target" and "stretch" fiscal 2017 performance:her qualifying termination on December 10, 2021.
Steven L. Spinner
  Annual Incentive Payout as % of Fiscal 2017 Actual Base Salary
Individual Goals Threshold Target Stretch Actual
Consolidated adjusted earnings per diluted share 5.0% 50.0% 100.0% 50.7%
Adjusted return on invested capital 3.0% 30.0% 60.0% 37.9%
Strategic plan execution (1) 4.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0%
Succession planning (2) 4.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0%
Total: 16.0% 100.0% 200.0% 108.6%


(1)In setting the performance metric applicable to Mr. Spinner based on strategic plan execution, the Compensation Committee based the performance metric on completing acquisition integration, reorganizing the regional sales team, and executing on shared service strategy. The Compensation Committee believed that Mr. Spinner made significant progress against these goals in fiscal 2017. Accordingly, the payout with respect to this metric was determined to be at "target" level of performance.
(2)In setting the performance metric applicable to Mr. Spinner based on succession planning, we based the performance on results that were improvements over existing strategies and included specific identification of potential internal candidates to replace our Chief Executive Officer in an emergency scenario and in the longer term, the initiation of programs designed to further the development of these individuals and the hiring of an internal resource to further these individuals and others at all levels within the Company. The Compensation Committee believed that Mr. Spinner made significant progress against this challenging long-term strategic goal. Accordingly, the payout with respect to this metric was determined to be at "target" level of performance.
Michael P. Zechmeister
  Annual Incentive Payout as % of Fiscal 2017 Actual Base Salary
Individual Goals Threshold Target Stretch Actual
Consolidated adjusted earnings per diluted share 3.8% 37.5% 75.0% 38.0%
Adjusted return on invested capital 2.2% 22.5% 45.0% 28.4%
Execution of shared service plan (1) 6.0% 15.0% 30.0% 15.0%
Total: 12.0% 75.0% 150.0% 81.4%
(1)In setting the performance metric applicable to this goal, the Compensation Committee set the goal based on staffing and the deployment of a new shared service team. The Compensation Committee believed that Mr. Zechmeister made significant progress against this challenging long-term strategic goal. Accordingly, the payout with respect to this metric was determined to be at "target" level of performance.
Sean F. Griffin
  Annual Incentive Payout as % of Fiscal 2017 Actual Base Salary
Individual Goals Threshold Target Stretch Actual
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA 3.8% 37.5% 75.0% 33.4%
Adjusted return on invested capital 1.1% 11.3% 22.5% 14.2%
Consolidated net sales 1.1% 11.3% 22.5% 2.8%
Adjusted EBTIDA as % of net sales 3.0% 7.5% 15.0% 12.6%
Acquisition synergies (1) 3.0% 7.5% 15.0% 15.0%
Total: 12.0% 75.0% 150.0% 78.0%
(1)In setting the performance metrics applicable to Mr. Griffin based on synergies achieved in fiscal 2017 related to the integration of certain acquisitions made in fiscal 2016 we based the performance metric on the amounts of synergies we anticipated we could generate when we consummated the acquisitions. Mr. Griffin exceeded expectations against this challenging goal. Accordingly, the payout with respect to this metric was determined to be at "stretch" level of performance.
Eric A. Dorne
  Annual Incentive Payout as % of Fiscal 2017 Actual Base Salary
Individual Goals Threshold Target Stretch Actual
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA 2.5% 25.0% 50.0% 22.3%
Adjusted return on invested capital 1.5% 15.0% 30.0% 19.0%
Manage IT expenses (1) 2.0% 5.0% 10.0% 6.2%
IT systems conversions (2) 2.0% 5.0% 10.0% 3.5%
Total: 8.0% 50.0% 100.0% 51.0%


(1)In setting the performance metric applicable to Mr. Dorne based on IT expenses, we based the performance metric on results that would provide a measurable cost savings compared to the prior year's results. For this performance metric, the "target" set for IT expenses as a percentage of consolidated net sales was approximately 0.865% and a target of approximately 0.779% was set for "stretch." For fiscal 2017, IT expenses as a percentage of net sales was approximately 0.843%. Accordingly, the payout with respect to this metric was determined to be between “target” and “stretch” level of performance.
(2)In setting the performance metric applicable to this goal, the Compensation Committee set the goal based on progress toward our IT system conversions. We believe that one of the best indicators of how difficult a particular performance metric was to achieve is reflected in what level of payout the executive actually received with respect to the metric. The Compensation Committee believed that Mr. Dorne made notable progress against this challenging long-term strategic goal in fiscal 2017, but below target. Accordingly, the payout with respect to this metric was determined to be between "threshold" and "target" level of performance.
Paul S. Green
  Annual Incentive Payout as % of Fiscal 2017 Actual Base Salary
Individual Goals Threshold Target Stretch Actual
Pacific Region adjusted EBITDA (1) 1.5% 15.0% 30.0% 26.7%
Consolidated adjusted EBTIDA 1.0% 10.0% 20.0% 8.9%
Pacific Region adjusted EBITDA as % of net sales (1) 4.0% 10.0% 20.0% 20.0%
Adjusted return on invested capital 0.8% 7.5% 15.0% 9.5%
Pacific Region net sales (1) 0.7% 7.5% 15.0% 1.2%
Total: 8.0% 50.0% 100.0% 66.3%
(1)In setting the performance metrics applicable to Mr. Green based on performance of our Pacific Region, we considered historical levels of performance and based the performance metrics on results that were improvements over the prior year's results. We believe that one of the best indicators of how difficult a particular performance metric is to achieve is reflected in what level of payout the executive actually received with respect to that metric. For the performance metrics for which we have not disclosed targets, Mr. Green achieved "stretch" and slightly below "stretch" performance level for Pacific Region adjusted EBITDA as percentage of net sales and Pacific Region adjusted EBTIDA, respectively, and slightly above "threshold" performance level for Pacific Region net sales.
Long-termLong-Term Equity-Based Incentive Program
2022 Grant of Time- and Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Units.Our core long-term equity-based incentive program in fiscal 20172022 for our Named Executive OfficersNEOs consisted of time-based vesting restricted stock unitsRSUs and performance-based vesting restricted stock units. The grant date fair values of time-based vesting restricted stock units and performance-based vesting restricted stock units each represented approximately 50%PSUs. Approximately 40% of the aggregate grant date fair value of these units awarded to NEOs represented RSUs that vest ratably over three years and 60% were PSUs that cliff-vest at the coreend of a three-year performance period.
The Compensation Committee considered stockholder feedback, as well as recommendations from its advisor, FW Cook, to adjust the long-term equity-based awards to each of the Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Spinner, with the grant date fair value of Mr. Spinner's performance units (including his customary one-year performance units) representing approximately 75% of the aggregate grant date fair value of his core award and time-based vesting restricted units representing approximately 25% of the aggregate grant date fair value of his core award.
In setting our Named Executive Officers' equity-based compensationincentive (LTI) program for fiscal 2017,2022 to better align with best practice. First, LTI awards are now a fixed dollar value rather than a percent of base salary, which no longer results in automatic LTI increases when base salary adjustments are made. Second, the Compensationmix of awards is now more heavily weighted to PSUs at 60%, with RSUs at 40%, and maximum payout aligned with peers at 200%. The Committee believed thatbelieves a mix of timetime- and performance-based vesting restricted stock units providedprovides a Named Executive OfficerNEO with an incentive to improve our stock price performance and a direct alignment with stockholders'stockholders’ interests, as well as a continuing stake in our long-term success. In addition, becauseLastly, the time-based equity awards vest ratably over four years, andCommittee simplified the performance units vestPSU program to only two years frommetrics after the dateremoval of grant (or one-year for a portion of Mr. Spinner's historical core award), if earned, we believe these awards provide strong incentives for the executives to remain employees of ours.Leverage metric given the significant progress the Company has made in paying down debt.
In addition to performance units with a two-year performance period (like those granted to all of our Named Executive Officers) we granted Mr. Spinner performance units with performance metrics tied to our performance duringAs stated above, in fiscal 2017 as part of our core compensation program as described below. Mr. Spinner received these additional performance units as part of his core award in order to incentivize him to achieve financial results for fiscal 2017 and deliver a target total core pay opportunity that the Compensation Committee considered to be competitive with the market.
All of our equity awards are made pursuant to plans that have been approved by stockholders.
Timing of Awards. The Compensation Committee generally makes equity-based grants in September of each year when the Compensation Committee also approves changes to our executive officers' annual base salaries, if any. These grants are effective after we have publicly released our preliminary results of operations for the recently completed fiscal year. The Compensation


Committee may also make equity-based grants from time to time for new executive officers or upon a significant change in an executive officer's job scope and responsibility.
Determinations of Awards. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves annual equity-based awards for all of our eligible employees, including our Named Executive Officers. In fiscal 2017,2022, the Compensation Committee determined the target grant date fair value of equity awards for our core compensation program was to be based on percentages of the recipient's then base salary dependent on the eligible employee's position within the Company.a fixed value that will be benchmarked annually and used as a lever to align executives overall target direct compensation and/or reward executives for outstanding performance. Other LTI award recipients were already receiving a fixed dollar value by level. For our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, except for NEOs, the fiscal 2022 grant values were:
41

Named Executive OfficerTarget Annual LTI $
Sandy Douglas (1)
$5,900,000
John W. Howard$1,500,000
Eric A. Dorne$1,800,000
Michael C. Stigers$1,000,000
Christopher P. Testa$1,800,000
Steven L. Spinner (2)
n/a
Jill E. Sutton (3)
$1,000,000
(1)Includes one-time inducement award to join the Company valued at $2,000,0000 and issued 60% in PSUs and 40% in RSUs.
(2)Mr. Spinner Mr. Griffin and Mr. Zechmeister, the percentage usedwas not eligible for fiscal 2017 grants related to our core program was 150% of fiscal 2016 base salary. Percentages used for fiscal 2017 grants related to our core program for Mr. Spinner, Mr. Griffin and Mr. Zechmeister were 329.2%, 200%, and 200%, respectively, of fiscal 2016 base salary. As discussed below, each of our Named Executive Officers received an additionalLTI grant of performance based or time-based vesting restricted stock units in fiscal 2017 outside2022 per his agreement and retirement on August 8, 2021.
(3)Ms. Sutton’s target is shown in full, but upon her qualifying termination on December 10, 2021, she forfeited a pro rata amount of our core program.her award.
TheThese grants were made in October 2021, following approval by the Compensation Committee may disregard these rangesCommittee.
Performance-Metrics for an employee, including a Named Executive Officer, upon a determination that other factors should result in an equity award that exceeds or is less than the specified range based on the executive's position with us. These factors may include consideration of competitive compensation data, a recent change in assigned duties, retention considerations or the historical performance of the executive. The Compensation Committee also considers the recommendations of members of senior management with respect to the mix of time-based vesting restricted stock units and performance-based vesting restricted stock units.
Time-Based Vesting Restricted StockPerformance Units. ForPSUs granted in fiscal 2017,2022 (October 2021) are subject to two metrics that the Compensation Committee awarded approximately 50%believes are critical to our long-term strategy. The performance criteria and weighting of the grant date fair value of the Named Executive Officers' (other than Mr. Spinner's) total long-term, equity-based incentive compensation under our core program in the form of time-based vesting restricted stock units pursuant to the Original Amendedthese PSUs are as follows: fiscal 2022-2024 adjusted EPS growth, weighted at 75%; and Restated Plan. For Mr. Spinner, his time-based awards represented approximatelyfiscal 2024 adjusted return on invested capital (adjusted ROIC), weighted at 25% of the grant date fair value of his awards under our core program. These awards were granted effective September 15, 2016. The time-based vesting restricted stock units, with the exception of the additional time-based vesting restricted stock units issued to certain Named Executive Officers outside of our core program as described below, vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and are shown in the table in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES—Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2017. For fiscal 2017, certain Named Executive Officers were also awarded additional time-based vesting restricted stock units with four-year cliff vesting pursuant to the Original Amended and Restated Plan, as described below.
Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Units. Adjusted EPS GrowthThe following information summarizes our long-term performance-based equity grants made in fiscal 2017 under our core program. At the end of 3 years, adjusted EPS growth is based on the average achievement against the 3-year performance goals and metrics. Adjusted EPS growth rate targets are set at the settlementtime of our long-term equity grants made in fiscal 2017, which had performance criteria tiedgrant for each year as a targeted rate of growth applied to the prior-year actual adjusted EPS. This design is intended to keep Management engaged throughout the three-year cycle even if there is under-performance in one year; or, conversely, if the maximum growth is achieved in one year, performance period ended July 30, 2017.Management must still meet predetermined growth rate goals in subsequent years. For example, if our executives were to significantly outperform relative to the year-one adjusted EPS growth target, they must still achieve the predetermined growth rate targets in the second and third years to attain an above-target payout because the contribution of the first year to total payout is effectively capped. If our target were a cumulative three-year growth target, maximum payout could be achieved with one year of significant out performance. The Compensation Committee believes that including an adjusted EPS metric aligns executives’ interest with long-term stockholder interests.
Fiscal 2017 Grant.2024 Adjusted ROIC. For fiscal 2017,Adjusted ROIC is defined as net adjusted operating profit after income taxes, divided by the sum of the average outstanding debt (including finance lease obligations) and average stockholders’ equity, plus or minus certain adjustments falling into categories approved by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee awarded approximately 50% ofbelieves this metric, which is set at the grant date, fairdrives long-term value ofby emphasizing prudent investments and effective capital management over the Named Executive Officers' (other than Mr. Spinner's) long-term, equity-based incentive compensation under our core program in the form offull 3-year performance units denominated in shares pursuant to the Original Amended and Restated Plan. For Mr. Spinner, his performance units represented approximately 75% of the grant date fair value of his long-term equity based compensation under our core program. The number of shares that may vest at the “threshold,” “target” and “stretch” levels of performance are shown in the table in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES—Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2017.period.
The fiscal 2017 performance-based vesting restricted stock units were denominated in shares based on the closing stock price of our common stock on the date of grant. The performance-based vesting restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2017 have two equally-weighted performance criteria - fiscal 2018 adjusted ROIC and fiscal 2018 adjusted EBITDA (defined as earnings before non-operating expenses (interest expense, interest income and other expense), depreciation, amortization and provision for income taxes, as adjusted by the Compensation Committee in the manner provided for in the award agreement. The applicable Named Executive Officers are eligible to earn between 0% and 200% of their targeted award, depending on our performance during the relevant measurement period with respect to five levels of performance for adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA, respectively. In addition to the performance criteria tied to adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA,the two financial metrics described above, the Compensation Committee approved the abilitya feature pursuant to adjustwhich the number of units that will vest will be adjusted upward or downward by up to 10% depending on how our common stock price performs relative to the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index (“Relative TSR”)(Relative TSR) over the two-yearthree-year performance period ending on the close of fiscal 2018.2024.
The Compensation Committee determined that adjusted EBITDA, rather than adjusted EBIT, was the appropriatebelieves this design focuses our Management team on improving core operational performance metric against which to measure our performanceand long-term value creation. Targets were based on long-term projections for all three fiscal years, taking into account investments in fiscal 2018 to determine whether a portion of the performance-based vesting restricted stock units would be earned in light of the increased levels of depreciationgrowth opportunities and amortization expense we are incurring as a result of the numerous acquisitions we completed in fiscal 2016. In addition to the adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA performance metrics, these awards include a minimum level of earnings per diluted share, calculated on a GAAP basis, that must be achieved for the particular performance period before any Named Executive Officer that is a “covered employee” under Section 162(m) of the Code will be eligible to have these units vest. This earnings per diluted share target constitutes the performance metric required under Section 162(m) of the Code. Even if this target is exceeded, the Company’s actual underlying


performance must exceed the levels necessary to generate this level of diluted earnings per share before any of these units will be earned.
For purposes of determining adjusted EBITDA and adjusted ROIC pursuant to these awards (and certain of the other one-time awards discussed below), the Compensation Committee excludes from our GAAP results any costs or expenses related to any of the following events or matters: (i) asset impairments or write-downs, (ii) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (iii) the effect of changes in tax law, accounting principles or other such laws or provisions affecting reported results, (iv) accruals for reorganization and restructuring (including acquisitions and dispositions) programs, (v) any items that are unusual in nature or infrequently incurring within the meaning of accounting principles generally acceptedongoing uncertainty in the United States ("GAAP") and/or in management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Company's annual report to stockholders for fiscal 2018, and (vi) any expenses for share-based compensation under ASC Topic 718. To the extent readily identifiable, the results of operations of businesses acquired in fiscal 2018 and the related balance sheet items shall not be included for purposes of computing adjusted EBITDA and adjusted ROIC. In the event the Company disposes of any line of business during fiscal 2018, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted ROIC shall be adjusted appropriately (based on the number of days during the year during which the line of business was operated) to reflect the disposition. After application of the foregoing mandatory adjustments, the Compensation Committee may adjust actual adjusted EBITDA and/or adjusted ROIC lower, or increase the adjusted EBITDA and/or adjusted ROIC targets, in order to account for the effects of matters the Compensation Committee determines in its sole discretionmacro-environment. The applicable NEOs are not adequately reflected in adjusted EBITDA and/or adjusted ROIC, as otherwise adjusted.
The performance metrics underlying these performance units were established by the Compensation Committee based on our business planning process with target level of performance established at levels that were, at the time of the grant, consistent with our internally prepared projections with significant improvements over those projections required to achieve above-target payouts and a threshold level of GAAP adjusted EBITDA and/or adjusted ROIC established below which none of the performance units would be earned.
Additional Performance Units Granted to CEO. As part of our core compensation program, our Chief Executive Officer also received additional performance units granted in September 2016 in order to incentivize him to achieve financial results for fiscal 2017 and deliver a target total pay opportunity that the Compensation Committee considered to be competitive with the market. On September 21, 2016, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Spinner an award of performance units based on a targeted grant date fair value of $1.5 million from the Original Amended and Restated Plan that required that we achieve a threshold level of GAAP earnings per diluted share of $1.00 and thereafter included a matrix of two equally-weighted performance criteria—adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA. The earnings per diluted share target constitutes the performance metric required by Section 162(m) of the Code. Even if this target is exceeded, the Company’s actual underlying performance must exceed the levels necessary to generate this level of diluted earnings per share before any of these units will be earned Mr. Spinner was eligible to earn between 0% and 200% of histheir targeted award, depending on our performance during fiscal 2017the relevant measurement period. Each metric must meet a minimum threshold level of performance for any payout to occur with respect to that metric (shown below). The table below does not include the actual forward targets. We generally do not disclose forward-looking goals for our long-term incentive plan because we do not consistently provide long-range guidance on all metrics and it is competitively sensitive information. We disclose performance goals for our incentive programs in full after completion of the performance period.
Performance MeasuresWeightThresholdTargetStretch
Threshold Payout(1)
Target Payout(1)
Stretch Payout(1)
Fiscal 2022-2024 Adjusted EPS Growth75 %70 %100 %130 %50 %100 %200 %
Fiscal 2024 Adjusted ROIC25 %90 %100 %110 %50 %100 %200 %
(1)Aggregate payout subject to 10% adjustment based on the following performance matrix:Relative TSR.

42

  Adjusted EBITDA ($ Thousands)
  <$308,656$317,710$326,764$335,818>$344,872
Adjusted Return on Invested Total Capital>6.95%100%125%150%175%200%
6.75%75%100%125%150%175%
6.55%50%75%100%125%150%
6.36%25%50%75%100%125%
<6.16%0%25%50%75%100%
Prior Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Program, Results and Payouts
Fiscal 2020-2022. The PSUs granted in fiscal 2020 (October 2019) have three weighted metrics: fiscal 2020 to 2022 adjusted EPS growth (60%), fiscal 2022 adjusted ROIC (20%), and fiscal 2022 Leverage, or Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA (20%). The applicable NEOs were eligible to earn between 50% and 150% of their targeted award, depending on our performance during the relevant measurement period across the threshold, target and maximum levels below. Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted ROIC and Leverage are non-GAAP metrics. A reconciliation to the nearest GAAP metrics is provided in Annex B.

Performance MeasureWeightThresholdTargetStretchThreshold PayoutTarget PayoutStretch Payout
Fiscal 2020-2022 Adjusted EPS Growth60%42%
84%
84%
F20 60%
F21 120%
F22 120%
78%
156%
156%
50%100%150%
Fiscal 2022 Adjusted ROIC20%4.78%5.31%5.84%50%100%150%
Fiscal 2022 Leverage (Net Debt/Adj. EBITDA)20%4.30x3.91x3.52x50%100%150%
In addition to the performance metriccriteria tied to adjusted EPS growth, adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA,Leverage, the Compensation Committee approved the ability to adjustgrants included a provision for adjustment of the number of units that couldwill vest upward or downward by up to 10% depending on the Relative TSR forover the one-yearthree-year performance period. The number of units that will vest is adjusted up or down proportionally by up to 10% based on the number of basis points difference between our performance and the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index.
OnIn September 15, 2017,2022, the Compensation Committee met to determine what percentage of the fiscal 2017 performance units with a one-year performance period granted to Mr. Spinner as part of our core compensation program had been earned. The Compensation Committee determined that our GAAP earnings per diluted share exceeded the $1.00 threshold required under Mr. Spinner’s award agreement. When measuring ourreviewed performance against the three-year performance period ending in fiscal 2022 with the following results, performance to target and final weighted payout of 90%.

Performance MetricWeightTargetActualPerformance as a Percentage of TargetWeighted Payout
Fiscal 2020-2022 Adjusted EPS Growth60%F20 60%
F21 120%
F22 120%
F20 121%
F21 48%
F22 16%
201%
40%
13%
30.0%
Fiscal 2022 Adjusted ROIC20%5.31%10.2%193%30.0%
Fiscal 2022 Leverage (Net Debt/Adj. EBITDA)20%3.91x2.6x153%30.0%
The number of earned PSUs was then adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted ROIC targets, the Compensation Committee approved certain adjustment to our actual fiscal 2017 results. The adjusted results included approximately $9.6 million of upward adjustments to EBITDA in the aggregate related to (i) unbudgeted, pre-tax restructuring expense related to fiscal 2017 cost saving measures, (ii) unbudgeted pre-tax legal expense for litigation, legal and governance matters, and (iii) additional pre-tax share performance-based share based compensation expenseby 10% as a result of our saleapplication of our investment in Kicking Horse Coffee in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The Compensation Committee believed it was appropriate to adjust for the impact of these items in light of the fact that the events giving rise to these items had not been entered into or had not been contemplated


at the time the performance targets were established or were unusual or unrelated to our core performance. As a result, our GAAP based EBITDA of $312.1 million was adjusted upward to $321.6 million. In addition to the income statement adjustments noted above, our GAAP ROIC was adjusted to exclude approximately $2.0 million of long-term debt we incurred to make an investment in fiscal 2017. As a result, our ROIC of 6.48% calculated on a GAAP basis for fiscal 2017 was adjusted upward to 6.76%. In reviewing the Company's performance on the Relative TSR modifier, which was 37,362 basis points, for a final payout of 99%. The table below shows the number of shares earned compared to target.

Named Executive OfficerShares at TargetMetric Payout %Shares at Metric PayoutFinal Shares After +10% TSR Modifier
Sandy Douglasn/a00
John W. Howard18,82090.0 %16,93818,631
Eric A. Dorne47,05190.0 %42,34646,580
Michael C. Stigers54,10990.0 %48,69853,567
Christopher P. Testa56,46190.0 %50,81555,896
Steven L. Spinner319,94990.0 %287,954316,749
Jill E. Sutton(1)
34,45290.0 %31,00734,107
(1)Ms. Sutton’s target shares were prorated for her time served in the 3-year performance period, given her qualifying termination in December 2021.
The payouts under the 2020 PSUs reflect our executive compensation program’s pay for performance structure. Despite exceeding the adjusted EPS maximum growth target in fiscal 2020, the Company did not meet the predetermined threshold adjusted EPS growth performance over fiscal 2020 actual performance in fiscal 2021 or 2022, which demonstrates that consistent financial performance over the performance period is required to achieve the robust targets set by our Compensation Committee determined that the Company's stock price performance when measured against the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index warranted a full 10% reduction in the actual payment of earned units. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved the vesting of 38,282 performance units, or 100.5% of the number of units that would have vested at target performance, for Mr. Spinner that were granted in September 2016 and tied to our fiscal 2017 performance effective upon the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017 contingent on our results reflected in our Annual Report on Form 10-K not differing from those anticipated at the time the Compensation Committee reviewed our results.Committee. The units earned and payable to Mr. Spinner reflect the application of the full 10% downward adjustment based on Relative TSR for the performance period.
Special, One-Time Performance and Time Based Equity Compensation    
Additional Performance Based Equity Compensation for all of our Named Executive Officers. In September 2016, the Compensation Committee concluded, following discussions with management, the performance-based vesting restricted stock units granted in September 2015 with performance criteria tied to the Company’s adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDALeverage metrics exceeded stretch performance expectations resulting in a higher payout for fiscal 2017 were unlikely to be earned based on management’s expectations for the Company’s performance in fiscal 2017. Nonetheless, the Compensation Committee believed that it was appropriate for eachthose metrics.
43

Accordingly, the Compensation Committee approved the award of performance-based vesting restricted stock units to each of the Named Executive Officers, with the exception of Mr. Zechmeister, in amounts, at target level of performance, equal to 50% of the award, at target level of performance, granted in September 2015, with performance criteria tied to fiscal 2017. In exchange for this award, each Named Executive Officer, other than Mr. Zechmeister who had not received a performance-based vesting restricted stock unit award in September 2015 as a result of his “on-boarding grant”, forfeited the performance-based vesting restricted stock unit award granted to him in September 2015. Mr. Zechmeister’s award of these performance units, at target level of performance, is equal to 44% of his fiscal 2016 base salary.
As it had done for the performance-based vesting restricted stock units granted to the Named Executive Officers tied to fiscal 2018 performance, the Compensation Committee utilized adjusted EBITDA, rather than adjusted EBIT, as one of the performance metrics, in addition to adjusted ROIC, for these awards in light of the increased levels of depreciation and amortization expected in future periods as a result of the numerous acquisitions we completed in fiscal 2016 and early fiscal 2017. In addition to the adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA performance metrics, these awards required a minimum level of earnings per diluted share, calculated on a GAAP basis, of $1.00 to be achieved for the particular performance period before any Named Executive Officer that is a “covered employee” under Section 162(m) of the Code would be eligible to have these units vest. This earnings per diluted share target constitutes the performance metric required under Section 162(m) of the Code. Even if this target is exceeded, the Company’s actual underlying performance must exceed the levels necessary to generate this level of diluted earnings per share before any of these units will be earned. Each Named Executive Officer was eligible to earn between 0% and 200% of 50% of the award granted in September 2015 at target level of performance that his award was replacing with the exception of Mr. Zechmeister who was eligible to receive between 0% and 200% of 44% of his fiscal 2016 base salary, depending on our performance during fiscal 2017 based on the following performance matrix:
  Adjusted EBITDA ($ Thousands)
  <$308,656$317,710$326,764$335,818>$344,872
Adjusted Return on Invested Total Capital>6.95%100%125%150%175%200%
6.75%75%100%125%150%175%
6.55%50%75%100%125%150%
6.36%25%50%75%100%125%
<6.16%0%25%50%75%100%
In addition to the performance criteria tied to adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA, the Compensation Committee approved the ability to adjust the number of units that could vest upward or downward by up to 10% depending on the Relative TSR for the one-year performance period.
On September 15, 2017, the Compensation Committee met to determine what percentage of the fiscal 2017 performance units with a one-year performance period granted to the Named Executive Officers outside of our core compensation program


had been earned. The Compensation Committee determined that our GAAP earnings per diluted share exceeded the $1.00 threshold required under the award agreements. When measuring our performance against the adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted ROIC targets, the Compensation Committee approved certain adjustment to our actual fiscal 2017 results. The adjusted results included approximately $9.6 million of upward adjustments to EBITDA in the aggregate related to (i) unbudgeted, pre-tax restructuring expense related to fiscal 2017 cost saving measures, (ii) unbudgeted pre-tax legal expense for litigation, legal and governance matters, and (iii) additional pre-tax share performance-based share based compensation expense as a result of our sale of our investment in Kicking Horse Coffee in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The Compensation Committee believed it was appropriate to adjust for the impact of these items in light of the fact that the events giving rise to these items had not been entered into or had not been contemplated at the time the performance targets were established or were unusual or unrelated to our core performance. As a result, our GAAP based EBITDA of $312.1 million was adjusted upward to $321.6 million. In addition to the income statement adjustments noted above, our GAAP ROIC was adjusted to exclude approximately $2.0 million of long-term debt we incurred to make an investment in fiscal 2017. As a result, our ROIC of 6.48% calculated on a GAAP basis for fiscal 2017 was adjusted upward to 6.76%. In reviewing the Company's performance on the Relative TSR for the performance period the Compensation Committee determined that the Company's stock price performance when measured against the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index warranted a full 10% reduction in the actual payment of earned units. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved the vesting at 100.5% of target performance with Messrs. Spinner, Zechmeister, Griffin, Dorne, and Green receiving 9,035, 5,015, 4,914, 3,025 and 2,965 performance units, respectively, that were granted September 2016 and tied to our fiscal 2017 performance effective upon the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017 contingent on our results reflected in our Annual Report on Form 10-K not differing from those anticipated at the time the Compensation Committee reviewed our results.
Special Performance-Based Equity Grant for Mr. Spinner. In October 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a special performance-based vesting restricted share unit equity award for Mr. Spinner to align him with our Company’s long-term success during this critical period of our Company’s strategic efforts and motivate performance that will contribute to increased stockholder value and stock price appreciation. Mr. Spinner’s award totals 175,000 units at target level of performance with vesting for 50,000 units annually at target level performance based 50% each on the Company’s net sales and adjusted EBITDA for each of fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019 and 25,000 units at target level performance based on our cumulative adjusted EBITDA for the three-year period inclusive of fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019. The actual number of shares that may be issued to Mr. Spinner with respect to this award can range from 0% of target to 120% of target with 80% of target payable for threshold level performance and 120% of target payable for maximum performance. In addition to the net sales and adjusted EBITDA performance metrics, each tranche of this award (including the award tied to our performance over the three-year cumulative performance period) includes a minimum level of earnings per diluted share, calculated on a GAAP basis, that must be achieved for the particular performance period before Mr. Spinner will be eligible to have these units vest. This earnings per diluted share target constitutes the performance metric required under Section 162(m) of the Code for the portion of this award intended to constitute performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. Even if this target is exceeded, the Company’s actual underlying performance must exceed the levels necessary to generate this level of diluted earnings per share before any of these units will be earned. For the portion of the award tied to our fiscal 2017, Mr. Spinner was eligible to receive from 0% of target to 120% of target with 80% of target payable for threshold level performance and 120% of target payable for maximum performance based on the following performance matrix:
 ThresholdTargetStretch
Fiscal 2017 Net Sales (in $ Millions)$8,893$9,375$9,656
Fiscal 2017 Adjusted EBTIDA (in $ Millions)$256.6$319.2$328.6
On September 15, 2017, the Compensation Committee met to determine what percentage of the fiscal 2017 performance-units with performance tied to fiscal 2017 granted to Mr. Spinner had been earned. The Compensation Committee determined that our GAAP earnings per diluted share exceeded the $1.00 threshold required under Mr. Spinner’s award agreement. When measuring our performance against the adjusted EBITDA targets, the Compensation Committee approved certain adjustments to our actual fiscal 2017 results. The adjusted results included approximately $15.6 million of upward adjustment to EBITDA in the aggregate related to (i) unbudgeted, pre-tax restructuring expense related to fiscal 2017 cost saving measures, (ii) unbudgeted pre-tax legal expense for litigation, legal and governance matters, and (iii) the gain the Company recorded in other income related to the sale of our investment in Kicking Horse Coffee in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The Compensation Committee believed it was appropriate to adjust for the impact of these items in light of the fact that the events giving rise to these items had not been entered into or had not been contemplated at the time the performance targets were established and the fact that Mr. Spinner played a key role in returning value to shareholders on the Company's investment in Kicking Horse Coffee. As a result, our GAAP based EBITDA of $312.1 million was adjusted upward to $327.6 million. GAAP net sales of $9.274 billion was not adjusted. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved the vesting of 53,747 performance units, or 107.5% of target performance, effective upon the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017contingent on our results reflected in our Annual Report on Form 10-K not differing from those anticipated at the time the Compensation Committee reviewed our results. Of these 53,747 units,


30,402 units were paid to Mr. Spinner effective upon the filing of such Annual Report on Form 10-K and 23,345 units will be paid to him upon the earlier of Mr. Spinner's termination of employment for any reason or immediately prior to a change in control.
Special Performance-Based Equity Grant for Mr. Griffin. The Compensation Committee recognizing Mr. Griffin’s key role in implementing the Company’s corporate strategy and his significant responsibilities for managing the Company’s operations, in October 2016, approved a special performance-based vesting restricted share unit equity award for Mr. Griffin. Mr. Griffin’s award totals 45,000 units at target level of performance with vesting for 17,500 units annually at target level performance based 50% each on the Company’s net sales and adjusted EBITDA for each of fiscal 2017 and 2018 and 10,000 units at target level performance based on our cumulative adjusted EBITDA for the two-year period inclusive of fiscal 2017 and 2018. The net sales and adjusted EBITDA targets applicable to Mr. Griffin’s award are identical to those utilized for Mr. Spinner’s award with respect to fiscal 2017 and 2018. In addition to the net sales and adjusted EBITDA performance metrics, each tranche of this award includes a minimum level of earnings per diluted share, calculated on a GAAP basis, that must be achieved for the particular performance period before Mr. Griffin will be eligible to have these units vest. This earnings per diluted share target constitutes the performance metric required under Section 162(m) of the Code for this award. Even if this target is exceeded, the Company’s actual underlying performance must exceed the levels necessary to generate this level of diluted earnings per share before any of these units will be earned. For the portion of the award tied to fiscal 2017, Mr. Griffin was eligible to receive from 0% of target to 120% of target with 80% of target payable for threshold level performance and 120% of target payable for maximum performance based on the following performance matrix:
 ThresholdTargetStretch
Fiscal 2017 Net Sales (in $ Millions)$8,893$9,375$9,656
Fiscal 2017 Adjusted EBTIDA (in $ Millions)$256.6$319.2$328.6
On September 15, 2017, the Compensation Committee met to determine what percentage of the fiscal 2017 performance-units with performance tied to fiscal 2017 granted to Mr. Griffin had been earned. The Compensation Committee determined that our GAAP earnings per diluted share exceeded the $1.00 threshold required under Mr. Griffin’s award agreement. When measuring our performance against the adjusted EBITDA targets, the Compensation Committee approved certain adjustments to our actual 2017 results. The adjusted results included approximately $15.6 million of upward adjustments to EBITDA in the aggregate related to (i) unbudgeted, pre-tax restructuring expense related to fiscal 2017 cost saving measures, (ii) unbudgeted pre-tax legal expense for litigation, legal and governance matters, and (iii) the gain the Company recorded in other income related to the sale of our investment in Kicking Horse Coffee in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The Compensation Committee believed it was appropriate to adjust for the impact of these items in light of the fact that the events giving rise to these items had not been entered into or had not been contemplated at the time the performance targets were established, and the fact that Mr. Griffin played a key role in returning value to shareholders on the Company's investment in Kicking Horse Coffee. As a result, our GAAP based EBITDA of $312.1 million was adjusted upward to $327.6 million. GAAP net sales of $9.274 billion was not adjusted. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved the vesting and payout of 18,811 performance units, 107.5% of target performance, effective upon the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K fiscal 2017contingent on our results reflected in our Annual Report on Form 10-K not differing from those anticipated at the time the Compensation Committee reviewed our results.
Additional Long-Term Equity Based Incentive Compensation. Certain of our Named Executive Officers were awarded additional time-based vesting restricted stock units in September 2016 outside of our core program. Messrs. Zechmeister, Dorne and Green were granted an award of 50,000, 25,000, and 25,000 restricted stock units, respectively. All of these awards vest in full on the fourth anniversary of the grant date. These additional grants were provided to Messrs. Zechmeister, Dorne and Green in light of these individuals’ increased responsibilities and duties within our organization as a result of organizational restructuring changes implemented in fiscal 2016. Mr. Dorne’s new roles include responsibility for our Canadian and Earth Origins operations as well as oversight of our risk and safety areas, Mr. Zechmeister’s responsibilities for fiscal 2017 include overseeing the consolidation of our financial planning and analysis, shared services and regional finance groups, while Mr. Green assumed the role of President of our Pacific Region in fiscal 2016.
Other Compensation and Benefits
The Named Executive OfficersNEOs are eligible for the same level and offeringtype of benefits that we make available to other employees, including our 401(k) plan, health care plan, life insurance plans, and other welfare benefit programs. In addition to the standard benefits offered to all employees, the Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Deferral Plans. We provide the Named Executive Officers with the ability to defer compensation asprograms and equity treatment upon retirement or a competitive pay practice so they may save amounts in a non-qualified retirement plan that are greater than the amount permitted to be deferred under the 401(k) Plan. For a description of the Deferral Plans, see EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation—Fiscal 2017 below.separation from service event. We do not have any defined benefit pension plans available to our Named Executive Officers.NEOs.
Perquisites and OtherAdditional Benefits.We provide certain Named Executive OfficersNEOs with perquisites and otheradditional benefits that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall executive compensation program. The costs of these benefits constitute


only a small portion of each Named Executive Officer'sNEO’s total compensation and includes,have included items such as relocation expenses and, for certain Named Executive Officers, contributions to our defined contribution plan, the payment of premiums for life insurance, automobile allowances, corporate housing andformer CEO, commuting air and travel reimbursement.reimbursement or security detail. We offer perquisites and other benefits that we believe to be competitive with benefits offered by companies with whom we compete for talent for purposes of recruitment and retention. In September 2022, the Committee approved a perquisite for senior vice presidents and above to pay for tax preparation fees beginning in 2023 in recognition of increased tax reporting obligations due to business travel.
Retirement. To recognize significant years of service to the Company and to incentivize employees who might consider retiring to remain focused on the long-term best interests of the Company regardless of their personal retirement plans, which could otherwise create bias toward short-term performance, the Committee has established a retirement policy that provides that time-based RSUs will continue to vest during retirement on the same terms as they would if the executive had not retired, but without the requirement that they remain employed. PSUs will be treated similarly on retirement, but subject to actual performance at the time when achievement of performance objectives are measured. In addition, an executive’s equity awards granted in the year of retirement will be prorated to reflect the service period prior to the date of retirement. Qualified retirement is defined as retirement by an employee who has reached age 59 or older and who has achieved at least 10 years of service to the Company. This policy applies to all participants, provided that, as described below, our CEO will be eligible for retirement treatment upon achievement of six years of service to the Company.
Components of Our Executive Compensation Program for Fiscal 20182023
Our Compensation ChangesCommittee made the following changes to base salary for the NEOs, effective October 30, 2022.
Named Executive Officer
Fiscal 2022 Base Salary (1)
Fiscal 2023 Base Salary(2)
% Change
Sandy Douglas$1,050,000 $1,050,000 — %
John W. Howard$675,000 $722,250 %
Eric A. Dorne$787,500 $787,500 — %
Michael C. Stigers$575,000 $598,000 %
Christopher P. Testa$810,000 $810,000 — %
(1)Reflects annual rate as of the end of fiscal 2022.
(2)Effective as of October 30, 2022.
Mr. Stigers annual cash incentive plan target for fiscal 2023 was increased to 85% of his base salary to align internally with other officers and in recognition of his accomplishments this past year. There were no other changes to annual incentive targets. The Committee did approve changes to the long-term incentive plan targets for certain NEOs. The fiscal 2023 award amounts reflect increases based on the results of benchmarking, recognition of accomplishments in fiscal 2022 and/or increased responsibilities of our executive officers as we continue to grow the business and execute against our Fuel the Future strategy. For Mr. Douglas, this is in recognition of his strong leadership and continued focus on expanding and strengthening the executive team to drive results, in addition to maintaining comparable total compensation that is aligned with market. For Mr. Howard this included, among other things, his accomplishments regarding debt and leverage reduction, capital structure foundation and revolving credit facility refinancing.
Named Executive OfficerTarget Fiscal 2022 LTI $Target Fiscal 2023 LTI $% Change
Sandy Douglas$3,900,000$5,000,00028.2 %
John W. Howard$1,500,000$1,800,00020.0 %
Eric A. Dorne$1,800,000$1,800,000— %
Michael C. Stigers$1,000,000$1,000,000— %
Christopher P. Testa$1,800,000$1,800,000— %
As a reminder, the Committee took several actions in fiscal 2018,2022, which incorporates investor feedback in connection with last year’s meeting and during our annual engagement:
44

Added a second metric to our short-term incentive plan. We believe the addition of a revenue metric (weighted at 25%) along with adjusted EBITDA (weighted at 75%) creates a balance between top- and bottom- line growth and aligning incentives with our Fuel the Future strategy to grow sales profitably;
Adjusted the design of long-term incentive awards to have a heavier weighting of performance-based awards; mix in fiscal 2022 will now be 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs (from 50%/50%); in connection with this change, the Committee also aligned maximum payout with market and peers at 200% (from 150%);
Simplified the long-term incentive plan PSUs for FY22-FY24 by removing the Leverage metric and re-weighting the remaining two metrics, adjusted EPS Growth and adjusted ROIC; and
Reduced change in control multiple for our CEO to 2.5x from prior CEO’s 2.99x.
Consulting, Retention, Severance and Change in Control Agreements
Consulting Agreement with Eric A. Dorne
Mr. Dorne retired from his position as Chief Operation Officer of the Company, effective October 29, 2022. The Company and Mr. Dorne entered into a consulting agreement pursuant to which Mr. Dorne has agreed to provide no more than 16 hours per month of consulting services for up to 12 months at a rate of $757 per hour.
Severance Agreements and Change in Control Agreements
As of July 30, 2022, we were a party to severance agreements and change in control agreements with each of Messrs. Douglas, Howard, Dorne and Testa. The capitalized terms “Cause,” “Good Reason” and “Change in Control” in this section are used as defined in those agreements. The Compensation Committee believes that the protections afforded in these severance and change in control agreements are reasonable and are an important element in retaining our executive officers. Each of the severance agreements includes non-solicitation, non-competition and intellectual property assignment provisions, which apply during the employment period and continue for a one-year period following termination of employment for any reason.
On September 21, 2022, the Compensation Committee made certain changesapproved an updated form of severance agreement with each of the current NEOs (other than the CEO, whose severance agreement was executed in August 2021). The updated severance agreements were effective on October 23, 2022 and expire on the third anniversary of that effective date, subject to extension by mutual agreement of the company and the individual executive officer. In addition to the compensation programterms described below, the updated severance agreements provide for the Named Executive Officers tiedpayment of an amount equal to such executive’s target bonus upon a qualifying termination, and revised restrictive covenant provisions, including to clarify the provisions and definitions regarding competitors, competition and the restricted period.
The change in control agreements also include non-solicitation and non-competition provisions, which apply during the employment period and continue for a two-year period, and intellectual property assignment provisions, which apply during the employment period and continue for a one-year period, following a termination of employment that occurs in contemplation of or within two years after a Change in Control. The severance and change in control agreements also contain confidentiality provisions that are not subject to a term. None of our executives is a party to an agreement providing for “gross up” payments for excise taxes imposed upon termination following a change in control. Any benefits to be paid upon a Change in Control under the change in control agreements are “double trigger,” which requires both a Change in Control and a termination of a the executive’s employment in contemplation of or within two years of the date of the Change in Control, either by us for a reason other than Cause, death or disability or by the executive for Good Reason.
The key benefits provided for in these agreements are summarized below:
Executive
Benefit or Payment (1)
Severance (2)
Change in Control (2)
CEOBase Multiple2X, continued pay2.5X, lump sum
Bonus Multiple2X target $, lump sum2.5X target $, lump sum
Prorated BonusYes, prorated and based on actual performanceYes, prorated and based on actual performance
Medical Benefits$70,000 lump sum$87,500 lump sum
Other ExecutivesBase Multiple1X, continued pay2X, lump sum
Bonus Multiple
None(3)
2X target $, lump sum
Prorated BonusYes, prorated and based on actual performanceYes, prorated and based on actual performance
Medical Benefits$35,000 lump sum$105,000 lump sum payment
(1) The provision of any such benefits will be subject to any restrictions under applicable law, including under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (Code).
(2) The treatment of equity awards upon separation is governed by the terms of the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and respective award
agreements.
45

(3) At the Committee’s September 2022 meeting, it approved an updated form of severance agreement, effective October 23, 2022, which provides for a payment equal to one time such executive’s target bonus payment based in part on benchmarking data provided by its independent compensation consultant.
In establishing the multiples of base salary and long-term equity based incentive compensation.
As described above under Competitive Marketplace Assessment, the Compensation Committee determinedbonus that a terminated executive would be entitled to conduct competitive market assessments when analyzing and setting the compensation of our Named Executive Officers every two years as opposed to annually and did not perform such an assessmentreceive following termination without Cause or for Good Reason following a Change in setting fiscal 2017 compensation. Accordingly, when it established the compensation for fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Semler Brossy, reviewed a broad-based market assessment. In selecting appropriate data for purposes of setting fiscal 2018 compensation,Control, the Compensation Committee considered companies with revenuethe need to be able to competitively recruit and retain talented executive officers who often times seek protection against the possibility that they might be terminated without Cause or be forced to resign for Good Reason following a Change in Control, while taking into account the views of our stockholders on appropriate multiples.
Mr. Stigers is party to a Transition Agreement entered into originally on October 22, 2018, between $5Supervalu and $10 billionUnited Natural Foods, Inc., at the time of the acquisition. The agreement was amended on March 27, 2019 then on May 12, 2020 and finally on March 9, 2021. The final amendment extends his ability to exercise Good Reason to July 31, 2023 by providing at least 9 months’ notice. This agreement provides for his original Change in Control benefits signed in December of 2015 at Supervalu. Benefits include a 2X base and target bonus payment paid in lump sum, plus a prorated bonus earned based on actual performance, outplacement services up to $25,000 and continued medical, dental and life insurance for up to 18 months.
Upon Ms. Sutton’s qualifying termination, the Committee and the market midpoint was defined as the averageBoard agreed to additional severance benefits equal to six months of the 25th and 50th percentiles to account for the low-margin nature of our business relative to general industry companies.
Base Salary. Base salary remains an important component of a Named Executive Officer's total compensation and for fiscal 2018 base salaries were generally targeted in the 25th to 50th percentile of the market assessment. For fiscal 2018, theher base salary for eachand 1.5x her annual bonus, at target. The Committee believed the payments to Ms. Sutton to be reasonable, market competitive, reflective of the Named Executive Officers has been increased over fiscal 2017 levels by the percentage noted below. With the exception of Messrs. Zechmeister, Griffin and Green, the percentage increases are consistent with the merit pool forMs. Sutton’s contributions to the Company, as well as necessary for a whole. Insmooth transition through the caseCompany’s organizational restructuring of Messrs. Zechmeister and Griffin, the competitive market place assessment performedareas that were previously under her oversight. Ms. Sutton received benefits payments as explained in the current year determined that their base salaries weretable below market for an employee performing comparable duties and their increase is indicative of our attempt to close this gap. For fiscal 2018, Mr. Green is assuming management responsibilities for the Company's Fresh operations in the Pacific region and the change in his base salary reflects the additional responsibilities he has assumed. Set forth below are the fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 base salaries for the Named Executive Officers and the percentage change between periods. The fiscal 2018 base salaries were effective for the first pay period in October 2017.Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control”.
Named Executive Officer 
Fiscal 2017
Base Salary
 
Fiscal 2018
Base Salary
 
Percentage
Change
Steven L. Spinner $922,500
 $946,000
 2.5%
Michael P. Zechmeister $461,250
 $493,538
 7.0%
Sean F. Griffin $550,000
 $588,500
 7.0%
Eric A. Dorne $383,400
 $393,100
 2.5%
Paul S. Green $335,000
 $351,750
 5.0%
Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Compensation. For fiscal 2018 the Compensation Committee approved changes to the Company's long-term equity-based incentive plan with respect to Mr. Spinner. As part of these changes Mr. Spinner will no longer receive a performance-based vesting restricted stock unit grant with a grant date fair value at targeted performance levels of $1.5 million tied to current year Company performance and instead will have that target value of $1.5 million added to his two-year performance period award to align Mr. Spinner’s regular annual long-term equity-based incentive opportunity with the rest of our Named Executive Officers’ core program. In consideration of this change, for fiscal 2018 only, 50% of the value of this award will be awarded as a portion of Mr. Spinner’s time-based vesting RSUs with the remaining 50% awarded as a portion of his two-year performance award. In connection with this transition and for fiscal 2018 only, Mr. Spinner's time-based restricted stock unit award granted in September 2017 will vest 60% on the first anniversary of the award in September 2018 and 13.3% in each successive year until fully vested, rather than ratable vesting over a four year period. The Compensation Committee has not made any special equity grants thus far in fiscal 2018.
Other Programs, Policies and Considerations
Potential Impact on Compensation from Executive Misconduct
If the Board determines that a Named Executive Officer has engaged in fraudulent or intentional misconduct, the Board will take action to remedy the misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and impose such discipline on the wrongdoers as appropriate. Discipline would vary depending on the facts and circumstances, and may include, without limitation, (1) termination of employment, (2) initiating an action for breach of fiduciary duty, and (3) if the misconduct resulted in a significant restatement of the our financial results, seeking reimbursement of any portion of performance-based or incentive compensation paid or awarded to the Named Executive Officer that is greater than would have been paid or awarded if calculated based on the restated financial results. These remedies would be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any actions imposed by law enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities.


Recoupment (Clawback) Policy
We have adoptedin place a recoupment policy applicable to our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, which provides that if we file an amendment to an SEC report to restate allNEOs, other principal officers and certain key employees or a portion of our financial statements within two years of filing the financial statements with the SEC,former employees designated by the Board or our CEO. Under the Compensation Committeepolicy, if the Company’s financial statements are required to be restated for any reason, except when due to a change in accounting policy that has a retroactive effect, the Board will review all performance-based compensation awarded or earned for all periods materially affected by such restatement. In addition, the Board will review all performance-based compensation awarded or earned that is based on performance metrics that appear to be materially inaccurate or affected in any way by fraud, regardless of whether a restatement of the Company’s financial statements is required.
The policy provides that the Board may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, seek the following actions with respect to compensation:
After conducting the review described above, the Board may seek recoupment from the persons covered by the policy for the extent of such performance-based compensation as it deems appropriate if it determines that:
the payment of such performance-based compensation was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial statement results that were subsequently corrected, or upon material inaccuracy or fraud, and a lower incentive payment or award would been made based upon the restated financial results or corrected performance metrics; or
a person covered by the policy has engaged in its sole discretion,conduct that will cause damage to the Company or is inimical or in any manner contrary to the best interests of the Company, and if the conduct resulted in a material inaccuracy in the Company’s financial statements or performance metrics which affects such person’s compensation.
The Board may also require reimbursementforfeiture of all or a portion of any bonus or incentive compensation paidin the case of misconduct in violation of law or granted after May 28, 2009Company policy, including through failure of an executive’s oversight responsibilities, that results in material financial or reputational harm to any executive officer or other officer covered by this policy. the Company.
The Board, or the Compensation Committee,policy was also has the rightamended in fiscal 2021 to require disclosure in the event the Board seeks recoupment or forfeiture pursuant to the recoupment policy, provided that, among other things, the related facts and circumstances giving rise to the recovery have been publicly disclosed.
46

Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) requires the recovery of incentive awards from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer if we are required to restate our financials due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirementsrequirement as a result of misconduct. In addition,Additionally, in October 2022, the SEC adopted final rules requiring the securities exchanges to adopt listing standards regarding recovery of incentive compensation, which listing standards may require the Board to update our recoupment policy. The Board is required under Section 954aware of the Dodd-Frank Act to adopt rules thatrequirements under SOX and the updated SEC regulations and will require every exchange-listed company to adopt a “clawback” policy for the recovery of certain incentive-based compensation from its executive officersconsider each in the event we are required to restate our financials as a result of material noncompliance with reporting requirements. When final rules under the Dodd-Frank Act are adopted, we expect to revise our existing clawback policy as necessary to comply with these final SEC rules.
Policy on Gross Up Payments in Connection with a Change in Control
We have adopted a policy under which we may not enter into new or amended agreements which provide for "gross ups" for excise tax obligations payable by our executives upon termination of employment following a change in control. We also entered into amendmentsaddition to the changecurrent recoupment policy in control agreement with Mr. Spinnercontemplation of any clawbacks. The Board intends to eliminate such "gross up" payments relatedmake any necessary updates to change in control. As a result, nonethe recoupment policy upon finalization of our executives is a party to an agreement providing for "gross up" payments for excise taxes imposed upon termination following a change in control. Mr. Spinner's employment agreement does not include a "gross up" for excise tax obligations payablethe required listing standards by him upon termination of employment following a change in control.NYSE.
Stock Ownership GuidelinesSeverance Agreements and Change in Control Agreements
As of July 30, 2022, we were a party to severance agreements and change in control agreements with each of Messrs. Douglas, Howard, Dorne and Testa. The capitalized terms “Cause,” “Good Reason” and “Change in Control” in this section are used as defined in those agreements. The Compensation Committee believes stock ownership guidelinesthat the protections afforded in these severance and change in control agreements are a key vehicle for aligning the interests of managementreasonable and our stockholders. A meaningful ownership stake by our Named Executive Officers demonstrates to our stockholders a strong commitment to our success. Accordingly, the Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines that requireare an important element in retaining our executive officersofficers. Each of the severance agreements includes non-solicitation, non-competition and intellectual property assignment provisions, which apply during the employment period and continue for a one-year period following termination of employment for any reason.
On September 21, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved an updated form of severance agreement with each of the current NEOs (other than the CEO, whose severance agreement was executed in August 2021). The updated severance agreements were effective on October 23, 2022 and expire on the third anniversary of that effective date, subject to hold sharesextension by mutual agreement of the company and the individual executive officer. In addition to the terms described below, the updated severance agreements provide for the payment of an amount equal to such executive’s target bonus upon a qualifying termination, and revised restrictive covenant provisions, including to clarify the provisions and definitions regarding competitors, competition and the restricted period.
The change in control agreements also include non-solicitation and non-competition provisions, which apply during the employment period and continue for a two-year period, and intellectual property assignment provisions, which apply during the employment period and continue for a one-year period, following a termination of employment that occurs in contemplation of or within two years after a Change in Control. The severance and change in control agreements also contain confidentiality provisions that are not subject to a term. None of our common stock having an aggregate market value from time to time which equals or exceeds three times their base salary, and in the case of Mr. Spinner, six times his base salary. Each executiveexecutives is expected to comply with the policy by the later of the fifth year after (i) the stock ownership guidelines were adopted, or (ii) he or she became an executive. Once attained, each executive officer is required to maintain this level of stock ownership for as long as they are employed by us and serving as an executive officer. When calculating whether a Named Executive Officer owns a sufficient number of shares under these guidelines, shares owned in the 401(k) Plan and deferred compensation plans are included in the number of shares owned, as are shares of vested and unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units subject only to time-based vesting restrictions. Unvested or unearned performance shares or performance units and unvested stock options do not count, though shares of stock issuable with respect to performance units that have been earned but not yet issued shall count. All our Named Executive Officers met our guidelines as of October 1, 2017.
Hedging and Insider Trading Policy
Our insider trading policy prohibits our executive officers from holding shares of our common stock in a margin account or from pledging shares of our common stock unless, in the case of pledging of the shares as collateral for a loan (not including margin debt), approved in advance by our General Counsel upon demonstration the individual clearly has the financial capacity to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities. In addition, our insider trading policy permits only limited types of hedging transactions that are structured to avoid the risks of short selling, options trading or margin trading and which must be made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan that is pre-cleared by our General Counsel and for which any securities involved in such transaction must be in excess of our minimum stock ownership guidelines. Currently, none of the members of the Board or our executive officers are engaged in any hedging or pledging transactions involving shares of our common stock.
Employment Agreements
We are currently a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Spinnerproviding for “gross up” payments for excise taxes imposed upon termination following a change in control. Any benefits to be paid upon a Change in Control under the change in control agreements are “double trigger,” which was entered intorequires both a Change in October 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”). The Employment Agreement has a three year term, subject to automatic one year renewals unless either party gives 180 days’ notice of intent not to renew. The Employment Agreement provides for an initial base salaryControl and a target cash bonus opportunity. The Employment Agreement also provides Mr. Spinner with certain benefits, such as reimbursementtermination of expenses, paid leave and participationa the executive’s employment in the Company’s employee benefit plans and programs.


The Employment Agreement provides for severance payments where Mr. Spinner is terminated without “cause”contemplation of or if Mr. Spinner resigns with “good reason.” “Good Reason” generally means the occurrence of any one or more of the following: (1) the assignment of Mr. Spinner to duties materially adversely inconsistent with his duties aswithin two years of the date of the Employment Agreement; (2)Change in Control, either by us for a material reductionreason other than Cause, death or disability or by the executive for Good Reason.
The key benefits provided for in Mr. Spinner’s title, executive authority or reporting status,these agreements are summarized below:
Executive
Benefit or Payment (1)
Severance (2)
Change in Control (2)
CEOBase Multiple2X, continued pay2.5X, lump sum
Bonus Multiple2X target $, lump sum2.5X target $, lump sum
Prorated BonusYes, prorated and based on actual performanceYes, prorated and based on actual performance
Medical Benefits$70,000 lump sum$87,500 lump sum
Other ExecutivesBase Multiple1X, continued pay2X, lump sum
Bonus Multiple
None(3)
2X target $, lump sum
Prorated BonusYes, prorated and based on actual performanceYes, prorated and based on actual performance
Medical Benefits$35,000 lump sum$105,000 lump sum payment
(1) The provision of any such benefits will be subject to any restrictions under applicable law, including failureunder Section 409A of the CompanyInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to appoint Mr. Spinner as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer; (3) a relocation more than fifty (50) miles from Mr. Spinner’s then current placetime (Code).
(2) The treatment of employment; (4) a reductionequity awards upon separation is governed by the Company in Mr. Spinner’s base salary, or a failure of the Company to pay or cause to be paid any compensation or benefits when due or under the terms of any plan established by the Company and failure to restore such base salary or make such payments within five (5) days of receipt of notice from Mr. Spinner, (5) failure to include Mr. Spinner in any new employee benefit plans proposed by the Company or a material reduction in Mr. Spinner’s level of participation in any benefit plans of the Company; provided that a Company-wide reduction or elimination of such plans shall not give rise to a “Good Reason” termination; (6) a material breach of the Employment Agreement by the Company; or (7) the failure of the Company to obtain a satisfactory agreement from any successor to the Company with respect to the ownership of substantially all the stock or assets of the Company to assume and agree to perform the terms of the Agreement,2020 Equity Incentive Plan and respective award
agreements.
45

(3) At the Committee’s September 2022 meeting, it approved an updated form of severance agreement, effective October 23, 2022, which provides for a payment equal to one time such executive’s target bonus payment based in each case topart on benchmarking data provided by its independent compensation consultant.
In establishing the extent not cured (if curable) following noticemultiples of such event.  “Cause” generally means (1) the conviction of Mr. Spinner under applicable law of any felony or any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, (2) unauthorized acts intended to result in Mr. Spinner’s personal enrichment at the material expense of the Company or its reputation, (3) any violation of Mr. Spinner’s duties or responsibilities to the Company which constitutes willful misconduct or dereliction of duty or (4) material breach of the sections of the Employment Agreement related to non-competition and the other activities that Mr. Spinner may engage in outside of his employment for the Company, in each case to the extent not cured (if curable) following notice of such event.
The severance payments owed to Mr. Spinner in the event the Company terminates his employment without "cause" or he voluntarily terminates his employment for "good reason" generally consist of (a) 200% of Mr. Spinner’s then current base salary (b) 200% of his current-year annual cash incentive payments based on target performance and (c) the pro-rated portion of the current-year annual cash incentive payments hebonus that a terminated executive would have been owedbe entitled to receive following termination without Cause or for the fiscal year in which his employment was terminated based on the Company's actual results when measured against the performance metrics applicable to Mr. Spinner for that period. Severance also includes payments to Mr. Spinner of $35,000 that he may use to pay for medical benefits for himself and his dependentsGood Reason following termination. In addition, where Mr. Spinner is terminated without “cause” or Mr. Spinner voluntarily terminates his employment for “good reason”, any stock options awarded to Mr. Spinner and not vested and exercisable on or prior to the date of Mr. Spinner's termination that would otherwise have become vested and exercisable on or prior to the first anniversary of the date of Mr. Spinner's termination, and any shares of restricted stock (including restricted stock units settled in shares of common stock) and performance-based vesting equity awards (including performance-based restricted stock units settled in shares of common stock) granted to Mr. Spinner that would have had any restrictions thereon removed or vested on or prior to the first anniversary of the date of Mr. Spinner's termination, will, in each case, have any restrictions thereon removed or become vested, as the case may be, with such restrictions with respect to any performance-based vesting equity awards to be removed on that number of awards as Mr. Spinner would have earned based on performance at the greater of target or actual levels of performance for the current year (but only if any gateway performance metrics applicable to the awards are achieved).
In addition, where Mr. Spinner is terminated without “cause” or Mr. Spinner voluntarily terminates his employment for “good reason” within one year after a Change in Control, (as defined below)the Compensation Committee considered the need to be able to competitively recruit and retain talented executive officers who often times seek protection against the possibility that they might be terminated without Cause or be forced to resign for Good Reason following a Change in Control, while taking into account the views of our stockholders on appropriate multiples.
Mr. Stigers is party to a Transition Agreement entered into originally on October 22, 2018, between Supervalu and United Natural Foods, Inc., at the time of the acquisition. The agreement was amended on March 27, 2019 then on May 12, 2020 and finally on March 9, 2021. The final amendment extends his ability to exercise Good Reason to July 31, 2023 by providing at least 9 months’ notice. This agreement provides for his original Change in Control benefits signed in December of 2015 at Supervalu. Benefits include a 2X base and target bonus payment paid in lump sum, plus a prorated bonus earned based on actual performance, outplacement services up to $25,000 and continued medical, dental and life insurance for up to 18 months.
Upon Ms. Sutton’s qualifying termination, the Committee and the Board agreed to additional severance benefits equal to six months of her base salary and 1.5x her annual bonus, at target. The Committee believed the payments to Ms. Sutton to be reasonable, market competitive, reflective of Ms. Sutton’s contributions to the Company, as well as necessary for a smooth transition through the Company’s organizational restructuring of areas that were previously under her oversight. Ms. Sutton received benefits payments as explained in lieuthe table below in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control”.
Other Programs, Policies and Considerations
Recoupment (Clawback) Policy
We have in place a recoupment policy applicable to our executive officers, including our NEOs, other principal officers and certain key employees or former employees designated by the Board or our CEO. Under the policy, if the Company’s financial statements are required to be restated for any reason, except when due to a change in accounting policy that has a retroactive effect, the Board will review all performance-based compensation awarded or earned for all periods materially affected by such restatement. In addition, the Board will review all performance-based compensation awarded or earned that is based on performance metrics that appear to be materially inaccurate or affected in any way by fraud, regardless of whether a restatement of the severance compensationCompany’s financial statements is required.
The policy provides that the Board may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, seek the following actions with respect to compensation:
After conducting the review described above, the Company must pay to Mr. Spinner (a) 3 times Mr. Spinner’s then current base salary, (b) 3 timesBoard may seek recoupment from the current-year annual cash incentive payments based on target performance and (c)persons covered by the pro-rated portion of the current-year annual cash incentive payments he would have been owedpolicy for the fiscal year in which his employment was terminated based on the Company's actual results when measured against the performance metrics applicable to Mr. Spinner for that period. The Company must make payments to Mr. Spinner of $105,000 that he may use to pay for medical benefits for himself and his dependents following termination. In addition, any and all unvested and unexercised stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based vesting equity awards granted to Mr. Spinner shall be treated in accordance with the applicable award agreements evidencing such equity-based awards and any applicable election forms related thereto. The Employment Agreement contemplates that if any payments or benefits otherwise payable to Mr. Spinner would constitute "parachute payments" within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, then such payments and benefits will either be (x) delivered in full, or (y) delivered as to such lesser extent that would result in no portion of such payments and benefits being subject toperformance-based compensation as it deems appropriate if it determines that:
the payment of such excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, whichever of the foregoing amounts, taking into account applicable taxes and the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, results in the receipt by Mr. Spinner on an after-tax basis, of the greatest amount of benefits.
Receipt of any severance payments or benefits is conditioned upon Mr. Spinner’s release of claims against the Company and its officers and directors.
The Employment Agreement contains provisions governing the nondisclosure and nonuse of confidential information of the Company, provisions requiring the assignment of certain intellectual property rights to the Company, and non-competition and non-solicitation restrictive covenants which remain in existence for one year or, in the event of termination for “cause” or without “good reason”, two years following Mr. Spinner’s termination.


The Employment Agreement provides that if the Company files an amendment to an SEC report to restate its financial statements filed in the two preceding years the Board or a committee of the Board consisting entirely of independent directors may require Mr. Spinner to repay any bonus or incentive compensation paid or granted to Mr. Spinner if the amount of bonus or incentiveperformance-based compensation was calculated basedpredicated upon the achievement of certain financial statement results that were subsequently reducedcorrected, or upon material inaccuracy or fraud, and a lower incentive payment or award would been made based upon the restated financial results or corrected performance metrics; or
a person covered by the policy has engaged in conduct that will cause damage to the Company or is inimical or in any manner contrary to the best interests of the Company, and if the conduct resulted in a material inaccuracy in the Company’s financial statements or performance metrics which affects such person’s compensation.
The Board may also require forfeiture of incentive compensation in the case of misconduct in violation of law or Company policy, including through failure of an executive’s oversight responsibilities, that results in material financial or reputational harm to the Company.
The policy was also amended in fiscal 2021 to require disclosure in the event the Board seeks recoupment or forfeiture pursuant to the recoupment policy, provided that, among other things, the related facts and circumstances giving rise to the recovery have been publicly disclosed.
46

Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) requires the recovery of incentive awards from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer if we are required to restate our financials due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement as a result of misconduct. Additionally, in October 2022, the restatement,SEC adopted final rules requiring the securities exchanges to adopt listing standards regarding recovery of incentive compensation, which listing standards may require the Board to update our recoupment policy. The Board is aware of the requirements under SOX and the amountupdated SEC regulations and will consider each in addition to the current recoupment policy in contemplation of any clawbacks. The Board intends to make any necessary updates to the recoupment policy upon finalization of the bonus or incentive compensation that would have been awarded to Mr. Spinner had the financial results been properly reported would have been lower than the amount actually awarded. required listing standards by NYSE.
Severance Agreements and Change in Control Agreements
We are currentlyAs of July 30, 2022, we were a party to amended and restated severance agreements and amended and restated change in control agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers, except for Mr. Spinner. Given the fact that we do not have employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers, except for Mr. Spinner, theMessrs. Douglas, Howard, Dorne and Testa. The capitalized terms “Cause,” “Good Reason” and “Change in Control” in this section are used as defined in those agreements. The Compensation Committee believes that the protections afforded in these severance agreements and change in control agreements are reasonable and are an important element in retaining our executive officers.
Each of the severance agreements includes confidentiality,non-solicitation, non-competition and intellectual property assignment provisions. Outsideprovisions, which apply during the contextemployment period and continue for a one-year period following termination of employment for any reason.
On September 21, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved an updated form of severance agreement with each of the current NEOs (other than the CEO, whose severance agreement was executed in August 2021). The updated severance agreements were effective on October 23, 2022 and expire on the third anniversary of that effective date, subject to extension by mutual agreement of the company and the individual executive officer. In addition to the terms described below, the updated severance agreements provide for the payment of an amount equal to such executive’s target bonus upon a qualifying termination, and revised restrictive covenant provisions, including to clarify the provisions and definitions regarding competitors, competition and the restricted period.
The change in control agreements also include non-solicitation and non-competition provisions, which apply during the employment period and continue for a two-year period, and intellectual property assignment provisions, which apply during the employment period and continue for a one-year period, following a termination of employment that occurs in contemplation of or within two years after a Change in Control, if we terminate anyControl. The severance and change in control agreements also contain confidentiality provisions that are not subject to a term. None of our Named Executive Officersexecutives is a party to an agreement providing for any reason other than Cause, death, or disability or such executive resigns“gross up” payments for Good Reason, we would be required to pay to the executive (i) his base salary, as in effect as of theexcise taxes imposed upon termination date of his employment for a period of one year following his termination, and (ii)make a cash payment in the amount of $35,000 to such individual that may be used by the individual to pay for post-termination medical benefits for himself and his dependents. No payments are owed to the Named Executive Officers pursuant to the severance agreement as a result of a change in control.
Any benefits to be paid upon a changeChange in controlControl under the amended and restated change in control agreements are "double“double trigger," which requires both a Change in Control and a termination of a Named Executive Officerthe executive’s employment in contemplation of or within two years of the date of the Change in Control, either by us for a reason other than Cause, death or disability or a resignation by the executive for Good Reason within one year of the date of the Change in Control. In the event of either a termination of the executive for a reason other than Cause, death or disability or his resignation for Good Reason within one year of the date of a Change in Control, the executive would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to (i) a multiple of his base salary (multiple of 2.99 times in the case of Messrs. Zechmeister and Griffin and 1.5 times in the case of Messrs. Dorne, and Green), as in effect at that time of his termination of employment, (ii) a multiple of the executive’s annual cash incentive payments based on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive is terminated (2.99 times in the case of Messrs. Zechmeister and Griffin and 1.5 times in the case of Messrs. Dorne and Green), and (iii) the prorated portion of the executive’s current-year annual cash incentive payments he would have been owed for the fiscal year in which his employment was terminated based on the Company’s actual results when measured against the performance metrics applicable to him for that performance period. We will also be required to make a cash payment in the amount of $105,000 to such individual that may be used by the individual to pay for post-termination medicalReason.
The key benefits for himself and his dependents. In addition, if the Named Executive Officer is terminated by the Company without Cause or voluntarily terminates his employment for Good Reason, in each case within one year following a Change in Control, any and all unvested and unexercised stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based vesting equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officer shall become fully vested as of the date of the Change in Control, including performance awards, which shall vest at target level of performance unless a greater level of vesting is provided for in the applicable award agreement.these agreements are summarized below:
Executive
Benefit or Payment (1)
Severance (2)
Change in Control (2)
CEOBase Multiple2X, continued pay2.5X, lump sum
Bonus Multiple2X target $, lump sum2.5X target $, lump sum
Prorated BonusYes, prorated and based on actual performanceYes, prorated and based on actual performance
Medical Benefits$70,000 lump sum$87,500 lump sum
Other ExecutivesBase Multiple1X, continued pay2X, lump sum
Bonus Multiple
None(3)
2X target $, lump sum
Prorated BonusYes, prorated and based on actual performanceYes, prorated and based on actual performance
Medical Benefits$35,000 lump sum$105,000 lump sum payment
(1) The provision of allany such benefits will be subject to any restrictions under applicable law, including under Section 409A of the Code. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (Code).
(2) The treatment of equity awards upon separation is governed by the terms of the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and respective award
agreements.
45

(3) At the Committee’s September 2022 meeting, it approved an updated form of severance agreement, effective October 23, 2022, which provides for a payment equal to one time such executive’s target bonus payment based in part on benchmarking data provided by its independent compensation consultant.
In establishing the multiples of base salary and bonus that a terminated executive would be entitled to receive following his termination without Cause or for Good Reason either before or within one year following a Change in Control, the Compensation Committee considered the need to be able to competitively recruit and retain talented executive officers who often-timesoften times seek protection against the possibility that they might be terminated without causeCause or be forced to resign for Good Reason following a Change in Control.Control, while taking into account the views of our stockholders on appropriate multiples.
For purposesMr. Stigers is party to a Transition Agreement entered into originally on October 22, 2018, between Supervalu and United Natural Foods, Inc., at the time of the acquisition. The agreement was amended on March 27, 2019 then on May 12, 2020 and finally on March 9, 2021. The final amendment extends his ability to exercise Good Reason to July 31, 2023 by providing at least 9 months’ notice. This agreement provides for his original Change in Control benefits signed in December of 2015 at Supervalu. Benefits include a 2X base and target bonus payment paid in lump sum, plus a prorated bonus earned based on actual performance, outplacement services up to $25,000 and continued medical, dental and life insurance for up to 18 months.
Upon Ms. Sutton’s qualifying termination, the Committee and the Board agreed to additional severance agreementsbenefits equal to six months of her base salary and 1.5x her annual bonus, at target. The Committee believed the payments to Ms. Sutton to be reasonable, market competitive, reflective of Ms. Sutton’s contributions to the Company, as well as necessary for a smooth transition through the Company’s organizational restructuring of areas that were previously under her oversight. Ms. Sutton received benefits payments as explained in the table below in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control”.
Other Programs, Policies and Considerations
Recoupment (Clawback) Policy
We have in place a recoupment policy applicable to our executive officers, including our NEOs, other principal officers and certain key employees or former employees designated by the Board or our CEO. Under the policy, if the Company’s financial statements are required to be restated for any reason, except when due to a change in control agreementsaccounting policy that has a retroactive effect, the Board will review all performance-based compensation awarded or earned for all periods materially affected by such restatement. In addition, the Board will review all performance-based compensation awarded or earned that is based on performance metrics that appear to be materially inaccurate or affected in any way by fraud, regardless of whether a restatement of the Company’s financial statements is required.
The policy provides that the Board may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, seek the following actions with respect to compensation:
After conducting the review described above, the terms "Cause", "Good Reason"Board may seek recoupment from the persons covered by the policy for the extent of such performance-based compensation as it deems appropriate if it determines that:
the payment of such performance-based compensation was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial statement results that were subsequently corrected, or upon material inaccuracy or fraud, and "Changea lower incentive payment or award would been made based upon the restated financial results or corrected performance metrics; or
a person covered by the policy has engaged in Control" haveconduct that will cause damage to the meanings set forth below.
"Cause" generally means (1)Company or is inimical or in any manner contrary to the conviction of the Named Executive Officer under applicable law of any felony or any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, (2) unauthorized acts intended to result in the Named Executive Officer's personal enrichment at the material expensebest interests of the Company, and if the conduct resulted in a material inaccuracy in the Company’s financial statements or its reputation, (3) anyperformance metrics which affects such person’s compensation.
The Board may also require forfeiture of incentive compensation in the case of misconduct in violation of the Named Executive Officer's dutieslaw or Company policy, including through failure of an executive’s oversight responsibilities, that results in material financial or reputational harm to the Company which constitutes willful misconductCompany.
The policy was also amended in fiscal 2021 to require disclosure in the event the Board seeks recoupment or derelictionforfeiture pursuant to the recoupment policy, provided that, among other things, the related facts and circumstances giving rise to the recovery have been publicly disclosed.
46

Section 304 of the sectionsSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) requires the recovery of incentive awards from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer if we are required to restate our financials due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement as a result of misconduct. Additionally, in October 2022, the SEC adopted final rules requiring the securities exchanges to adopt listing standards regarding recovery of incentive compensation, which listing standards may require the Board to update our recoupment policy. The Board is aware of the agreements related to confidentialityrequirements under SOX and non-competition,the updated SEC regulations and will consider each in each caseaddition to the extent not cured (if curable) following notice of such event.
"Good Reason" generally means, the occurrencecurrent recoupment policy in contemplation of any one or moreclawbacks. The Board intends to make any necessary updates to the recoupment policy upon finalization of the following withoutrequired listing standards by NYSE.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Compensation Committee believes stock ownership guidelines are a key vehicle for aligning the executive's express written consent: (1)interests of Management and our stockholders. A meaningful ownership stake by our officers demonstrates to our stockholders a strong commitment to our success. Accordingly, the assignmentBoard has adopted stock ownership guidelines that require our executive officers to hold shares of our common stock having an aggregate market value from time to time which equals or exceeds the below multiples:
Associates Subject to GuidelinesMultiple of Base Salary
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)6X
Other Executive Officers3X
Other Senior Officers (SVPs and above)1X
Each covered officer is expected to comply with the policy by the fifth year after he or she became subject to the guidelines. Compliance with the guidelines is tested once per year for as long as the officer is employed by the Company. When calculating whether an officer owns a sufficient number of shares under these guidelines, vested and unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units are included. Starting in fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee strengthened this policy to provide that only 50% of the Named Executive Officervalue of an executive officer’s unvested restricted stock units will count towards ownership, to duties materially adversely inconsistentfurther align leaders with his dutiesstockholders and tie their interests to long-term stock price appreciation. Further, in fiscal 2022, the Committee amended the policy to provide that vested stock options and stock appreciation rights will not be counted in determining compliance. Officers are not allowed to hedge their interests in the stock held pursuant to the guidelines. Our guidelines provide that, once in compliance, an officer shall be deemed to remain in compliance despite a subsequent reduction in stock price that may otherwise cause non-compliance. Given the sustained decline in our stock price at the level specified in our stock ownership guidelines for 18 months, the five-year accumulation period was reset as of the dateend of the severance agreementfiscal 2020. Each of our executive officers was in compliance as of July 30, 2022.
Hedging and changeInsider Trading Policy
Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our Directors and certain employees, including executive officers, from engaging in control agreement,certain speculative transactions in our equity securities, including short sales, hedging transactions and pledging our stock as applicable, and failure to rescind such within thirty (30) days of notice from the executive; (2) a material reduction in the Named Executive Officer’s title, executive authority or reporting status; (3) the Company's requirement that the Named Executive Officer relocate more than fifty (50) miles from his


then current place of employment; (4) a reduction by the Company in the Named Executive Officer's base salary, or a failure of the Company to pay or cause to be paid any compensation or benefits when due or under the terms of any plan established by the Company and failure to restore such base salary or make such payments within five (5) days of receipt of notice from the Named Executive Officer; (5) failure to include the Named Executive Officer in any new employee benefit plans proposed by the Company or a material reduction in the Named Executive Officer's level of participation in any benefit plans of the Company; provided that a Company-wide reduction or elimination of such plans shall not give rise to a "Good Reason" termination; or (6) the failure of the Company to obtain a satisfactory agreement from any successor to the Company with respect to the ownership of substantially all the stock or assets of the Company to assume and agree to perform the terms of the severance agreement or change in control agreement, as applicable, and in each case to the extent not cured (if curable) following notice of such event.
"Change in Control" means the happening of any of the following:
any "person", including a "group" (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, but excluding the Company, any of its affiliates, or any employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its affiliates) is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13(d)(3) under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing the greater of 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities;
approval by the stockholders of the Company of a definitive agreement (1) for the merger or other business combination of the Company with or into another corporation if (A) a majority of the directors of the surviving corporation were not directors of the Company immediately prior to the effective date of such merger or (B) the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to the effective date of such merger own less than 60% of the combined voting power in the then outstanding securities in such surviving corporation or (2) for the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or
the purchase of 30% or more of the Company's stock pursuant to any tender or exchange offer made by any "person", including a "group" (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), other than the Company, any of its affiliates, or any employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its affiliates.security.
Tax Deductibility of Compensation
When it reviews compensation matters, the Compensation Committee considers, among other matters, the anticipated tax and accounting treatment of payments and benefits with respect to us and, when relevant, to the executive. Section 162(m) of the Code limits toimposes an annual deduction limit of $1 million on the annual tax deduction foramount of compensation paid to each of the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and certain other NEOs. Prior to the three other highest paid executive officers employed at the endeffectiveness of the year (other than the chief financial officer). However,Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, this deduction limit did not apply to compensation that does not exceed $1 million during any fiscal year or that qualifiesqualified as "performance-based compensation"“performance-based compensation” (as defined in Section 162(m)) is deductible.. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the qualified “performance-based compensation” exemption from Section 162(m), subject to an exception for compensation paid pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and has not been modified in any material respect after such date. The Compensation Committee considers these requirementsalso approved, and attemptsmay continue to ensure that both cash and equity components of the Named Executive Officers' total compensation are tax deductible by us, to the maximum extent possible, by the use of stockholder-approved plans that are intended to comply, to the extent practicable, with Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee reserves the right to make non-deductible awards (e.g. service vested restricted stock units, non-performance-based cash payments, onboarding grants for new hires or performance-basedapprove, compensation that exceeds the limits in the Original Amended$1 million limitation and Restated Plan). Our performance-based cash incentive plan is intendednon-deductible. While accounting and tax treatment are relevant issues to be a subplan of our Original Amended and Restated Plan, which was approved by our stockholders.  Accordingly, assuming that awards otherwise comply with the technical requirements of Section 162(m) these awards should qualify as “performance-based compensation” and as a result be deductible if paid out in accordance with the terms of the plan and performance metrics approved by the Compensation Committee. Nonetheless,consider, the Compensation Committee believes that stockholder interests are best served by not restricting flexibility in designing compensation programs, even though such programs may determine to approve awards that do not meet the requirementsresult in non-deductible compensation expenses for tax purposes.

47

Report of Section 162(m). In making the compensation decisions in connection with Mr. Spinner's employment agreement, the Compensation Committee took into account that it is likely that the cash payment and a portion of the equity award made thereunder will not be deductible for federal income tax purposes given the limitations contained in Section 162(m) and the Original Amended and Restated Plan. The Compensation Committee will continue to review and evaluate, as necessary, the impact of Section 162(m) on our executive compensation programs, but the Compensation Committee has approved in the past and may approve in the future, compensation that is not considered performance-based under Section 162(m) or that is outside the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m).


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
We have reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management.Management. Based on our review and discussion with management,Management, we have recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017.

30, 2022.
James P. Heffernan,Daphne J. Dufresne, Chair
Eric F. Artz
Ann Torre BatesJames L. Muehlbauer
Peter A. Roy
48
The foregoing Report



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
Executive Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table—Fiscal Years 2015-20172020-2022
The following table sets forth for each of the Named Executive Officers:NEOs for each fiscal year indicated: (i) the dollar value of base salary, retention bonuses and non-equity incentive compensation earned during the fiscal year indicated;earned; (ii) the aggregate grant date fair value related to all equity-based awards made to the Named Executive Officer for the fiscal year indicated;NEO; (iii) non-qualified deferred compensation earnings, during the fiscal year where applicable; (iv) all other compensation for the fiscal year indicated;compensation; and (v) the dollar value of total compensation forcompensation.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal PositionYearSalaryBonus
Stock
Awards(1)
Option
Awards
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3)
All Other
Compensation(4)
Total
Sandy Douglas(8)
2022$1,029,808— $5,899,913— $1,784,744— $7,827$8,722,292
Chief Executive Officer2021— — — — — — — — 
2020— — — — — — — — 
John W. Howard2022662,500 — 1,499,935 — 765,446 — 10,250 2,938,131 
Chief Financial Officer2021618,750 — 1,199,989 — 717,453 — 9,923 2,546,115 
2020567,308 — 849,987 — 794,985 — 9,577 2,221,857 
Eric A. Dorne2022778,125 — 1,799,968 — 899,038 — 10,075 3,487,206 
Chief Operating Officer2021750,000 — 1,499,969 — 869,640 — 7,742 3,127,351 
2020614,808 — 749,993 — 752,274 — 8,767 2,125,842 
Michael C. Stigers(8)
2022575,000 — 999,972 — 489,046 — 9,952 2,073,970 
Chief Executive Officer, Cub2021— — — — — — — — 
2020— — — — — — — — 
Christopher P. Testa2022795,000 675,000 (5)1,799,968 — 918,535 — 10,250 4,198,753 
President2021750,000 — 1,499,969 — 869,640 — 9,750 3,129,359 
2020605,769 — 899,988 — 742,774 266 10,942 2,259,739 
Steven L. Spinner2022267,276— — — — — 6,044,738(6)6,312,014
Former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman20211,200,000— 5,099,971— 2,087,136— 16,2588,403,365
20201,200,000— 5,099,987— 2,522,39412,61229,1758,864,168
Jill E. Sutton2022215,938 — 999,972 — 212,069 — 1,139,214 (7)2,567,193 
Former Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Secretary2021562,500 — 1,264,970 — 539,612 — 8,608 2,375,690 
2020498,750 — 697,487 — 524,185 — 8,631 1,729,053 

(1)Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of awards of RSUs and PSUs at the target level as computed under ASC 718 granted during the fiscal year indicated. For PSUs, grant date fair value is calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance result (i.e., target level of performance) for each of the performance periods, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. These amounts do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that were paid to, or may be realized by, the NEO for any of the fiscal years reflected. Refer to footnotes 1 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 30, 2022 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of these awards. The grant date fair value of PSUs awarded to Mr. Douglas in fiscal 2022, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance, was $4,679,926 (annual grant) and $2,399,988 (inducement grant), respectively. The grant date fair value of PSUs awarded to Mr. Howard in fiscal 2022, 2021 and 2020, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance, was $1,799,922, $899,992 and $224,993, respectively. The grant date fair value of PSUs awarded to Mr. Dorne in fiscal 2022, 2021 and 2020, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance, was $2,159,980, $1,124,968 and $562,495, respectively. The grant date fair value of PSUs awarded to Mr. Stigers in fiscal 2022, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance, was $1,199,948. The grant date fair value of PSUs awarded to Mr. Testa in fiscal 2022, 2021 and 2020, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance, was $2,159,980, $1,124,968 and $674,991, respectively. The grant date fair value of PSUs awarded to Mr. Spinner in fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2020, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance, was $3,824,978 and $3,824,990, respectively. He was not eligible for a fiscal 2022 award. The grant date fair value of PSUs awarded to Ms. Sutton in fiscal 2022, 2021 and 2020, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance, was $1,199,948, $1,073,727 and $523,115, respectively; Ms Sutton’s amounts reflect full grant value prior to proration upon her qualifying termination in December 2021.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE(2)Amounts shown for fiscal 2022 reflect payments made in fiscal 2023 under our annual cash incentive plan related to fiscal 2022 performance. Amounts shown for fiscal 2021 and 2020 reflect payments under our annual cash incentive plan for those fiscal years in fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2021, respectively. For a discussion regarding the annual cash incentive plan, see “Executive Compensation
49

Name and Principal PositionYearSalaryBonus (1)
Stock
Awards (2)
Option
Awards (3)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (4)
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (5)
All Other
Compensation
 Total
Steven L. Spinner2017$919,039
$1,250,000
$10,656,191
$
$998,060
$69,811
$103,646
(6)$13,996,747
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman2016889,346

3,647,182



103,317
 4,639,845
2015872,300

2,758,034
218,840

20,745
88,249
 3,958,168
Michael P. Zechmeister2017459,519

3,075,068

374,272
8,541
54,819
(7)3,972,219
Chief Financial Officer2016398,076

1,515,203
505,029
198,755
2,474
37,715
 2,657,252
Sean F. Griffin2017542,308

3,079,970

422,753
65,905
8,260
(8)4,119,196
Chief Operating Officer2016477,038

1,156,002

183,145
1,573
6,154
 1,823,912
 2015440,300

544,154
94,529

18,411
10,464
 1,107,858
Eric A. Dorne2017379,031

1,640,326

193,202

9,524
(8)2,222,083
Chief Administrative and Information Officer2016340,346

594,193

106,125

6,554
 1,047,218
         

Paul S. Green2017331,154

1,570,363

219,523
55,637
13,468
(9)2,190,145
President, Pacific Region         

(1)In October 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the payment of $1,250,000 in cash to Mr. Spinner as part of Mr. Spinner’s entering into an employment agreement with the Company. This payment was made to Mr. Spinner in recognition of the successful execution of the Company’s acquisition and “building out the store” strategies in fiscal 2016 along with Mr. Spinner’s commitment to remain with the Company through the term of his employment agreement and expanded non-competition covenants and time periods contained in his employment agreement.
(2)Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of awards of time-based vesting restricted stock units and performance units at the target level, as computed under ASC 718 granted during the fiscal year indicated. For performance units, grant date fair value is calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance result (i.e., target level of performance) for each of the performance periods, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. These amounts do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that were paid to, or may be realized by, the Named Executive Officer for any of the fiscal years reflected. Refer to footnote 3 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 29, 2017 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of these awards. The grant date fair value of awards of performance units to Mr. Spinner in fiscal 2017, fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance, were $13,978,644, $4,417,488, and$3,943,630, respectively. The grant date fair value of awards of performance units granted in fiscal 2017 to Messrs. Zechmeister, Griffin, Dorne, and Green, assuming stretch performance, or maximum level, performance were $1,293,750, $3,650,023, $770,175, and $697,500, respectively. The grant date fair value of awards of performance units granted in fiscal 2016 to Messrs. Griffin and Dorne, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance were $770,525 and $475,350, respectively. Mr. Zechmeister did not receive a grant of performance units in fiscal 2016. The grant date fair value of awards of performance units granted in fiscal 2015 to Mr. Griffin, assuming stretch, or maximum, level performance, was $407,951.
(3)Amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of awards of stock options, as computed under ASC 718, granted to the Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year indicated. These amounts do not reflect the actual amounts that may be realized by the Named Executive Officer for any of the fiscal years reflected. Refer to footnote 3 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 29, 2017 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used to determine the grant date fair value of these awards.
(4)Amounts shown for fiscal 2017 reflect payments made in fiscal 2018 under our 2017 Senior Management Cash Incentive Plan related to fiscal 2017 performance. For a discussion regarding the 2017 Senior Management Cash Incentive Plan,


see EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION-CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis-ComponentsAnalysisComponents of our Core Executive Compensation Program-Performance-BasedProgram for Fiscal 2022Performance-Based Annual Cash Incentive Compensation.
(5)
Amounts reported in this column represent earnings on deferred compensation that exceed 120% of the federal applicable long-term rate, which was 2.60%. These amounts, as well as all other earnings on deferred compensation of the Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2017, are included in the table included under
(3)The Deferred Compensation Plan and the Deferred Stock Plan were frozen in 2019 and paid out in fiscal 2020.Nonqualified Deferred Compensation—Fiscal 2017 under the column "Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year."
(6)Represents an automobile allowance ($6,934), an allowance for living expenses while in the area of our Corporate Headquarters in Providence, Rhode Island ($53,737), an amount received to "gross up" the two preceding benefits to offset the related tax obligations ($20,534), our contributions to a 401(k) account ($8,855) and the provision of air and rail travel from Mr. Spinner's homes in New York and Pennsylvania to our Corporate Headquarters ($13,586).
(7)Represents relocation expenses which were reimbursed ($51,119) and our contributions to a 401(k) account ($3,700).
(8)Represents our contributions to a 401(k) account.
(9)Represents our contributions to a 401(k) account ($6,732) and taxable fringe benefits relating to a gross up of state taxes as a result of Mr. Green's relocation from Texas to California ($6,736).
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 2017(4)Represents our contributions to 401(k) accounts to Messrs. Douglas, Howard, Dorne, Stigers and Testa.
(5)Represents a retention payment under an agreement entered into on March 10, 2021 during the CEO search and transition process, and particularly in recognition of Mr. Testa’s important internal and external relationships.
(6)Represents Mr. Spinner’s 2x base salary and bonus multiple plus COBRA payments per his employment agreement upon retirement ($6,035,000), our contributions to a 401(k) account ($508) and earned paid time off days ($9,230) for which payment was due upon retirement.
(7)Represents Ms. Sutton’s 1x base salary multiple paid bi-weekly through the end of fiscal 2022 ($319,223) plus her COBRA payment ($35,000) per her Severance Agreement, plus a lump sum payment equal to 1.5x her target bonus opportunity ($783,870) approved by the Committee and our contributions to a 401(k) account ($1,121).
(8)Messrs. Douglas and Stigers were not NEOs in fiscal 2021 or fiscal 2020. Accordingly, compensation information for those years is not provided.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2022
The following table reflects the equity-based awards approved by the Compensation Committee on September 22, 2021 and granted by the Company in fiscal 2017:2022:
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)
NameGrant DateThreshold ($)Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
All Other Stock Awards (#)(3)
All Other Option Awards (#)Exercise Price of Option Awards ($/sh)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(4)
Sandy Douglas10/12/2021— — — 25,280 50,561 101,122 — — — 2,339,963 
10/12/2021— — — 12,964 25,929 (5)51,858 — — — 1,199,994 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 33,707 — — 1,559,960 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 17,286 (5)— — 799,996 
N/A772,356 1,544,712 2,317,067 — — — — — — — 
John W. Howard10/12/2021— — — 9,723 19,446 38,892 — — — 899,961 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 12,964 — — 599,974 
N/A331,250 662,500 993,750 — — — — — — — 
Eric A. Dorne10/12/2021— — — 11,668 23,336 46,672 — — — 1,079,990 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 15,557 — — 719,978 
N/A389,062 778,125 1,167,187 — — — — — — — 
Michael C. Stigers10/12/2021— — — 6,482 12,964 25,928 — — — 599,974 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 8,643 — — 399,998 
N/A215,625 431,250 646,875 — — — — — — — 
Christopher P. Testa10/12/2021— — — 11,668 23,336 46,672 — — — 1,079,990 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 15,557 — — 719,978 
N/A397,500 795,000 1,192,500 — — — — — — — 
Steven L. Spinner (6)
10/12/2021— — — — — — — — — — 
10/12/2021— — — — — — — — — — 
N/A— — — — — — — — — — 
Jill E. Sutton10/12/2021— — — 6,482 12,964 25,928 — — — 599,974 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 8,643 — — 399,998 
N/A91,774 183,548 275,322 — — — — — — — 
  
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)

 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards

     
NameGrant DateThreshold ($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
 
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
 
All
Other
Stock
Awards
(#)
All
Other
Option
Awards
(#)
Exercise
Price of
Option
Awards
($/sh)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(8)
Steven L. Spinner9/15/2016


 


 
18,4806



731,069
 9/21/2016


 
38,0422

76,0842

 


1,500,000
 9/21/2016


 
2,2483

8,9903

17,9803

 


354,372
 9/21/2016


 
4,6384

18,5504

37,1004

 


731,250
 10/27/2016


 
140,0005

175,0005

210,0005

 


7,339,500
 N/A147,046
919,039
1,838,078
 


 



Michael P. Zechmeister9/15/2016


 


 
11,3806



450,193
 9/15/2016


 


 
50,0007



1,978,000
 9/21/2016


 
1,2483

4,9903

9,9803

 


196,875
 9/21/2016


 
2,8534

11,4104

22,8204

 


450,000
 N/A55,142
344,639
689,279
 


 



Sean F. Griffin9/15/2016


 


 
12,6406



500,038
 9/21/2016


 
1,2233

4,8903

9,7803

 


192,631
 9/21/2016


 
3,1704

12,6804

25,3604

 


500,000
 10/27/2016


 
36,0005

45,0005

54,0005

 


1,887,300
 N/A65,077
406,731
813,462
 


 



Eric A. Dorne9/15/2016


 


 
6,7306



266,239
 9/15/2016


 


 
25,0007



989,000
 9/21/2016


 
7533

3,0103

6,0203

 


118,838
 9/21/2016


 
1,6884

6,7504

13,5004

 


266,250
 N/A30,322
189,516
379,031
 


 



Paul S. Green9/15/2016


 


 
5,8806



232,613
 9/15/2016


 


 
25,0007



989,000
 9/21/2016


 
7383

2,9503

5,9003

 


116,250
 9/21/2016


 
1,4754

5,9004

11,8004

 


232,500
 N/A26,492
165,577
331,154
 


 



(1)
This column shows separately the possible payouts to the Named Executive Officers under our 2017 Senior Management Cash Incentive Plan for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017 for "threshold", "target" and "maximum"(1)This column shows separately the possible payouts to the NEOs under our annual cash incentive plan for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2022 for “threshold”, “target” and “maximum” performance. Actual amounts paid for these incentives are reflected in the table included under Summary Compensation TableFiscal Years 2020-2022” under the column “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”Summary Compensation Table—Fiscal Years 2015-2017 under the column "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation."


(2)This award that was granted on September 21, 2016(2)These awards were granted on October 12, 2021 under the Original Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and represent the number of PSUs that may be earned over a three-year performance period at “threshold,” “target” and “maximum” levels of performance. Vesting of these PSUs is linked to our attaining certain levels of adjusted EPS growth for each year during fiscal 2022 through 2024, and Restated Plan represents the number of performance units that could have been earned at "target" and "maximum" levels of performance granted to Mr. Spinner in fiscal 2017. Vesting of these performance units was linked to our attaining certain levels of diluted EPS, adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2017. In addition, the amount of performance units that could have been earned could be increased or decreased by the Compensation Committee by up to 10% based on our Relative TSR for the one-year performance period. The performance award was denominated in shares based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. At the conclusion of the performance period, and based on our results measured against the performance measures (adjusted by the Compensation Committee as permitted under the applicable award agreement), 100.50% of the target level of these performance units was earned and the award was settled with the issuance of 38,232 shares of our common stock after the application of a 10% downward adjustment based on our Relative TSR for the one-year performance period.
(3)
These awards that were granted on September 21, 2016 under the Original Amended and Restated Plan represent the number of performance units that could have been earned with a one-year performance period at "threshold," "target" and "maximum" levels of performance. Vesting of these performance units was linked to our attaining certain levels of diluted EPS, adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2017. In addition, the amount of performance units that could have been earned could be increased or decreased by the Compensation Committee by up to 10% based on our Relative TSR for the one-year performance period. Target levels of performance is equal to 50% of 150% of the base salary for fiscal 2015 for Messrs. Dorne and Green, 50% of 175% of the base salary for fiscal 2016 for Mr. Zechmeister, 50% of 175% of the base salary for fiscal 2015 for Mr. Griffin, and 50% of 162.5% of the base salary for fiscal 2015 for Mr. Spinner. At the conclusion of the one-year performance period and based on our results measured against the performance measures (adjusted by the Compensation Committee as permitted under the applicable award agreement), 100.5% of the target level of these performance were earned and the awards were settled with the issuance of 9,035, 5,015, 4,914, 3,025 and 2,965 shares of our common stock, respectively, for Messrs. Spinner, Zechmeister, Griffin, Dorne and Green after application of a 10% downward adjustment based on our Relative TSR for the one-year performance period. These performance units and their related performance-based vesting are described in more detail in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Our Core Executive Compensation Program-Long-term, Equity-Based Incentive Program—Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Units.
(4)
These awards that were granted on September 21, 2016 under the Original Amended and Restated Plan represent the number of performance units that may be earned with a two-year performance period at "threshold," "target" and "maximum" levels of performance. Vesting of these performance units is linked to our attaining certain levels of diluted EPS, adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2018. In addition, the amount of performance units that may be earned may be increased or decreased by the Compensation Committee by up to 10% based on our Relative TSR for the two-year performance period. Target levels of performance is equal to 50% of 150% of the base salary for fiscal 2016 for Messrs. Dorne and Green, 50% of 200% of the base salary for fiscal 2016 for Messrs. Zechmeister and Griffin, and 50% of 162.5% of the base salary for fiscal 2016 for Mr. Spinner. At the conclusion of the two-year performance period (i.e. fiscal 2018), the performance units may vest based on our diluted EPS, adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2018. The performance units earned by the Named Executive Officer will be settled in a like number of shares. Moreover, the Compensation Committee may adjust the performance units earned upward or downward by up to 10% based on our Relative TSR for the two-year performance period. These performance units and their related performance-based vesting are described in more detail in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Our Core Executive Compensation Program-Long-term, Equity-Based Incentive Program—Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Units.
(5)These awards that were granted to Messrs. Spinner and Griffin on October 27, 2016 under the Original Amended and Restated Plan represent the number of performance units that may be earned at "threshold," "target" and "maximum" levels of performance. Mr. Spinner’s award totals 175,000 units at target level of performance with vesting for 50,000 units annually at target level performance based on the Company achieving a minimum amount of diluted EPS for the applicable fiscal year and then based 50% each on the Company’s net sales and adjusted EBITDA for each of fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019 and 25,000 units at target level performance based on the Company achieving a cumulative minimum amount of diluted EPS for fiscal 2017, fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019 and then based on our cumulative adjusted EBITDA for the three-year period inclusive of fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019. Mr. Griffin’s award totals 45,000 units at target level of performance with vesting for 17,500 units annually at target level performance based on the Company achieving a minimum amount of diluted EPS for the applicable fiscal year and then based 50% each on the Company’s net sales and adjusted EBITDA for each of fiscal 2017 and 2018 and 10,000 units at target level performance based on the Company achieving a cumulative minimum amount of diluted EPS for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 and then based on our cumulative adjusted EBITDA for the two-year period inclusive of fiscal 2017 and 2018. The actual number of shares that may be issued with respect to these awards can range from 0% of target to 120% of target with 80% of target payable for threshold level performance and 120% of target payable for maximum performance. Based on our GAAP earnings per diluted


share, adjusted EBITDA and net sales for fiscal 2017 when measured against2024. In addition, the fiscal 2017number of PSUs earned may be increased or decreased by up to 10% based on our Relative TSR for the three-year performance targets, Messrs. Spinner and Griffinperiod. At the conclusion of the three-year performance period, the PSUs may vest based on our results of these financial metrics. The PSUs earned 53,747 and 18,811 units, respectively, of which 23,345 of Mr. Spinner's unitsby each NEO will be paid outsettled in the same number of shares. These PSUsare described in more detail in “Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis
50

Components of Our Executive Compensation Program for Fiscal 2022Long-term Equity-Based Incentive Program2022 Grant of Time- and Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Units.”
(3)Represents RSUs granted in fiscal 2022 to each of the NEOs. The RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning on October 12, 2022.
(4)For grants during fiscal 2022, the amount shown with respect to each award represents the grant date fair value of the award calculated using the assumptions described in footnote (1) of the table included under “Summary Compensation TableFiscal Years 2020-2022.” The grant date fair value of PSUs was calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance result (i.e., target level of performance) for each of the performance periods, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures.
(5)Represents an inducement award granted to Mr. Douglas upon hire consisting of 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs. At the conclusion of the three-year performance period, the PSUs may vest based on our results of the financial metrics described above in footnote 2. These PSUs are described in more detail in “Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and AnalysisComponents of Our Executive Compensation Program for Fiscal 2022Long-term Equity-Based Incentive Program2022 Grant of Time- and Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Units.” The RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning on October 12, 2022.
(6)Mr. Spinner was not eligible for a payout under our annual cash incentive plan or long-term incentive grants due to his termination of employment, or, if earlier, upon consummation of a changeretirement in control.early fiscal 2022
(6)These awards were time-based vesting restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2017 to the Named Executive Officers that vest in four equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
(7)On September 15, 2016, Messrs. Zechmeister, Dorne and Green were granted time-based vesting restricted stock units of 50,000, 25,000 and 25,000, respectively, that will vest on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.
(8)
For grants during fiscal 2017, the amount shown with respect to each award represents the grant date fair value of the award calculated using the assumptions described in footnotes (2) and (3) of the table included under Summary Compensation Table—Fiscal Years 2015-2017. The grant date fair value of performance units was calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance result (i.e., target level of performance) for each of the performance periods, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20172022 Year-End
The following table summarizes information with respect to holdings of stock options and stock awards by the Named Executive OfficersNEOs as of July 29, 2017.30, 2022. This table includes unexercised and unvested stock options, unvested time-based vesting restricted stock unitsRSUs and unvested performance-based vesting restricted stock units.PSUs. Each equity grant is shown separately for each Named Executive Officer,NEO, except that incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options granted on the same date with the same material terms, including exercise price, vesting period and expiration date, are combined.

51


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Option AwardsStock Awards
NameGrant DateNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Exercisable
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Unexercisable
Option Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration Date
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
 (#)(1)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(3)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(4)
Sandy Douglas10/12/2021— — — — 33,707 1,432,885 — — 
10/12/2021— — — — 17,286 734,828 — — 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 101,122 4,298,696 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 51,858 2,204,484 
Totals:    50,993 2,167,713 152,980 6,503,180 
John W. Howard10/4/2019— — — — 73,825 (5)3,138,301 — — 
12/19/2019— — — — 6,274 266,708 — — 
10/12/2020— — — — 23,028 978,920 — — 
10/12/2021— — — — 12,964 551,100 — — 
12/19/2019— — — — — — 18,820 800,038 
10/12/2020— — — — — — 51,813 2,202,571 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 38,892 1,653,299 
Totals:    116,091 4,935,029 109,525 4,655,908 
Eric A. Dorne9/13/20127,700 — 58.98 9/13/2022— — — — 
9/16/20134,280 — 67.48 9/16/2023— — — — 
9/19/20144,630 — 64.55 9/19/2024— — — — 
9/25/2018— — — — 2,582 109,761 — — 
12/11/2018— — — — 1,059 45,018 — — 
12/19/2019— — — — 15,684 666,727 — — 
10/12/2020— — — — 28,785 1,223,650 — — 
10/12/2021— — — — 15,557 661,328 — — 
12/19/2019— — — — — — 47,051 2,000,138 
10/12/2020— — — — — — 64,765 2,753,160 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 46,672 1,984,027 
Totals:16,610    63,667 2,706,484 158,488 6,737,325 
Michael C. Stigers5/16/201415,377 — 48.58 5/16/2024— — — — 
4/30/20158,050 — 56.94 4/30/2025— — — — 
12/19/2019— — — — 31,253 1,328,565 — — 
10/12/2020— — — — 16,552 703,626 — — 
10/12/2021— — — — 8,643 367,414 — — 
12/19/2019— — — — — — 54,109 2,300,174 
10/12/2020— — — — — — 37,240 1,583,072 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 25,928 1,102,199 
Totals:23,427    56,448 2,399,605 117,277 4,985,445 
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
52

  Option Awards Stock Awards
NameGrant Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable (1)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable (1)
Option Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration Date 
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(1)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(2)
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(5)
Steven L. Spinner9/16/20087,500

24.54
9/16/2018
 


 
 9/11/200912,311

24.30
9/11/2019
 


 
 9/10/201017,760

33.90
9/10/2020
 


 
 9/12/201117,150

37.82
9/12/2021
 


 
 9/13/201223,160

58.98
9/13/2022
 


 
 9/16/2013



 2,707
102,541

 
 9/16/20139,848
3,282
67.48
9/16/2023
 


 
 9/19/2014



 6,090
230,689

 
 9/19/20147,385
7,385
64.55
9/19/2024
 


 
 9/17/2015



 20,940
793,207

 
 9/15/2016



 18,480
700,022

 
 9/21/2016



 

37,100
(3) 
1,405,348
 10/27/2016



 

150,000
(4) 
5,682,000
Michael P. Zechmeister9/17/20158,258
24,772
51.52
9/17/2025
 


 
 9/17/2015



 22,057
835,519

 
 9/15/2016



 11,380
431,074

 
 9/15/2016



 50,000
1,894,000

 
 9/21/2016



 

22,820
(3) 
864,422
Sean F. Griffin9/12/20111,760

37.82
9/12/2021
 


 
 9/13/201211,750

58.98
9/13/2022
   
 
 9/16/2013



 1,345
50,949

 
 9/16/20134,898
1,632
67.48
9/16/2023
 


 
 9/19/2014



 2,634
99,776

 
 9/19/20143,190
3,190
64.55
9/19/2014
 


 
 9/17/2015



 11,218
424,938

 
 9/15/2016



 12,640
478,803

 
 9/21/2016



 

25,360
(3) 
960,637
 10/27/2016



 

33,000
(4) 
1,250,040
Eric A. Dorne9/12/20111,362

37.82
9/12/2021
 


 
 9/13/20127,700

58.98
9/13/2022
 


 
 9/16/2013



 882
33,410

 
 9/16/20133,210
1,070
67.48
9/16/2023
 


 
 9/19/2014



 1,910
72,351

 
 9/19/20142,315
2,315
64.55
9/19/2024
 


 
 9/17/2015



 5,189
196,559
  

 9/15/2016



 6,730
254,932

 
 9/15/2016



 25,000
947,000

 
 9/21/2016



 

13,500
(3) 
511,380



  Option Awards Stock Awards
NameGrant Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable (1)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable (1)
Option Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration Date 
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(1)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(2)
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(5)
Paul S. Green9/16/2013



 592
22,425

 
 9/19/2013



 185
7,008

 
 9/19/2014



 1,565
59,282

 
 9/19/20141,895
1,895
64.55
9/19/2024
 


 
 9/17/2015



 3,382
128,110

 
 9/15/2016



 5,880
222,734

 
 9/15/2016



 25,000
947,000

 
 9/21/2016



 

11,800
(3) 
446,984
(1)On September 15, 2016, Messrs. Zechmeister, Dorne and Green were granted four year cliff vest time-based vesting restricted stock units of 50,000, 25,000 and 25,000 units, respectively. All other awards vested or will vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
(2)Market value reflects the number of unvested restricted stock units multiplied by $37.88 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on July 28, 2017, the last business day of fiscal 2017.
(3)
Represents the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to performance units at the maximum level of performance utilizing the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on July 28, 2017, the last business day of fiscal 2017. The performance units have performance criteria tied to our performance in fiscal 2018 denominated in shares at grant, and the number of performance units shown is based on the amounts of the Named Executive Officer's fiscal 2016 base salary which is described in more detail in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Our Core Executive Compensation Program—Long-term Equity-Based Incentive Program—Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Units.
(4)Represents the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to performance units at the maximum level of performance utilizing the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on July 28, 2017, the last business day of fiscal 2017. Mr. Spinner's awards are tied to our performance in fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019 and then based on our cumulative performance for the three-year period inclusive of fiscal 2017, 2018 and 2019 denominated in shares at grant. Mr. Griffin's awards are tied to our performance in fiscal 2018 and our cumulative performance for the two-year period inclusive of fiscal 2017 and 2018 denominated in shares at grant.
(5)Market value reflects the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to performance units at the maximum level of performance, multiplied by $37.88 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on July 28, 2017, the last business day of fiscal 2017.
Option AwardsStock Awards
NameGrant DateNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Exercisable
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Unexercisable
Option Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration Date
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)(1)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)(2)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(3)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(4)
Christopher P. Testa9/13/20124,100 — 58.98 9/13/2022— — — — 
9/16/20133,510 — 67.48 9/16/2023— — — — 
9/19/20143,800 — 64.55 9/19/2024— — — — 
9/25/2018— — — — 3,645 154,949 — — 
12/19/2019— — — — 18,821 800,081 — — 
10/12/2020— — — — 28,785 1,223,650 — — 
10/12/2021— — — — 15,557 661,328 — — 
12/19/2019— — — — — — 56,461 2,400,157 
10/12/2020— — — — — — 64,765 2,753,160 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 46,672 1,984,027 
Totals:11,410    66,808 2,840,008 167,898 7,137,344 
Steven L. Spinner9/13/201223,160 — 58.98 9/13/2022— — — — 
9/16/201313,130 — 67.48 9/16/2023— — — — 
9/19/201414,770 — 64.55 9/19/2024— — — — 
12/19/2019— — — — 319,949 13,601,032 
10/12/2020— — — — 220,206 9,360,957 
Totals:51,060      540,155 22,961,989 
Jill E. Sutton12/19/2019— — — — — — 34,452 1,464,555 
10/12/2020— — — — — — 13,060 555,181 
10/12/2020— — — — — — 14,985 637,012 
10/12/2021— — — — — — 3,092 131,441 
Totals:      65,589 2,788,189 
(1)All awards granted through 2018 vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. All awards granted in 2019 or later vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the date set forth in the applicable award agreement.
(2)Market value reflects the number of unvested RSUs multiplied by $42.51 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on July 29, 2022, the last business day of fiscal year 2022.
(3)Represents the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to PSUs at the applicable level of performance. The PSUs granted in 2019 are shown at target performance, while the PSUs granted in 2020 & 2021 are shown at maximum performance.
(4)Market value reflects the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the applicable level of performance, multiplied by $42.51 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on July 29, 2022, the last business day of fiscal year 2022.
(5)Mr. Howard’s sign-on grant awarded on October 4, 2019 cliff vested on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested—Fiscal 20172022
The following table summarizes information for the Named Executive OfficersNEOs concerning exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock unitsRSUs and performance unitsPSUs during the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017,30, 2022, including the (i) the number of shares of stock underlying options exercised in fiscal 2017;2022; (ii) the aggregate dollar value realized upon such exercises of stock options utilizing the actual sales price for same-day sale transactions and the closing price for any exercise and hold transactions; (iii) the number of shares of stock received from the vesting of restricted stock unitsRSUs during fiscal 20172022 and performance unitsany PSUs earned based on fiscal 20172022 performance; and (iv) the aggregate dollar value realized upon the vesting of such restrictedRSUs and PSUs.
53

Option Exercises and Stock Vested
Option AwardsStock Awards
NameNumber of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)Value Realized on Exercise ($)
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(1)
Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2)
Sandy Douglas— — — — 
John Howard— — 36,418 (4)1,489,015 (4)
Eric A. Dorne— — 82,108 (5)3,258,496 (5)
Michael C. Stigers35,157 448,765 (3)93,094 (6)5,403,361 (6)
Christopher P. Testa— — 94,098 (7)3,719,460 (7)
Steven L. Spinner— — 829,671 (8)32,575,723 (8)
Jill E. Sutton— — 89,691 (9)3,828,589 (9)
(1)In connection with the vesting of RSUs and PSUs, our NEOs surrendered shares of stock to cover withholding taxes, which reduced the actual value received upon vesting. The number of shares surrendered but included in this table is as follows: Mr. Howard—14,855; Mr. Dorne—31,902; Mr. Stigers—42,466; Mr. Testa—40,149; Mr. Spinner—377,551; and Ms. Sutton—39,264.
(2)Represents the product of the number of shares or shares underlying units vested and performance units. Performance unitsthe closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the vesting date.
(3)Represents the cash proceeds received by Mr. Stigers as a result of the exercise of 35,157 vested stock options.
(4)Mr. Howard was awarded toPSUs during fiscal 2020, of which 18,631 PSUs were earned for the Named Executive Officers on September 21, 2016 (including our Chief Executive Officer's additional one-year award) with performance criteria tied to the one-yearthree-year performance period ended July 29, 201730, 2022 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units in fiscal 2023 are included herein.
(5)Mr. Dorne was awarded PSUs during fiscal 2020, of which 46,580 PSUs were earned byfor the Named Executive Officers. Performance units awarded to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer on October 27, 2016 withthree-year performance criteria tied to our fiscal yearperiod ended July 29, 201730, 2022 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units in fiscal 2023 are included herein.
(6)Mr. Stigers was awarded PSUs during fiscal 2020, of which 53,567 PSUs were earned. For additional information see EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONCompensation Discussionearned for the three-year performance period ended July 30, 2022 and AnalysisComponentsthe like number of Our Executive Compensation ProgramLong-Term Equity-Based Incentive ProgramPerformance-Based Incentive ProgramPerformance-Based Vesting Restricted Stock Units.shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units in fiscal 2023 are included herein. Mr. Stigers had a converted cash-settled award that settled at a fixed $32.50 per share value from the Supervalu acquisition. There were no shares received as a result of the vesting but the value is included herein.

(7)Mr. Testa was awarded PSUs during fiscal 2020, of which 55,896 PSUs were earned for the three-year performance period ended July 30, 2022 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units in fiscal 2023 are included herein.

(8)Mr. Spinner was awarded PSUs during fiscal 2020, of which 316,749 PSUs were earned for the three-year performance period ended July 30, 2022 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units in fiscal 2023 are included herein. Also includes Mr. Spinner's distribution of deferred shares for PSUs that were deferred until his retirement.
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED(9)Ms. Sutton was awarded PSUs during fiscal 2020, of which 34,107 prorated PSUs were earned for the three-year performance period ended July 30, 2022 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units in fiscal 2023 are included herein
  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name 
Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise (#)
 
Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)
 
Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting (#)(1)
 
Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)(2)
 
Steven L. Spinner 
 $
 91,851
(3)$4,024,506
(3)
Michael P. Zechmeister 
 
 12,368
(4)507,177
(4)
Sean F. Griffin 
 
 27,820
(5)1,215,091
(5)
Eric A. Dorne 
 
 7,356
(6)304,347
(6)
Paul S. Green 
 
 6,305
(7)263,068
(7)
(1)In connection with the vesting of restricted stock units and performance units, our Named Executive Officers surrendered shares of stock to cover withholding taxes, which reduced the actual value received upon vesting. The number of shares surrendered but included in this table was: Mr. Spinner—44,149; Mr. Zechmeister—4,124; Mr. Griffin—12,824; Mr. Dorne—2,456; and Mr. Green—1,727.
(2)Represents the product of the number of shares or shares underlying units vested and the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the vesting date.
(3)Mr. Spinner was awarded performance units during fiscal 2017, of which 76,828 performance units vested for the one-year performance period ended July 29, 2017 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units are included herein. Additionally, Mr. Spinner earned an additional 23,345 performance units which are to be distributed at a future date based on the terms of his award agreement, which shares to be issued in settlement of those units are not included herein.
(4)Mr. Zechmeister was awarded performance units during fiscal 2017, of which 5,015 performance units vested for the one-year performance period ended July 29, 2017 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units are included herein.
(5)
Mr. Griffin was awarded performance units during fiscal 2017, of which 23,725 performance units vested for the one-year performance period ended July 29, 2017 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units are included herein. Additionally, Mr. Griffin has elected to defer 25% of the shares issued upon vesting of each of his September 16, 2013 and September 19, 2014 restricted stock unit awards and 75% of the shares issued upon vesting of his September 17, 2015 award. One-quarter of such restricted stock units vested during fiscal 2017, and the value herein excludes the resulting deferral of 3,472 shares ($134,568). For each portion of these stock awards that vests but is deferred, the proportionate number of shares are allocated to Mr. Griffin's balance in the Deferred Stock Plan. See the table under Nonqualified Deferred Compensation—Fiscal 2017.
(6)Mr. Dorne was awarded performance units during fiscal 2017, of which 3,025 performance shares vested for the one-year performance period ended July 29, 2017 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units are included herein.
(7)Mr. Green was awarded performance units during fiscal 2017, of which 2,965 performance shares vested for the one-year performance period ended July 29, 2017 and the like number of shares of our common stock issued in settlement of these units are included herein.
Pension Benefits
We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans.plans for NEOs.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation—Fiscal 20172022
OurUntil February 2019, our executive officers and directors arewere eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan and a deferred stock plan. These deferral plans were terminated in February 2019 and amounts therein were distributed in March 2020. Therefore, there is nothing to report for fiscal 2022.
CEO Pay Ratio
SEC rules require us to disclose the Deferred Compensation Plan andtotal annual compensation of Sandy Douglas, our CEO for fiscal 2022, to the Deferred Stock Plan.
The Deferral Plans were established to provide participants withmedian of the opportunity to defer the receipttotal annual compensation of all or a portionemployees other than Mr. Douglas, as well as the ratio of their compensation. The purposesuch amounts to each other (referred to as the “CEO pay ratio”). We chose to use Mr. Douglas as he was the primary executive officer in that role at the time we identified our median employee. Total compensation for Mr. Douglas and our median employee is calculated in accordance with SEC rules applicable to the Summary Compensation Table. We calculated this information for the twelve (12) months ended July 30, 2022. For such period, Mr. Douglas’ total compensation was $8,722,292, based on information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. However, given Mr. Douglas’ hire date was in fiscal week two, we have annualized his salary and 401k match, for an adjusted total of $8,742,796 . Based on the Deferral Plans is to allow executivesadjusted total compensation for the CEO and non-employee directors to deferour median employee’s total compensation of $59,523, the ratio of Mr. Douglas’s total compensation to a non-qualified retirement plan that, in the casemedian employee’s total compensation was 147 to 1.
54

To identify the median employee, we obtained payroll data for all active employees (full-time, part-time, active and seasonal) as of June 11, 2022, utilizing cash compensation as our employees, are in amounts greater thanconsistently applied compensation measure. This date was moved up two weeks from last year’s date purely for administrative ease purposes and has no material impact on the amount permittedprocess. Canadian wages were converted to be deferred under our 401(k) Plan. Under the Deferral Plans, only the payment of the compensation earned by the participant is deferred and there is no deferral of the expense in our financial statements related to the participants' earnings. We record the related compensation expense in the year in which the compensation is earned by the participants.


Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, participants may elect to defer a minimum of $0 and a maximum of 90% of base salary and 100% of bonuses, commissions, and effective January 1, 2007, share unit awards, earned by the participantsU.S. dollars using an average annual exchange rate for the calendar year. Under12 months ended June 29, 2022. Earnings for permanent employees who did not work for the Deferred Compensation Plan, participants can elect to defer between 0% and 100%entire year (i.e., new hires) were annualized. The wages of their restricted stock awards. From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010, participants' cash-derived deferrals under the Deferred Compensation Plan earned interest at the 5-year certificate of deposit annual yield taken from the Wall Street Journal Market Data Center (as captured on the first and last business date of each calendar quarter and averaged) plus 3% credited and compounded quarterly. Effective January 1, 2011, participants may elect to allocate their cash-derived deferrals to certain measurement funds which track the performance of actual mutual funds and are treated as deemed investments. The earnings that would have been received if such actual investment had been made are credited to the participants' accounts in proportion to their hypothetical investments. The value of equity-based awards deferred under the Deferred Compensation and Deferred Stock Plans are based upon the performance of our common stock.temporary employees were not annualized.
A participant in our Deferral Plans who terminates his or her employment with us due to retirement will be paid his or her Deferral Plan balances in a lump sum or in installments based on the participant's elections over a pre-determined period of time. A participant who terminates his or her employment with us due to disability (as defined in each of the Deferral Plans) will be paid his or her balances in a lump sum within 60 days after such participant is determined to have become disabled. Beneficiaries of a participant who dies before a complete payout of his or her Deferral Plan balances will receive a lump sum payment within 60 days after the Compensation Committee is provided with proof of death of such participant. A participant who terminates his or her employment with us for any other reason will receive payment of his or her Deferral Plan balances in a lump sum, within 60 days after either (a) the six-month anniversary of the date on which such participant's employment with us terminates, if such participant is a "key employee" under the Deferral Plans or (b) the date on which such participant's employment with us terminates, for all other participants.
The following table summarizes information regarding the non-qualified deferred compensation of the Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2017, including deferrals of salaries, performance-based cash incentive compensation, and restricted stock unit compensation earned.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
NameType of Deferral
Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year (1)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year
(2)(3)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal
Year End (4)
Steven L. SpinnerCash Compensation$30,470
$
$109,455
$
$1,340,575
 Deferred Stock

(98,263)
307,775
Michael P. ZechmeisterCash Compensation20,646

10,473

77,503
 Deferred Stock




Sean F. GriffinCash Compensation221,442

91,340

971,608
 Deferred Stock134,568

(15,173)
169,475
Eric A. DorneCash Compensation




 Deferred Stock




Paul S. GreenCash Compensation121,529

70,061

558,113
 Deferred Stock




(1)
Amounts reported as "Deferred Compensation" in this column are reported as compensation in the "Salary" and "Non-Equity Incentive Compensation" columns for fiscal 2017 of the table under Summary Compensation Table—Fiscal Years 2015-2017.
(2)
Participants' non-equity deferrals under the Deferred Compensation Plan earned investment returns based on the performance of certain measurement funds as allocated by the participants. Any amounts reflected in the "Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year" column for non-equity awards that had preferential earnings (in excess of 120% of the July 2017 "compounded annually" federal long-term rate) have been reported as compensation in the "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings" column in the table under Summary Compensable Table—Fiscal Years 2015-2017.
(3)The value of equity-based awards deferred under the Deferral Plans is based upon the performance of our common stock. For restricted stock and restricted stock units, earnings or losses are calculated as follows: (i) number of vested shares deferred in fiscal 2017 valued at the change in the closing stock price from the date of vesting to the end of fiscal 2017 plus, (ii) the number of vested shares that were deferred prior to fiscal 2017, valued by the change in the closing stock price on the first day of fiscal 2017 to the last day of fiscal 2017. None of the amounts reflected in the "Aggregate Earnings


in Last Fiscal Year" column for equity awards have been reported as compensation in table under Summary Compensable Table—Fiscal Years 2015-2017 as a result of the fact that above-market or preferential earnings are not possible in connection with these items.
(4)
This column includes the following amounts that previously have been reported as non-equity compensation in fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015 in the table under Summary Compensation Table—Fiscal Years 2015-2017 and summary compensation tables for prior fiscal years, combined: Mr. Spinner—$129,787; Mr. Zechmeister—$45,744, and Mr. Griffin—$347,351.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control
The information below describes and quantifies the compensation that would become payable to each of our Named Executive Officers under the then-existing plans and arrangementsNEOs if the Named Executive Officer'sNEO’s employment had terminated on July 29, 2017,30, 2022, given the Named Executive Officer'sNEO’s compensation and service levels as of such date and, if applicable, based on our closing stock price on that date. These benefits are in addition to benefits generally available to salaried employees. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon the events discussed below, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be different. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event and our stock price at the time of such event.
As discussed under EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Programs, Policies and Considerations—Severance Agreements and Change in Control Agreements, as of July 29, 2017 we were a party to a severance agreement and change in control agreement with eachIf an associate, including any of our Named Executive Officers, except for our Chief Executive Officer, with whom we were a party to an employment agreement. This employment agreement provides for benefits upon a termination of Mr. Spinner's employment, whether occurring before or within one year following a change in control that are different than those provided for in the severance and change in control agreements and is described in more detail in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION-Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Other Programs, Policies and Considerations-Employment Agreements.
If one of the Named Executive OfficersNEOs, were to die or become disabled, target bonus would be paid, any unvested restricted stock units would become immediately vested (with performance units vesting at target levels of performance), and any unexercisable stock options would be cancelled and forfeited. Any vested stock options exercisable at the time of death or disability would be exercisable at any time on or before the earlier to occur of the date that is one year after such cessationseparation or the grant'sgrant’s expiration date.
For a description of termination provisions in the severance and change in control agreements, see EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Executive CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Programs, Policies and Considerations—AnalysisEmployment, Severance Agreements and Change in Control AgreementsAgreements.. In addition, the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and award agreements for long-term equity-based incentivesequity incentive awards also address some of these circumstances. The following table describes the potential payments as of July 29, 201730, 2022 upon termination of the NamedNEOs. For Mr. Spinner, the values represent his severance payments owed per his Employment Agreement that were triggered upon his retirement in fiscal 2022 and any other payments and stock vestings earned during the year. Similarly, Ms. Sutton’s values represent the actual payments made upon her departure in fiscal 2022.
55

Payments Upon Termination
Separation from Service Without Cause, including Resignation for Good Reason(1)
Termination without Cause not qualifying as a Separation from Service without Cause(1)
Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control(2)
Termination as a result of Death or DisabilityRetirementTermination for Cause, or Resignation for Other Than Good Reason
Sandy Douglas
Cash Severance Pay$7,034,744 (3)$7,034,744 (3)$8,347,244 (4)$1,544,712 (5)$— $— 
Medical Benefits70,000 (6)70,000 (6)87,500 (6)— — — 
Acceleration of Stock Options— — — — — — 
Acceleration of Stock Awards1,651,018 (7)— 5,419,302 (8)5,419,302 (8)— — 
Total$8,755,762 $7,104,744 $13,854,046 $6,964,014 $ $ 
John W. Howard
Cash Severance Pay$1,440,446 (9)$1,440,446 (9)$3,465,446 (10)$662,500 (5)$— $— 
Medical Benefits35,000 (6)35,000 (6)105,000 (6)— — — 
Acceleration of Stock Options— — — — — — 
Acceleration of Stock Awards6,092,661 (7)— 8,030,096 (8)8,030,096 (8)— — 
Total$7,568,107 $1,475,446 $11,600,542 $8,692,596 $ $ 
Eric A. Dorne
Cash Severance Pay$1,686,538 (9)$1,686,538 (9)$4,049,038 (10)$778,125 (5)$— $— 
Medical Benefits35,000 (6)35,000 (6)105,000 (6)— — — 
Acceleration of Stock Options— — — — — — 
Acceleration of Stock Awards7,198,813 (7)— 7,534,090 (8)7,534,090 (8)7,198,813 (7)— 
Total$8,920,351 $1,721,538 $11,688,128 $8,312,215 $7,198,813 $ 
Michael C. Stigers
Cash Severance Pay$2,526,546 (11)$2,526,546 (11)$2,526,546 (11)$431,250 (5)$— $— 
Medical Benefits— — 105,000 (6)— — — 
Acceleration of Stock Options— — — — — — 
Acceleration of Stock Awards6,119,995 (7)— 6,306,273 (8)6,306,273 (8)6,119,995 (7)— 
Total$8,646,541 $2,526,546 $8,937,819 $6,737,523 $6,119,995 $ 
Christopher P. Testa
Cash Severance Pay$1,728,535 (9)$1,728,535 (9)$4,158,535 (10)$795,000 (5)$— $— 
Medical Benefits35,000 (6)35,000 (6)105,000 (6)— — — 
Acceleration of Stock Options— — — — — — 
Acceleration of Stock Awards5,693,704 (7)— 8,067,633 (8)8,067,633 (8)— — 
Total$7,457,239 $1,763,535 $12,331,168 $8,862,633 $ $ 
Steven L. Spinner (3)
Cash Severance Pay$— $— $— $— $6,000,000 (12)$— 
Medical Benefits— — — — 35,000 (6)— 
Acceleration of Stock Options— — — — — — 
Acceleration of Stock Awards— — — — 33,532,483 (13)— 
Total$ $ $ $ $39,567,483 $ 
Jill E. Sutton
Cash Severance Pay$1,918,139 (14)$— $— $— $— $— 
Medical Benefits35,000 (6)— — — — — 
Acceleration of Stock Options— — — — — — 
Acceleration of Stock Awards3,427,666 (7)— — — — — 
Total$5,380,805 $ $ $ $ $ 
(1)The Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan provides for certain prorated or partial vesting of shares upon Separation from Service without Cause (as defined in the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan). The severance agreements provide for cash severance benefits only, including for certain terminations without Cause that do not qualify as a Separation from Service without Cause under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan.
(2)Amounts presented in this column assume that the NEO is terminated without Cause or resigns for Good Reason in contemplation of or within two years following a Change in Control (each as defined in the NEO’s applicable change in control agreement).
56

(3)Amount represents the sum of (i) 2 times the CEO’s target base salary as of July 30, 2022, (ii) 2 times the CEO’s annual cash incentive payment based on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive is terminated and (iii) the amount of the CEO’s annual cash incentive payment that he would have earned during the fiscal year in which the executive was terminated.
(4)Amount represents the sum of (i) 2.5 times the CEO’s base salary as of July 30, 2022, (ii) 2.5 times the CEO’s annual cash incentive payments based on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive is terminated, and (iii) the amount of the CEO’s annual cash incentive payment he would have earned during the fiscal year in which his employment was terminated
(5)Represents the target bonus opportunity paid upon death or disability.
(6)Represents the amount that the Company would be required to pay in lieu of post-termination medical benefits for the executive and the executive’s dependents.
(7)Amount represents the intrinsic value of each share that will vest upon a Separation from Service without Cause, which reflects shares underlying RSUs expected to vest within 365 days of the separation date (prorated with respect to any awards granted within 365 days of the separation date) and a prorated portion of unearned PSUs that are outstanding on July 30, 2022, which vest on an accelerated basis following the relevant termination date (as defined in the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan or the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, as applicable), with unearned PSUs vesting based on the “target” level of performance. These amounts are calculated by multiplying (i) the aggregate number of equity awards which vest on an accelerated basis by (ii) $42.51 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on July 29, 2022 (the last business day of fiscal 2022). See “Compensation Discussion and AnalysisComponents of Executive Officers. ThisCompensation Program for Fiscal 2022—Other Compensation and Benefits for more information.
(8)Amount represents the intrinsic value of each share underlying a RSU or unearned PSU outstanding on July 30, 2022, and which vests on an accelerated basis following the relevant termination date (as defined in the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan or the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, as applicable), with unearned PSUs vesting based on the “target” level of performance. These amounts are calculated by multiplying (i) the aggregate number of equity awards which vest on an accelerated basis by (ii) $42.51 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on July 29, 2022 (the last business day of fiscal 2022).
(9)Amount represents the sum of (i) the NEO’s base salary, as in effect as of July 30, 2022 and (ii) the prorated portion of the amount of the NEO’s annual cash incentive payment that the executive would have earned during the fiscal year in which the executive’s employment was terminated. Amounts in the table excludes potentialreflect a full year bonus amount due to the assumption of a termination at year end. If an executive were terminated during the fiscal year, this amount would be prorated.
(10)Amount represents the sum of (i) 2 times the NEO’s base salary as of July 30, 2022, (ii) 2 times the NEO’s annual cash incentive payments relatedbased on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive is terminated, and (iii) the amount of the NEO’s annual cash incentive payment he or she would have earned during the fiscal year in which his or her employment was terminated.
(11)Per Mr. Stigers Transition Agreement last amended on March 9, 2021, amount represents the sum of (i) 2 times the NEO’s base salary as of July 30, 2022 (the assumed termination date), (ii) 2 times the NEO’s annual cash incentive payments based on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive is terminated, and (iii) the amount of the NEO’s annual cash incentive payment he would have earned during the fiscal year in which his employment was terminated. Cash Severance also includes $25,000 in outplacement services per his agreement.
(12)Per Mr. Spinner’s Employment Agreement, the amount represents the sum of (i) 2 times Mr. Spinner’s base salary as of July 30, 2022, and (ii) 2 times his annual cash incentive payments based on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive was terminated, and (iii) the amount of the annual cash incentive payment, which was $0 as he was not eligible due to his pending retirement.
(13)Per Mr. Spinner’s Employment Agreement, represents the intrinsic value of each share underlying a RSU or unearned PSU outstanding on July 30, 2022, with unearned PSUs vesting on an accelerated basis based on the “target” level of performance, plus Mr. Spinner's distribution of deferred shares for PSUs that were deferred until his retirement. These amounts are calculated by multiplying (i) the aggregate number of equity awards which vest on an accelerated basis by (ii) $42.51 per share, the closing price of our Deferral Plans, which are described in more detail in Nonqualified Deferred Compensation—Fiscal 2017common stock on the NYSE on July 29, 2022 (the last business day of fiscal 2022).

(14)Upon Ms. Sutton’s departure, the Committee and the Board agreed to extend base salary payments to Ms. Sutton for an additional six months (to 1.5 times in total) and to pay Ms. Sutton an additional severance amount equal to 1.5 times her annual bonus, at target, included herein, plus the prorated portion of her bonus earned in fiscal 2022.


BENEFITS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
57

Payments Upon Termination Employee
Resignation for
Good Reason
 
Termination
Without
Cause
 
Termination
following
Change in
Control(1)
 
Termination
as a result
of Death or
Disability
 
Termination
for Cause or
Resignation for
Other Than
Good Reason
 
Steven L. Spinner           
Cash Severance Pay $3,737,000
(2)$3,737,000
(2)$6,699,358
(4)$
 $1,219,339
(8)
Medical Benefits 35,000
(5)35,000
(5)105,000
(5)
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Options 
 
 
 
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Awards 7,264,134
(6)7,264,134
(6)7,264,134
(6)7,264,134
(7)
 
Total $11,036,134
 $11,036,134
 $14,068,492
 $7,264,134
 $1,219,339
 
Michael P. Zechmeister           
Cash Severance Pay $461,250
(3)$461,250
(3)$2,876,816
(9)$
 $
 
Medical Benefits 35,000
(5)35,000
(5)105,000
(5)
 
 
Relocation Costs 
 
 100,000
(10)
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Options 
 
 
 
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Awards 
 
 3,592,804
(6)3,592,804
(7)
 
Total $496,250
 $496,250
 $6,674,620
 $3,592,804
 $
 
Sean F. Griffin           
Cash Severance Pay $550,000
(3)$550,000
(3)$3,418,253
(9)$
 $
 
Medical Benefits 35,000
(5)35,000
(5)105,000
(5)
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Options 
 
 
 
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Awards 
 
 2,576,484
(6)2,576,484
(7)
 
Total $585,000
 $585,000
 $6,099,737
 $2,576,484
 $
 
Eric A. Dorne           
Cash Severance Pay $383,400
(3)$383,400
(3)$1,071,630
(11)$
 $
 
Medical Benefits 35,000
(5)35,000
(5)105,000
(5)
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Options 
 
 
 
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Awards 
 
 1,759,943
(6)1,759,943
(7)
 
Total $418,400
 $418,400
 $2,936,573
 $1,759,943
 $
 
Paul S. Green           
Cash Severance Pay $335,000
(3)$335,000
(3)$1,011,028
(11)$
 $
 
Medical Benefits 35,000
(5)35,000
(5)105,000
(5)
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Options 
 
 
 
 
 
Acceleration of Stock Awards 
 
 1,610,052
(6)1,610,052
(7)
 
Total $370,000
 $370,000
 $2,726,080
 $1,610,052
 $
 


(1)Amounts presented in this column assume that the Named Executive Officer is terminated without Cause or resigns for Good Reason within one year following a Change in Control. If the Named Executive Officer's employment were terminated for any reason other than termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason within one year following a Change in Control, the Named Executive Officer would be entitled only to the amounts set forth in the Acceleration of Stock Options and Acceleration of Stock Awards rows.

(2)The amount represents the sum of (i) 2 times the Named Executive Officer's base salary at the assumed termination date, and (ii) 2 times the Named Executive Officer's annual cash incentive payments based on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive was terminated.

(3)The amount represents continuation of the Named Executive Officer's base salary for one year following the assumed date of termination, but does not include any earned but unpaid cash incentive payment as of the assumed termination date.


Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

(4)Amount represents the sum of (i) 3 times the Named Executive Officer's base salary at the assumed termination date, (ii) 3 times the Named Executive Officer's annual cash incentive payments based on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive is terminated, (iii) accrued and unpaid vacation, and (iv) the amount of the Named Executive Officer's annual cash incentive payment that he would have earned during the fiscal year in which his employment was terminated.

(5)If the Company terminates the Named Executive Officer without Cause or such executive voluntarily terminates his employment for Good Reason, or if the Company terminates the Named Executive Officer without Cause or such executive voluntarily terminates his employment for Good Reason, in either case, within one year following a Change in Control, the Company would be required to pay the executive the amount which may be used to pay for post-termination medical benefits for himself and his dependents.

(6)Amount represents the intrinsic value of each unvested stock option, share of restricted stock, restricted stock unit or unearned performance unit outstanding on July 29, 2017, and which vests on an accelerated basis following the relevant termination event, with unearned performance units vesting based on the "target" level of performance. These amounts are calculated by multiplying (i) the aggregate number of equity awards which vest on an accelerated basis by (ii) the amount by which $37.88 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on July 28, 2017, the last business day of fiscal 2017, exceeds the exercise price payable per award, if any. This does not include any awards granted in fiscal 2018.

(7)Amount represents the intrinsic value of each restricted stock unit (with performance units vesting at target levels of performance) outstanding on July 29, 2017, which vests on an accelerated basis following the death or disability (as defined in the 2004 Equity Plan or Original Amended and Restated Plan, as applicable) of the Named Executive Officer. These amounts are calculated by multiplying (i) the aggregate number of equity awards which vest on an accelerated basis by (ii) the amount by which $37.88 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on July 28, 2017, the last business day of fiscal 2017, exceeds the exercise price payable per award, if any. This does not include any awards granted in fiscal 2018.

(8)Amount represents the sum of (i) base salary earned through the termination date, (ii) accrued and unpaid vacation, and (iii) cash incentive compensation earned as of the termination date in respect to the prior fiscal year which has not been paid as of the termination date.

(9)Amount represents the sum of (i) 2.99 times the Named Executive Officer's base salary at the assumed termination date, (ii) 2.99 times the Named Executive Officer's annual cash incentive payments based on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive is terminated, (iii) accrued and unpaid vacation, and (iv) the amount of the Named Executive Officer's annual cash incentive payment that he would have earned during the fiscal year in which his employment was terminated.

(10)If the Company terminates the Named Executive Officer without Cause or such executive voluntarily terminates his employment for Good Reason, in either case, within one year following a Change in Control, the Company would be required to reimburse the executive up to $100,000 for certain relocation costs.

(11)Amount represents the sum of (i) 1.5 times the Named Executive Officer's base salary at the assumed termination date, (ii) 1.5 times the Named Executive Officer's annual cash incentive payments based on target performance for the fiscal year in which the executive is terminated, (iii) accrued and unpaid vacation, and (iv) the amount of the Named Executive Officer's annual cash incentive payment that he would have earned during the fiscal year in which his employment was terminated.

The following table provides certain information with respect to equity awards under our equity compensation plans as of July 30, 2022.

Plans CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the second column)
Plans approved by stockholders5,409,338 (1)$54.11 (1)2,862,679 (2)
Plans not approved by stockholders106,892 (3)— — 
Total5,516,230 $54.11 2,862,679 

(1)Includes 361,481 stock options constituting replacement options issued in connection with our acquisition of Supervalu, 3,281,035 RSUs under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, 68,255 stock options under the 2012 Plan, 57,380 stock options under the United Natural Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, and 1,748,079 PSUs under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan. RSUs and PSUs do not have an exercise price because their value is dependent upon continued employment over a period of time or the achievement of certain performance goals and are to be settled for shares of common stock. Accordingly, they have been disregarded for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price.

(2)All shares were available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan. The Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan authorizes grants in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units or a combination thereof but includes limits on the number of awards that may be issued in the form of restricted shares or units. The number of shares remaining available for future issuances assumes that, with respect to outstanding PSUs, the vesting criteria will be achieved at the target level.

(3)Includes shares to be issued pursuant to inducement grants of RSUs and PSUs granted to 5 new hires between December 11, 2020 and March 11, 2022.


58



PROPOSALProposal 2—RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMRatification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, has selected KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 28, 2018,29, 2023, subject to ratification by stockholders at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. Stockholder ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by law or otherwise. However, the Board is submitting the selection of KPMG LLP to stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of KPMG LLP, the Board will reconsiderconsider whether to appoint KPMG LLP despite the matter.stockholder vote or to select another independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023 and possibly future years.
Representatives of KPMG LLP, which served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended, July 29, 2017,30, 2022, will be present at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make such statements as they may desire.
The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2018.
The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023. Proxies received by the Board will be voted “FOR” the proposal unless a contrary choice is specified in the proxy.
Fees Paid to KPMG LLP
In addition to retaining KPMG LLP to audit our financial statements for fiscal 2017,2022, we engaged the firm from time to time during the year to perform other services. The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP in connection with services rendered during the last two fiscal years.
Fee Category Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2016Fee CategoryFiscal 2022Fiscal 2021
Audit Fees $2,416,882
 $2,108,000
Audit Fees$4,694,554 $4,725,996 
Audit-Related Fees 47,500
 531,243
Audit-Related Fees— 32,663 
Tax Fees 302,192
 259,593
Tax Fees704,000 752,838 
All Other Fees 1,780
 1,650
All Other Fees8,125 — 
 $2,768,354
 $2,900,486
$5,406,679 $5,511,497 
Audit Fees consistsconsist of fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, including fees related to KPMG LLP'sLLP’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting, the review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by KPMG LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-Related Feesconsists consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under "Audit“Audit Fees." These” For fiscal 2021, these services includeprimarily related to fees associated with employee benefit plan audits, accounting consultations in connection with acquisitions, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. Fiscal 2016 audit-related fees also include diligence fees related to the acquisition of Haddon House Food Products, Inc. and certain related affiliates.audits.
Tax Feesconsists consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal and state tax compliance, cost segregation studies, tax audit defense and mergers and acquisitions.
All Other Feesconsists consist of fees for services other than the services reported above. In fiscal 2016 and 2017, we utilized KPMG LLP for a subscription to an online accounting research tool.
The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the non-audit services described above by KPMG LLP is compatible with maintaining auditor independence and determined that KPMG LLP'sLLP’s provision of non-audit services did not compromise its independence as our independent registered public accounting firm.

59


Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services
In accordance with its charter,Our Audit Committee has adopted a written Pre-Approval Policy, under which the Audit Committee's policy is to pre-approveCommittee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by KPMG LLP. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other related services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one yeartwelve months and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. KPMG LLP and managementManagement are required to report periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by KPMG LLP in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. The Audit Committee has adopted a written pre-approval policy pursuant to which, among other things,Under the Pre-Approval Policy, the Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority (subject to certain exceptions and dollar limits) to the chairpersonchair of the Audit Committee who shall report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee for ratification at its next scheduled meeting. During fiscal 2017,2022, all services provided to us by KPMG LLP were pre-approved either by the Audit Committee or the chairperson of the Audit Committee acting pursuant to delegated authority in accordance with the pre-approval policy and the Audit Committee's charter.Pre-Approval Policy.

60



PROPOSALProposal 3—ADVISORY APPROVAL OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONAdvisory Approval of Our Executive Compensation
As described in EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee's goal in settingWe made several enhancements to our executive compensation isprogram after our 2021 Annual Meeting, informed by engagement with several of our stockholders, and, as a result, we received a 92.6% Say on Pay at our last annual meeting. During our 2022 engagement discussions, our stockholders were complimentary of our responsiveness and our compensation program in light of the changes made in fiscal 2022. We continue to providehave a strong executive compensation program that attracts individualswe believe is appropriate and effective in aligning the interests of our executives with the skills necessary for us to achievethose of our business plan, motivates our executive talent, rewards those individuals fairly over time for performance that enhances stockholder value and retains those individuals who continue to perform at or above the levels that are deemed necessary to ensure our success.stockholders. Our compensation program is also designed to reinforce a sense of ownership in our company,Company and foster an entrepreneurial spirit. Our program drives urgency with respect to meeting deadlinesdelivering significant value; and overall entrepreneurial spirit and to link rewards,alignment of compensation incentives, including both short-termshort- and longer termlong-term awards, as well as cash and non-cash awards, to measurable pre-established corporate and individual performance metrics established bymetrics. We believe we have developed a compensation program designed to deliver our Fuel the Compensation Committee. In applying these principles, we seek to integrate compensation with our short- and long-termFuture strategic plansobjectives and to align theour executives’ interests with those of our executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders.
Our compensation programs are designed so that they maintain a pay-for-performance incentive program but do not include compensation mix overly weighted toward annual incentives, highly leveraged short-term incentives, uncapped or "all or nothing" bonus payouts or unreasonable performance goals. Our cash and equity incentive programs include several design features that reduceincludes the likelihood of excessive risk-taking, including the use of reasonably obtainable and balanced performance metrics, maximum payouts at levels deemed appropriate, a carefully considered "peer group" to ensure our compensation practices are measured and appropriately competitive, and significant weighting towards long-term incentives that promote longer-term goals and reward sustainable stock, financial and operating performance, especially when combined with our executive stock ownership guidelines. Additionally, our executive compensation recoupment policy allows us to recover bonus payments and certain equity awards under certain circumstances, and compliance and ethical behaviors are factors considered in all performance and bonus assessments.following:
üNo employment agreements with any of our NEOs and clearly outlined terms for treatment of compensation upon termination of employment.
üEquity grants are weighted more heavily toward performance, with 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs (compared to 50%/50% in prior years).
üSTI plan includes a revenue metric, which, balanced with the existing adjusted EBITDA metric, aligns with our strategy to grow sales profitably.
üLTI plan no longer includes a leverage metric, given significant progress on this metric in recent years toward our long-term goal. Adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC incentivize prudent capital investments in our business that aligns with an increase in stockholder value.
üMaintain disciplined equity grant practices.
StockholdersYou are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which discusses how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation objectives and philosophies, as well as the table under EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES—“Executive Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table—Fiscal Years 2015-20172020-2022” and other related compensation tables and narrative disclosure, which describe the compensation of our Named Executive OfficersNEOs in fiscal 2017.2022.
The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis are effective in aligning the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and incentivizing performance that supports our short- and long-term strategic objectives, and that the compensation of the Named Executive OfficersNEOs in fiscal 20172022 reflects and supports these compensation policies and procedures.
As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and as a matter of good corporate governance, stockholders will be asked at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting to approve the following advisory resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company'sCompany’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.
This advisory vote, commonly referred to as a "say-on-pay"“say-on-pay” advisory vote, is non-binding on the Board. Although non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding our executive compensation programs. The Board has adopted, and stockholders have approved, a policy of providing for annual advisory votes by stockholders on executive compensation. The next such vote will occur at the 2018 Annual Meetingnext annual meeting.
The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the advisory approval of our executive compensation. Proxies received by the Board will be voted “FOR” the proposal unless a contrary choice is specified in the proxy.

61

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the advisory approvalProposal 4—Approval of our executive compensation. Proxies received by the Board will be voted “FOR” the proposal unless a contrary choice is specified in the proxy.


PROPOSAL 4APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Background
Amendments Proposed.Our Board of Directors has adopted, effective as of October 27, 2017, and recommends that you approve the United Natural Foods, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan”). The United Natural Foods, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Original Plan") was initially approved by our stockholders on December 12, 2012 at our 2012 annual meeting of stockholders and was subsequently amended and restated on December 16, 2015 at our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders (the "Original Amended and Restated Plan"). The key revisions to the Original Amended and Restated Plan as reflected in the Second Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan
Background
On November 17, 2022, our Board approved the Second Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan are as follows:
(Second Amended and Restated Plan) to (i) increase the number of shares available for issuance under the Original Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan by 2,500,000 shares, all of which shares may be issued as full value awards;
add specific provisions to5,000,000 shares; (ii) update the Original Amended and Restated Plan providing that while dividends or dividend equivalent rights may accrue or be paid into escrowlimitation on shares of restricted stock and restricted share units prior to the vesting of such awards, a participant will forfeit any dividends (or dividend equivalent rights) paid on such awards that do not thereafter vest; and
extend the minimum one-year vesting period required under the Original Amended and Restated Plan with respect to certainnon-employee director awards to all awards underinclude a cap on total director compensation (including cash compensation) and set that cap at $800,000 per year (iii) remove the restrictive covenants language from the Second Amended and Restated Plan and include it in each award agreement; (iv) extend the term of the plan from seven years to 10 years; (v) require the execution of a release in connection with the vesting of any shares as a result of a separation from service without cause (as defined in the plan); and (vi) certain other clarifying and conforming changes. The 2020 Equity Incentive Plan was originally approved by stockholders in December 2019, and an amendment thereto was approved by stockholders on January 12, 2021. The Board believes that equity compensation is an essential component of our corporate strategy and recommends that you vote to approve the Second Amended and Restated Plan.
The Second Amended and Restated Plan permits the grant of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted shares, RSUs, performance awards, and other stock-based awards to current or prospective officers, employees, directors and consultants. The Second Amended and Restated Plan includes terms and conditions that reflect governance best practices, including, among other things, double trigger change in control provisions; minimum vesting provisions; prohibitions on repricing; provision for treatment upon death, disability, retirement and certain separation of service events; provisions regarding performance-based awards; no liberal share recycling; and limits on grant amounts to outside directors and per participant limits.
Best Practices
As further described below in “Summary of the Second Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan”, the Second Amended and Restated Plan includes terms and conditions that reflect best practices in governance and compensation:
Grants under the plan are subject to our recoupment policy and stock ownership guidelines as in effect from time to time (including any changes that may be implemented to comply with an exceptionlisting requirements). Awards are not transferable (other than upon death);
Change in control provisions are “double trigger” (requiring both a change in control and a termination of employment), with a market-standard definition of change in control;
The plan specifically describes the treatment of awards upon death, disability, retirement and certain separation events, thus limiting the need for exercise of administrative discretion and, in the case of retirement, maintaining incentives to thisfocus the executives that are nearing retirement (a time of heightened risk for short-term initiatives), on long-term performance;
The plan contains a one-year minimum vesting requirement, with exceptions for death, disability and change in control;
The minimum vesting requirement does not apply with respect to awards representing no more than 5% of the share reserve;
The plan prohibits repricing of options and SARs;
The plan includes detailed provisions for performance awards, which generally terminate upon termination of employment (other than terminations upon death, disability and retirement);
The plan does not contain “liberal share recycling” provisions (shares surrendered upon payment of the option exercise price or used to pay tax withholding on any award are not added back to the number of shares reservedthat are available for awards, and any SARs that are settled in shares will be deemed to use the full amount of shares underlying the award);
The plan contains limits on grant amounts and total compensation to outside directors and per participant award limits; and
Dividends (if any) payable on unvested awards are not available until the award has vested.
Shares Available and Outstanding Awards
As of November 14, 2022, there were 59,902,801 shares of our common stock outstanding, with a closing price of $45.29 per share. As of such date, we had outstanding awards under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and the Company’s prior equity incentive plan (the Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, or Prior Plan), and we had
62

outstanding replacement awards made to Supervalu employees to replace awards denominated in shares of Supervalu when we acquired Supervalu in October 2018. The table below shows the shares available for issuance under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
NASDAQ rules require us to obtain stockholder approval of material amendments to equity compensation plans, such as the increase in shares availablePlan or reserved for issuance under the Original Amended and Restated Plan.
Available Shares and Outstanding Awards. As of October 16, 2017, assuming 100% of outstanding full value, time-based vesting awards vest and all full value, performance-based vesting awards vest at target level performance, 758,735 shares were available for future grant under the Original Amended and Restated Plan (with only 115,345 of such shares available for issuance as full value awards).

The following table displays the number of full value awards and stock options outstanding as of the last day of each of the Company’s most recently completed three fiscal years and as of October 16, 2017 as well as additional information with respect to the average exercise price and remaining term for stock options, along with the shares available for issuance under the Original Plan and the Original Amended and Restated Plan as of such dates and the total number of the Company’s shares then outstanding:November 14, 2022:
Fiscal YearOptions OutstandingWeighted Average Exercise Price of Stock OptionsWeighted Average Remaining Term (years)Full Value Awards OutstandingShares Available for IssuanceCommon Shares Outstanding
2015444,516$46.976.1621,232761,49350,096,308
2016343,629$49.135.8733,7972,354,57050,383,397
2017328,689$49.525.01,270,1111,389,24850,622,148
Current130,457$62.286.91,694,848758,73550,921,462
New Shares    2,500,000 

(1)Types of SharesAs reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K or proxy statement for the applicable fiscal year.
Number of Shares
(2)Available for New Grants under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive PlanIncludes 361,3901,580,981 Shares
Shares Underlying Existing Awards Granted under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan
2,334,781 shares that could be issued if currently outstanding performance units are earnedunder time-vesting “full value” awards (restricted shares and settled inrestricted stock units) 2,045,796 performance-vesting restricted stock awards (at maximum levels of performance)(1)
Shares Underlying the Prior PlanOptions to purchase 68,605 shares (with a weighted average price of the Company’s common stock at target level$65.95 per share and weighted average remaining term of performance. For more information regarding these performance units, see “Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion1.3 years
Supervalu Replacement OptionsReplacement options to purchase 357,481 shares (with a weighted average price of $51.22 and Analysis - Long-term Equity Based Incentive Program” and “Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Fiscal 2018 Compensation Changes.”average remaining term of 1.7 years
Total Shares Available for Grant or Underlying Existing Awards6,387,644



Grant Practices.(1)The following table sets forth information related to stock optionsperformance units consist of awards granted in October 2020, 2021 and restricted share units (excluding performance shares and performance units) granted by the Company under the Company's equity plans and2022, which will vest or be forfeited in fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017:
  Shares Subject to Options Restricted Share Units
Fiscal Year GrantedForfeited GrantedForfeited
2015 76,940 310,23077,369
2016 33,03034,102 470,428116,232
2017 3,430 704,84098,434
Total 109,97037,532 1,485,498292,035
From July 30, 2017 through October 16, 2017, the Company granted 561,800 restricted stock units with time-based vesting and 42,684 previously awarded time-based vesting restricted stock units were forfeited.
In addition to time-based vesting restricted stock units, the Company has granted performance-based vesting restricted stock units in each of the last three fiscal years, which were allocated as follows:
Performance units for each of our senior executives with performance criteria tied to our adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA (and for the award made during fiscal 2017 to our covered officers (as defined under Section 162(m) of the Code), our diluted EPS) for fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the award was granted and that also allowed for more or less units to be earned based on the performance of our stock price as compared to a group of comparable companies or the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index for the two-year performance period.
Performance units for our Chief Executive Officer with performance criteria tied to our adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA (and for the award made during fiscal 2017 to our covered officers (as defined under Section 162(m) of the Code), our diluted EPS) for the fiscal year in which the award was granted that also allowed for more or less units to be earned based on the performance of our stock price as compared to the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index for the one-year performance period. As described under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis- Fiscal 2018 Compensation Changes" elsewhere in this proxy statement, beginning in September 2017, the Compensation Committee determined to eliminate these one-year performance units from our Chief Executive Officer's equity awards.
A special performance unit award to certain executives in September 2016 with performance criteria tied to our adjusted ROIC and adjusted EBITDA, (and for the award made to our covered officers (as defined under Section 162(m) of the Code), diluted EPS) for the fiscal year in which the award was granted that also allowed for more or less units to be earned based on the performance of our stock price as compared the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index for the one-year performance period, which awards replaced two-year performance period awards granted to our executive officers in September 2015 that were forfeited.
A special performance unit retention award to our Chief Operating Officer in October 2016 with performance criteria tied to our diluted EPS, net sales, and adjusted EBITDA that vests in tranches based on three separate performance periods; (i) fiscal 2017, (ii) fiscal 2018, and (iii) the cumulative two-year period ending July 28, 2018.
A special performance unit retention award to our Chief Executive Officer in October 2016 with performance criteria tied to our diluted EPS, net sales, and adjusted EBITDA that vests in tranches based on four separate performance periods; (i) fiscal 2017, (ii) fiscal 2018, (iii) fiscal 2019, and (iv) the cumulative three-year period ending August 3, 2019.


The following table sets forth information related to the performance-based vesting restricted stock unit awards with two-year performance periods granted under the Original Plan and the Original Amended and Restated Plan in each of fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017 and the portion of those awards that vested or was forfeited following completion of the applicable performance period:
Grant DatePerformance PeriodPerformance Awards Granted at Target Level of Performance (# of shares)Performance Awards Vested (# of shares)Performance Awards Forfeited (as a % of total award)
September 19, 2014August 3, 2014 - July 30, 201649,205 (1)100%
September 17, 2015August 2, 2015 - July 29, 201772,090100%
September 21, 2016August 1, 2016 - July 28, 201899,790N/A (2)(3)N/A (2)(3)
October 27, 2016July 30, 2017 - July 28, 201867,500N/A (2)(4)N/A (2)(4)
October 27, 2016July 29, 2018 - August 3, 201950,000N/A (2)(4)N/A (2)(4)
October 27, 2016August 1, 2016 - July 28, 201810,000N/A (2)(4)N/A (2)(4)
October 27, 2016August 1, 2016 - August 3, 201925,000N/A (2)(4)N/A (2)(4)
(1)Performance awards were denominated in dollars at grant and the number of shares was calculated using the stock price on the grant date.
(2)The performance period for these awards are still in process. Accordingly, the Company cannot calculate the number of shares that will be issued if the units vest.
(3)The recipient may be entitled to earn up to 200% of the target level award based on outstanding Company performance, plus an additional 10% based on the Company's stock price performance over the two-year performance period as compared to the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index.
(4)The recipient may be entitled to earn up to 120% of the target level award based on outstanding Company performance.
The following table sets forth information related to the performance-based vesting restricted stock unit awards granted under the Original Plan and the Original Amended and Restated Plan (with one-year performance periods in each of fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017 and the portion of those awards that vested or were forfeited following completion of the applicable one-year performance period:
Grant DatePerformance PeriodPerformance Awards Granted at Target Level of Performance (# of shares)Performance Awards Vested (# of shares)Performance Awards Forfeited (as a % of total award)
September 19, 2014August 3, 2014 - August 1, 201523,238100%
September 17, 2015August 2, 2015 - July 30, 201629,115100%
September 21, 2016 (1)July 31, 2016 - July 29, 201777,45277,838None
October 27, 2016 (2)July 31, 2016 - July 29, 201767,50072,558None
(1)On September 21, 2016, 77,452 performance units were granted to certain of our executive officers at target levels of performance (with vesting of more or less units possible based on actual performance) and the performance of the Company's stock price when compared to the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index) measured against certain adjusted EBITDA, adjusted ROIC and for our covered officers (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code) diluted EPS performance targets for fiscal 2017. Based upon the performance against the applicable performance targets, 77,838 of these performance units vested on September 26, 2017 and were converted into a like number of shares of Company common stock.
(2)On October 27, 2016, 67,500 performance units were granted to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer at target levels of performance (with vesting of more or less units possible based on actual performance) measured against certain diluted EPS, net sales and adjusted EBITDA targets. Based upon the performance against the applicable performance targets, 72,558 of these performance units vested on September 26, 2017, 49,213 of which were converted into a like number of shares of Company common stock that were issued to these individuals on September 26, 2017 and 23,345 of which were converted into a like number of shares of Company stock, that will not actually be paid to our Chief Executive Officer until the termination of his employment, or, if earlier, upon consummation of a change in control of the Company.


In addition to the above-described performance units, from July 30, 2017 through October 16, 2017, the Company granted 109,100 performance units (at target level of performance) withcompany performance metrics tied to our adjusted ROIC, adjusted EBITDA,pre-established financial metrics over three-year performance periods (fiscal 2021-2023, fiscal 2022-2024 and for our covered officers (as defined in Section 162(m)fiscal 2023-2025, respectively). The number of the Code), diluted EPS for fiscal 2019, whichshares issued upon vesting may be adjusted upwardhigher or downwardlower than target depending on our performance during the relevant measurement period, subject to further adjustment based on Relative TSR. For more information about these performance awards, see “Executive Compensation-Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Long Term Equity-Based Incentive Program”.

For more information concerning the Company's actual performance and on how our common stock price performs relative togrants made by the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index over the two-year performance period.
There have been no performance units grantedCompany in fiscal 2018,2020 through October 16, 2017, that have a performance period that is less than one full fiscal year.2022, see “Historical Grants and Share Usage” below.
In determiningWe are asking stockholders to adoptapprove the Second Amended and Restated Plan, so that we can effectively maintain the vital equity component of our compensation program going forward. Our equity compensation program, which furthers our executive compensation philosophy, provides our executives and non-executive employees with an incentive to deliver our long-term strategic objectives. In addition, we believe these awards allow us to attract, retain and reward key employees and directors and to align the interests of our employees with those of our stockholders over the long term.
Our Board recognizes the impact of dilution on stockholders and believes that it has prudently managed equity awards, giving proper consideration to the dilutive impact of stock awards on stockholder equity. Recently, our Board approved a share repurchase program, which will give us the opportunity to partially offset dilution. Our Compensation Committee reviews benchmark data in setting equity compensation levels and believes that grant amounts to our executive officers and other employees are sufficiently competitive to attract and retain top talent while remaining consistent with market levels of equity compensation.
Total dilution after giving effect to the proposed amendment would be 19.0%. We calculated our dilution rate as the sum of grants outstanding and shares available for future awards (numerator) divided by basic common shares outstanding, in each case as of November 14, 2022.
Our total number of outstanding shares is significantly lower than that of other companies of similar size, as measured by revenues. In fact, as of the end of fiscal 2022, our outstanding share count was approximately 43% of the median number of the outstanding shares most recently reported of the Comparator Group of wholesale distribution companies with similar revenues that we use for benchmarking executive compensation. Assuming a normalized number of outstanding shares given the industry benchmarks just described, our total dilution would be 6.2%. Unless we can offer comparable packages of equity compensation, we will be at a disadvantage when competing for executive talent with companies with operations similar to ours in size and complexity, and we will be required to replace the equity award mix with cash-based incentives, which may not represent the same level of alignment with the interests of stockholders as equity awards. As our stock price has increased, we have maintained disciplined equity grant practices, which is evidenced by the normalized dilution discussed above and a 79% decrease in shares granted from fiscal 2020 to fiscal 2022. Further, we do not sell shares withheld to cover taxes, and do not recycle these as available shares. Accordingly, actual dilution upon vesting of outstanding awards is less than reflected above.
The 1,580,981 shares remaining available under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and recommend the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan for stockholder approval, the Board considered various factors, including the following:
As of October 16, 2017, assuming all outstanding performance share units vest at 100% of target performance, approximately 758,735 shares remain available for grant under the Original Amended and Restated Plan with 118,247 “full-value” awards available for issuance. Based on historical usage, the current share price of our common stock and expected practices (including the Compensation Committee's recent practice ofmay not granting stock options as part of our equity incentive program), and noting that future circumstances may require the Companybe sufficient to make changesallow us to its expected practices, the Company estimates that the existing shares available for grant as full value awards under the Original Amended and Restated Plan would be sufficientcontinue to make equity grants (and settle previously issued performance-based equity awards)to our employees and directors. If stockholders do not approve this request for onlyadditional authorized shares, our ability to grant new equity-based compensation, and thus attract and retain valuable employees, would be significantly diminished, and retention of key employees is vital to achieving our business strategy. We believe that it is in the remainderbest interests of fiscal 2018.
If the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan is approved, the Company would have 2,500,000 additional shares authorizedour stockholders for issuance for future awards under the plan, with all of them available for issuance as full value awards.
The additional sharesour leadership to be authorized for grant under the Second Amendedstockholders and Restated Equity Incentive Plan wouldto be dilutive to stockholders by 5.4% based on the outstandingcompensated in shares as of October 16, 2017.
Based on historical usage and current share price of our common stock,stock. We strive to align our executive compensation packages to market, with the Company estimatesresult that the additional 2,500,000 shares to be authorized for grant under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, if approved by the Company’s stockholders, should be sufficient for the Company to make equity grants for approximately the next 3 years, assuming the Company continues to grant awards consistent with its historical usage (excluding one-time, special awards) and expected practices, and noting that future circumstances may require us to make changes toa significant
63

portion of our expected practices.
The Company’s stock price performance and certain special retention awards that we deemed importantexecutive officers’ total pay opportunities are in order to retain and align key talent with our long-term strategy were not contemplated at the time of stockholder approvalequity-based incentives: 60% of the Original Amendedtotal opportunity for our CEO, and Restated Plan causedan average of 52% for our other NEOs. We generally grant equity awards to employees at and above the Company to usedirector level, because the shares reserved for issuance underperformance of employees at that level and above has the Original Amended and Restated Plan more quickly than the Board had anticipated at the time the Original Amended and Restated Plan was submitted to the Company’s stockholders for their approval.
The Compensation Committee’s decision to transition away from the use of stock options as a partmost direct impact on achievement of the Company’s corelong-term strategic goals. Grants to associates other than executive officers represented 69% of the total equity dollars in fiscal 2022. To continue our long-term incentive program, has caused a significant number ofif we do not have sufficient shares remaining available, for issuancewe may be required to issue cash-based awards which, as mentioned above, would be less favorable to stockholders. For information about grants made under the Original Amendedour equity plans, see “Historical Grants and Restated Plan to likely go unused as stock options are not expected to be used in a meaningful amount in the foreseeable future.
Share Usage”, below.
Summary of the Second Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan
The following summary of the material terms of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, as proposed to be amended, as set forth in AppendixAnnex A to this proxy statement. You should read the complete text of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan for more details regarding the operation of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
PurposePlan. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this section shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Second Amended and Restated Plan.
Purpose
The purpose of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan is to promote our interests and those of our stockholders by attracting and retaining key officers, employees, directors and consultants; motivating such individuals by means of performance-related incentives to achieve long-range performance goals; enabling such individuals to participate in our long-term growth and financial success; encouraging ownership of our stock by such individuals; and linking their compensation to our long-term interests and those of our stockholders.
Administration.    
The Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan willmust be administered by a committee composed of at least two "non-employee“non-employee directors," within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and Rule 16b-3l 6b-3 thereunder, each of whom will be an "outside director" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code and "independent"“independent” within the meaning of NASDAQthe NYSE listing rulesstandards and the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has appointed the full Compensation Committee to serve as the administrator of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee will determinedetermines eligibility for and designatedesignates participants of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, determinePlan; determines the


type and amountnumber of awards to be granted, determinegranted; determines the timing, terms and conditions of any award,award; and makemakes other determinations as provided in the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. All decisions and interpretations made by the Compensation Committee with respect to the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan will be binding on us and participants. Subject to certain limitations under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to our officers or managers to grant, modify or cancel awards, other than with respect to participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.Act; any resolution delegating such authority shall specify the maximum amount that may be granted under such delegated authority.
Prohibition on Repricing without Stockholder Approval
.    The Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan provides that, without the approval of our stockholders, the Compensation Committee may not lower the option price of a stock option after it is granted, lower the grant price of a SAR after it is granted, cancel a stock option in exchange for a replacement stock option or SAR with a lower exercise price or grant price when the option price exceeds the fair market value of the underlying shares (other than in certain limited situations involving a changeChange in control) and grant substitute options atControl), cancel a SAR in exchange for a replacement stock option or SAR with a lower optionexercise price than the canceled option, cancel a SARor grant price when the grant price exceeds the fair market value of the underlying shares (other than in certain limited situations involving a changeChange in control) and grant substitute SARs with a lower grant price than the canceled SARs, Control), or take any action with respect to a stock option or SAR that would be treated as a repricing under the rules and regulations of the principal securities exchange on which shares of our common stock are traded.
Minimum Vesting Period
. Except for Substitute Awards, as determined by the Compensation Committee following the grant of an Award in connection with the death, disability or retirement(as defined in Section 409A of the Code) of the Participant, or in the event of a Change in Control or Separation from Service without Cause, Awards granted hereunder shall have a Vesting Period of not less than one (1) year from the date of grant; grant; provided, that the Compensation Committee under the Second Amended and Restated Plan has the discretion to waive this requirement with respect to an Award at the time of granting such Award so long as the total number of Shares that are issued under this Plan pursuant to Awards having an originally stated Vesting Period of less than one year from the date of grant (or, in the case of vesting of Performance Awards or other Awards the vesting of which is subject to the achievement of performance-based objectives, over a period of less than one year measured from the commencement of the period over which performance is evaluated) shall not exceed 5% of the Share Reserve.share reserve.

64

Eligible Participants
.    Any current or prospective officer, employee, director or consultant of ours or one of our subsidiaries is eligible to be designated as a participant by the Compensation Committee. Committee. However, the granting, vesting and exercise of an award to a prospective employee, director or consultant are conditioned upon such individual attaining such status. status. The Board must approve awards to directors thatwho are not also employees of ours. ours. As of October 16, 2017, November 14, 2022, approximately 223526 employees 6and 10 non-employee directors and an indeterminate numberof consultants would behave been eligible to participate in the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.Plan if such plan was effective.
Shares Subject to the Second Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan
.    The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan following its approval by the stockholders shall not exceed the sum of (i) 2,500,000 Shares,is expected to be 11,030,163 shares(Authorized Shares). This represents 5,000,000 additional shares, plus (ii) 758,735, the number of shares remaining available for grant under the Original Amended and Restatedexisting Plan as of the end of2023 annual meeting, including shares that are expected to be forfeited and returned to the day that the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentiveexisting Plan was approved by the Board. As described above, although 758,735 shares remained available for issuance under the Original Amended and Restated Plan as of October 16, 2017, only 118,247 of these shares remain available for issuance as full-value awards and a portion of those sharessuch time. The actual number may be required to be issued in settlement of performance-based vesting restricted stock unit awards outstanding but unvested as ofhigher or lower depending on actual grants and forfeitures made after the date hereof. record date.The maximum number of new awards that we may issue as restricted shares or , restricted share units (i.e.or performance share units (i.e., full-value awards) ifis equal to the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan is 2,618,247 plus any earlier awardsnumber of full-value awards issued under the Original Plan or the Original Amended and Restated Plan that expire, terminate, are settled in cash, are forfeited or canceled for any reason without the delivery of shares. Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares with respect to which incentive stock options may be granted under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan is 250,000. 1,000,000. Each share issued pursuant to an award will reduce the share reserve by one share. share. If any award granted under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, the Original Plan or the Original Amended and RestatedPrior Plan expires, terminates, is settled in cash (in whole or in part, including, except with respect to shares utilized to cover tax withholding) or otherwise is forfeited or canceled for any reason without the delivery of shares, the shares no longer subject to such award will again be available for awards under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a stock option or SAR is exercised, in whole or in part, by tender or withholding of shares or if our tax withholding obligation for any award under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan is satisfied by the tender or withholding shares, the number of shares deemed to have been issued under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan will be the number of shares that were subject to the award or portion thereof and not the net number of shares actually issued. issued. SARs to be settled in shares will be counted in full against the number of shares reserved regardless of the number of shares issued in settlement of the SAR. The number of shares subject to the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan may be adjusted in the event of certain changes in our capital structure.structure.
Per Participant Limitations
Limitations on Awards to Covered Employees.    With respect to any individual who was in the prior year or is reasonably expected to be in the current year a "covered employee" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, theThe maximum number of shares in respect of which stock optionsoption and SARs (taken together)that may be granted in any fiscal yearto a participant under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan for any fiscal year is 150,000, the900,000. The grant date maximum numbervalue of restricted shares in respect of which all, RSUs and performance awards denominated in shares that may be granted in any fiscal year under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan is 125,000, and the maximum amount of all performance awards that are settled in cash and that may be grantedto one individual in any fiscal year under the Second Amended and


Restated Equity Incentive Plan is $2,500,000. The individual "covered employee"$10,000,000. These limitations are cumulative; that is, cumulative. In other words, to the extent that shares of common stock or cash for which awards are permitted to be granted to sucha participant during a fiscal year are not covered by an award to such participant in that fiscal year (such shortfall, the “Shortfall Amount”), the number of shares of common stock (or amount of cash, as the case may be) available for awards to such participant will automatically increase in the subsequent fiscal years during the term of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan until used.the earlier of the time the Shortfall Amount has been granted to the participant, or the end of the third fiscal year following the year to which such Shortfall Amount relates (determined on a “first-in-first-out”basis). The aggregate grant date fair value of equity grants to any non-employee director in any calendar year plus the total cash compensation paid to such director for services rendered for such calendar year may not exceed $800,000.
Terms and Conditions of Awards
.    The Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan permits the grant of stock options, SARs, restricted shares, restricted share units, performance awards (including performance shares and performance units), and other stock-based awards. awards. Stock options granted under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan may be either incentive stock options complying with Section 422 of the Code or nonqualified stock options. options. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees. employees. All other awards may be granted to current or prospective officers, employees, directors and consultants. consultants. All awards under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan must be evidenced by an award agreement that may specifyspecifying the terms and conditions of the award and any rules applicable thereto.thereto.
Stock Options. A stock option represents the right to purchase a specified number of shares during a specified period of up to ten years. years. The award agreement will set forth the number of shares subject to the stock options, the option price, and the conditions and limitations applicable to the exercise of the stock options as determined by the Compensation Committee. Committee. The option price of stock options may not be less than the fair market value on the date that such stock options are deemed to be granted under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Plan. With respect to incentive stock options, the terms and conditions of such stock options will be subject to and comply with Section 422 of the Code. Code. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value (determined at the time the incentive stock option is granted) of the shares with respect to which all incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by an employee during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, $100,000, or if and to the extent stock options fail to qualify as incentive stock options for any other reason, such stock options will constitute non-qualified stock options. options. Incentive stock
65

options may not be granted to any individual who, at the time of grant owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all of our outstanding common stock or any of our subsidiaries, unless the exercise price is not less than 110% 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant and the exercise of such option is prohibited by its terms after the expiration of five years from the date of grant of such option.option.
SARsSARs. Unless otherwise set forth in the award agreement, award agreement, SARs represent the right to receive anan amount of cash equal, or shares of common stock having a value equal, to the increase in the fair market valuevalue of a specified number of shares between the grant date of the SARs and the date on which they are exercised. are exercised. The award agreement will set forth the number of shares subject to the award, the grant price, and the conditions and limitations applicable to the exercise of the SARs as determined by the Compensation Committee. Committee. The grant price of SARs may not be less than the fair market value on the date that such SARs are deemed to be granted under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.Plan.
RestrictedRestricted Shares. The award agreement for restricted shares will set forth the number of shares subject to the award, the period during which, and the conditions under which, the restricted shares may be forfeited to us, and the other terms and conditions of the award. award. Restricted shares may not be sold, transferred, or otherwise encumbered or disposed of until the expiration of the restricted period and the fulfillment of any other conditions to the award. award. The award agreement will set forth a period of time during which the participant must remain in the continuous employment (or other service-providing capacity) for the forfeiture and transfer restrictions to lapse.lapse. If provided in the award agreement, an award will continue to vest and be exercisable after retirement. Unless otherwise provided in the award agreement, the participant receiving restricted shares will have the right to vote such shares and receive dividends, but any dividends paid on unvested shares of restricted stock will be escrowed and not paid to the participant until the shares of restricted stock on which the dividends were paid vest, and the participant will forfeit any dividends paid on restricted shares that are later forfeited by the participant. At the end of the restricted period and provided that any other restrictive conditions of the award are met, a stock certificate will be delivered to the participant free of the restricted stock legend (or restrictions on book-entry shares will be removed).
RestrictedRestricted Share Units. Each restricted share unitRSU will have a value equal to the fair market value of a share on the date such restricted share units are deemed to beRSU granted under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted share unitsPlan. RSUs may be paid in cash, shares, other securities or property (as determined by the Compensation Committee) upon the lapse of restrictions applicable to the award and otherwise in accordance with the award agreement. Restricted share unitsRSUs will be subject to transfer restrictions similar to those of restricted shares, except that no shares are awarded to a participant who is granted restricted share unitsRSUs on the date of grant, and such participant will have no rights of a stockholder with respect to the restricted share unitsRSUs until the restrictions set forth in the award agreement lapse. lapse. The award agreement for restricted share unitsRSUs will set forth the number of shares subject to the award, the period during which, and the conditions under which, the restricted shares unitsRSUs may be forfeited to us, and the other terms and conditions of the award. award. The award agreement will set forth a period of time during which the participant must remain in the continuous employment (or other service-providing capacity) for the forfeiture and transfer restrictions to lapse. lapse. The award agreement may also set forth performance or other conditions (including, but not limited to, performance goals based on the criteria listed in the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan) that will subject the shares to forfeiture and transfer restrictions. The award agreement will specify whether restricted share units entitle the participant to dividend equivalent rights at the time of payment of dividends to our stockholders, but such dividend equivalentrestrictions


rights shall not be payable to the participant until fulfillment of any restrictive condition set forth in the applicable award agreement and only dividend equivalent rights with respect to restricted share units for which the restrictive conditions shall not be fulfilled shall be forfeited by the participant. . Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee or as provided in the award agreement, all of the restricted share unitsRSUs (and any dividend equivalent rights with respect thereto) will terminate unless the participant remains in continuous employment for the entire restricted period and unless the other restrictive conditions of the award are met.
Performance AwardsAward. .    The Compensation Committee may grant performance awards, which will consist of a right that is denominated in cash or shares (including but not limited to restricted shares and restricted share units), valued, as determined by the Compensation Committee, in accordance with the achievement of such performance goals during such performance periods as the Compensation Committee may establish, and payable at such time and in such form as the Compensation Committee shall determine. determines. Subject to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan and any applicable award agreement, the Compensation Committee will determine the performance goals to be achieved during any performance period, the length of any performance period, the amount of any performance award and the amount and kind of any payment or transfer to be made pursuant to any performance award, and may amend specific provisions of the performance award; award; however, any such amendment may not adversely affect existing performance awards made within a performance period commencing prior to implementation of the amendment. Performance awards may be paid in a lump sum or in installments following the close of the performance period or, in accordance with the procedures established by the Compensation Committee, on a deferred basis. Except as otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee at or after grant, separationbasis. Separation from service prior to the end of any performance period, other than for reasons of death, disability, retirement or disability, separation from service without cause (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Plan), will result in the forfeiture of the performance award, and no payments will be made.made. If provided in the applicable award agreement or in accordance with any determination of the Compensation Committee, performance awards granted in the year in which retirement occurs will be pro-rated to reflect the length of service during the applicable performance period prior to retirement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, waive any performance goals and/or other terms and conditions relating to a performance award.
     Awards that are granted as performance-based awards
66

The Compensation Committee must, in writing, select the performance goal(s) applicable to "covered officers" within the meaning of Section 162(m) ofperformance period, establish the Codevarious targets and that are intendedbonus amounts which may be earned for such performance period, and specify the relationship between performance goals and targets and the amounts to be "performance-based compensation" withinearned for such performance period. Following the meaningcompletion of Section 162(m) of the Code will be based upon the attainment ofeach performance targets related to one or more performance goals selected by period, the Compensation Committee from amongmust certify in writing whether the following: earnings beforeapplicable performance targets have been achieved and the amounts, if any one, payable for such performance period. The Compensation Committee may adjust the amount of cash or morenumber of the following: interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and/or stock compensation; net sales; operating (or gross) income or profit; pretax income before allocation of corporate overhead and/or bonus; operating efficiencies; operating income as a percentage of net sales; return on equity, assets, capital, capital employed or investment; after tax operating income; net income; earnings or book value per share; financial ratios; cash flow(s); total sales or revenues or sales or revenues per employee; capital expenditures as a percentage of net sales; total operating expenses, or some component or combination of components of total operating expenses, as a percentage of net sales; stock price or total stockholder return, including any comparisons with stock market indices; appreciation in or maintenance of the price of the common stock or any of our publicly-traded securities; dividends; debt or cost reduction; comparisons withshares payable to take into account additional factors that it might deem relevant affecting performance metrics of peer companies; comparisons of our stock price performance to the stock price performance of peer companies; strategic business objectives, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified cost targets, meeting or reducing budgeted expenditures, attaining division, group or corporate financial goals, meeting business expansion goals (including, without limitation, developmental, strategic or manufacturing milestones of products or projects in development, execution of contracts with current or prospective customers and development of business expansion strategies) and meeting goals relating to acquisitions, joint ventures or collaborations or divestitures; economic value-added models; or any combination thereof. Each goal may be expressed on an absolute and/or relative basis, may be based on or otherwise employ comparisons based on internal targets, our past performance or the past performance of any of our subsidiaries, operating units, business segments or divisions and/or the past or current performance of other companies, and in the case of earnings-based measures, may use or employ comparisons relating to capital, stockholders' equity and/or shares outstanding, or to assets or net assets. .
The Compensation Committee may appropriately adjust any evaluation of performance under the foregoing criteria to exclude any of the following events that occurs during a performance period:period: (i) asset impairments or write-downs;write-downs, (ii) litigation or claim judgments or settlements;settlements, (iii) the effect of changes in tax law, accounting principles or other such laws or provisions affecting reported results;results, (iv) accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs;programs, (v) any termsitems that are unusual in nature or infrequently occurring (within the meaning of applicable accounting standards) and/or described in management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in ourthe Company's annual report to stockholders on Form 10-K for the applicable year;year, (vi) the effect of adverse federal, governmental or regulatory action, or delays in federal, governmental or regulatory action; oraction; (vii) any other event either not directly related to our operations or not within the reasonable control of our management.management; and (viii) any other event, condition or circumstance for which the Compensation Committee determines that an adjustment would be appropriate based on Compensation Committee guidelines, prior practice or other considerations.
Other Stock-Based AwardsOth.    er Stock-Based Awards. The Compensation Committee may grant stock-based awards other than stock options, SARs, restricted shares restricted share units, , RSUsand performance awards. Such other stock-based awards will consist of an award of shares or an award denominated or payable in, or valued in whole or part by reference to, shares, and will have terms determined by the Compensation Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
Separation from Service
.    The Compensation Committee will determine the terms and conditions that will apply to any award upon a participant'sparticipant’s separation from service and may provide such terms and conditions in the award agreement or in such rules and regulations as it may prescribe. Unless provided in the award agreement, awards will fully vest on death or disability. Unless otherwise provided in the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan


, an award agreement or by a contractualwritten employment or similar agreement between us and a participant, if a participant'sparticipant’s employment with or service to us terminates before the restrictions imposed on the award lapse, the performance goals have been satisfied or the award otherwise vests, such award will be forfeited.
Change in Controlforfeited. UnlessExcept as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, in an award agreement or by a contractualwritten employment agreement or similar agreement between us and a participant, if within twelve months after we obtain actual knowledge that a changeparticipant’s employment terminates prior to a Change in controlControl (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan) has occurred, a participant's employment with or service to us is terminated , for any reason allother than death or disability, the vesting of any unvested award will not be triggered by such termination of employment or service. Notwithstanding the foregoing, termination of employment or service without Cause or for Good Reason that takes place within four (4) months prior to a Change in Control and that is made at the behest of the acquirer or in contemplation of such Change in Control will be treated as if such termination of employment or service took place after such Change in Control provided that the change in control actually occurs.
In the case of an employee participant who is not a party to an employment agreement or separate agreement which is governing the treatment of equity awards, the following treatment will apply with respect to awards (subject to the exercise of committee discretion). Upon a qualifying Separation from Service without Cause (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Plan), a prorated portion of outstanding awards of RSUs shall vest upon such separation and a prorated portion of outstanding PSUs shall continue to vest subject to actual performance. The remainder of RSUs and PSUs not vesting in accordance with the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Plan will be forfeited. Pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Plan, the Compensation Committee has authority to make determinations as to the timing, conditions and acceleration of vesting of equity awards granted, including in regard to any separation of service. Additionally, such prorated vesting is subject to the participant’s execution and non-revocation of release.
The Second Amended and Restated Plan permits awards to continue to vest in retirement (defined as a termination of active employment after the participant will vest, become immediately exercisablehas attained 59 years of age and payable and haveprovided ten (10) years of service), if so provided in the award agreement. Performance awards granted in the year in which retirement takes place are pro-rated to reflect the length of the participant’s service during the applicable performance period prior to retirement. As a matter of policy, the Company expects all restrictions lifted. award agreements under the Plan to include provisions allowing for vesting through retirement.
Change in Control
In the event of a changeChange in control, Control, the successor or purchasing entity may, without the consent of any participant, either assume or continue our rights and obligations under any award outstanding immediately prior to the changeChange in controlControl or substitute for any such outstanding award a substantially equivalent award with respect to the successor'ssuccessor’s or purchasing entity'sentity's stock. The Compensation Committee may in its discretion and without the consent of any participant, determine that, upon the occurrence of a changeChange in control, Control, each or any award or a portion thereof outstanding immediately prior to the changeChange in control
67

Control and not previously exercised or settled will be canceled in exchange for a payment with respect to each vested share subject to such award in cash, shares, shares of a corporation or other business entity a party to the changeChange in control, Control, or other property which, in any such case, will be in an amount having a fair market value equal to the fair market value of the consideration to be paid per share in the changeChange in control, Control, reduced by the exercise or purchase price per share, if any, under such award.   award.
Unless otherwise expressly provided in the award agreement, an employment agreement or other written agreement between us and a participant, or the definitive transaction agreement governing such Change in Control, in the event of a Change in Control in which the acquiror does assume or continue outstanding awards upon the Change in Control, if a participant’s employment with or service to us is terminated involuntarily for any reason other than Cause (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Plan), or a participant terminates his or her employment or service for Good Reason (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Plan) within twelve (12) months of such Change in Control: (a) stock options and SARs will become fully vested as of the termination date, and exercisable no later than 30 days following such termination date (or such other date permitted by Section 409A of the Code); (b) restricted shares and RSUs will become fully vested as of such termination date, and will be delivered no later than 30 days following such termination date; and (c) any then-in-progress performance awards will become fully vested at target performance levels as of such termination date, and will be delivered no later than 30 days following such termination date. Any outstanding performance awards relating to performance periods ending prior to the termination date which have been earned but not paid will become immediately payable.
Unless otherwise expressly provided in the award agreement, an employment agreement or similar written agreement with us, or the definitive transaction agreement governing such Change in Control, in the event of a Change in Control in which the acquiror does not assume or continue outstanding awards upon the Change in Control, all outstanding awards that are not assumed or continued will be treated as follows (to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code): (a) stock options and stock appreciation rights will become fully vested and exercisable as of date and time immediately prior to the Change in Control; (b) restricted shares and RSUs will become fully vested as of the date and time immediately prior to the Change in Control and shall settle immediately following the Change in Control; and (c) unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, any performance awards relating to performance periods that have not ended as of the date of a Change in Control will automatically vest and become payable at the target level of performance.
Transferability of Awards
.    Except as otherwise permitted in an award agreement or by the Compensation Committee, awards under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan are not transferable other than by a participant's will or the laws of descent and distribution.distribution.
Term and Amendment
.    No new awardsawards may be granted under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan after the tenth anniversary of its adoption by the Board, October 27, 2017. effective date, which shall be January 10, 2023, subject to approval of our stockholders. The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan at any time; time; however, no amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation or termination may be made without stockholder approval if approval is necessary to comply with any tax or regulatory requirement for which or with which the Board deems it necessary or desirable to comply.comply.
Restrictive Covenants
Agreement to the restrictive covenants that shall be set forth in the applicable award agreement under the Second Amended and Restated Plan, including confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation and cooperation, is a condition to receipt of an award. The Committee may waive any conditions or rights under, amend the terms of or alter, suspend, discontinue, cancel or terminate any award granted (including retroactively) provided that any such action does not materially or adversely affect the rights of the participant without his or her consent.
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a brief summary of certain Federal income tax laws in effect on the date hereof with applicability to the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Plan. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and the exact tax consequences to any participant will depend on his or her particular circumstances and other factors. factors. The Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan participants are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to any state tax consequences or particular federal tax implications of awards granted under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Plan. The Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan is not intended to be qualified under Section 401(a)40l(a) of the Code.Code.
Stock Options
Stock Options.    A participant will not recognize income, and we will not be entitled to take a deduction, upon the grant of stock options. options. Upon exercising a non-qualified option, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the difference between the exercise price and fair market value of the shares acquired on the date of exercise, and we will be
68

entitled to a deduction for the same amount. Any ordinary income of the participant will be subject to tax withholding by us. us. We generally will have no tax consequence in connection with the later disposition of shares acquired pursuant to non-qualified stock options. options. A participant generally will not recognize income, and we will not be entitled to take a deduction, upon the exercise of an incentive stock option (except that the alternative minimum tax may apply). If shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are held for the longer of two years from the grant date of the stock options and more than one year after the date they were exercised, the difference between the sale price and the exercise price generally will be taxed as long-term capital gain or loss, and we will not be entitled to any deduction. deduction. We generally will have no tax consequence in connection with the later disposition of shares acquired pursuant to incentive stock options if such holdings periods are met. If the participant does not satisfy these holding periods, then the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of the lesser of the amount realized upon such disposition and the fair market value of such shares on the date of exercise, over the exercise price, and we should be entitled to take a corresponding deduction.deduction.
SARs
SARs.    A participant will not recognize income, and we will not be entitled to take a deduction, upon the grant of SARs. SARs. Upon exercising a SAR, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income in the amount by which the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise exceeds the SAR exercise price, if any, and we will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount. Any ordinary income of the participant will be subject to tax withholding by us. us. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon the later disposition of the shares will be capital gain or loss, which may be long- or short-term capital gain or loss depending on the holding period. period. We generally will have no tax consequence in connection with the later disposition of shares acquired pursuant to a SAR.
Restricted Shares
.    The award of restricted shares will not result in taxable income to the participant, and we will not be entitled to take a deduction, at the time of grant unless the participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to be


taxed at such time. time. If such election is not made, upon the lapse of the restrictions upon restricted shares, the participant will recognize ordinary income in the amount equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time the restricted shares vest (less any amount paid for the shares), and we will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount.
Prior to the lapse of the restrictions on restricted shares, any dividends received on such shares will be treated as ordinary income to the participant.participant. If an effective election under Section 83(b) of the Code is made within 30 days after receipt of restricted shares, , the participant will recognize ordinary income in the year that the restricted shares are awarded in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of such awardaward determined as if the restricted shares were not subject to restrictions, and we will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount. If the election is made, the participant will not recognize income at the time that the restrictions actually lapse. lapse. Any dividends received after the election is made generally will constitute qualified dividend income. income. If the restricted shares subject to the election are subsequently forfeited, the participant will not be entitled to a deduction or tax refund. refund. Any ordinary income of the participant will be subject to tax withholding by us. us. We generally will have no tax consequence in connection with the later disposition of shares acquired pursuant to vested restricted shares.shares.
Restricted Share Units
.    With respect to a grant of restricted share units, RSUs, the participant will recognize ordinary income on the amountamount of cash (for units payable in cash) or the fair market value of the common stock (for units settled in stock) at the time such payments are made availableavailable to the participantparticipant under the terms of the restricted share unitRSU award, and we will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount. The participant also is subject to capital gainsgains treatment on the subsequent sale of any shares acquired through the vestingsettlement of restricted share units.the RSU. For this purpose, the participant's basis in the common stock is his or her fair market valuevalue at the time the restricted share units become vestedRSUs are settled (unless delivery of the shares has been validlyvalidly deferred). Any ordinary income of the participantparticipant will be subject to tax withholding by us. us. We generally will have no tax consequence in connection with the later disposition of shares acquired pursuant to restricted share units.RSU. A Section 83(b) election is not available with respect to RSUs.
Performance Awards
.    A participant will not recognize income, and we will not be entitled to take a deduction, upon the grant of performance awards unless the participant makes an effective election under Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed at the time of the grant. A Section 83(b) election may not be availableavailable with respect to certain forms of performance awards. awards (e.g., those denominated as units). With respect to performance awardsawards settled in shares participants, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares received as the performance goals are met and such awardsawards vest or are settled (depending on the type of the award), less any amount paidamount paid by the participant for the performance awards. awards. With respect to performance awards settled in cash participants, participants will recognize ordinary income in such amount at the time the performance goals are attained, and the payments are made available to the participant. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon the later disposition of shares acquired upon the vesting of performance awards will be capital gaingain or loss, which may be long- or short-term capital gain or loss depending on the holding period. period. Unless a participant makes aan effective Section 83(b) election, the participant's
69

participant’s basis in the stock will be its fair market value at the time the performance goals are met and the performance awards become vested. vested or, if applicable, upon settlement of performance share units. We generally will have no tax consequence in connection with the later disposition of shares acquired pursuant to a performance award.award.
Section 162(m).    Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a public company's tax deduction for compensation paid in excess of $1.0 million in any tax year to its chief executive officer and certain other most highly compensated executives. However, compensation that qualifies as "performance-based compensation" is excluded from this $1.0 million deduction limit and therefore remains fully deductible by the company that pays it. We generally intend that, except as otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, performance awards and stock options granted with an exercise price at least equal to 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock at the date of grant to employees the Compensation Committee expects to be named executive officers at the time a deduction arises in connection with such awards, will qualify as "performance-based compensation" so that these awards will not be subject to the Section 162(m) deduction limitations. The Compensation Committee will not necessarily limit executive compensation to amounts deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code, however, if such limitation is not in the best interests of us and our stockholders and the Compensation Committee may take actions that could cause compensation that was otherwise intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” to no longer so qualify if it determines that doing so is in our best interests.Substitute Payments
Substitute Payments.    Substitute payments for dividends made to participants with respect toupon the vesting of restricted shares or certain performance awards payable in our stock will be taxed as ordinary income to the participant until the shares vest. . After vesting, dividend payments may be qualified dividend income subject to a current maximum federal capital gains tax rate of 15%treatment provided that the stockholder meets certain other requirements with respect to those shares. shares. If a participant makes aan effective Section 83(b) election with respect to restricted shares or certain eligible performance awards, these payments may be qualified dividend income, provided that the other requirements are met. We recommend that participants consult with their tax advisors to determine whether such dividends are qualified dividend income.income.
Section 409A
.    Section 409A of the Code provides generally generally that nonqualified deferred compensation that does not meet certaincertain requirements will subject the recipients of such compensationcompensation to accelerated taxation, accelerated taxation, enhanced underpayment interest andand an additional twenty percent tax. tax. Although we intend to administeradminister the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan soso that awards awards will be exempt from, or will comply with, the requirementsrequirements of Section 409A of the Code, we do not warrant that any awardaward under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan will qualify will qualify for favorable favorable tax treatment under SectionSection 409A


of the the Code or any other provision of federal state, local, state, local or foreign law. foreign law. We will not be be liable to any any participant for any tax, interest, or penalties that such participant might owe as a resultresult of the grant, the grant, holding, vesting, exercise, or paymentpayment of any awardany award under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.Plan.
New Plan Benefits
The Second Amended and Restated Plan does not provide for set benefits or amounts of awards, and we have not approved any awards that are conditioned on stockholder approval of the increase in available shares under the Second Amended and Restated Plan. Any future awards awards granted to eligible participants participants under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan will be subjectsubject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee and, therefore, the Compensation Committee and, therefore, thetotal number of awards thatthat will be grantedgranted under the Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive PlanPlan is not determinable at this time.time.
Historical Grants and Share Usage
The following table displays the number of full value awards (restricted share units and performance share units) and stock options outstanding as of the last day of each of the Company’s most recently completed three fiscal years and as of November 14, 2022 as well as additional information with respect to the average exercise price and remaining term for stock options, along with the shares available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive or the Prior Plan as of such dates and the total number of the Company’s shares then outstanding:
Fiscal Year
Options Outstanding (1)
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Stock OptionsWeighted Average Remaining Term (years)
Full Value Awards Outstanding(2)
Shares Available for IssuanceCommon Shares Outstanding
20201,130,073$46.464.47,416,6492,865,12454,603,757
2021764,310$49.022.26,891,7643,932,34956,284,144
2022487,116$54.111.65,029,1142,862,67958,308,537
11/14/2022426,086$53.591.73,473,3511,580,98159,902,801

(1)Fiscal 2020, fiscal 2021, fiscal 2022 and November 14, 2022 include 932,309, 601,662, 361,481 and 357,481 of Supervalu replacement options, respectively.
(2)Fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021 include 301,717 and 50,514 of replacement awards issued in connection with the Supervalu acquisition, respectively, which we settled in cash upon vesting.
The following table sets forth information related to stock options and RSUs (excluding performance shares and performance units) granted by the Company under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and the Prior Plan and forfeited in fiscal years 2020, 2021, 2022 and through November 14, 2022 for fiscal 2023:

70

Fiscal YearOption Shares Granted
Option Shares Forfeited(1)
Restricted Share Units Granted (2)
Restricted Share Units Forfeited
2020429,2255,081,497385,481
2021312,4612,128,307350,870
202265,986945,991258,434
11/14/202257,0301,166,28363,636
Total864,7029,322,0781,058,421
(1)Excludes options cancelled upon expiration of exercise period.
(2)Number of RSUs granted decreased 81% from fiscal 2020 to fiscal 2022.

The following table sets forth information related to the PSU awards granted under the Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, as applicable, in fiscal 2020, 2021 and 2022, and through November 14, 2022 for fiscal 2023, and the portion of those awards that vested or were forfeited following completion of the applicable performance period (if such performance period has ended):

Grant DatePerformance Period
Performance Awards Granted at Target Level of Performance
(# of shares)(1)
Performance Awards Vested
(# of shares)(2)
Performance Awards Forfeited
(as a % of total award)(1)(2)
12/19/2019Fiscal 2020 – 2022977,860955,5112%
10/12/2020Fiscal 2021 – 2023545,054--
10/12/2021Fiscal 2022 – 2024297,588--
10/6/2022Fiscal 2023 – 2025363,040--

(1)Excludes awards forfeited prior to vesting due to separation of service; Number of PSUs granted decreased 70% from fiscal 2020 to fiscal 2022.
(2)The performance periods for the awards granted on October 12, 2020, October 12, 2021 and October 6, 2022 are not completed.

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the approval of the Second Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan. Proxies received by the Board will be voted “FOR” the proposal unless a contrary choice is specified in the proxy.

71

Other Matters
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
This table includes information regarding the amount of our common stock beneficially owned as of November 14, 2022 by (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our executive officers named in the “Executive Compensation TablesSummary Compensation TableFiscal Years 2020-2022,” (iii) all of our current directors and executive officers as a vote “FOR” Proposal 4group and (iv) each person or entity known to approve theus to own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned(2)(3)
Percentage
Ownership
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
J. Alexander Miller Douglas(4)
15,683 **
Eric F. Artz50,872 **
Ann Torre Bates11,470 **
Gloria R. Boyland6,099 **
Denise M. Clark57,824 **
Daphne J. Dufresne47,542 **
Michael S. Funk(5)
67,270 **
Shamim Mohammad— **
James L. Muehlbauer72,340 **
Peter A. Roy73,595 **
Jack Stahl38,776 **
Eric A. Dorne74,875 **
John W. Howard84,083 **
Jill E. Sutton(6)
18,642 **
Michael C. Stigers(7)
125,449 
Christopher P. Testa114,916 **
Steven L. Spinner(8)
169,965 **
All current directors and executive officers, as a group (18 persons)(9)
823,022 1.4 %
Other Stockholders:
BlackRock, Inc.(10)
8,816,181 14.7 %
The Vanguard Group(11)
6,567,828 11.0 %
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(12)
3,896,345 6.5 %
Kiltearn Partners LLP(13)
3,047,034 5.1 %
**    Less than 1%
(1)The address for each listed director and executive officer is c/o United Natural Foods, Inc. Second Amended, 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island 02908. The address for BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055. The address for The Vanguard Group, Inc. is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. The address for Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One, Austin, Texas 78746. The address for Kiltearn Partners LLP, Kiltearn Limited and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. Proxies received by the Board will be voted “FOR” the proposal unless a contrary choiceMurdoch Murchison is specified in the proxy.Exchange Place 3, 3 Semple Street, Edinburgh, United Kingdom EH3 8BL.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides certain information with respect to equity awards under our equity compensation plans as of July 29, 2017.
Plan Category 
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
 
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in the second column)
 
Plans approved by stockholders 1,598,800
(1)$49.52
(1)1,389,248
(2)
Plans not approved by stockholders 69,549
(3)
(3)
 
Total 1,668,349
 $49.52
 1,389,248
 

(1)Includes 944,997 restricted stock units under the Original Plan and the Original Amended and Restated Plan, 252,290 performance-based vesting restricted stock units under the Original Plan and the Original Amended and Restated Plan and 130,457 stock options under the Original Plan and the Original Amended and Restated Plan, 72,824 restricted stock units under the 2004 Plan, 80,070 stock options under the 2004 Plan and 118,162 stock options under the 2002 Plan. Restricted stock units and performance stock units do not have an exercise price because their value is dependent upon continued employment over a period of time or the achievement of certain performance goals, and are to be settled for shares of common stock. Accordingly, they have been disregarded for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price.
(2)All shares were available for issuance under the Original Plan and the Original Amended and Restated Plan. The Original Plan and the Original Amended and Restated Plan authorizes grants in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units or a combination thereof but includes limits on the number of awards that may be issued in the form of restricted shares or units. (2)The number of shares remaining available for future issuances assumes that, with respect to outstanding performance-based restricted stock units, the vesting criteria will be achieved at the target level.
(3)Consists of phantom stock units outstanding under the United Natural Foods Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan. See note 11 "Retirement Plans" to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 29, 2017 for more information. Phantom stock units do not have an exercise price because the units may be settled only for shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis at a future date as outlined in the plan.



PROPOSAL 5ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY APPROVALS OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In Proposal 3, stockholders are being asked to cast a non-binding advisory vote with respect to the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. This advisory vote is typically referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote. In this Proposal 5, the Board of Directors is also asking stockholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote on how frequently say-on-pay votes should be held in the future.
Every six years, the Company’s stockholders have the opportunity to advise the Board of Directors as to how frequently the Company should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires that the stockholders vote for a frequency of every one year, every two years, every three years, or you may abstain from voting.

Stockholders last had the opportunity to vote on the frequency of the advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers in 2011, and stockholders voted in favor of an annual vote. In response to the stockholder vote, the Board of Directors adopted an annual “say-on-pay” vote for the past six years. Stockholders have the opportunity to vote on this matter again at the annual meeting.

This advisory vote, commonly referred to as a “say-on-frequency” advisory vote, is non-binding on the Board. Although non-binding, the Board of Directors will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding the frequency with which it will submit the advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers to a vote of stockholders.

The frequency that receives the greatest level of support from our stockholders, represented by the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter, will be approved.

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote for ONE YEAR as the frequency of the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve named executive officer compensation. Proxies received by the Board will be voted for ONE YEAR unless a contrary choice is specified in the proxy.



PROPOSAL 6STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL OF CERTAIN FUTURE SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
We have been advised that the Teamsters General Fund of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 25 Louisiana Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001, beneficial owner of no less than 185 shares of common stock intends to presentbeneficially owned by each stockholder is determined under SEC rules, and the following proposalinformation is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for consideration at the annual meeting. The proponent’s resolution and supporting statement are quoted verbatim below. We are not responsible for the content of the proponent’s proposal or supporting statement.

Proponent’s Proposal and Supporting Statement

RESOLVED: That the shareholders of United Natural Foods, Inc. (“the Company”) urge the Board of Directors to seek shareholder approval of future severance agreements with senior executives that provide benefits in an amount exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executives’ base salary plus bonus.

“Future severance agreements” include employment agreements containing severance provisions, special retirement provisions and agreements renewing, modifying or extending existing agreements.

“Benefits” include lump-sum cash payments (including payments in lieu of medical andany other benefits); the payment ofpurpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any “gross-up” tax liability; the estimated present value of special retirement provisions; any stock or option awards that are awarded under any severance agreement; any prior stock or option awardsshares as to which a person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which a person has the executive’s access is accelerated underright to acquire within 60 days after November 14, 2022, through the severance agreement; fringe benefits; and consulting fees (including reimbursable expenses) to be paid tovesting and/or exercise of any equity award or other right. The inclusion herein of such shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the executive.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

We believe that requiring shareholder ratification of “golden parachute” severance packages with a total cost exceeding 2.99 times an executive’s base salary plus bonus will provide valuable feedback, encourage restraint, and strengthen the hand of the Board’s compensation committee.

According to the Summary of Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control on page 50 of the Company’s 2016 Proxy Statement, if therenamed stockholder is a changedirect or indirect beneficial owner of control and termination, the CEO will receive three times the sum of his base salary. If there had been a change of control and termination on July 30, 2016, the CEO would have received a cash severance of $3.9 million upon termination, in addition to payments for equity awards and other benefits. In the CEO’s case, he would receive a total of $6.2 million in a change in control and termination scenario.

If you agree with us that the Company should seek shareholder ratification of severance packages with a total cost exceeding 2.99 times an executive’s base salary plus bonus, then please vote for this proposal.

The Company’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal 6

The Board, with input from the relevant committees of the Board, has carefully considered the proposal submitted by the Teamsters General Fund of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and believes that its adoption is notsuch shares. Unless otherwise indicated, each person named in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders. For the reasons discussed below, the Board opposes this stockholder proposaltable has sole voting power and unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

The Company’s current cash severance agreements are largely consistentinvestment power (or shares such power with the proposal. While the proposal addresses future severance agreements, we believe that the Company’s current severance arrangements with its senior executive officers (pursuant to which only one executive is entitled to a slightly higher payout of cash severance than the limit proposed in the stockholder proposal) demonstrate that the proposal is unnecessary in regards to cash severance payments. In particular, Mr. Spinner’s employment agreement, which the Company entered into in October 2016, provides that if Mr. Spinner’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by Mr. Spinner for good reason, he is entitled to receive a cash severance payment equal to two times his annual base salary and two times his target cash incentive award for the year in which his employment is terminated together with a pro rata payout of the cash incentive payment he would have been entitled to receive for the year in which his employment was terminated based on the Company’s actual performance. Similarly, pursuant to severance agreements entered into with the Company’s other senior executive officers, the executives are entitled to receive cash severance payments in amounts equal to the executive’s annual base salary if such executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by the executive for good reason.

For termination scenarios similar to those that trigger payments as described in the preceding paragraph and which occur within twelve months following a change in control of the Company, the cash severance amounts payable to the Company’s senior


executive officers under employment agreements, in the case of Mr. Spinner, and change in control agreements for the other senior executives, are equal to such executive’s annual base salary and target cash incentive award for the year in which the executive’s employment is terminated times a multiplier (ranging from 1.5 to 3). Only four executives have a multiplier greater than 1.5 and only Mr. Spinner, whose multiplier is 3, has a multiplier greater than 2.99. In addition, in such termination scenarios following a change in control, the senior executives are entitled to receive a pro rata payout of the cash incentive payment the executive would have been entitled to receive for the year in which his or her employment was terminated based on the Company’s actual performance. While in certain circumstances these payments of a prorated portion of the current year’s cash incentive plan payout opportunity may exceed the cap in the proposal when combined with the cash severance payments also payable to the executive, the Company believes such payments are appropriate because these payments are paid only for the portion of the year that the employee worked for the Company and are based on the Company’s actual performance in that year.

Therefore, the Company believes that its current cash severance arrangements with its senior executive officers are largely consistent with the proposal. For the reasons described below, the Company does not believe a cap on the value of any accelerated equity awards is appropriate.

The proposal would impose inflexible competitive disadvantages on the Company’s ability to attract and retain senior executive leadership. The Board believes that stockholder interests are best protected by providing flexibility to the Compensation Committee, which is comprised of independent directors, regarding whether, and how, to offer severance benefits to executives including benefits payable in connection with or following a change in control. Such determinations are based on an assessment of the needs of the Company, the competition for talent, advice from an independent compensation consultant and other relevant factors, including the constantly changing structure of compensation and retention programs in the marketplace. We believe that it is appropriate to provide our key executive officers with severance protections upon certain types of termination events, such as by the Company without cause, by the executive for good reason or in connection with a change in control, in order to support our compensation objective of attracting and retaining highly qualified executives. Furthermore, in the context of potential change in control situations, the Company’s equity-based awards (which are granted pursuant to plans approved by the Company’s stockholders) incentivize our senior executive officers, who may otherwise be primarily concerned about the potential termination of their employment, to remain objective, avoid conflicts of interest and stay focused on executing a strategic change that maximizes stockholder value by strengthening the alignment of their interests with those of the Company and its stockholders. By restricting the use of this important compensation tool, implementation of the proposal could materially hamper the Company’s ability to attract and retain the highest quality and most talented senior executive team.

Subjecting severance agreements to stockholder votes would impair the Company’s recruitment of highly qualified executives. Calling a special meeting of stockholders to obtain prior approval of a severance arrangement that would provide benefits in excess of the proposal’s cap would be expensive and impractical and could severely disadvantage the Company’s ability to recruit highly qualified executives. Top candidates, when informed that the terms of their compensation arrangements first require stockholder approval, would likely be unwilling to wait for such approval and may instead seek employment elsewhere, including at one of the Company’s competitors who do not face similar restrictions on their ability to offer severance protection. Even if the severance arrangement could instead be ratified by stockholders after the fact, as the proposal suggests, the potential for stockholders to reject the severance arrangement—potentially many months after entering into an agreement—would likely result in the promised severance benefits being viewed by a potential candidate as too uncertain to merit serious consideration. Delay and uncertainty would be injected into the hiring process, disadvantaging the Company in its efforts to recruit and retain the best available executive talent. Given these risks, the Board believes that the interests of stockholders are best served by providing flexibility to the Compensation Committee, which consists solely of independent directors (and which receives guidance and advice from an independent compensation consultant), to design severance packages for potential executive candidates.

Implementation of the proposal could force the Company to fundamentally change its executive compensation program by severely limiting the use of equity-based awards. The Company’s executive compensation program is comprised of three primary elements - base salary, annual cash incentive plan opportunity and long-term equity-based awards, which in recent years have been split between time-based vesting restricted stock units and performance-based vesting restricted stock units. In Mr. Spinner’s case, historically over sixty percent of his annual compensation at target level performance has been awarded in the form of equity-based awards. For our other senior executive officers, equity-based compensation typically makes up between 40% and 50% of their total target compensation opportunity for a year. Much of our senior executive officers’ equity-based compensation vests over multiple years of service, with a significant percentage of these executive’s annual awards typically vesting based on Company performance.

Because a significant percentage of the Company’s senior executive officers’ compensation is equity-based, it would not be practical simply to avoid stockholder approval by entering into severance arrangements for amounts less than the proposal’s 2.99x cap because the benefits covered by the proposal include not only cash severance but also the value of equity awards that are accelerated upon a severance event. The primary effect of the proposal, if adopted by the Company, would be to limit the


Company’s ability to accelerate the vesting of equity under future change of control agreements or equity awards. The Company structured Mr. Spinner’s employment agreement and its other senior executive officers’ change of control agreements, which are guided by the Company’s governance practices and policies (e.g., “double trigger” change of control provisions, no tax gross-ups), to be well-aligned with those of the Company’s peers. Mr. Spinner’s employment agreement and the Company’s other senior executive officers’ change of control agreements provide for acceleration of the vesting of equity under a “double trigger” change of control provision—the occurrence of a change in control and a certain types of terminations within a specified period following such change in control, and, in Mr. Spinner’s case, if he is terminated by the Company without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason, in either case prior to a change in control. Under the Original Amended and Restated Plan, which was approved by the Company’s stockholders, as noted below, the Company’s equity awards may accelerate in the Compensation Committee’s discretion upon a change of control and automatically accelerate, absent the Compensation Committee determining otherwise, upon the termination of an employee’s employment within twelve months following a change in control.

The Board believes that its current practice of using the acceleration of vesting of equity awards in certain circumstances is appropriate and in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders as it is consistent with the practices of numerous publicly traded companies, including many of those with whom we compete for talent and against whom we evaluate our performance. In practice, the proposal would severely restrict the Company’s ability to issue such awards, because including the value of accelerated equity awards with other fixed severance payments would very likely exceed the proposal’s cap. In order to implement the proposal and remain competitive in attracting and retaining highly qualified executives, we believe that we may need to fundamentally restructure the Company’s executive compensation program to either significantly reduce the role of equity-based awards or remove vesting requirements for such equity-based pay. The Company’s equity-based awards, including the allocation of annual grants between time-based vesting and performance-based vesting awards, as well as the awards’ vesting requirements, support the achievement of our business strategies and goals in a manner that is consistent with the pay-for-performance philosophy favored by the Board and the Compensation Committee and aid in the motivation and retention of our executive leadership.

Stockholders endorse the Company’s compensation program. The compensation of our named executive officers was approved by holders of approximately 97% and 93% of the votes cast at the two most recent annual meetings of stockholders, respectively. In addition, approximately 90% of the holders of votes cast approved the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Original Amended and Restated Plan in 2015, which plan includes as a component thereof a provision that provides for the accelerated vesting of equity-based awards in the event that an employee’s employment ends within twelve months following a change in control. The Company’s stockholders have repeatedly endorsed the Company’s compensation program by wide margins. Moreover, the Board believes that our stockholders have had, and will continue to have, the opportunity to provide holistic feedback on our compensation practices. The Company holds annual votes on the Company’s executive compensation program. SEC rules further require separate approval of golden parachute compensation agreements or understandings payable to named executive officers in connection with a sale, merger or related transaction. The Company also provides other avenues of communication to the Company’s management and Board. These avenues of communication, along with the annual say-on-pay votes, are the most effective method of providing stockholders with a voice in the Company’s executive compensation program. Requiring additional stockholder approval of specific elements of the Company’s compensation program is unlikely to provide stockholders with more effective input and carries the risk of jeopardizing the Company’s ability to attract and retain highly qualified candidates.

The broad and unclear language of the proposal could impact a variety of payments to senior executives. The proposal is extraordinarily broad and unclear, purporting to address “severance” payments. A careful reading of the proposal, however, shows that the proposal as written actually impacts much more. Because the payments covered by the proposal do not exclude retirement plan payments, deferred compensation plans, disability benefits, death benefits and other benefits payable at retirement or termination for any other reason, whether or not they were earned and vested prior to the executive’s termination of employment, all of these may be captured by the proposal. Because these amounts could be aggregated in determining whether the payments exceeded the limits of the proposal, it could have the effect of prohibiting payments that are made in connection with a retirement or other termination, whether the amounts were previously earned and vested including, for example, the payment of a death benefit or vested retirement plan payments.Moreover, the Company already has a formal policy under which it may not enter into new or amended agreements which provide for “gross ups” for excise tax obligations payable by the Company’s executives upon termination of employment following a change in control. The proposal is also unclearspouse) with respect to the scope of individuals it purports to cover, as “senior executive” is not a group identified by the proponent or the Company.

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “AGAINST” this stockholder proposal. Proxies received by the Board will be voted “AGAINST” the proposal unless a contrary choice is specified in the proxy.



PROPOSAL 7STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING A DECREASE TO THE OWNERSHIP THRESHOLD FOR STOCKHOLDERS TO CALL A SPECIAL STOCKHOLDER MEETING
We have been advised that James McRitchie and Myra K. Young, 9295 Yorkship Court, Elk Grove, California 95758, beneficial owners of no less than 300all shares of common stock acting through their designated agent, John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Ave., No. 205, Redondo Beach, California 90278, intend to presentlisted as owned by such person.
(3)The shares of common stock shown in the table include the following proposal for consideration atnumbers of shares that are issuable upon the annual meeting. The proponents’ resolutionexercise of stock options and supporting statementthat are quoted verbatim below. We are not responsible for the content of the proponents' proposal or supporting statement.

Proponent’s Proposalexercisable within 60 days after November 14, 2022: Mr. Dorne—8,910; Mr. Testa—7,310; and Supporting Statement

ITEM 7 - Special Shareholder Meetings

RESOLVED:

Mr. Stigers—23,427. All directors and executive officers as a group—39,647.
The shareholdersshares of United Natural Foods Inc. (UNFI) ('Company') hereby request that the Board of Directors take the steps necessary to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing document to give holderscommon stock shown in the aggregatetable do not include any shares issuable pursuant to restricted stock units, as no restricted stock units will vest within 60 days after November 14, 2022.
(4)Includes 600 shares held by Mr. Douglas’s spouse.
(5)Includes 100 shares held by a minor child.
72

(6)Ms. Sutton left the Company in December 2021. The number of our outstanding common stockshares is based on information disclosed in Ms. Sutton’s director and officer questionnaire, which she completed in August 2022, and the power to callCompany’s record of PSUs that vested and were delivered on October 6, 2022.
(7)Includes 10,000 shares held by a special shareowner meeting. This proposal does not impact our board's current power to call a special meeting.revocable family trust.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT:

Delaware law allows 10% of company shares to call a special meeting. A shareholder right to call a special meeting is a way to bring an important matter to the attention of both management(8)Mr. Spinner retired from his position as CEO and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. This is important because there could be 15-months between annual meetings.

A shareholder right to act by written consent and to call a special meeting are two complimentary ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. Both are associated with increased governance quality and shareholder value. Our Company offers no right of shareholders to act by written consent. Additionally, the relative dependency on sales to Whole Foods Market leaves our Company more vulnerable to possible changes.

Currently, more than 70% of the companies in the S&P 500 have adopted company bylaws, articles of incorporation, or charter provisions to allow shareholders to call a special meeting.

This proposal topic won more than 50% support at The Western Union Company and Ryder Systems, Inc., in 2017. It may be possible to adopt this proposal by simply incorporating text similar to the following into our governing documents:

"Special meetings of the stockholders, for any purpose or purposes, unless otherwise prescribed by statute, may be called by the ChairmanChair of the Board or the President,effective August 9, 2021. The number of shares is based on information disclosed in Mr. Spinner’s director and shall be called by the Chairman of the Board or President or Secretary upon the orderofficer questionnaire, which he completed in writing of a majority of or by resolution of the Board of Directors, or at the request in writing of stockholders owning 15% of the entire capital stock of the Corporation issued and outstanding and entitled to vote."

We urge the Board to join the mainstream of major U.S. companies and establish a right for shareholders owning 15% of our outstanding common stock to call a special meeting.

Please vote for: Special Shareowner Meetings - Proposal 7


The Company’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal 7

The BoardAugust 2022, and the NominatingCompany’s record of PSUs that vested and Governance Committee have carefully considered the proposal submitted by James McRitchiewere delivered on October 6, 2022.
(9)Excludes Mr. Dorne, Mr. Spinner and Myra K. Young and believe that its adoption isMs. Sutton, as at they were not in the best interestsofficers of the Company or its stockholders. For the reasons discussed below, the Board opposes this stockholder proposal and unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.as of November 22, 2022.

Our stockholders already have(10)Beneficial ownership information based solely on a meaningful right to call a special meeting. Our bylaws currently provide that stockholders holding 25% or more of our outstanding stock may call a special meeting. After careful consideration, our Board presented, and shareholders approved, implementing this special meeting right in 2014.  The Board continues to believe that this special meeting


bylaw provision is the appropriate mechanism for shareholders to call a special meeting in the event of an extraordinary matter that cannot wait until the next annual meeting.

Special meetings require significant expenses and resources. Because our stockholders also have the right to propose business for consideration at our annual meeting of stockholders, the Board believes that special meetings should only be called to consider extraordinary events that are of interest to a broad base of our stockholders and that cannot be delayed until our next annual meeting of stockholders. The Board believes that the 15% ownership threshold called for in the Proposal is unduly low and could result in stockholders who have not garnered significant support from other stockholders disrupting the Company by calling special meetings of stockholders to consider proposals that may not be supported by other stockholders and that are not viewed by the Board as being in the best interest of all stockholders. For every special meeting, we must incur significant expenses including legal, printing and mailing expenses, as well as other costs normally associated with holding a stockholder meeting. Moreover, organizing and preparing for a special meeting requires significant attention from our directors, officers and other employees, diverting their focus from performing their primary functions of overseeing and operating our business in the best interest of all of our stockholders.

The current threshold strikes the right balance. The Board believes that a 25% threshold strikes an appropriate balance between enhancing stockholder rights and protecting against the risk that a small minority of stockholders could trigger the expense and distraction of a special meeting that is not in the best interest of our stockholders as a whole. If the proposal were adopted, a small minority of stockholders—potentially with narrow, short-term interests-could call special meetings to pursue matters that have little likelihood of success and that as much as 85% of our stockholders do not view as requiring immediate attention, without regard to how the costs and other burdens might impact the Company’s future success or the interests of the vast majority of stockholders. Moreover, the Board believes the Company’s 25% ownership threshold is among the most common thresholds among large public companies who offer stockholders the right to call a special meeting and certain of the Company’s institutional stockholders have in the past expressed support for a 25% ownership threshold to be able to request a special meeting of stockholders.

The Company has strong corporate governance practices, ample avenues of communication between the Company and its stockholders and a record of accountability. The Company’s current corporate governance practices reflect the Board’s dedication to being responsive and accountable to stockholders. The Company solicits and values stockholder discussion and input on corporate governance matters and takes every step possible to ensure that such input is received in the ordinary course. Our investor relations and finance teams maintain open and direct lines of communication with our stockholders, and we have been responsive to stockholder feedback received in the past. Together, management and the Board regularly assess and refine the Company’s corporate governance policies and procedures to take into account evolving best practices and to address feedback provided by stockholders and other stakeholders. In addition to the Board’s adoption of the Company’s special meeting bylaw provision, the Company has implemented numerous other corporate governance measures to ensure the Board remains accountable to stockholders and to provide stockholders with greater influence on the nomination and election of directors and the ability to directly communicate their views to the Board. For example:

Each member of the Board is elected annually to a one-year term;
Each director must be elected by a majority vote in an uncontested election, and any director who fails to receive the required number of votes for re-election must tender his or her written resignation to the Board;
Schedule 13G/A majority of the Company’s directors are independent;
The Board has designated an independent director to serve as the Board’s "Lead Independent Director" to coordinate the activities of the other independent members of the Board;
Stockholders are able to recommend director candidates to the Nominating and Governance Committee (as described further under “Director Nominees Recommended by Stockholders” beginning on page 15);
The Company has adopted, and enhanced, a proxy access bylaw, which permits a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning continuously for at least three years shares of our stock representing an aggregate of at least 3% of the voting power entitled to vote in the election of directors, to nominate and include in our proxy materials director nominees, provided that the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements in our Bylaws;
The Board values stockholder discussion and input and provides channels for stockholders to communicate directly with members of the Board (as described further under “Communication with the Board of Directors” beginning on page 15); and
The Company has eliminated all super majority voting provisions from its certificate of incorporation and Bylaws.

In summary, the Board’s actions confirm its strong commitment to best governance practices and responsiveness to the Company’s stockholders. Moreover, the Board has adopted a special meeting bylaw provision that the Board believes serves the


best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Accordingly, the Board believes that adoption of the stockholder proposal is not necessary or appropriate.

The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “AGAINST” this stockholder proposal. Proxies received by the Board will be voted “AGAINST” the proposal unless a contrary choice is specified in the proxy.

OTHER MATTERS
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our common stock ("Reporting Persons") to filefiled with the SEC initial reportson February 7, 2022 by BlackRock, Inc. BlackRock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 8,647,556 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 8,816,181 shares. Includes shares beneficially owned by BlackRock Life Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, Aperio Group, LLC, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd., BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. BlackRock Fund Advisors beneficially owns 5% or greater of the outstanding shares reported on the Schedule 13G.
(11)Beneficial ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities. To our knowledge,information based solely on reviewa Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2022 by The Vanguard Group. The Vanguard Group reported shared voting power with respect to 57,316 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 6,469,247 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 98,581 shares.
(12)Beneficial ownership information based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 2022 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reported sole voting power with respect to 3,820,729 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,896,345 shares. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of copiesthe Investment Advisors Act of 1940, furnishes investment advice to four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manager or sub-adviser to certain other commingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts (such investment companies, trusts and accounts, collectively referred to as the “Funds”). In certain cases, subsidiaries of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP may act as an adviser or sub-adviser to certain Funds. In its role as investment advisor, sub-adviser and/or manager, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP or its subsidiaries (collectively, "Dimensional") may possess voting and/or investment power over the securities of the Issuer that are owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of the Issuer held by the Funds. However, all securities reported in this schedule are owned by the Funds. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such reports furnishedsecurities.
(13)Beneficial ownership information based solely on a Schedule 13G/A jointly filed with the SEC on February 10, 2022 by Kiltearn Partners LLP, Kiltearn Limited and Murdoch Murchison. Kiltearn Partners LLP, Kiltearn Limited and Murdoch Murchison each reported shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to us during the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Reporting Persons were complied with.

3,047,034 shares.

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 2018Next Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Stockholder Proposal
Any proposal that a stockholder wishes to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meetingnext annual meeting of Stockholders must be submitted to our corporate secretary, Joseph J. Traficanti,Corporate Secretary at 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island 02908, no later than the close of business on July 6, 2018.25, 2023. We strongly encourage stockholders interested in submitting a proposal to contact legal counsel with regard to the detailed requirements of applicable securities laws. Submitting a stockholder proposal does not guarantee that we will include it in our proxy statement.
Proxy Access Nominee
We have also adopted a proxy access right that permits a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning continuously for at least three years shares of our stock representing an aggregate of at least 3% of the voting power entitled to vote in the election of directors, to nominate and include in our proxy materials director nominees, provided that the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements in our Bylaws. Under ourFourth Amended and Restated Bylaws to be considered timely, compliant(the Bylaws). For the next annual meeting of stockholders, notice of proxy access director nominations for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be submitted to the Corporate Secretary at the address specified above no earlier than June 6, 201825, 2023 and no later than July 6, 2018; provided, however, that if (A) the annual meeting is not within 30 days before25, 2023.
Advanced Notice Provisions for Proposal or after the anniversary date of the preceding year’s meeting, or (B) no annual meeting was held during the preceding year, to be timely the stockholder notice must be received no later than 90 days prior to such annual meeting or, if later, the tenth day after the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of such meeting is first made, whichever occurs first.Nominee
Our Bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure with regard to stockholder proposals and director nominations. If a stockholder wishes to present a proposal before the 2018 Annual Meetingnext annual meeting of Stockholders,stockholders or to nominate a director for election, but does not wish (or is not entitled) to have the proposal or director nomination considered for inclusion in our proxy statement, such stockholder must give written notice to our corporate secretaryCorporate Secretary at the address noted above. Our corporate secretaryabove, which notice must receive such notice not lessbe received by our Corporate Secretary no earlier than 90 days nor moreAugust 13, 2023 and no later than 120 days prior to the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.September 12, 2023. The stockholder'sstockholder’s submission must include certain specified information concerning the proposal or director nominee and the stockholder, including such stockholder'sstockholder’s ownership of our common stock, as described in more detail in our Bylaws. As we will not entertain any proposals at the annual meeting that do not meet these requirements, we strongly encourage stockholders to seek advice from legal counsel before submitting a proposal.
THE BOARD HOPES THAT STOCKHOLDERS WILL ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON OR ON THE INTERNET THROUGH A VIRTUAL WEB CONFERENCE. REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO VOTE VIA THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE, OR BY COMPLETING, SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD, OR BENEFICIAL STOCKHOLDERS NAMED AS PROXIES BY THEIR STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD, WHO ATTEND THE MEETING MAY REVOKE THEIR PROXIES AND CAST THEIR VOTES DURING THE MEETING OR ELECTRONICALLY OVER THE INTERNET THROUGH THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING.
73


See “Proposal 1Election of DirectorsStockholder Director Recommendations and Proxy Access” for further information on the requirements in our Bylaws related to proxy access and our advance notice procedures.
By OrderUniversal Proxy Rules
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which notice must be postmarked or transmitted electronically to UNFI at its principal executive offices no later than 60 calendar days prior to the anniversary date of the Annual Meeting (for the 2023 Annual Meeting (to be held in calendar year 2024), no later than November 11, 2023). However, if the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting is changed by more than 30 calendar days from such anniversary date, then notice must be provided by the later of 60 calendar days prior to the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting or the 10th calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2023 Annual Meeting is first made by the Company.
74


Information About the Meeting
Record Date and Share Ownership
Only stockholders of record on our books at the close of business on Monday, November 14, 2022 (the Record Date) will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on November 14, 2022, we had 59,902,801 shares of common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock entitles the record holder to one vote on each matter to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting. Copies of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this proxy statement, the proxy card and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2022, were first made available to stockholders of record as of the Record Date on or about November 14, 2022. The Board is making these materials available to you on the Internet or, upon your request, is delivering printed versions of these materials to you without charge by mail. On or about November 22, 2022, we mailed to all stockholders of record as of the Record Date the Notice of Proxy Availability, which contains instructions on how to access these materials and vote. Stockholders of record who have previously elected to receive a full set of proxy materials in hard copy will receive such materials in lieu of the Notice of Proxy Availability.
We will, upon written request of any stockholder, furnish without charge a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2022, as filed with the SEC, without exhibits. Please address all such requests to United Natural Foods, Inc., 11840 Valley View Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, Attn: Investor Relations or via email to InvestorRelations@unfi.com. Exhibits will be provided upon written request and payment of an appropriate processing fee.
Submitting and Revoking Your Proxy
If you complete and submit a proxy, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by your proxy in accordance with your instructions. If you submit a proxy but do not complete the voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by your proxy as follows:
FOR the election of Eric F. Artz, Ann Torre Bates, Gloria R. Boyland, Denise M. Clark, J. Alexander Miller Douglas, Daphne J. Dufresne, Michael S. Funk, Shamim Mohammad, James L. Muehlbauer, Peter A. Roy and Jack Stahl as directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders (Proposal 1);
FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 29, 2023 (Proposal 2);
FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation (Proposal 3); and
FOR the approval of our amended and restated equity incentive plan (Proposal 4).
If other matters come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. We have not received notice of other matters that may properly be presented at the Annual Meeting.
You may revoke or revise your proxy at any time before it is exercised by (1) delivering to us a signed proxy card with a date later than your previously delivered proxy, (2) voting via the Internet while attending the virtual Annual Meeting, (3) granting a subsequent proxy through the Internet or telephone, or (4) sending a written revocation to our corporate secretary at 313 Iron Horse Way, Providence, Rhode Island 02908. Attendance at the Annual Meeting virtually through the Internet will not itself be deemed to revoke your proxy unless you vote via the Internet while attending the Annual Meeting. Your latest dated proxy card or telephone or Internet proxy at the time of the meeting is the one that is counted.
How to Vote
For Proposal 1, you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” each of the nominees to the Board. You may also abstain from voting “FOR” or “AGAINST” any nominee. For Proposals 2, 3 and 4 you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or abstain from voting.
Stockholders of Record
If you are a stockholder of record, there are four ways to vote:
by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card by mail, if you request a paper copy of the proxy materials;
by making a toll-free telephone call within the United States or Canada using a touch-tone telephone to the toll-free number provided on your Notice of Proxy Availability;
by voting on the Internet before the meeting; or
75

by voting on the Internet during the meeting.
To vote on the Internet before the meeting, go to the website address indicated on your Notice of Proxy Availability to complete an electronic proxy card prior to the Annual Meeting. You will be asked to provide the 16-digit control number from the Notice of Proxy Availability. You may also vote on the Internet while attending the meeting virtually through the Internet.
If you plan to vote by telephone or Internet in advance of the meeting, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on January 9, 2023 to be counted. Internet voting during the Annual Meeting is also permissible through the virtual web meeting hosted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2023. If you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting while attending virtually, you must have your 16-digit control number from your Notice of Proxy Availability.
Street Name Holders
If you hold your shares of common stock in a stock brokerage account or through a bank or other nominee, you are considered to be the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” If you hold your shares in street name, these proxy materials will be forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee and you should follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee. However, the organization that holds your shares is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. You may not vote directly any shares you beneficially own that are held in street name; however, as the beneficial owner of the shares, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares. You may complete and return a voting instruction card to your broker, bank or other nominee. Please check your Notice of Proxy Availability or contact your bank, broker or other nominee for more information. If you hold your shares in street name and wish to vote while attending the virtual Annual Meeting, you must have your 16-digit control number from your Notice of Proxy Availability.
We provide Internet proxy voting to allow you to vote your shares online both before and during the meeting, with procedures designed to confirm the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your Internet access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies.
Broker Non-Votes and Proxy Solicitation
If you do not provide your broker instructions on how to vote your shares on non-discretionary items, a “broker non-vote” will occur. Proposals 1, 3 and 4 are non-discretionary items for which your broker will not be able to vote your shares without your instructions. Proposal 2 (ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP) is a discretionary item, and your broker may vote your shares in its discretion even without voting instructions from you. In the case of a broker non-vote, your shares would be included in the number of shares considered present at the meeting for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum but will not otherwise have any effect on the outcome of the vote on Proposals 1, 3 and 4.
In addition to solicitations by mail and the Internet, our directors, officers and employees may, without additional remuneration, solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile and personal interviews. In addition, we have retained Saratoga Proxy Consulting, LLC, to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $15,000 plus associated costs and expenses. We will request brokerage houses, banks, and nominees to forward copies of the proxy materials to those persons for whom they hold shares and request instructions for voting the proxies. We will reimburse such brokerage houses, banks and other nominees for their reasonable expenses in connection with this distribution.
Quorum
Presence by attendance through the virtual Annual Meeting, or by proxy, of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding at the close of business on the Record Date and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required for a quorum at the meeting. Shares of common stock present by attendance through the virtual Annual Meeting or represented by proxy (including shares that abstain or do not vote with respect to one or more of the matters presented for stockholder approval) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting.
Votes Required
Proposal 1 (election of a total of eleven nominees as directors) is an uncontested director election. In uncontested elections, our Bylaws require that each nominee be elected by a majority of votes cast with respect to such nominee. Therefore, a director will be elected if the number of shares voted “FOR” the director exceeds the number of shares voted “AGAINST” the director. Since each nominee is already a director, our Bylaws require any nominee who does not receive the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes cast to offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors,
sssign.jpg
Steven L. Spinner
Chairwill make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on such recommendation within 90 days from the date of the Board, Presidentcertification of the election results. Abstentions and Chief Executive Officerbroker non-votes will have no effect on this item because they are not considered votes cast.
76

For each of Proposal 2 (ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP), Proposal 3 (advisory approval of our executive compensation) and Proposal 4 (approval of the Second Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan), the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast on the proposal is necessary for approval. Abstentions (in the case of Proposals 2, 3 and 4) and broker non-votes (in the case of Proposal 3 and 4) will have no effect on the results because they are not considered votes cast.
Attending the Annual Meeting
We will be hosting a fully virtual Annual Meeting, as we have done for several years, live via the Internet. There will be no in-person meeting. We believe that hosting the Annual Meeting via the Internet encourages greater attendance and participation, including from investors who could not otherwise travel to attend our meeting, by providing virtual access and the ability to submit questions to be answered by Management or directors online during and prior to the Annual Meeting. In addition, this format eliminates certain costs associated with holding an in-person meeting.
A summary of the information you need to attend the Annual Meeting online is provided below:
Any stockholder as of the Record Date can attend the Annual Meeting virtually through the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2023.
Meeting starts at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, with log-in at 3:45 p.m. on Tuesday, January 10, 2023.
If attending the Annual Meeting virtually through the Internet, please have your 16-digit control number provided on your Notice of Proxy Availability to enter the Annual Meeting.
If you hold your shares in street name and wish to vote while attending the virtual Annual Meeting, you must have your 16-digit control number from your Notice of Proxy Availability.
Instructions on how to attend and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2023.
Stockholders may vote and, subject to any rules of conduct posted on the Annual Meeting website, submit questions while attending the Annual Meeting through the Internet. If your question is properly submitted during the relevant portion of the meeting agenda, we will do our best to respond to your question during the live webcast as time permits. We may consolidate answers to similar questions and will prioritize questions from stockholders who identify themselves by name. We will post responses to questions that we do not have sufficient time to answer during the meeting on our website.
If we experience technical difficulties during the meeting (e.g., a temporary or prolonged power outage), we will determine whether the meeting can be promptly reconvened (if the technical difficulty is temporary) or whether the meeting will need to be reconvened on a later day (if the technical difficulty is more prolonged). In either of these situations, we will promptly notify stockholders of the decision via www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2023. If you encounter technical difficulties accessing our meeting or asking questions during the meeting, a support line will be available on the login page of the virtual meeting website.
Webcast replay of the Annual Meeting will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/unfi2023 until January 10, 2024.
Before the meeting, you may post any questions to be answered at the meeting at www.proxyvote.com. You may also ask questions during the meeting, as described above.
Householding
We have adopted a procedure for stockholders whose shares are held in street name called “householding,” pursuant to which stockholders of record who have the same address and the same last name will receive only one Notice of Proxy Availability each and, as applicable, one set of any additional proxy materials that are delivered, unless one or more of these stockholders notifies us that they wish to continue receiving multiple copies. This procedure provides extra convenience for stockholders and a cost savings for us. Currently, we are not providing householding to stockholders of record.
If at any time you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate Notice of Proxy Availability and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are delivered, or if your shares are held in street name and you are receiving multiple copies of our Notice of Proxy Availability and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are delivered and wish to receive only one, please notify your bank, broker or other nominee. We will promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of the proxy statement to any stockholder residing at an address to which only one copy was mailed. Requests for additional copies for the current year or future years should be directed to our Investor Relations Department at (952) 828-4144 or United Natural Foods, Inc., 11840 Valley View Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, Attn: Investor Relations.
77

Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate control numbers for use in voting their shares, and, if requested, separate proxy cards.
The Board hopes that stockholders will attend the Annual Meeting on the Internet through a virtual web conference. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you are urged to vote via the Internet, by telephone, or by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card as soon as possible so that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders of record, or beneficial stockholders named as proxies by their stockholders of record, who attend the Annual Meeting may revoke their proxies and cast their votes electronically over the Internet through the virtual Annual Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,
jacksig.jpg
Jack Stahl
Independent Chair of the Board
November 3, 2017

22, 2022


78




Annex A


















SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
20122020 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


(EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 10, 2023)





































A-1














TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTSA-2
Section 1. PurposeA-3
Section 2. DefinitionsA-3
Section 3. AdministrationA-7
Section 4. Shares Available for AwardsA-7A-9
Section 5. EligibilityA-8A-10
Section 6. Stock Options and Stock Appreciation RightsA-8A-11
Section 7. Restricted Shares and Restricted Share UnitsA-10A-13
Section 8. Performance AwardsA-12A-15
Section 9. Other Stock-Based AwardsA-12A-16
Section 10. Non-Employee Director and Outside Director AwardsA-12A-16
Section 11. Provisions Applicable to Covered Officers and Performance AwardsA-13
Section 12. Separation from ServiceA-15
Section 13. Change in ControlA-15
Section 14. Amendment and TerminationA-16
Section 15. General ProvisionsA-17
Section 16.12. Change in ControlA-20
Section 13. Amendment and TerminationA-22
Section 14. General ProvisionsA-22
Section 15. Term of The PlanA-19A-25



















A-2

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
20122020 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

(EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 10, 2023)


Section 1.    History and Purpose.
Purpose.

This plan shall be known as the “TheThe United Natural Foods, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 20122020 Equity Incentive Plan”Plan (the “Plan”Plan). The purpose of the Plan is was established by United Natural Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) to promote the interests of United Natural Foods, Inc. (the “Company”)Company and its stockholders by fulfilling one or more of the following objectives: (i) attracting and retaining key officers, employees and directors of, and consultants to, the Company and its Subsidiaries and Affiliates;Subsidiaries; (ii) motivating such individuals by means of performance-related incentives to achieve long-rangelong-term performance goals; (iii) enabling such individuals to participate in the long-term growth and financial success of the Company; (iv) encouraging ownership of stock in the Company by such individuals; and (v) linkingaligning their compensation towith the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders. With respectThe Plan has been amended from time to any awards granted undertime and the following provisions constitute an amendment and restatement of the Plan that are intendedas in effect immediately prior to comply with the requirements of “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with such requirements.

Effective Date.

Section 2.    Definitions.

As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:

2.1“Affiliate”Acquiror” has the meaning provided in Section 12.1.

2.2 “Affiliate means (i) any entity that, directly or indirectly, is controlled by the Company, (ii) any entity in which the Company has a significant equity interest, (iii) an affiliate of the Company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under Section 12 of the Exchange Act; and (iv) any entity in which the Company has at least twenty percent (20%) of the combined voting power of the entity’s outstanding voting securities, in each case as designated by the Board as being a participating employer in the Plan.

2.22.3 ““Award”Award means any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Share Award, Restricted Share Unit, Performance Award, or Other Stock-Based Award granted under the Plan, whether singly, in combination or in tandem, to a Participant by the Committee (or the Board) pursuant to such terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations, if any, as the Committee (or the Board) may establish.establish, or any similar award under the Prior Plan.

2.32.4 “Award Agreement”Agreement means any written agreement, contract or other instrument or document evidencing any Award, which may, but need not, be executed or acknowledged by a Participant.

2.42.5 ““Board”Board means the Board of Directors of the Company.

2.52.6 Cause” means, unless otherwise defined in the applicable Award Agreement, (i) conviction of the Participant under applicable law of a(A) any felony or (B) any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude; (ii) unauthorized acts intended to result in the Participant’s personal enrichment at the material expense of the Company or aany Subsidiary or Affiliate;Affiliate or their reputation; (iii) any violation of the Participant’s duties or responsibility’sresponsibilities to the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate which constitutes willful misconduct or dereliction of duty. For purposesduty; or (iv) material breach of the covenants described in Section 14.8 of this definition, no act, or failure to act, on the Participant’s part shall be considered “willful” unless done, or omitted to be done, by the Participant not in good faith and without reasonable belief that the Participant’s action or omission was in the best interestPlan.













A-3


2.62.7 “Change in Control”Control means, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, the happening of one of the following:

(a)any "person"“person”, including a “group” (as such term isterms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities ofAct, but excluding the Company, under anany of its Affiliates, or any employee benefit plan maintained byof the Company or any corporation owned, directlyof its Affiliates) is or indirectly, by the Company's stockholders in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company's stock, becomes the "beneficial owner"“beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-313(d)(3) under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 25% or morethe greater of the total combined voting power of the Company's then-outstanding securities pursuant to a tender or exchange offer made directly to the Company's stockholders and which the Board does not recommend such stockholders to accept;
(b)a majority of directors, whose election or nomination for election is not approved by a majority of the members of the Incumbent Board then serving as members of the Board, are elected within any single 24-month period to serve on the Board; or
(c)consummation of:


(i)    a merger, consolidation or reorganization involving the Company, unless:
(A)    the stockholders of the Company, immediately before the merger, consolidation or reorganization, own, directly or indirectly immediately following such merger, consolidation or reorganization, at least 75% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the corporation resulting from such merger, consolidation or reorganization in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the voting securities immediately before such merger, consolidation or reorganization;
(B)    individuals who were members of the Incumbent Board immediately prior to the execution of the agreement providing for such merger, consolidation or reorganization constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the surviving corporation immediately following such merger, consolidation or reorganization; and
(C)    no person (other than (I) the Company or any Subsidiary thereof, (II) any employee benefit plan (or any trust forming a part thereof) maintained by the Company, any Subsidiary thereof, or the surviving corporation, or (III) any person who, immediately prior to such merger, consolidation or reorganization, had beneficial ownership of securities representing 25%30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then-outstanding securities) has beneficial ownershipCompany’s then outstanding securities;

(b) the stockholders of securitiesthe Company shall approve a definitive agreement and a transaction is consummated (1) for the merger or other business combination of the Company with or into another corporation if (A) a majority of the directors of the surviving corporation were not directors of the Company immediately followingprior to the effective date of such merger consolidation or reorganization representing 25% or more(B) the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to the effective date of such merger own less than 60% of the combined voting power ofin the surviving corporation's then outstanding voting securities;
(ii)    a complete liquidationsecurities in such surviving corporation or dissolution of the Company; or
(iii)    an agreement(2) for the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to any person (other than a transfer to a Subsidiary).Company;

For purposes(c) the purchase of 30% or more of the definition of Change in Control, “Incumbent Board” means those persons who either (A) have been memberscombined voting power of the Board sinceCompany’s then outstanding securities pursuant to any tender or exchange offer made by any “person”, including a “group” (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Effective DateExchange Act), other than the Company, any of its Affiliates, or (B) are new directors whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the stockholdersany employee benefit plan of the Company was approved by a voteor any of its Affiliates; or

(d) the disposal of any line of business representing at least three-fourths15% of the members ofCompany’s consolidated net sales for the Board then in office who either were directors described in clause (A) hereof or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved,then-most recently completed fiscal year; provided, however, that an individual whose election or nomination for election is approved as a result of either an actual or threatened election contest or proxy contest, including by reason of any agreement intended to avoid or settle any election contest or proxy contest, willsuch disposal shall only be deemed not to have been so approveda “Change in Control” for purposesParticipants primarily employed in the line of this definition.business disposed of.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, and solely for the purpose of determining the timingcase of any payments pursuant to any AwardsAward that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, a Change in Control shall meanmust also constitute a “changechange in control event within the ownershipmeaning of the Company,” a “change in the effective control of the Company,” or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company” as such terms are defined in Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) of the Treasury Regulations.

409A.
2.7
2.8 ““Code”Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

2.82.9 ““Committee”Committee means a committee of the Board composed of not less than two Non-Employee Directors, each of whom shall be (i) a “non-employee director” for purposes of Exchange Act Section 16 and Rule 16b-3 thereunder (ii) an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m), and (iii)(ii) “independent” within the meaning of the listing standards of the NasdaqNew York Stock MarketExchange and the rules and regulations of the SEC.

2.92.10 ““Consultant”Company” means United Natural Foods, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its successors and assigns.

2.11 “Consultant means any consultant to the Company or its Subsidiaries or Affiliates.Subsidiaries.

2.102.12 ““Covered Officer”Director means at any date (i) any individual who, with respect to the previous taxable year of the Company, was a “covered employee” of the Company within the meaning of Section 162(m); provided, however, that the term “Covered Officer” shall not include any such individual who is designated by the Committee, in its discretion, at the time of any Award or at any subsequent time, as reasonably expected not to be such a “covered employee” with respect to the taxable year of the Company in which the applicable Award will be paid or vested, and (ii) any individual who is designated by the Committee, in its discretion, at the time of any Award or at any subsequent time, as reasonably expected to be such a “covered employee” with respect to the taxable year of the Company in which any applicable Award will be paid or vested.

2.11“Director” means a member of the Board.

2.122.12A ““Disability”Director Limit” has the meaning provided in Section 10.3 of the Plan.

2.13 “Disability means, unless otherwise defined in the applicable Award Agreement, a disability that would qualify as a total and permanent disability under the Company’s then current long-term disability plan. With respect to Awards subject to Section 409A of the Code, unless otherwise defined in the applicable Award Agreement, the term “Disability” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 409A of the Code.



2.13Early Retirement” means, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, retirement of a Participant with the express consent of the Committee at or before the time of such retirement, from active employment with the Company and any Subsidiary or Affiliate prior to age 65, in accordance with any applicable early retirement policy of the Company then in effect or as may be approved by the Committee.

2.14Effective Date”Date has the meaning provided in Section 16.115.1 of the Plan.











A-4

2.15“Employee”Employee means a current or prospective officer or employee of the Company or of any Subsidiary or Affiliate.Subsidiary.

2.16Exchange Act”Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

2.17Fair Market Value”Value with respect to the Shares, means, for purposes of a grant of an Award as of any date, (i) the reported closing sales price of the Shares on the NasdaqNew York Stock Market,Exchange, or any other such market or exchange as is the principal trading market for the Shares, on such date, or in the absence of reported sales on such date, the closing sales price on the immediately preceding date on which sales were reported or (ii) in the event there is no public market for the Shares on such date, the fair market value as determined, in good faith and by the reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method (as applicable), by the Committee in its sole discretion, and for purposes of a sale of a Share as of any date, the actual sales price on that date.

2.18 RESERVED.
2.18
“Full Value Award Cap” has the meaning provided in Section 4.1 of the Plan.

2.19Good Reason” means, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, the occurrence of any one or more of the following without the Participant’s express written consent: (i) the assignment of duties to a Participant following a Change in Control that are materially adversely inconsistent with the Participant’s duties immediately prior to a Change in Control, and failure to rescind such assignment within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice from the Participant; (ii) a material reduction in a Participant’s title, authority or reporting status following a Change in Control as compared to such title, authority or reporting status immediately prior to a Change in Control, (iii) the Company’s requirement that a relocation of the office at which the Participant is to perform the majority of his or her duties following a Change in Control to a locationrelocate more than fifty (50)(50 miles from the location at whichParticipant’s place of employment prior to the Participant performed such duties prior to the Change in Control; (iv) a material reduction in the Participant’s base salary as in effect immediately prior to a Change in Control or the failure of the Company to pay or cause to be paid any compensation or benefits when due, and failure to restore such annual base salary or make such payments within five (5) days of receipt of notice from the Participant; or (v) the failure to include the Participant in any new employee benefit plans proposedestablished by the Company for similarly-situated executives or a material reduction in the Participant’sEmployee’s level of participation in any existingbenefit plans of any type;the Company in which the Employee participated immediately prior to the Change in Control provided that a reduction or elimination of such plans with respect to all similarly-situated executives or a Company-wide reduction or elimination of such plans shall not constitute “Good Reason” for purposes of this Plan.Plan; or (vi) the failure of the Company to obtain a satisfactory agreement from the Acquiror to assume and perform the Award Agreement; provided that, in each case, (A) within sixty (60) days of the initial occurrence of the specified event the Participant has given the Company or any successor to the Company at least thirty (30) days to cure the Good Reason, (B) the Company or any such successor has not cured the Good Reason within the thirty (30) day period and (C) the Participant resigns within ninety (90) days from the initial occurrence of the event giving rise to the Good Reason.

2.20Grant Price”Price means the price established at the time of grant of an SAR pursuant to Section 6 hereof used to determine whether there is any payment due upon exercise of the SAR.

2.21Incentive Stock Option”Option means an option to purchase Shares from the Company that is granted under Section 6 of the Plan and that is intended to meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code or any successor provision thereto.thereto, or a similar Award under the Prior Plan.

2.22Non-Employee Director”Director means a member of the Board who is not an officer or employee of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate.Subsidiary.

2.23Non-Qualified Stock Option”Option means an option to purchase Shares from the Company that is granted under Sections 6 or 10 of the Plan and is not intended to be an Incentive Stock Option.Option, or a similar Award under the Prior Plan.













A-5

2.24Normal RetirementOption means, unless otherwise defined in the applicable Award Agreement, retirement of a Participant from active employment with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates on or after such Participant’s 65th birthday.

2.25“Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option.

2.262.25 “Option Price”Price means the purchase price payable to purchase one Share upon the exercise of an Option.

2.272.26 “Other Stock-Based Award” Awardmeans any Award granted under Sections 9 or 10 of the Plan or the Prior Plan. For purposes of determining the number of Awards granted hereunder in relation to the Full Value Award Cap set forth in Section 4.1 hereof, anAn Other Stock-Based Award that is not settled in cash shall be treated as a Restricted Share Award if the amounts payable thereunder will be determined by reference to the full value of a Share.Award.



2.282.27 “Outside Director”Director means, with respect to the grant of an Award, a member of the Board then serving on the Committee.

2.292.28 ““Participant”Participant means any Employee, Director, Consultant or other person who receives an Award under the Plan.

2.302.29 “Performance Award”Award means any Award granted under Section 8 of the Plan or a similar Award under the Prior Plan. For purposes of determining the number of Awards granted hereunder in relation to the Full Value Award Cap set forth in Section 4.1 hereof, aA Performance Award that is not settled in cash shall be treated as a Restricted Share Award if the amounts payable thereunder will be determined by reference to the full value of a Share.Award.

2.312.30 ““Person”Person means any individual, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, government or political subdivision thereof or other entity.

2.30A “Prior Effective Date” means December 18, 2019.

2.31 “Prior Plan” means the United Natural Foods, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

2.32Relocation” has the meaning provided in Section 11.3 hereof.

2.33 Restricted Share”Share means any Share granted under Sections 7 to 10 of the Plan, or solely for the purposes of Section 4.1, a similar Award under the Prior Plan.

2.332.34 “Restricted Share Unit”Unit means any unit granted under Sections 7 to 10 of the Plan, or solely for the purposes of Section 4.1, a similar Award under the Prior Plan.

2.34“Retirement” means Normal or Early Retirement.

2.35“SEC”Retirement” means the termination of the Participant’s employment with the Company and all of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates on or after the date on which both of the following have occurred: (i) the Participant has attained 59 years of age and (ii) the Participant has provided ten (10) years of service to ’s employment with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates. Years of service will be calculated as full years since the Participant’s most recent “hire date” or “rehire date,” which shall mean the applicable date on file for the Participant in the Company’s human resources books and records, determined in the Company’s sole discretion.
2.36 “SEC means the Securities and Exchange Commission or any successor thereto.

2.362.37 “Section 16”16 means Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder and any successor provision thereto as in effect from time to time.

2.38 RESERVED.
2.37“Section 162(m)” means Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder and any successor provision thereto as in effect from time to time.

2.382.39 “Separation from Service”Service or Separates from Service”Service shall have the meaning ascribed to such term pursuant to Section 409A of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder. In the event an Award is not subject to Section 409A of the Code, the term “Separation from Service” or “Separates from Service” shall mean the termination of employment or service with the Company, the Subsidiaries and the Affiliates.

2.392.40 ““Shares”Separation from Service without Cause” has the meaning provided in Section 11.3 hereof.










A-6

2.41 “Share Reserve” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.1 hereof.

2.42 “Shares means shares of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company, or any security into which such shares may be converted by reason of any event of the type referred to in Sections 4.2,, 13.3, 12.1, and 14.3.13.3.

2.402.43 ““Share Reserve”Specified Employee has the meaning set forth in Section 4.1 hereof.

2.41“Specified Employee” has the meaning ascribed to such term pursuant to Section 409A of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

2.422.44 “Stock Appreciation Right” Rightor “SAR”SAR means a stock appreciation right granted under Sections 6,, 8 or 10 of the Plan, or a similar Award under the Prior Plan, that entitles the holder to receive, with respect to each Share encompassed bysubject to the exercise of such SAR the amount determined by the Committee and specified in an Award Agreement. InIf the absence of such a determination,Award Agreement fails to specify the amount to be received by the holder, the holder shall be entitled to receive, with respect to each Share encompassed by the exercise of such SAR, the excess of the Fair Market Valuefair market value of such Share on the date of exercise over the Grant Price.

2.432.45 ““Subsidiary”Subsidiary means any Person (other than the Company) of which 50% or more of its voting power or its equity securities or equity interest is owned directly or indirectly by the Company.

2.442.46 “Substitute Awards”Awards means Awards granted solely in assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by a company acquired by the Company or any Subsidiary or with which the Company or a Subsidiary combines.

2.452.47 “Vesting Period”Period means the period of time specified by the Committee during which vesting restrictions for an Award are applicable.






Section 3.    Administration.

3.1Authority of Committee. Committee. The Plan shall be administered by a Committee, which shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board; provided, however, with respect to Awards to Outside Directors, all references in the Plan to the Committee shall be deemed to be references to the Board. Subject to the terms of the Plan and applicable law, and in addition to other express powers and authorizations conferred on the Committee by the Plan, the Committee shall have full and final power and authority in its discretion (and in accordance with Section 409A of the Code with respect to Awards subject thereto) to: (i)

(a) designate Participants; (ii)

(b) determine eligibility for participation in the Plan and decide all questions concerning eligibility for and the amount of Awards under the Plan; (iii)

(c) determine the type or types of Awards to be granted to a Participant; (iv)

(d) determine the number of Shares to be covered by, or with respect to which payments, rights or other matters are to be calculated in connection with Awards; (v)

(e) determine the timing, terms, and conditions, including performance objectives, as applicable, and any adjustments thereto, of any Award; (vi)

(f) accelerate the time at which all or any part of an Award may be vested, settled or exercised; (vii)











A-7

(g) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances Awards may be settled or exercised in cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards or other property, or canceled, forfeited or suspended and the method or methods by which Awards may be settled, exercised, canceled, forfeited or suspended; (viii)

(h) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, other property, and other amounts payable with respect to an Award shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the holder thereof or of the Committee; (ix)

(i) grant Awards as an alternative to, or as the form of payment for grants or rights earned or payable under, other bonus or compensation plans, arrangements or policies of the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate; (x)

(j) grant Substitute Awards on such terms and conditions as the Committee may prescribe, subject to compliance with the Incentive Stock Option rules under Section 422 of the Code and the nonqualified deferred compensation rules under Section 409A of the Code, where applicable; (xi)

(k) make all determinations under the Plan concerning any Participant’s Separation from Service, with the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate, including whether such separation occurs by reason of Cause, Good Reason, Disability, Retirement, or in connection with a Change in ControlRetirement, and whether a leave of absence constitutes a Separation from Service; (xii)

(l) make all determinations under the Plan, including by setting a policy, concerning the treatment of a leave of absence that the Committee determines not to constitute a Separation from Service;

(m) conclusively interpret and administer the Plan, any Award Agreement and any instrument or agreement relating to the Plan or an Award made under the Plan; (xiii)

(n) except to the extent otherwise prohibited by the Plan, including Section 6.2, of the Plan, amend or modify the terms of any Award at or after grant with the consent of the holder of the Award, or in the case of an amendment or modification that is to the Participant’s benefit, without the consent of the holder of the Award; (xiv)

(o) establish, amend, suspend or waive such policies, processes, rules and regulations and, if desired, appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan; (xv)

(p) adopt special guidelines and provisions for Persons who are residing in, employed in or subject to the taxes of any domestic or foreign jurisdiction to comply with applicable tax and securities laws of such domestic or foreign jurisdiction; and (xvi)

(q) correct any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or in any agreement related thereto orthereto; and

(r) make any other determination and take any other action that the Committee deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan, subject to the exclusive authority of the Board under Section 1413 hereunder to amend or terminate the Plan.

3.2 Committee Discretion Binding. Binding. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, all designations, determinations, interpretations, and other decisions under or with respect to the Plan or any Award shall be within the sole discretion of the Committee, may be made at any time and shall be final, conclusive, and binding upon all Persons, including the Company, any Subsidiary or Affiliate, any Participant and any holder or beneficiary of any Award. The Committee shall have no obligation to treat Participants or eligible Participants uniformly, and the Committee may make determinations













A-8

under the Plan selectively among Participants who receive, or Employees or Directors who are eligible to receive, Awards (whether or not such Participants or eligible Employees or Directors are similarly situated). A Participant or other holder of an Award may contest a decision or action by the Committee with respect to such person or Award only on the grounds that such decision or action was arbitrary or capricious or was unlawful, and any review of such decision or action shall be limited to determining whether the Committee’s decision or action was arbitrary or capricious or was unlawful.unlawful

3.3 Delegation. Delegation. Subject to the terms of the Plan and applicable law, the Committee may delegate to one or more officers or managers of the Company or of any Subsidiary or Affiliate, or to a Committee of such officers, or managers, the authority, subject to such terms and limitations as the Committee shall determine, to grant Awards to or to cancel, modify or waive rights with respect to, or to alter, discontinue, suspend or terminate Awards held by Participants who are not officers or directors of the Company for purposes of Exchange Act Section 16 or who are otherwise not subject to such Section 16. Any resolution delegating authority to grant Awards shall specify the maximum number of Shares underlying Awards that may be granted pursuant to such delegated authority.

3.4 No Liability. Liability. No member of the Board or Committee shall be liable for any action taken or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or any Award granted hereunder.

Section 4.    Shares Available for Awards.

4.1 Shares Available. Available; Assumption of Prior Plan Awards. Subject to adjustment under Section 4.3 and the provisions of Section 4.2 below, the maximum aggregate number of Shares reserved and available for distribution under the Plan shall not exceed the sum of (i) 2,500,00011,030,1631Shares, plus (ii) the number of shares available for grant under the Plan as of the end of the day that is the effective date of the amendment and restatement of this Plan (such aggregate amount, the "Share Reserve"). Awards made under the Prior Plan were assumed as of the Prior Effective Date. The number of Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options may be granted under this Plan shall be no more than 250,000. Subject to the application of the last sentence of this Section 4.1, the


maximum number of Awards that the Company may issue from the Share Reserve as Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall be 2,500,000 (the “Full Value Award Cap”).1,000,000. If any Award granted under this Plan or the Prior Plan (whether before or after the Effective Date of this Plan) shall expire, terminate, be settled in cash or otherwise be forfeited or canceled for any reason without the delivery of Shares, then the Shares covered by such Award, or to which such Award relates, or the number of Shares otherwise counted against the Share Reserve, to the extent of any such forfeiture, termination, settlement, expiration or cancellation, shall be added back to the Share Reserve. The Committee may make such other determinations regarding the counting of Shares issued pursuant to this Plan or the Prior Plan as it deems necessary or advisable, provided that such determinations shall be permitted by law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Option or SAR is exercised, in whole or in part, by tender or withholding of Shares, or if the Company’s tax withholding obligation for any Award (including Awards granted prior to the Effective Date) is satisfied by the tender or withholding Shares, the number of Shares deemed to have been issued under the Plan for purposes of the limitation set forth in this Section 4.1 shall be the number of Shares that were subject to the Award or portion thereof, and not the net number of Shares actually issued, and any SARs to be settled in Shares shall be counted in full against the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan, regardless of the number of Shares issued upon the settlement of the SAR. Any

4.2 Per Participant Limitations. The maximum number of Shares in respect of which Options and SARs may be granted to a Participant during any fiscal year under the Plan is 900,000. The maximum value of Restricted Share Awards, Restricted Share Unit Awards and Performance Awards denominated in Shares that again becomemay be granted to any Participant during any fiscal year under the Plan is $10,000,000, excluding, for this purpose, the value of any dividends or dividend equivalents payable in accordance with the Plan on any Award. The value of such Awards shall be based on the grant date fair value. For Performance Awards denominated in Shares, the value shall be the grant date fair value of the target number of Shares. For Performance Awards that are denominated in cash, the maximum value that may be granted to any Participant during any fiscal year under the Plan is $10,000,000. The individual Participant limitations set forth in this Section 4.2 shall be cumulative; that is, to the extent that Shares or cash for which Awards are permitted to be granted to a Participant during a fiscal year are not covered by an Award to such Participant in that fiscal year (such shortfall, the “Shortfall Amount”), the number of Shares (or amount of cash, as the case may be) available for Awards to










1 5,000,000 additional shares, plus the number of shares remaining available for grant pursuantunder the existing Plan as of the 2023 annual meeting, including shares that are expected to this Section shall be added backforfeited and returned to the Full Value Award Cap ifexisting Plan by such time.
A-9

such Participant shall automatically increase in the original Awardsubsequent fiscal years during the term of the Plan until the earlier of the time the Shortfall Amount has been granted to the Participant, or the end of the third fiscal year following the year to which such Shares wasShortfall Amount relates (determined on a Restricted Stock Award or Restricted Stock Unit Award (or treated as such hereunder)“first-in-first-out” basis).


4.24.3 Adjustments.Adjustments. Without limiting the Committee’s discretion as provided in Section 1312 hereof, if there shall occur any change in the capital structure of the Company by reason of any extraordinary dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares, other securities or other property, and other than a normal cash dividend), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of Shares or other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase Shares or other securities of the Company, or other corporate transaction or event having an effect similar to the foregoing, affects the Shares, then the Committee shall, in an equitable and proportionate manner as determined by the Committee (and, as applicable, in such manner as is consistent with Sections 162(m), 422 and 409A of the Code and the regulations thereunder) either: , take action as provided in clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) of this Section 4.3, as follows:

(i) adjust any or all of (1) the aggregate number of Shares or other securities of the Company (or number and kind of other securities or property) with respect to which Awards (or any particular type of Awards) may be granted under the Plan, includingin the Full Value Award Cap;aggregate or on a per Participant basis,; (2) the number of Shares or other securities of the Company (or number and kind of other securities or property) subject to outstanding Awards under the Plan, provided that the number of Shares subject to any Award shall always be a whole number; (3) the grant or exercise price with respect to any Award under the Plan, and (4) the limits on the number of Shares or Awards that may be granted to Participants under the Plan in any calendar year; period;

(ii) provide for an equivalent award in respect of securities of the Acquiror or surviving entity of any merger, consolidation or other transaction or event having a similar effect; or

(iii) make provision for a cash payment to the holder of an outstanding Award.

Any such adjustments to outstanding Awards shall be effected in a manner that precludes the material enlargement or dilution of rights and benefits under such Awards.


4.34.4 Substitute Awards.Awards. Any Shares issued by the Company as Substitute Awards in connection with the assumption or substitution of outstanding grants from any acquired corporation shall not reduce the Shares available for Awards under the PlanShare Reserve to the extent that the rules and regulations of any stock exchange or other trading market on which the Shares are listed or traded provide an exemption from shareholder approval for assumption, substitution, conversion, adjustment, or replacement of outstanding awards in connection with mergers, acquisitions, or other corporate combinations.

4.44.5 Sources of Shares Deliverable under Awards. Awards. Any Shares delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Shares or of issued Shares which have been reacquired by the Company.

Section 5.    Eligibility.
Eligibility.

Any current or prospective Employee, Director or Consultant shall be eligible to be designated a Participant; provided, however, that Outside Directors shall only be eligible to receive Awards granted consistent with Section 10, provided further that the and Awards to Non-Employee Directors shall be subject to Section 10.3. The granting, vesting and exercise of an Award to a prospective Employee, Director or Consultant areshall be conditioned upon such individual attaining such status.


A-10

Section 6.    Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.

6.1 Grant. Grant. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole and complete authority to determine the Participants to whom Options and SARs shall be granted, the number of Shares subject to each Award, the Option Price or Grant Price and the conditions and limitations applicable to the exercise of each Option and SAR. An Option may be granted with or without a related SAR. An SAR may be granted with or without a related Option. The grant of an Option or SAR shall occur when the Committee by resolution, written consent or other appropriate action determines to grant such Option or SAR for a particular number of Shares to a particular Participant at a particular Option Price or Grant Price, as the case may be, or such later date as the Committee shall specify in such resolution, written consent or other appropriate action. The Committee shall have the


authority to grant Incentive Stock Options and to grant Non-Qualified Stock Options.Options; provided, however, that an Option will be deemed to be a Non-Qualified Stock Option unless it is specifically designated by the Committee as an Incentive Stock Option (and/or to the extent that it does not otherwise satisfy the requirements for an Incentive Stock Option). In the case of Incentive Stock Options, the terms and conditions of such grants shall be subject to and comply with Section 422 of the Code, as from time to time amended, and any regulations implementing such statute.Code. An Employee who has been granted an Option under the Plan may be granted additional Options under the Plan if the Committee shall so determine; provided, however, that to the extent the aggregate Fair Market Valuefair market value (determined at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted) of the Shares with respect to which all Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by an Employee during any calendar year (under all plans described in Section 422(d) of the Code of the Employee’s employer corporation and its parent and Subsidiaries) exceeds $100,000, or if and to the extent the Options fail to qualify as Incentive Stock Options for any other reason, such Options shall constitute Non-Qualified Stock Options. No dividends or dividend equivalents shall be paid or accrue on any Option.

6.2 Price. Price. The Committee in its sole discretion shall establish the Option Price at the time each Option is granted and the Grant Price at the time each SAR is granted. Except in the case of Substitute Awards, the Option Price of an Option may not be less than the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date such Option is deemed to have been granted, pursuant to Section 6.1, and the Grant Price of an SAR may not be less than the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date such SAR is deemed to have been granted pursuant to Section 6.1.granted. In the case of Substitute Awards or Awards granted in connection with an adjustment provided for in Section 4.24.3 hereof in the form of Options or SARs, such grants shall have an Option Price (or Grant Price) per Share that is intended to maintain the economic value of the Award that was replaced or adjusted as determined by the Committee.Committee determined in a manner that conforms to Section 409A of the Code and other applicable law. Notwithstanding the foregoing and except as permitted by the provisions of Section 4.24.3 hereof, neither the Board nor the Committee shall not have the powerauthority to (i) lower the Option Price of an Option after it is granted, (ii) lower the Grant Price of an SAR after it is granted, (iii) cancel an Option when the Option Price exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares in exchange for the grant of a replacement Option or SAR with a lower Option Price or Grant Price (as applicable) or cash or another Award (other than in connection with a Change in Control or a Substitute Award) and grant substitute Options with a lower Option Price than the cancelled Options,, (iv) cancel an SAR when the Grant Price exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares in exchange for the grant of a replacement SAR or Option with a lower Grant Price of Option Price (as applicable) or cash or another Award (other than in connection with a Change in Control or a Substitute Award), or (v)take any other action with respect to an Option or SAR that would be treated as a repricing under the rules and regulations of the principal securities exchange on which the Shares are traded, in each case without the approval of the Company’s stockholders.

6.3 Term. Term. Subject to the Committee’s authority under Section 3.1 and the provisions of Section 6.6, hereof, each Option and SAR and all rights and obligations thereunder shall expire on the date determined by the Committee and specified in the Award Agreement. The Committee shall be under no duty to provide terms of like duration for Options or SARs granted under the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, but subject to Section 6.4(a) hereof, no Option or SAR shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date such Option or SAR was granted.

6.4 Exercise.Exercise.

(a) Each Option and SAR shall be exercisable at such times and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may, in its sole discretion, specify in the applicable Award Agreement or thereafter. The Committee shall have full and complete authority to determine whether an Option or SAR will be exercisable in full at any time or from time to time during the term of the Option or SAR, or to provide for the exercise thereof in such installments, upon the occurrence of such events and at such times during the term of the Option or SAR as the Committee may determine. The Committee may provide, at or after the grant, that the period of time over which an Option, other than an Incentive Stock Option, or SAR may be exercised shall be automatically extended if on the scheduled expiration of such Award, the Participant’s exercise of such Award would violate applicable securities law; provided, however, that during the extended exercise period the Option or SAR may only be exercised to the extent such Award was exercisable in accordance with its terms immediately prior to such scheduled expiration date; provided further, however, that such extended exercise period shall end not later than thirty (30) days after the exercise of such Option or SAR first would no longer violate such laws.

A-11

(b) The Committee may impose such conditions with respect to the exercise of Options or SARs, including without limitation, any relating to the application of federal, state or foreign securities laws or the Code, as it may deem necessary or advisable.

(c) An Option or SAR may be exercised in whole or in part at any time, with respect to whole Shares only, within the period permitted thereunder for the exercise thereof, and shall be exercised by written notice of intent to exercise the Option or SAR, delivered to the Company at its principal office, and payment in full to the Company at the direction of the Committee of the amount of the Option Price for the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is then being exercised. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Award Agreement may provide, or be amended to provide, that if on the last day of the term of an Option or SAR the Fair Market Value of one Share exceeds the Option Price or Grant Price, as applicable, of such Award by an amount as may be determined by the Committee, the Participant has not exercised the Option or SAR and the Option or SAR has not otherwise expired, the Option or SAR shall be deemed to have been exercised by the Participant on such day with payment of the Option Price made by withholding Shares


otherwise issuable in connection with the exercise of the Option. In such event, the Company shall deliver to the Participant the number of Shares for which the Option was deemed exercised, less the number of Shares required to be withheld for the payment of the total purchase price and required withholding taxes, and any fractional Share shall be settled in cash; and in the case of an SAR, the net number of Shares that the Participant would have received had the Participant actually exercised such SAR on such date.

(d) Payment of the Option Price shall be made in (i) cash or cash equivalents, (ii) at the discretion of the Committee, by transfer, either actually or by attestation, to the Company of unencumbered Shares previously acquired by the Participant, valued at the Fair Market Valuefair market value of such Shares on the date of exercise (or next succeeding trading date, if the date of exercise is not a trading date), together with any applicable withholding taxes (which taxes may be satisfied in accordance with Section 15.614.6 of the Plan), such transfer to be upon such terms and conditions as determined by the Committee, (iii) by a combination of (i) or (ii), or (iv) by any other method approved or accepted by the Committee in its sole discretion, including, if the Committee so determines, (x) a cashless (broker-assisted) exercise that complies with applicable laws or (y) withholding Shares (net-exercise) otherwise deliverable to the Participant pursuant to the Option having an aggregate Fair Market Valuefair market value at the time of exercise equal to the total Option Price together with any applicable withholding taxes (which taxes may be satisfied in accordance with Section 15.6)14.6). Until the optioneeParticipant (or other Person exercising the Option) has been issued the Shares subject to such exercise, he or she shall possess no rights as a stockholder with respect to such Shares. The Company reserves, at any and all times in the Company’s sole discretion, the right to establish, decline to approve or terminate any program or procedures for the exercise of Options by means of a method set forth in subsection (iv) above, including with respect to one or more Participants specified by the Company notwithstanding that such program or procedures may be available to other Participants.

(e) At the Committee’s discretion, the amount payable as a result of the exercise of an SAR may be settled in cash, Shares or a combination of cash and Shares. A fractional Share shall not be deliverable upon the exercise of a SAR but a cash payment will be made in lieu thereof.

6.5 Separation from Service.Service. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, an Option or SAR may be exercised only to the extent that it is then exercisable, and if at all times during the period beginning with the effective date of granting such Award (or if later, the date on which the Participant first became an Employee, Director or Consultant) and ending on the date of exercise of such Award the Participant is an Employee, Non-Employee Director or Consultant, and shall terminate immediately upon a Separation from Service by the Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 6.5 to the contrary, the Committee may determine in its discretion that an Option or SAR may be exercised following any such Separation from Service, whether or not exercisable at the time of such separation; provided, however, that in no event may an Option or SAR be exercised after the expiration date of such Award specified in the applicable Award Agreement, except as provided in Section 6.4(a). If provided in the applicable Award Agreement or in accordance with any determination of the Committee at or after grant, an Award shall continue to vest and be exercisable after Retirement.

6.6 Ten Percent Stock Rule.Notwithstanding any other provisions in the Plan, if at the time an Incentive Stock Option is otherwise to be granted pursuant to the Plan, the optionee or rights holderemployee owns directly or indirectly (within the meaning of Section 424(d) of the Code) Shares of the Company possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or its parent or Subsidiary or Affiliate corporations (within the meaning of Section 422(b)(6) of the Code), then any Incentive Stock Option to be granted to such optionee or rights holderEmployee pursuant to the Plan shall satisfy the requirement of Section 422(c)(5) of the Code, and the Option Price shall be not less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of the Shares, of the Company, and such Incentive Stock Option by its terms shall not be exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from the date such Option is granted.


A-12

Section 7.     Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units.

7.1 Grant.Grant.

(a) Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole and complete authority to determine the Participants to whom Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units shall be granted, the number of Restricted Shares and/or the number of Restricted Share Units to be granted to each Participant, the duration of the period during which, and the conditions under which, the Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units may be forfeited to the Company, and the other terms and conditions of such Awards. The Restricted Share and Restricted Share Unit Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements in such form as the Committee shall from time to time approve, which agreements shall comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions provided hereunder and any additional terms and conditions established by the Committee that are consistent with the terms of the Plan.



(b) Each Restricted Share Award and Restricted Share Unit Award made under the Plan shall be for such number of Shares as shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement containing the terms of such Restricted Share Award or Restricted Share Unit Award. Such agreement shall set forth a period of time during which the Participant receiving such Award must remain in the continuous employment (or other service-providing capacity) of the Company in order for the forfeiture and transfer restrictions to lapse. If the Committee so determines, the restrictions may lapse during such restricted period in installments with respect to specified portions of the Shares covered by the Restricted Share or Restricted Share Unit Award. As provided in this Plan, in an applicable Award Agreement or in accordance with any determination of the Committee at or after grant, an Award shall continue to vest and be exercisable after Retirement and may vest in part upon Separation from Service without Cause. The Award Agreement may also, in the discretion of the Committee, set forth performance or other conditions (including, but not limited to, performance goals based on the criteria listed in Section 11) that will subject the Shares to forfeiture and transfer restrictions.restrictions (whether in addition to or separately from any service-based requirement). The Committee may, at its discretion, waive all or any part of the restrictions applicable to any or all outstanding Restricted Share and Restricted Share Unit Awards.

7.2 Delivery of Shares and Transfer Restrictions.Restrictions.

(a) At the time a Restricted Share Award is granted, a certificate representing the number of Shares awarded thereunder shall be registered in the name of the Participant receiving such Award. Such certificate shall be held by the Company or any custodian appointed by the Company for the account of the Participant receiving such Award subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, and shall bear such a legend setting forth the restrictions imposed thereon as the Committee, in its discretion, may determine. The foregoing to the contrary notwithstanding, the Committee may, in its discretion, provide that a Participant’s ownership of Restricted Shares prior to the lapse of any transfer restrictions or any other applicable restrictions shall, in lieu of such certificates, be evidenced by a “book entry” (i.e.(i.e., a computerized or manual entry) in the records of the Company or its designated agent in the name of the Participant who has received such Award, and confirmation and account statements sent to the Participant with respect to such book-entry Shares may bear the restrictive legend referenced in the preceding sentence. Such records of the Company or such agent shall, absent manifest error, be binding on all Participants who receive Restricted Share Awards evidenced in such manner. The holding of Restricted Shares by the Company or such an escrow holder, or the use of book entries to evidence the ownership of Restricted Shares, in accordance with this Section 7.2(a), shall not affect the rights of Participants as owners of the Restricted Shares awarded to them, nor affect the restrictions applicable to such shares under the Award Agreement or the Plan, including the transfer restrictions.

(b) Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, the Participant receiving an Award of Restricted Shares shall have all rights of a stockholder with respect to the Restricted Shares, including the right to receive dividends and the right to vote such Shares, subject to the following restrictions: (i) the Participant shall not be entitled to delivery of the stock certificate until the expiration of the restricted period and the fulfillment of any other restrictive conditions set forth in the Award Agreement with respect to such Shares; (ii) none of the Shares may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered or disposed of during such restricted period or until after the fulfillment of any such other restrictive conditions; (iii) dividends payable on Restricted Shares for which the forfeiture restrictions have not yet lapsed shall be held in escrow and shall not be payable to the Participant until the expiration of the restricted period and the fulfillment of any other restrictive conditions set forth in the Award Agreement with respect to such Restricted Shares and any dividends paid with respect to Restricted Shares for which the restricted period shall not expire or for which any other restrictive conditions shall not be fulfilled shall be forfeited by the Participant; and (iv) except as otherwise set forth in this Plan, the applicable Award Agreement, or as otherwise determined by the Committee at or after grant, all of the Shares shall be forfeited and all rights of the Participant to such Shares shall terminate, without further obligation on the part of the Company, unless the Participant remains in the continuous employment or service of the Company for the entire restricted period in relation to which such Shares were granted and unless any other restrictive conditions relating to the Restricted Share Award are met. Restricted Share Units (and any dividend equivalent rights with respect thereto) shall be subject to similar transfer (and payment) restrictions as
A-13

Restricted Share Awards, except that no Shares are actually awarded to a Participant who is granted Restricted Share Units on the date of grant, and such Participant shall have no rights of a stockholder (including the right to receive dividends) with respect to such Restricted Share Units until the restrictions set forth in the applicable Award Agreement have lapsed.

7.3 Termination of Restrictions. Restrictions. At the end of the restricted period and provided that any other restrictive conditions of the Restricted Share Award are met, or at such earlier time as otherwise determined by the Committee, all restrictions set forth in the Award Agreement relating to the Restricted Share Award or in the Plan shall lapse as to the Restricted Shares subject thereto, and a stock certificate for the appropriate number of Shares, free of the restrictions and restricted stock legend, shall be delivered to the Participant or the Participant’s beneficiary or estate, as the case may be (or, in the case of book-entry Shares, such restrictions and restricted stock legend shall be removed from the confirmation and account statements delivered to the Participant or the Participant’s beneficiary or estate, as the case may be, in book-entry form). The Company shall have the right to repurchase Restricted Shares at their original issuance price or other stated or formula price (or to require forfeiture of such Shares if issued


at no cost) in the event that conditions specified in the Award Agreement with respect to such Restricted Shares are not satisfied prior to the end of the applicable restricted period.

7.4 Payment of Restricted Share Units. Units. Each Share subject to a Restricted Share Unit shall have a value equal to the Fair Market Valuefair market value of a Share. Restricted Share Units may be paid in cash, Shares, other securities or other property, as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, upon the lapse of the restrictions applicable thereto, or otherwise in accordance with the applicable Award Agreement. The applicable Award Agreement shall specify whether a Participant will be entitled to receive dividend equivalent rights in respect of Restricted Share Units at the time of any payment of dividends to stockholders on Shares. If the applicable Award Agreement specifies that a Participant will be entitled to dividend equivalent rights, the amount of any such dividend equivalent right (i) shall equal the amount that would be payable to the Participant as a stockholder in respect of a number of Shares equal to the number of vestedShares then subject to the Restricted Share Units then credited to the Participant, (ii) shall not be payable to the Participant until the fulfillment of any restrictive conditions set forth in the Award Agreement with respect to such Restricted Share Units and any dividends equivalent rights with respect to Restricted Share Units for which the restrictive conditions shall not be fulfilled shall be forfeited by the Participant, and (iii) shall otherwise be payable in accordance with Section 409A of the Code with regard to Awards subject thereto. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee at or after grant, Restricted Share Units may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered or disposed of, andof. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee at or after grant, or as provided in this Plan or the applicable Award Agreement, all Restricted Share Units and all rights of the grantee to such Restricted Share Units (and any dividend equivalents with respect thereto) shall terminate, without further obligation on the part of the Company, unless the Participant remains in continuous employment or service of the Company for the entire restricted period in relation to which such Restricted Share Units were granted and unless any other restrictive conditions relating to the Restricted Share Unit Award are met.


A-14

Section 8.    Performance Awards.

8.1 Grant. Grant. The Committee shall have sole and complete authority to determine the Participants who shall receive a Performance Award, which shall consist of a right that is (i) denominated in cash or Shares (including but not limited to Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units), (ii) valued, as determined by the Committee, in accordance with the achievement of such performance goals during such performance periods as the Committee shall establish, and (iii) payable at such time and in such form as the Committee shall determine.

8.2 Terms and Conditions. Conditions. Subject to the terms of the Plan and any applicable Award Agreement, the Committee shall determine the performance goals to be achieved during any performance period, the length of any performance period, the amount of any Performance Award and the amount and kind of any payment or transfer to be made pursuant to any Performance Award, and may amend specific provisions of the Performance Award; provided, however, that such amendment may not adversely affect existing Performance Awards made within a performance period commencing prior to implementation of the amendment.

8.3 Payment of Performance Awards. Awards. Performance Awards may be paid in a lump sum or in installments following the close of the performance period or, in accordance with the procedures established by the Committee, on a deferred basis. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee at or after grant, Separation from Service prior to the end of any performance period, other than for reasons of death, Disability, or Disability,Retirement or Separation from Service without Cause, will result in the forfeiture of the Performance Award, and no payments will be made. As set forth in accordance with the terms of this Plan, the applicable Award Agreement, or in accordance with any determination of the Committee at or after grant, Performance Awards shall continue to vest after Retirement or Separation from Service without Cause, but Performance Awards granted in the year in which Retirement occurs and Performance Awards held by a Participant upon a Separation from Service without Cause shall be pro-rated to reflect the length of the Participant’s service during the applicable performance period prior to such Retirement or Separation from Service without Cause. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may in its discretion, waive any performance goals and/or other terms and conditions relating to a Performance Award. A Participant’s rights to any Performance Award may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered or disposed of in any manner, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and/or except as the Committee may determine at or after grant.

8.4 Establishment of Performance Criteria. In the case of grants of Performance Awards, the Committee shall, in writing, (1) select the performance goal or goals applicable to the performance period, (2) establish the various targets and bonus amounts which may be earned for such performance period, and (3) specify the relationship between performance goals and targets and the amounts to be earned by each Participant for such performance period. The Committee shall make such determination within 90 days after the commencement of the performance period, unless the Committee determines that it is necessary or appropriate to extend the time for determining the performance criteria. Following the completion of each performance period, the Committee shall certify in writing (which may be set forth in the minutes of the Committee) whether the applicable performance targets have been achieved and the amounts, if any, payable for such performance period. In determining the amount earned by a Participant for a given performance period, the Committee shall have the right to adjust the amount of cash or number of Shares payable at a given level of performance to take into account additional factors that the Committee may deem relevant in its sole discretion to the assessment of individual or corporate performance for the performance period.

8.5 Adjustment of Performance Criteria. The Committee may appropriately adjust any evaluation of performance to exclude any of the following events that occurs during a performance period: (i) asset impairments or write-downs, (ii) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (iii) the effect of changes in tax law, accounting principles or other such laws or provisions affecting reported results, (iv) accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs, (v) any items that are unusual in nature or infrequently occurring (within the meaning of applicable accounting standards or otherwise in the reasonable determination of the Committee) and/or described in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable year, (vi) the effect of adverse federal, governmental or regulatory action, or delays in federal, governmental or regulatory action; (vii) any other event either not directly related to the operations of the Company or not within the reasonable control of the Company’s management; and (viii) any other event, condition or circumstance for which the Committee determines that an adjustment would be appropriate based on Committee guidelines, prior practice or other considerations.


A-15

Section 9.    Other Stock-Based Awards.


The Committee shall have the authority to determine the Participants who shall receive an Other Stock-Based Award, which shall consist of any right that is (i) not an Award described in Sections 6, and 7 or 8 above and (ii) an Award of Shares or an Award denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, Shares (including, without limitation, securities convertible into Shares), as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan. Subject to the terms of the Plan and any applicable Award Agreement, the Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of any such Other Stock-Based Award.


Section 10.    Non-Employee Director and Outside Director Awards.

10.1 Non-Employee Director Awards. The Board may provide that all or a portion of a Non-Employee Director’s annual retainer, meeting fees and/or other awards or compensation as determined by the Board, be payable (either automatically or at the election of a Non-Employee Director) in the form of Non-Qualified Stock Options, Restricted Shares, Restricted Share Units and/or Other Stock-Based Awards, including, subject to Section 15.17,14.17, unrestricted Shares. The Board shall determine the


terms and conditions of any such Awards, including the terms and conditions which shall apply upon a termination of the Non-Employee Director’s serviceSeparation from Service as a member of the Board, and shall have full power and authority in its discretion to administer such Awards, subject to the terms of the Plan and applicable law.

10.2 Outside Director Awards. The Board may also grant Awards to Outside Directors pursuant to the terms of the Plan, including any Award described in Sections 6,, 7 and 9 above. With respect to such Awards, all references in the Plan to the Committee shall be deemed to be references to the Board.

10.3 Equity Limits to Directors. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the maximum numberaggregate grant date fair value (computed as of Shares subject tothe date of grant in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all Awards granted during any 12-month period to any Non-Employee Director during any single calendar year, plus the total cash compensation paid to such director for services rendered for such calendar year, shall not exceed $400,000 in total value (calculating the value of any such Awards based on the grant date fair value of such Awards for financial reporting purposes and excluding, for this purpose, the value of any dividends or dividend equivalents paid in accordance with the Plan on certain Awards)$800,000 (the "Director Limit").  The Board may not, without the approval of the stockholders, increase; and further provided that the Director Limit.

Section 11. Provisions ApplicableLimit for any Non-Employee Director shall be determined without regard to Covered Officers and Performance Awards.

11.1    Performance-based Compensation. Notwithstanding anything in the Planamounts paid to the contrary, unless the Committee determines thatNon-Employee Director for any period in which such individual was an employee or consultant (other than grants of awards paid for service in their capacity as a Performance Award to be grantedNon-Employee Director), and any severance and other payments such as consulting fees paid to a Covered Officer should not qualify as “performance-based compensation”Non-Employee Director for purposes of Section 162(m), Performance Awards grantedsuch individual’s prior or current service to Covered Officers shall be subject to the terms and provisions of this Section 11.

11.2    Performance-based Compensation. The Committee may grant Performance Awards to Covered Officers based solely upon the attainment of performance targets related to one or more performance goals selected by the Committee from among the goals specified below. For the purposes of this Section 11, performance goals shall be limited to one or more of the following Company, Subsidiary, operating unit, business segment or division financial performance measures:

(a)    earnings before any one or more of the following: interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and/or stock compensation;

(b)    net sales;

(c)    operating (or gross) income or profit;

(d)    pretax income before allocation of corporate overhead and/or bonus;

(e)    operating efficiencies;
(f)    operating income as a percentage of net sales;

(g)    return on equity, assets, capital, capital employed or investment;

(h)    after tax operating income;

(i)    net income;

(j)    earnings or book value per Share;

(k)    financial ratios;

(l)    cash flow(s);

(m)    total sales or revenues or sales or revenues per employee;

(n)    capital expenditures as a percentage of net sales;

(o)    total operating expenses, or some component or combination of components of total operating expenses, as a percentage of net sales;

(p)    stock price or total stockholder return, including any comparisons with stock market indices;



(q)    appreciation in or maintenance of the price of the common stock or any publicly-traded securities of the Company;

(r)    dividends;

(s)    debt or cost reduction;

(t)    comparisons with performance metrics of peer companies;

(u)    comparisons of Company stock price performance to the stock price performance of peer companies;        

(v)    strategic business objectives, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified cost targets, meeting or reducing budgeted expenditures, attaining division, group or corporate financial goals, meeting business expansion goals (including, without limitation, developmental, strategic or manufacturing milestones of products or projects in development, execution of contracts with current or prospective customers and development of business expansion strategies) and meeting goals relating to acquisitions, joint ventures or collaborations or divestitures;

(w)    economic value-added models; or

(x)    any combination thereof.

Each goal may be expressed on an absolute and/or relative basis, may be based on or otherwise employ comparisons based on internal targets, the past performance of the Company or any Subsidiary, operating unit, business segmentAffiliate other than serving as a director shall not be taken into account in applying the Director Limit. For the avoidance of doubt, any compensation that is deferred shall be counted toward this limit for the year in which it was first earned, and not when paid or divisionsettled if later.

10.4 Post-Service Vesting. If a Non-Employee Director ceases to serve as a director for any reason, other than an involuntary removal during the pendency of a term as director, any Award made to such Non-Employee Director may continue to vest if so provided in the Award Agreement or in accordance with any determination of the Company and/Board at or the past or current performance of other companies, and in the case of earnings-based measures, may use or employ comparisons relating to capital, stockholders’ equity and/or Shares outstanding, or to assets or net assets. The Committee may appropriately adjust any evaluation of performance under criteria set forth in this Section 11.2 to exclude any of the following events that occurs during a performance period: (i) asset impairments or write-downs, (ii) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (iii) the effect of changes in tax law, accounting principles or other such laws or provisions affecting reported results, (iv) accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs, (v) any items that are unusual in nature or infrequently occurring (within the meaning of applicable accounting standards) and/or described in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable year, (vi) the effect of adverse federal, governmental or regulatory action, or delays in federal, governmental or regulatory action or (vii) any other event either not directly related to the operations of the Company or not within the reasonable control of the Company’s management; provided that the Committee commits to make any such adjustments within the 90 day period set forth in Section 11.4.after grant.

11.3    
A-16

Award Limits. With respect to any Covered Officer: (a) the maximum numberTable of Shares in respect of which all Performance Awards may be granted in any fiscal year under Contents
Section 8 is 125,000; (b) the maximum amount of all Performance Awards that are settled in cash and that may be granted in any fiscal year under Section 8 is $2,500,000; and (c) the maximum number of all Shares in respect of which Options or SARs (taken together) may be granted in any fiscal year under the Plan is 150,000. The individual Covered Officer limitations set forth in this Section 11.3 shall be cumulative; that is, to the extent that Shares or cash for which Awards are permitted to be granted to a Participant during a fiscal year are not covered by an Award to such Participant in that fiscal year (such shortfall, the “Shortfall Amount”), the number of Shares (or amount of cash, as the case may be) available for Awards to such Participant shall automatically increase in the subsequent fiscal years during the term of the Plan until the earlier of the time the Shortfall Amount has been granted to the Participant, or the end of the third fiscal year following the year to which such Shortfall Amount relates (determined on a “first-in-first-out” basis).

11.4    Establishment of Performance Criteria. In the case of grants of Performance Awards with respect to which compliance with Section 162(m) is intended, no later than 90 days following the commencement of each performance period (or such other time as may be required or permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code), the Committee shall, in writing, (1) select the performance goal or goals applicable to the performance period, (2) establish the various targets and bonus amounts which may be earned for such performance period, and (3) specify the relationship between performance goals and targets and the amounts to be earned by each Covered Officer for such performance period. Following the completion of each performance period, the Committee shall certify in writing (which may be set forth in the minutes of the Committee) whether the applicable performance targets have been achieved and the amounts, if any, payable to Covered Officers for such performance period. In determining the amount earned by a Covered Officer for a given performance period, subject to any applicable Award Agreement, the Committee shall have the right to reduce (but not increase) the amount payable at a given level of performance to take into account additional


factors that the Committee may deem relevant in its sole discretion to the assessment of individual or corporate performance for the performance period.

11.5    Conformance with Section 162(m). Unless otherwise expressly stated in the relevant Award Agreement, each Performance Award granted to a Covered Officer under the Plan is intended to be performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m). Accordingly, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, if any provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement relating to such an Award does not comply or is inconsistent with Section 162(m), such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such requirements, and no provision shall be deemed to confer upon the Committee discretion to increase the amount of compensation otherwise payable to a Covered Officer in connection with any such Award upon the attainment of the performance criteria established by the Committee.

Section 12. 11.    Separation from Service.


12.111.1 Impact on Awards.AwardsThe. Except as provided in Section 11.2 of this Plan, the Committee shall have the full power and authority to determine the terms and conditions that shall apply to any Award upon a Separation from Service, with the Company, its Subsidiaries and Affiliates, including a separationSeparation from the CompanyService with or without Cause, by a Participant voluntarily, including for Good Reason, or by reason of death, Disability, Early Retirement or Normal Retirement, and may provide such terms and conditions in the Award Agreement or in such rules and regulations as it may prescribe. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, Awards shall fully vest on death or Disability.

12.211.2 Forfeiture of Awards.Performance Awards on Separation from Service; No Acceleration of Vesting. Unless otherwise provided in (i) this Plan or (ii) an Award Agreement or a written employment or similar agreement between the Company or a Subsidiary and a Participant, if a Participant’s Separation from Service occurs before the restrictions imposed on the Award lapse, the performance goals have been satisfied or the Award otherwise vests, such Award shall be forfeited. Except as otherwise provided in this Plan, an Award Agreement or by a contractualwritten employment agreement or similar agreement between the Company or a Subsidiary and a Participant, if a Participant’s employment with or service to the Company or a Subsidiary terminates before the restrictions imposed on the Award lapse, the performance goals have been satisfied or the Award otherwise vests, such Award shall be forfeited.
Section 13. Change in Control.

13.1    Certain Terminations. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, or in an Award Agreement or by a contractual agreement between the Company or a Subsidiary and a Participant, if, within twelve months after the Company obtains actual knowledge thatprior to a Change in Control, has occurred,for any reason other than death or Disability, the vesting of any unvested Award shall not be triggered by such Separation from Service. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Separation from Service without Cause or for Good Reason that takes place within four (4) months prior to a Change in Control and that is made at the behest of an Acquiror or in contemplation of such Change in Control shall be treated as if such Separation From Service took place after such Change in Control, if such Change in Control actually occurs.

11.3 Separation from Service without Cause.

(a) The provisions of this Section 11.3 shall apply with respect to Participants who are Employees but are not party to an employment agreement or separate written agreement with the Company governing equity treatment upon Separation from Service.

(b) With respect to Restricted Share Units, provided that a Participant signs and does not revoke a release of claims, as more fully described in Section 11.3(g), upon the date such release becomes irrevocable (the “Release Finalization Date”),:

(i) any Restricted Share Units that were scheduled to vest within 365 days from the date of Separation from Service without Cause and were granted more than 365 days preceding the date of Separation from Service without Cause, shall vest effective as of the Release Finalization Date;

(ii) the RSU Separation Pro-Rated Number (as defined below) of Restricted Share Units that were scheduled to vest within 365 days from the date of Separation from Service without Cause, and were granted less than 365 days prior to the date of Separation from Service without Cause, shall vest effective as of the Release Finalization Date; and

(iii) any remaining time-vesting Restricted Share Units not vesting as provided herein shall be forfeited effective as of the date of Separation from Service without Cause.

The “RSU Separation Pro-Rated Number” for time-vesting Restricted Share Units shall be the product of (A) the total number of time-vesting Restricted Share Units granted under the Award Agreement less than 365 days prior to the date of Separation from Service without Cause and (B) the quotient of (1) the number of days from the grant date of such award to the date of Separation from Service without Cause and (2) 365.

(c) With respect to performance-based Restricted Share Units, provided that a Participant signs and does not revoke a release of claims, as more fully described in Section 11.3(g), upon the Release Finalization Date:

(i) the PSU Separation Pro-Rated Number (as defined below) of performance-based Restricted Share Units shall continue to vest, on the same terms that such performance-based Restricted Share Units would have vested had the Participant remained an Employee, but without the requirement of continued employment, provided, however, that if the vesting date under such terms is earlier than the Release Finalization Date, the performance-based Restricted Share Units shall vest on the Release Finalization Date; and

(ii) any remaining performance-based Restricted Share Units not vesting as provided herein above shall be forfeited effective as of the date of Separation from Service without Cause.

The “PSU Separation Pro-Rated Number” for performance-based Restricted Share Units shall be the product of (A) the total number of performance-based Restricted Share Units and (B) the quotient of (1) the number of days beginning on the first day
A-17

of the performance period and ending on the date of Separation from Service without Cause, and (2) the total number of days in the performance period (for example 1,095 days for a three-year performance period).

(d) With respect to Other Stock-based Awards, as contemplated by Section 9 of this Plan, the Committee shall have the authority to determine the terms and conditions of any such Other Stock-Based Award, including without limitation, the treatment of such awards upon a Participant’s employmentRetirement or Separation from Service without Cause at the time of grant of such Other Stock-Based Awards.

(e) A “Separation from Service without Cause” shall mean a Separation from Service that meets the following criteria:
(i) The Company provides written notice to the Participant that the Separation from Service results from one or more of the following:

(A) Workforce reduction or reorganization;

(B) A significant reduction in job responsibilities, accountabilities or authorities;

(C) A determination by the Company that the Participant’s qualifications, experience or abilities, are not sufficient to meet the demands and requirements of the job consistently at the nature and level expected for the title, role, authority, or position;

(D) a material reduction equal to ten percent (10%) or more in the Participant’s total target compensation (including base, bonus and equity) (other than as a result of an across-the-board reduction affecting substantially all Employees with similar authority, status, or servicejob title); or

(E) the Participant’s job being relocated to a location that is more than 50 miles from the Participant’s then current job location (“Relocation”) and the Participant declines Relocation;

(ii) at the time of the Separation from Service, the Participant has been actively at work (or on an approved leave of absence) during the six-month period immediately preceding the date of the Separation from Service and continues working through the date designated by the Company as the Participant’s Separation from Service date or any earlier date that is designated by the Company as the Participant’s release from duty date;

(iii) the Separation from Service is not for “Cause” as defined in this Plan;

(iv) the Separation from Service does not qualify as Retirement;

(v) the Company has not determined that the Separation from Service was for failure to meet the performance requirements of the Participant’s position, including violations of the UNFI Code of Conduct and/or UNFI stated values or commitments, as documented in written performance feedback previously provided to the Participant;

(vi) except as otherwise determined by the Authorized Officers (as defined below), the Participant has not accepted another position with (or to perform work for) the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate (or(whether as an associate, consultant, or agent) following the Separation from Service;

(vii) except as otherwise determined by the Authorized Officers, if the Participant was employed at a business unit of the Company that was sold or otherwise transferred to a new employer, (A) the Participant has not, within 120 days following such sale or other transfer, accepted a position of employment from the new employer at such business unit, or received an offer of a position from the new employer that does not require Relocation and with base pay that is not less than the Participant’s then current rate of base pay, even if the Participant has not accepted such offer, and (B) the Participant’s position with such business unit has not been continued immediately following the closing of that transaction by operation of law or otherwise. For purposes of this subparagraph (vii), “business unit” shall mean any subunit of their successors)the Company as defined at the discretion of the Company (by way of example, a subsidiary, district, region, or cost center may be “business units” under this subparagraph);

(viii) except as otherwise determined by the Authorized Officers, if the Participant’s job at a facility is involuntarily terminated because the Company ceases operations at that facility, but another employer commences operations at that facility, and, prior to such Separation from Service, (A) that other employer has not offered the Participant a position at that facility with base pay that is not less than the Participant’s current base pay from the Company, even if the Participant does not accept such offer, and (B) the Participant has not accepted any position with that other employer;

A-18

(ix) except as otherwise determined by the Authorized Officers, if the Company has outsourced the Participant’s job function, the Participant has not accepted any position with the outsource vendor and the outsource vendor has not offered the Participant a position that does not require Relocation and with base pay that is not less than the Participant’s current base pay, even if the Participant has not accepted such offer; and

(x) except as otherwise determined by the Authorized Officers, the Participant has not failed to return Company property on or before the Participant’s last day of work.

(f) The determination by any two of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, or Chief Legal Officer (the “Authorized Officers”) of the Company that a Separation from Service constitutes a Separation from Service without Cause for any reason, all outstanding Awardspurposes of the foregoing shall constitute a final determination of such Participantstatus for purposes of the vesting provisions described herein with no further action required by the Committee; the decisions of such two officers, taken together shall vest, become immediately exercisablebe recorded and payableretained with the books and have all restrictions lifted.records relative to equity awards of the Company.

13.2    Accelerated Vesting.(g) To receive the vesting treatment described in this section 11.3, Participants must sign and not revoke a release of claims and such other agreements as may be requested by the Company. Any release of claims must be in the form and manner prescribed by the Company. The Committee may (indecision whether any other agreements, including but not limited to restrictive covenants, are included shall be made in the discretion of the Company. To the extent any Award vesting in accordance with this Section 11.3 is subject to Section 409A of the Code, and the period for the Participant to consider and/or revoke a release of claims spans two calendar years, then the extent applicable),settlement/payment of Shares pursuant to that Award shall in its discretion, provide in any Award Agreement, or,all cases occur in the eventsecond calendar year.


A-19

Section 12.    Change in Control, may take such actions as it deems appropriate to provide, for the acceleration of the exercisability, vesting and/or settlement in connection with such Change in Control of each or any outstanding Award or portion thereof and Shares acquired pursuant thereto upon such conditions (if any), including termination of the Participant’s service prior to, upon, or following such Change in Control, to such extent as the Committee shall determine. In the event of a Change of Control, and without the consent of any Participant, the Committee may, in its discretion, provide that for a period of at least fifteen (15) days prior to the Change in Control, any Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercisable as to all Shares subject thereto and that upon the occurrence of the Change in Control, such Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall terminate and be of no further force and effect.Control.


13.312.1 Assumption, Continuation or Substitution. Substitution. In the event of a Change in Control, the surviving, continuing, successor, or purchasing corporation or other business entity or parent thereof, as the case may be (the "Acquiror"), may (in accordance with Section 409A, to the extent applicable), without the consent of any Participant, either assume or continue the Company’s rights and obligations under each or any Award or portion thereof outstanding immediately prior to the Change in Control or substitute for each or any such outstanding Award or portion thereof a substantially equivalent award with respect to the Acquiror’s stock, as applicable; provided, that in the event of such an assumption, the Acquiror must grant the rights set forth in Section 13.112.2 of this Plan to the Participant in respect of such assumed Awards. For purposes of this Section, if so determined by the Committee, in its discretion, an Award denominated in Shares shall be deemed assumed if, following the Change in Control, the Award (as adjusted, if applicable, pursuant to Section 4.24.3 hereof) confers the right to receive, subject to theany vesting or other terms and conditions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, for each Share subject to the Award immediately prior to the Change in Control, the consideration (whether stock, cash, other securities or property or a combination thereof) to which a holder of a share of StockShare on the effective date of the Change in Control was entitled; provided, however, that if such consideration is not solely common stock of the Acquiror, the Committee may, with the consent of the Acquiror, provide for the consideration to be received upon the exercise or settlement of the Award, for each Share subject to the Award, to consist solely of common stock of the Acquiror equal in Fair Market Valuefair market value to the per share consideration received by holders of Shares pursuant to the Change in Control.



13.412.2 Vesting of Assumed or Continued Awards. Unless otherwise expressly provided in (i) the Award Agreement, (ii) an employment agreement or other written agreement with the Company or a Subsidiary and a Participant, or (iii) the definitive transaction agreement governing such Change in Control, in the event of a Change in Control in which the Acquiror does assume or continue outstanding Awards upon the Change in Control, if the Participant’s employment with or service to the Company or a Subsidiary (or any of their successors) is terminated involuntarily for any reason other than Cause, or a Participant terminates his or her employment or service for Good Reason, within twelve (12) months of such Change in Control:

(a) Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall become fully vested as of the Participant’s Separation from Service, and exercisable no later than 30 days following such Separation from Service termination date;

(b) Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units shall become fully vested as of such Separation from Service, and shall be delivered no later than 30 days following such Separation from Service (or such other date permitted by Section 409A of the Code); and

(c) Any then-in-progress Performance Awards shall become fully vested at target performance levels as of such Separation from Service, and shall be delivered no later than 30 days following such Separation from Service (or such other date permitted by Section 409A of the Code). Any outstanding Performance Awards relating to performance periods ending prior to the Separation from Service which have been earned but not paid shall become immediately payable (unless otherwise required to be paid on a different date pursuant to Section 409A of the Code).

12.3 No Assumption or Continuation of Awards. Unless otherwise expressly provided in (i) the Award Agreement, (ii) an employment agreement or similar written agreement with the Company or a Subsidiary, or (iii) the definitive transaction agreement governing such Change in Control, in the event of a Change in Control in which the Acquiror does not assume or continue outstanding Awards upon the Change in Control, all outstanding Awards that are not assumed or continued shall be treated as follows (to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code):

(a) Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall become fully vested and exercisable as of date and time immediately prior to the Change in Control;

(b) Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units shall become fully vested as of the date and time immediately prior to the Change in Control and shall settle immediately following the Change in Control (or such other date permitted by Section 409A of the Code); and

(c) Unless otherwise determined by the Committee pursuant to Section 12.5, to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code, any Performance Awards relating to performance periods that will not have ended as of the date of a Change in Control shall automatically vest and become payable at the target level of performance. Any outstanding Performance Awards relating to performance periods ending prior to the Change in Control date which have been earned but not paid shall become immediately payable.

A-20

12.4 Cash-Out of Awards. TheNotwithstanding Sections 12.2 and 12.3, the Committee may (in accordance with Section 409A, to the extent applicable), in its discretion at or after grant and without the consent of any Participant, determine that, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, each or any Award or a portion thereof outstanding immediately prior to the Change in Control and not previously exercised or settled shall be canceled in exchange for a payment with respect to each vested Share including pursuant to Section 13.2 subject to such Award, whether vested or unvested, in (i) cash, (ii) stock of the Company or of a corporation or other business entity a party to the Change in Control, or (iii) other property which, in any such case, shall be in an amount having a Fair Market Valuefair market value equal to the Fair Market Valuefair market value of the consideration to be paid per Share in the Change in Control, reduced by the exercise or purchase price per share, if any, under such Award (which payment may, for the avoidance of doubt, be $0, in the event the per share exercise or purchase price of an Award is greater than the per share consideration in connection with the Change in Control). In the event such determination is made by the Committee, the amount of such payment (reduced by applicable withholding taxes, if any), if any, shall be paid to Participants in respect of the vested portions of their canceled Awards as soon as practicable following the date of the Change in Control and may be paid in respect of the unvested portions of their canceled Awards in accordance with the vesting schedules applicable to such Awards.

13.512.5 Performance Awards.Awards. The Committee may (in accordance with Section 409A, to the extent applicable), in its discretion at or after grant, provide that in the event of a Change in Control, (i) any outstanding Performance Awards relating to performance periods ending prior to the Change in Control which have been earned but not paid shall become immediately payable, (ii) all then-in-progress performance periods for Performance Awards that are outstanding shall end, and either (A) any or all Participants shall be deemed to have earned an award equal to the relevant target award

opportunity for the performance period in question, or (B) at the Committee’s discretion, the Committee shall determine the extent to which performance criteria have been met with respect to each such Performance Award, if at all, but not above target, and (iii) the Company shall cause to be paid to each Participant such partial or full Performance Awards, in cash, Shares or other property as determined by the Committee, within thirty (30) days of such Change in Control, based on the Change in Control consideration, which amount may be zero if applicable. In the absence of such a determination, any Performance Awards relating to performance periods that will not have ended as of the date of a Change in Control shall be terminated and canceled for no further consideration.


A-21

Section 14. 13. Amendment and Termination.


14.113.1 Amendments to the Plan. Plan. The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate the Plan or any portion thereof at any time (and in accordance with Section 409A of the Code with regard to Awards subject thereto); provided that no such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation or termination shall be made without stockholder approval if such approval is necessary to comply with any tax or regulatory requirement for which or with which the Board deems it necessary or desirable to comply.

14.213.2 Amendments to Awards. Awards. Subject to the restrictions of the Plan, including Section 6.2, hereof, the Committee may waive any conditions or rights under, amend any terms of or alter, suspend, discontinue, cancel or terminate, any Award theretofore granted, prospectively or retroactively in time (and in accordance with Section 409A of the Code with regard to Awards subject thereto); provided that any such waiver, amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance, cancellation or termination that would materially and adversely affect the rights of any Participant or any holder or beneficiary of any Award theretofore granted shall not to that extent be effective without the consent of the affected Participant, holder or beneficiary.beneficiary (other than to the extent necessary to conform to Section 409A).

14.313.3 Adjustments of Awards upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. Events. The Committee is hereby authorized to make equitable and proportionate adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (and shall make such adjustments for the events described in Section 4.2 hereof) affecting the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate, or the financial statements of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate, or of changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles.

14.413.4 Foreign Employees.Employees. In order to facilitate the making of any Award or combination of Awards under the Plan, the Committee may provide for such special terms for Awards to Participants who are foreign nationals or who are employed by the Company or any Subsidiary outside of the United States of America as the Committee may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy or custom. Moreover, the Committee may approve such supplements to or amendments, restatements or alternative versions of the Plan as it may consider necessary or appropriate for such purposes, without thereby affecting the terms of the Plan as in effect for any other purpose, and the Corporate Secretary or other appropriate officer of the Company may certify any such document as having been approved and adopted in the same manner as the Plan. No such special terms, supplements, amendments or restatements, however, shall include any provisions that are inconsistent with the terms of the Plan as then in effect unless the Plan could have been amended to eliminate such inconsistency without further approval by the shareholders of the Company.



Section 14.    General Provisions.
Section 15. General Provisions.

15.114.1 Limited Transferability of Awards. Awards. Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, an Award Agreement or by the Committee at or after grant, no Award shall be assigned, alienated, pledged, attached, sold or otherwise transferred or encumbered by a Participant, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. No transfer of an Award by will or by laws of descent and distribution shall be effective to bind the Company unless the Company shall have been furnished with written notice thereof and an authenticated copy of the will and/or such other evidence as the Committee may deem necessary or appropriate to establish the validity of the transfer. No transfer of an Award for value shall be permitted under the Plan.

15.214.2 Dividend Equivalents. Equivalents. In the sole and complete discretion of the Committee, but subject to any conditions set forth in this Plan, an Award (other than an Option or SAR) may provide the Participant with dividends or dividend equivalents, payable in cash, Shares, other securities or other property, on a current or deferred basis. All dividend or dividend equivalents which are not paid currently may, atbut only when the Committee’s discretion, accrue interest, or be reinvested into additional Shares.related Award vests. In the case of dividends or dividend equivalents credited in connection with Performance Awards , such amounts shall be subject to the same restrictions as apply to dividends or dividend equivalents payable with respect to the applicable Performance Award type (such as Restricted Shares or Restricted Share Units). The total number of Shares available for grant under Section 4 shall not be reduced to reflect any dividends or dividend equivalents that are reinvested into additional Shares or credited as Performance Awards.until payment thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to an Award subject to Section 409A of the Code, the payment, deferral or crediting of any dividends or dividend equivalents shall conform to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and such requirements shall be specified in writing.

15.3.14.3 Compliance with Section 409A of the Code. Code. No Award (or modification thereof) shall provide for deferral of compensation that does not comply with Section 409A of the Code unless the Committee, at the time of grant, specifically provides that the Award is not intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, if one or more of the payments or benefits received or to be received by a Participant pursuant to an Award would cause the Participant to incur any additional tax or interest under Section 409A of the Code, the Committee may reform such provision to maintain to the maximum extent practicable the original intent of the applicable provision without violating the provisions of Section 409A of the Code. In addition, if a Participant is a Specified Employee at the time of his or her
A-22

Separation from Service, to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of taxes under Section 409A, any payments with respect to any Award subject to Section 409A of the Code to which the Participant would otherwise be entitled by reason of such Separation from Service shall be made on the date that is six months after the Participant’s Separation from Service (or, if earlier, the date of the Participant’s death). Although the Company intends to administer the Plan so that Awards will be exempt from, or will comply with, the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, the Company does not warrant that any Award under the Plan will qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 409A of the Code or any other provision of federal, state, local or foreign law. The Company shall not be liable to any Participant for any tax, interest, or penalties that Participant might owe as a result of the grant, holding, vesting, exercise, or payment of any Award under the Plan.


15.414.4 No Rights to Awards. Awards. No Person shall have any claim to be granted any Award, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment of Participants or holders or beneficiaries of Awards. The terms and conditions of Awards need not be the same with respect to each Participant.

15.514.5 Share Certificates. Certificates. All certificates for Shares or other securities of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate delivered under the Plan pursuant to any Award or the exercise thereof shall be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the Plan or the rules, regulations and other requirements of the SEC or any state securities commission or regulatory authority, any stock exchange or other market upon which such Shares or other securities are then listed, and any applicable Federal or state laws, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.

15.614.6 TaxWithholding. Withholding. A Participant may be required to pay to the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate, and the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate shall have the right and is hereby authorized to withhold from any Award, from any payment due or transfer made under any Award or under the Plan, or from any compensation or other amount owing to a Participant the amount (in cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards or other property) of any applicable withholding or other tax-related obligations in respect of an Award, its exercise or any other transaction involving an Award, or any payment or transfer under an Award or under the Plan and to take such other action as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for the payment of such taxes. The Committee may provide for additional cash payments to holders of Options to defray or offset any tax arising from the grant, vesting, exercise or payment of any Award. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may in its discretion permit a Participant to satisfy or arrange to satisfy, in whole or in part, the tax obligations incident to an Award by: (a) electing to have the Company withhold Shares or other property otherwise deliverable to such Participant pursuant to the Award (provided, however, that the amount of any Shares so withheld shall not exceed the amount necessary to satisfy required federal, state local and foreign withholding obligations using the maximum statutory withholding rates for federal, state, local and/or foreign tax purposes, including payroll taxes, that are applicable to supplemental taxable income) and/or (b)


tendering to the Company Shares owned by such Participant (or by such Participant and his or her spouse jointly) and purchased or held for the requisite period of time, if any, as may be required to avoid the Company’s or the Affiliates’Subsidiaries’ or Subsidiaries’Affiliates’ incurring an adverse accounting charge, based, in each case, on the Fair Market Valuefair market value of the Shares on the payment date as determined by the Committee. All such elections shall be irrevocable, made in writing, signed by the Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

15.7
14.7 Award Agreements. Agreements. Each Award hereunder shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall be delivered (including, but not limited to, through an online equity incentive plan management portal) to the Participant and may specify the terms and conditions of the Award and any rules applicable thereto. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Plan and any Award Agreement, the terms of the Plan shall prevail. The Committee shall, subject to applicable law, determine the date an Award is deemed to be granted. The Committee or, except to the extent prohibited under applicable law, its delegate(s) may establish the terms of agreements or other documents evidencing Awards under this Plan and may, but need not, require as a condition to any such agreement’s or document’s effectiveness that such agreement or document be executed by the Participant, including by electronic signature or other electronic indication of acceptance, and that such Participant agree to such further terms and conditions as specified in such agreement or document. The grant of an Award under this Plan shall not confer any rights upon the Participant holding such Award other than such terms, and subject to such conditions, as are specified in this Plan as being applicable to such type of Award (or to all Awards) or as are expressly set forth in the agreement or other document evidencing such Award.

15.814.8 Restrictive Covenants. Each Award Agreement shall include, or be deemed to include, restrictive covenants as determined by the Committee or its delegate and each Participant shall agree to adhere to such covenants as a condition to receipt of an Award.

14.9 Other Compensation Arrangements. Arrangements. Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate from adopting or continuing in effect other compensation arrangements, which may, but need not, provide for the grant of Options, Restricted Shares, Restricted Share Units, Other Stock-Based Awards or other types of Awards provided for hereunder. No payment under the Plan shall be taken into account in determining any benefits under any pension, retirement,
A-23

savings, profit sharing, group insurance, welfare or benefit plan of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate unless provided otherwise in such other plan.


15.914.10 No Right to Employment. Employment or Other Service. The grant of an Award shall not be construed as giving a Participant the right to be retained in the employ or other service of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate. Further, the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate may at any time dismiss a Participant from employment or service, free from any liability or any claim under the Plan, unless otherwise expressly provided in an Award Agreement.

15.1014.11 No Rights as Stockholder. Stockholder. Subject to the provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, no Participant or holder or beneficiary of any Award shall have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any Shares to be distributed under the Plan until such person has become a holder of such Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with each grant of Restricted Shares hereunder, the applicable Award Agreement shall specify if and to what extent the Participant shall not be entitled to the rights of a stockholder in respect of such Restricted Shares.

15.1114.12 Governing Law. Law. The validity, construction and effect of the Plan and any rules and regulations relating to the Plan and any Award Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to conflicts of laws principles.

15.1214.13 Severability. Severability. If any provision of the Plan or any Award is, or becomes, or is deemed to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction or as to any Person or Award, or would disqualify the Plan or any Award under any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to conform to the applicable laws, or if it cannot be construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the intent of the Plan or the Award, such provision shall be stricken as to such jurisdiction, Person or Award and the remainder of the Plan and any such Award shall remain in full force and effect.

15.1314.14 Other Laws. Laws. The Company will not be obligated to issue, deliver or transfer any Shares pursuant to the Plan or to remove restrictions from Shares previously delivered pursuant to the Plan until: (a) all conditions of the applicable Award Agreement have been met or removed to the satisfaction of the Committee; (b) all other legal matters, including receipt of consent or approval of any regulatory body and compliance with any state or federal securities or other law, in connection with the issuance and delivery of such Shares have been satisfied; (c) the Participant or holder or beneficiary of the Shares or Award has executed and delivered to the Company such representations or agreements as the Committee may consider appropriate to satisfy the requirements of any state or federal securities or other law; and (d) such issuance would not entitle the Company to recover amounts under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act from such Participant or holder or beneficiary of the Shares or Award. The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel necessary to the lawful issuance of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue the Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.



15.1414.15 No Trust or Fund Created. Created. Neither the Plan nor any Award shall create or be construed to create a trust or separate fund of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate and a Participant or any other Person. To the extent that any Person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate pursuant to an Award, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate.Subsidiary.

15.1514.16 No Fractional Shares. Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award, and the Committee shall determine whether cash, other securities or other propertyany obligation to deliver fractional Shares shall be paid or transferred in lieudeemed fully satisfied by the delivery of any fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares or any rights thereto shall be canceled, terminated or otherwise eliminated.the next lower number of whole Shares.

15.1614.17 ClawbackClawback; Cancellation of Awards. Each Award granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be subject to forfeiture or repayment pursuant to the terms of any applicable compensation recovery policy adopted by the Company as in effect from time to time, including any such policy that may be adopted or amended to comply with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any rules or regulations issued by the SEC or the NasdaqNew York Stock Market.Exchange. In addition, the Committee or the Board may cancel unpaid Awards held by a Participant from whom the Committee or the Board would be entitled to recover compensation under any compensation recovery policy then in effect.

15.1714.18 Minimum Vesting Requirements.Requirements. Except for Substitute Awards, as determined by the Committee following the grant of an Award in connection with the death disability or retirementDisability of the Participant, or in the event of a Change in Control or a Separation from Service without Cause, Awards granted hereunder shall have a Vesting Period of not less than one (1) year from the date of grant; provided, that the Committee has the discretion to waive this requirement with respect to an Award at the time of granting such Award so long as the total number of Shares that are issued under this Plan pursuant to Awards having an originally stated Vesting Period of less than one year from the date of grant (or, in the case of vesting of Performance Awards or other Awards the vesting of which is subject to the achievement of performance-based
A-24

objectives, over a period of less than one year measured from the commencement of the period over which performance is evaluated) shall not exceed 5% of the Share Reserve.


15.1814.19 Headings. Headings. Headings are given to the sections and subsections of the Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. Such headings shall not be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction or interpretation of the Plan or any provision thereof.

Section 16. 15.    Term of The Plan.


16.115.1 Effective Date. Date. The Plan, as amended and restated as set forth herein, shall be effective and will amend and restate the previously effective plan, upon the date that it is adopted by the Board (the “Effective Date”), subject to the approval of the Planapproved by the Company’s stockholders at a meeting duly held in accordance with applicable law within twelve (12) months following the Effective Date. Upon such approval of the Plan, all Awards granted under the Plan on or after the (the “Effective Date shall be fully effective as if such approval had occurred on the Effective Date.”). If the Plan is not approved as set forth in this section, this amendment and restatement of the Plan will not become effective and any Awards granted under the Plan following the Effective Date shall be nullsubject to the terms of the Plan as in effect prior to the amendment and void and of no effect.restatement.

16.215.2 Expiration Date. Date. No new Awards shall be granted under the Plan after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in an applicable Award Agreement, any Award granted hereunder may, and the authority of the Board or the Committee to amend, alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue or terminate any such Award or to waive any conditions or rights under any such Award shall, continue after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date.

A-25



card01.jpg




Annex B
card02.jpgReconciliation of Non-GAAP Performance Metrics

This proxy statement refers to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital), Adjusted EPS (earnings per diluted share), and Adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio. These metrics are used by the Company in evaluating our performance for purposes of our executive compensation program. We believe the non-GAAP financial measure provides investors with useful supplemental information about the performance of our business and insight into the metrics we use for executive compensation purposes.

Non-GAAP financial measures have no standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP and therefore may not be comparable with calculations of similar measures for other companies. Management does not intend these items to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related GAAP measure.

Capitalized terms used in the notes to this table but not defined in this proxy statement are used as defined in the notes to the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2022 (the Annual Report), to which you should refer for further information.

Reconciliation of net income from continuing operations and income from discontinued operations, net of tax to Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited)
(in millions)

Fiscal Year Ended
July 30, 2022
(52 weeks)
Fiscal Year Ended
July 31, 2021
(52 weeks)
Fiscal Year Ended
August 1, 2020
(52 weeks)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$254 $149 $(251)
Adjustments to continuing operations net income (loss):
Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(6)(6)(5)
Net periodic benefit income, excluding service cost(1)
(40)(85)(39)
Interest expense, net155 204 192 
Other, net(2)(8)(4)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(2)
56 34 (91)
Depreciation and amortization285 285 282 
Share-based compensation43 49 34 
Goodwill impairment charges(3)
— — 425 
LIFO charge(4)
158 24 18 
Restructuring, acquisition and integration related expenses(5)
21 56 87 
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(6)
(87)(4)18 
Multiemployer pension plan withdrawal (benefit) charges(7)
(8)63 — 
Notes receivable charges(8)
— — 13 
Legal reserve charge, net of settlement income(9)
— — 
Other retail expense(10)
— $
Adjusted EBITDA of continuing operations829 766 681 
Adjusted EBITDA of discontinued operations(11)
— 10 
Adjusted EBITDA$829 $770 $691 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(11)
$— $$(18)
Adjustments to discontinued operations net income (loss):
Benefit for income taxes— (1)(5)
Restructuring, store closure and other charges, net(12)
— (1)33 
Adjusted EBITDA of discontinued operations(11)
$— $$10 

B-1

(1)Fiscal 2021 includes a postretirement settlement gain of $17 million associated with the termination of remaining corporate plans. Fiscal 2020 includes a lump sum defined pension plan settlement expense of $11 million.
(2)Fiscal 2020 includes the tax benefit from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which includes the impact of tax loss carrybacks to 35% tax years allowed under the CARES Act.
(3)Fiscal 2020 primarily reflects a goodwill impairment charge attributable to a reorganization of our reporting units and a sustained decrease in market capitalization and enterprise value of the Company, resulting in a decline in the estimated fair value of the U.S. Wholesale reporting unit. In addition, this charge includes a goodwill finalization charge attributable to the SUPERVALU acquisition and an asset impairment charge.
(4)During fiscal 2022, the Company revised its definition of Adjusted EBITDA to exclude the impact of the non-cash LIFO charge. Prior periods have been revised to conform to the current year presentation.
(5)Fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2021 primarily reflects costs associated with advisory and transformational activities to position our business for further value-creation. In addition, fiscal 2021 includes costs associated with distribution center consolidations. Fiscal 2020 primarily reflects Shoppers asset impairment charges, closed property and distribution center impairment charges and costs, and administrative fees associated with integration activities. Refer to Note 4—Restructuring, Acquisition and Integration Related Expenses in Part II, Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
(6)Fiscal 2022 primarily reflects the gain on sale of our Riverside, California distribution center in the third quarter of fiscal 2022. Fiscal 2020 primarily reflects a $50 million accumulated depreciation and amortization charge related to the requirement to move Retail from discontinued operations to continuing operations, partially offset by $32 million of gains on the sale of distribution centers and other assets.
(7)Fiscal 2022 reflects an adjustment to multiemployer withdrawal charge estimates. Fiscal 2021 includes charges related to withdrawal liabilities from three Retail multiemployer pension plans.
(8)Reflects reserves and charges for notes receivable issued by the SUPERVALU business prior to its acquisition to finance the purchase of stores by its customers.
(9)Reflects a charge to settle a legal proceeding and income received to settle a separate legal proceeding.
(10)Reflects expenses associated with event-specific damages to certain retail stores.
(11)We believe the inclusion of discontinued operations results within Adjusted EBITDA provides investors a meaningful measure of total performance.
(12)Amounts represent store closure charges and costs, operational wind-down and inventory charges, and asset impairment charges related to discontinued operations. Fiscal 2021 also reflects income related to a severance benefit amount.

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP performance metric. We define Adjusted EBITDA as a consolidated measure inclusive of continuing and discontinued operations results, which we reconcile by adding Net income (loss) from continuing operations, less Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, plus Non-operating income and expenses, including Net periodic benefit income, excluding service cost, Interest expense, net and Other, net, plus Provision (benefit) for income taxes and Depreciation and amortization all calculated in accordance with GAAP, plus adjustments for Share-based compensation, non cash LIFO charge or benefit, Restructuring, acquisition and integration related expenses, Goodwill impairment charges, (Gain) loss on sale of assets, certain legal charges and gains, certain other non-cash charges or other items, as determined by management, plus Adjusted EBITDA of discontinued operations calculated in a manner consistent with the results of continuing operations, outlined above.

B-2

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Adjusted Return on Invested Capital
(in millions, except percentages)
Fiscal 2022 As Reported (1)
LIFO Charge(2)
Restructuring, Acquisition and Integration Related Expenses(3)
Gain on Sale of Assets(4)
Pension Income
Multiemployer Pension Plan Withdrawal Benefit(5)
Adjust Invested Capital to Averages(6)
Fiscal 2022 As Adjusted
Operating income (loss)$423 $158 $21 $(87)$40 $(8)$— $547 
Effective tax rate(7)
26.1 %26.1 %26.1 %26.1 %26.1 %26.1 %26.1 %26.1 %
Tax on operating Income(111)(41)(6)23 (10)— $(143)
Net operating profit after tax$312 $117 $15 $(64)$30 $(6)$ $404 
Total debt and finance lease obligations$2,159 $— $— $— $— $— $131 2,290 
Total stockholder’s equity1,792 — — — — — (139)1,653 
Total invested capital$3,951 $ $ $ $ $ $(8)$3,943 
Return on invested capital7.9 %10.2 %
(1)All “As Reported” financial data below is shown as it was filed within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2022.
(2)During fiscal 2022, the Company revised its definition of Adjusted ROIC to exclude the impact of the non-cash LIFO charge.
(3)Primarily reflects costs associated with advisory and transformational activities to position our business for further value-creation. Refer to Note 4—Restructuring, Acquisition and Integration Related Expenses in Part II, Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
(4)Primarily reflects the gain on sale of our Riverside, California distribution center in the third quarter of fiscal 2022.
(5)Reflects an adjustment to previously multiemployer withdrawal charge estimates.
(6)Calculated based on total debt and equity utilizing the average of fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022 ending balances.
(7)The adjusted effective tax rate is calculated based on adjusted net income before tax, and its impact reflects the exclusion of changes to uncertain tax positions, valuation allowances, tax impacts related to the exercise of share-based compensation awards and discrete GAAP tax items which could impact the comparability of the operational effective tax rate.

Adjusted ROIC is a non-GAAP performance metric.
We define adjusted ROIC as Adjusted EBITDA (as publicly disclosed, plus or minus any other one-time adjustments made by management), less Depreciation & Amortization expense, excluding the impact of pension income/expense, plus Other income, less Stock-based comp expense,
1.Tax-effected by our adjusted tax rate,
2.Divided by the average invested capital balance, comprised of the sum of
a.The average quarter-ending debt (face value) balances, and
b.The average quarter-ending book value of equity balances
B-3

Reconciliation of Net income (loss) per Diluted Common Share to Adjusted Net income per Diluted Common Share
Fiscal Year Ended
July 30, 2022
(52 weeks)
Fiscal Year Ended
July 31, 2021
(52 weeks)
Fiscal Year Ended
August 1, 2020
(52 weeks)
Net income (loss) attributable to UNFI per diluted common share$4.07 $2.48 $(5.10)
Goodwill impairment charges(1)
— — 7.91 
Restructuring, acquisition, and integration related expenses(2)
0.34 0.93 1.62 
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(3)
(1.42)(0.06)0.32 
LIFO charge(4)
2.59 0.41 0.33 
Benefit plan settlement (gain) charges(5)
— (0.28)0.21 
Surplus property depreciation and interest expense(6)
0.05 0.05 0.15 
Multiemployer pension plan withdrawal (benefit) charges(7)
(0.13)1.05 — 
Notes receivable charges(8)
— — 0.23 
Loss on debt extinguishment(9)
0.10 0.51 — 
Legal reserve charge, net of settlement income(10)
— — 0.02 
Other retail expense(11)
— 0.06 0.03 
Discontinued operations store closures and other charges, net(12)
— (0.07)0.63 
Tax impact of adjustments and adjusted effective tax rate(13)
(0.77)(0.90)(2.99)
Impact of diluted shares— — (0.09)
Adjusted net income per diluted common share (Retail in Discontinued Operations)(14)
4.83 4.18 3.27 
Depreciation and amortization adjustment(15)
— — (0.31)
Adjusted net income per diluted common share (Retail in Continuing Operations)$4.83 $4.18 $2.96 

(1)Primarily reflects a goodwill impairment charge attributable to a reorganization of our reporting units and a sustained decrease in market capitalization and enterprise value of the Company, resulting in a decline in the estimated fair value of the U.S. Wholesale reporting unit. In addition, this charge includes a goodwill finalization charge attributable to the SUPERVALU acquisition and an asset impairment charge.
(2)Primarily reflects costs associated with advisory and transformational activities to position our business for further value-creation. Refer to Note 4—Restructuring, Acquisition and Integration Related Expenses in Part II, Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
(3)Fiscal 2022 primarily reflects the gain on sale of our Riverside, California distribution center in the third quarter. Fiscal 2020 primarily reflects a $50 million accumulated depreciation and amortization charge related to the requirement to move Retail from discontinued operations to continuing operations, partially offset by $34 million of gains on the sale of distribution centers and other assets.
(4)During fiscal 2022, the Company revised its definition of Adjusted EPS to exclude the impact of the non-cash LIFO charge. Prior periods have been revised to conform to the current year presentation.
(5)Fiscal 2021 includes an other postretirement settlement gain of $17 million associated with the termination of remaining corporate plans. Fiscal 2020 includes a lump sum defined benefit pension plan settlement expense of $11 million associated with the acceleration of a portion of the accumulated unrecognized actuarial loss as a result of the lump sum settlement payments.
(6)Reflects surplus, non-operating property depreciation and interest expense, including accelerated depreciation related to a location on which we recognized a gain that is included in Restructuring, acquisition and integration related expenses.
(7)Fiscal 2022 reflects an adjustment to multiemployer withdrawal charge estimates. Fiscal 2021 includes charges related to withdrawal liabilities from three Retail multiemployer pension plans.
(8)Reflects reserves and charges for notes receivable issued by the SUPERVALU business prior to its acquisition to finance the purchase of stores by its customers.
(9)Reflects non-cash charges related to the acceleration of unamortized debt issuance costs from debt prepayments.
(10)Reflects a charge to settle a legal proceeding and income received to settle a separate legal proceeding.
(11)Reflects expenses associated with event-specific damages to certain retail stores.
(12)Amounts represent store closure charges and costs, operational wind-down and inventory charges, and asset impairment charges related to discontinued operations. Fiscal 2021 also reflects the impact of a severance benefit amount.
(13)Represents the tax effect of the pre-tax adjustments using an adjusted effective tax rate. The adjusted effective tax rate is calculated based on adjusted net income before tax, and its impact reflects the exclusion of changes to uncertain tax positions, valuation allowances, tax impacts related to the exercise of share-based compensation awards and discrete GAAP tax items which could impact the comparability of the operational effective tax rate. The Company believes using this adjusted effective tax rate will provide better consistency across the interim reporting periods since each of these discrete items can cause volatility in the GAAP tax rate that is not indicative of the true operations of the Company. By providing this non-GAAP measure, management intends to provide investors with a meaningful, consistent comparison of the Company’s effective tax rate on ongoing operations.
B-4

(14)The computation of diluted earnings per share is calculated using diluted weighted average shares outstanding, which includes the net effect of dilutive stock awards.
(15)In fiscal 2020 the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $50.0 million related to the change in presentation of Retail to continuing operations. This charge was calculated under GAAP as the depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recognized had Retail been included in continuing operations for the full time period since the SUPERVALU acquisition date. This adjustment attributes the pro rata amount of the non-cash charge recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 to the applicable time periods in which it would have been recognized had Retail been included within continuing operations since the acquisition date. UNFI believes the inclusion of this adjustment is a useful indicator of performance to both management and investors, as it provides a relative comparison to how UNFI’s results of operations will be reported on an ongoing basis.

B-5

Calculation of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio
(in millions, except ratios)
Fiscal Year Ended
July 30, 2022
(52 weeks)
Fiscal Year Ended
July 31, 2021
(52 weeks)
Fiscal Year Ended
August 1, 2020
(52 weeks)
Current portion of long-term debt and finance lease liabilities$27 $120 $83 
Long-term debt2,109 2,175 2,427 
Long-term finance lease liabilities23 35 143 
Less: Cash and cash equivalents(44)(41)(47)
Net carrying value of debt and finance lease liabilities2,115 2,289 2,606 
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
$829 $770 $691 
Adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio2.6 x3.0 x3.8 x
(1)During fiscal 2022, the Company revised its definition of Adjusted EBITDA to exclude the impact of the non-cash LIFO charge. Prior periods have been revised to conform to the current year presentation.
B-6

unitednaturalfoodsinc_qfmxb.jpg





unitednaturalfoodsinc_qfmxc.jpg